[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference yukon::christian_v7

Title:The CHRISTIAN Notesfile
Notice:Jesus reigns! - Intros: note 4; Praise: note 165
Moderator:ICTHUS::YUILLEON
Created:Tue Feb 16 1993
Last Modified:Fri May 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:962
Total number of notes:42902

790.0. "various Hebrew texts" by OUTSRC::HEISER (watchman on the wall) Fri Sep 01 1995 13:41

    Well if we can do Greek as in 785.*, naturally we have to do Hebrew
    also.
    
    Catherine Geever, Margaret and Preston Heinle of Arizona State 
    University's theological department wrote "Messianic Prophecies from 
    a Dead Sea Scroll" as their thesis project (Password Communications,
    ISBN 1-57074-275-8).  It contrasts the Dead Sea Scroll's Messianic
    Prophecies with the Masoretic Text.  Some of the passages contrasted
    that I've seen so far are startling in the changes made.
    
    The Masoretic Text was previously thought to be the oldest O.T.
    manuscript before the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls.  What is
    interesting to note is the way the Messianic passages have been altered
    between the two manuscripts.
    
    An inspection of Rabbinic writings (Mishna) from as early as 300 B.C. to 
    as late as 700 A.D. clearly show that they felt passages such as Isaiah
    7:14, 9:6, and chapter 53 were Messianic.  It also shows that they were
    expecting the arrival of the Messiah during the first century B.C. and
    that they expected Him to be cut off as it says in Daniel 9:24-27. 
    Even the great Hebrew scribes like Rabbi Moses ben Maimon (aka
    Maimonides) and Rabbi Moses ben Nahman (aka Nahmanides) considered the
    Isaiah passages to be Messianic.  
    
    Historical records show that the tide began to turn around 1000 A.D.
    when Jews started to alter the Messianic sections to counteract
    Christian teachings.  Another good book to read that documents all of
    this is "The Search for Messiah" by Pastor Chuck Smith and Mark Eastman
    (1993).
    
    Mike
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
790.2don't know for sureOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Sep 01 1995 14:215
    My only guess is because Greek is a more legal language so they might
    do that for clarity.  The Septuagint (LXX) is dated around 300 B.C. so
    it is also fairly close to the dates of original authorship.
    
    Mike
790.4using what they hadDYPSS1::DYSERTBarry - Custom Software DevelopmentFri Sep 01 1995 17:526
    I figure that some use the LXX because they were dealing with folks who
    were only familiar with the LXX. Can you imagine the disciples trying
    to witness to someone saying, "The Scripture says..." but their
    potential convert replies, "Not the Scripture I know."
    
    	BD�
790.5OUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallFri Sep 01 1995 19:415
    Well that was the reason for the LXX in the first place:  the Hebrews
    had lost the use of their natural language and all spoke Greek, yet
    they wanted to be able to read the Scriptures.
    
    Mike
790.6fyiOUTSRC::HEISERwatchman on the wallWed Feb 07 1996 14:014
    We went over the plagues in Exodus last night in class.  I thought it
    interesting that the Tanakh says the gnats were lice.
    
    Mike
790.7quote from the Babylonian TalmudPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Apr 11 1996 13:4415
    In the days of the Second Temple, there was a custom to fasten a red-colored
    strip of wool to the head of the goat which was to be sent away on the
    Day of Atonement.  When this red ribbon became white, it was a sign that God
    had forgiven Israel's sins.  There is a statement in the Babylonian Talmud
    (Yoma, chapter 39b) that about "40 years before the Second Temple was
    destroyed...the red wool did not become white!"  The same passage informs 
    us that the gates of the Temple swung open on their own accord!  The 
    ancient rabbis believed that these events were indicators that the sins of 
    Israel were no longer being forgiven and the Temple would soon be 
    destroyed!  
    
    {from "The Search for Messiah," by Dr. Mark Eastman & Pastor Chuck Smith, 
     ISBN 0-936728-50-7}
    
    "Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!" John 1:29
790.8Interesting date, that oneEVMS::LYCEUM::CURTISChristos voskrese!Sat Apr 13 1996 17:443
    erm, wasn't the Second Temple the one destroyed by Titus?
    
    Dick
790.9PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Apr 15 1996 14:484
    Dick, I don't remember who the Roman Emperor was then, but it was in 70
    A.D. when the Second Temple was destroyed (on the 9th of Av).
    
