[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference yukon::christian_v7

Title:The CHRISTIAN Notesfile
Notice:Jesus reigns! - Intros: note 4; Praise: note 165
Moderator:ICTHUS::YUILLEON
Created:Tue Feb 16 1993
Last Modified:Fri May 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:962
Total number of notes:42902

879.0. "Who is Babylon the Great?" by SNLV01::FLECKBOB () Thu Apr 04 1996 02:22

    Can anyone explain who Babylon the Great is. The book of Revelation
    seems to mention it many times. Can I have some bible references please
    to help me understand how you came to that conclusion.
    Thanks and regards, Bob 
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
879.1ICTHUS::YUILLEHe must increase - I must decreaseThu Apr 04 1996 07:2970
Hi Bob,

� Can anyone explain who Babylon the Great is.

Throughout the Bible, Babylon is a place, and the spirit behind that place 
as expressed through the people it affects.  

The physical location of Babylon in Revelation is slightly contraversial,
as a place of secondary significance.  It is generally recognised as being
a place identified as the heart of iniquity.  The original Babylon was the
heart of idolatry, and when Israel sinned repeatedly through idolatry, that
was where they were taken in captivity - sort of rubbing their nose in it,
so that the horror of it would be some prevention from falling again in
that way. 

Revelation 18 shows Babylon as the heart of trade and commerce, as well as 
every other sin.  Revelation 18:17-18 implies that it is visible from the 
sea.  Revelation 16, which describes the 'bowl' judgements focuses on the 
Euphrates for the sixth bowl, from verse 12, and comes back to Babylon for 
judgement with the seventh bowl in verse 19.  Some might take the earlier 
reference to the Euphrates to indicate the original location of Babylon.

The uncertainty lies in identifying where the Revelation Babylon is.
I believe the principle ideas are:

    The original Babylon
	On the basis of the name.

    Rome
	On the basis of it being the power base of the Roman empire, 
	perceived to rise again towards the end of the era.  Specifically 
	identified as the city of seven hills, in Revelation 7:9

    America
	On the basis of it being the commerce centre of the western world, 
	and also in view of the corruption (idolatry) which comes from it.

Another factor to be considered in taking it as literal Babylon is the
explicit condemnation, and curse against it in Isaiah 13: 

  And Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees' excellency,
  shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. It shall never be
  inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation:
  neither shall the Arabian pitch tent there; neither shall the shepherds
  make their fold there.  But wild beasts of the desert shall lie there; and
  their houses shall be full of doleful creatures; and owls shall dwell
  there, and satyrs shall dance there. 
   
						Isaiah 13:19-21

- specifically the statement in verse 20, that it shall never again be 
inhabited following God's overthrow of it.  Some see this as fulfilled 
following the Greek conquest, as it has been devastated through the 
centuries.  Some see it as not fulfilled until the millenium, as a place of 
cursing.  The former would seem to preclude it being referred to
specifically in Revelation, as it should be devastated by then.  The latter 
leaves room for it to be rebuilt and reestablished as a centre of 
civilisation, but although Saddam Hussein is said to be rebuilding it, I 
personally think that this is unlikely, as it would need to have become an 
established cultural and commercial focus for the rest of the world, to the
extent that its destruction seems like the end of civilisation.  The 
accelerating fulfilment of prophecy, in terms of drawing together the 
circumstances of the end times seems to me to bring Jesus' return closer 
than the time to establish a world centre quite this radically.

								Andrew

[ I've not been able to participate here much over the last months, due to   ]
[ various commitments and pressures.  I've been limited to 'mostly reading'. ]
[ This entry is primarily due to losing a crucial disc for the morning...!   ]
879.2PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Apr 04 1996 13:1812
    Just to extrapolate on what Andrew said, Babylon was never really
    destroyed as Isaiah and Revelation describe.  A lot of scholars think
    that it will be rebuilt, which Saddam Hussein has been doing for the
    last 20 years (I have pictures of some of the buildings and projects). 
    Saddam has even offered wealth for life for anyone who could duplicate
    Nebuchadnezzar's hanging gardens.
    
    I tend to agree with the literal Babylon view.  Both Iran/Iraq are
    currently stockpiling military & nuclear weapons from Russia.  They now
    have the technology to force themselves into a greater position.
    
    Mike
879.3metaphorDYPSS1::DYSERTBarry - Custom Software DevelopmentThu Apr 04 1996 13:3610
    Just to add a bit to what Andrew said, Babylon (as used in Revelation)
    is really a metaphor for the worldly system. It comprises both the
    commercial and the spiritual systems. I'm not one to ascribe symbology
    to everything in Revelation, but the case of Babylon is certainly
    justified. Other places (e.g. Jerusalem, Egypt) are I believe often
    used metaphorically as well (can't point you to bcv right now, though).
    Even today, we speak of Wall Street, Madison Avenue, etc., not to refer
    to the literal streets but to what they represent.
    
    	BD�
879.4stil confusedSNLV01::FLECKBOBTue Apr 09 1996 02:0720
    It could not be the ancient Baylon the Great because Revelation was
    written at the end of the first century and describes events yet to
    happen.
    Ancient Babylon was destroyed, wether or not Sadam Hussain will ever
    succeed in rebuilding it or not, time will tell but for now we must
    consider it as destroyed.
    It can't be the commercial empires of the world or even the superpowers
    of the world because both are said to be morning her destruction which
    is yet to come. Both the mergants and the kings have been having
    dealings (fornications) with her which again indicates some kind of
    third party. Who today is getting rich by having dealings with both
    governments and the commercial giants? Rev 17:1-5
    Rev 18:21 talks about her/its destruction and warns us to get out of
    her if we don't want to be destroyed with her/it. It must be some kind
    of organisation that we as people can belong to. I don't think its a
    political party. Hoever she/it is, we don't want to be there when she/it
    gets destroyed. I am convinced it must be symbolic for something as
    most of the book of revelation is something that was given to John in a
    dream.
    
879.5Willing to Be A Tad DirectYIELD::BARBIERITue Apr 09 1996 08:1025
      Ultimately, Babylon is a religious form that is an apostasy from
      the pure and that won't ever be pure, but will someday be so dark
      that there will be no light in her at all.  (I say this because
      I believe some can be saved within Babylon at the *present* time.)
    
      My belief is that salvation is from sin and that one of the hallmark
      characteristics of Babylon's theology is that we can never overcome
      sin by the blood of the Lamb, i.e. the love of Christ could never 
      motivate us to perfectly obey Him.
    
      I don't mind saying this as this is the Christian Conference and
      you asked.  The whore of Babylon, at the very least, is inclusive
      of the Roman Catholic Church - by that I don't mean her individual
      members, but rather its ecclesiastical set-up.  The papacy, etc.
    
      But, if you check Isaiah 4, all 7 women have the bread how they want
      it.  All churches return to the whore.
    
      Anyway, I thought I ought give a direct answer to your direct
      question.   If there are any Catholics reading, I am sorry if I
      have offended you.  I am not saying you are not Christian.
    
    						Tony
    
      
879.6PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallTue Apr 09 1996 13:198
    Babylon was never destroyed as Isaiah prophesied.  Those prophecies are
    still waiting to be fulfilled.
    
    The Roman Empire was never really conquered either.  It just sort of
    fizzled out.  This is one of the reasons why it is expected to make a
    comeback under the name of the EUC.
    
    Mike