    Mike
790.10Titus, ~A.D. 70SUBSYS::LOPEZHe showed me a River!Tue Apr 16 1996 13:277

re-1,-2

Yes. Titus in ~A.D. 70

ace
790.11FYI - Old Testament manuscriptsPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu Apr 25 1996 18:2322
       Manuscript              Description                 Completion Date
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Septuagint    Greek translation of entire        285 B.C.
                        Tanakh
    
      Dead Sea      Qumran community                   100 B.C.
      Scrolls
    
      Targum        Oldest Tanakh commentaries         200 A.D.
                    (written in Aramaic)
    
      Mishnah       Oral traditions preserved since    200 A.D.
                         450 B.C.
    
      Babylonian    Commentary on Mishnah              400 A.D.
      Talmud
    
      Massoretic    JPS Tanakh based on this text      1000 A.D.
      Text
    
      Midrash       Commentary on Tanakh               300 A.D. (addendum to
                                                           1600 A.D.)
790.12Masoretic textDYPSS1::DYSERTBarry - Custom Software DevelopmentFri Apr 26 1996 08:213
    My notes say that the Masoretic text was formed around AD500, not 1000.
    
    	BD�
790.13fwiwPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon Apr 29 1996 12:386
    My sources (Zondervan's Pictoral Encyclopedia of the Bible, McDowell's
    "Evidence that Demands a Verdict, vol. 1", and "Search for the Messiah"
    by Mark Eastman & Chuck Smith) all point to 800 A.D. to 1000 A.D.
    timeframe.
    
    Mike
790.14fyi - OT focus on Messiah's characteristicsPHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu May 02 1996 14:289
    I've just completed a paper from my Tanakh (Old Testament) class taught 
    by Rabbi Plotkin (Reform rabbi).  The main topic of the paper outlining the
    characteristics of the Messiah in the Tanakh according to the writings
    of ancient rabbis (including the Dead Sea scrolls) vs. what modern 
    rabbis believe.  I have a PostScript version that I can mail to anyone
    who is interested (send me mail).  It may be especially useful to those
    that regular discuss matters of faith with Jewish friends.
    
    Mike
790.15No Orthodox rabbis to teach courses to you?COVERT::COVERTJohn R. CovertThu May 02 1996 16:357
Mike, I find it interesting that you're taking a course from a Reform rabbi.

That's sort of like taking a course from a UU minister, isn't it?

At least from the perspective of a bible-believing Christian.

/john
790.16PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallThu May 02 1996 17:2410
    I had an elective to burn and was curious.  After having met a few, I 
    don't think you'll find any professor teaching a religion course at a 
    major university with serious fundamental convictions.  Staffing
    managers don't consider major universities a missions field.  The ones
    I've been exposed to are either frustrated historians or very liberal.
    
    btw - this particular rabbi is miles away from being anything like a UU
    minister.
    
    Mike
790.17dittoDYPSS1::DYSERTBarry - Custom Software DevelopmentFri May 03 1996 12:1115
    Re: Note 790.16 by PHXSS1::HEISER

�    After having met a few, I 
�    don't think you'll find any professor teaching a religion course at a 
�    major university with serious fundamental convictions.
�    The ones
�    I've been exposed to are either frustrated historians or very liberal.
    
    This has been my experience as well. I still clearly recall (after
    nearly 20 years) how taken aback my religion professor was when I
    started describing the traditional eschatological points of view. I got
    the impression that he had never even *heard* the terms rapture, great
    tribulation, millennium, etc.
    
    	BD�
790.18PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon May 06 1996 13:057
    One thing is for sure: I'm extremely thankful to God that I've been 
    sitting under solid teaching and doctrine the past 5 years.  Otherwise, 
    classes like these would sway or confuse you from the truth.  God has 
    blessed to the point where I leave each professor something to think about 
    when I leave their class.  Hopefully God continues to nurture the seeds.
    
    Mike
790.19ROCK::PARKERMon May 06 1996 13:148
    RE: .18
    
    That they may be without excuse.  And His Word will not return void,
    accomplishing the purpose for which it was sent.
    
    Thanks for being a faithful proclaimer/defender, Mike.
    
    /Wayne
790.201 Peter 3:15PHXSS1::HEISERwatchman on the wallMon May 06 1996 13:503
    "but sanctify Christ the Lord in your hearts, always being ready to
    make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope
    that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence;"
790.21ROCK::PARKERMon May 06 1996 13:598
    RE: .20
    
    Amen!
    
    One of my favorite verses, and one I always had in mind during grad
    school.
    
    Keep the faith! :-)
790.22i.e. 'share it'BBQ::WOODWARDC...but words can break my heartMon May 06 1996 19:441
    or 'give it (your Faith) away'