T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
509.2 | | PCCAD::RICHARDJ | Living With A Honky Tonk Attitude | Wed Jun 22 1994 14:03 | 15 |
| I did not read the book, but listened to several interviews with the
author. I wondered why her book became so popular ? There are others
who have written books of after life experiences long before this
woman. I listened to another women on the 700 club many years ago, who had
a more detailing experience than this women had. Her story was more
convincing than the "Blinded By The Light" author.
Also, I find it strange that the author of "BBTL" will
not reveal her medical records, so that we can know what she died from.
The woman I saw on the 700 Club did reveal her records. She died from
complications caused by a ruptured appendix. She was about to be wheeled
to the morgue by the orderly when she came back to life.
Jim
|
509.3 | fwiw | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 22 1994 14:15 | 1 |
| The author is a Mormon.
|
509.4 | | PCCAD::RICHARDJ | Living With A Honky Tonk Attitude | Wed Jun 22 1994 16:08 | 6 |
| RE:3
I thought she said she was raised Catholic, but doesn't belong to
any denomination now ?
Jim
|
509.5 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 22 1994 16:46 | 2 |
| She was interviewed by a local program and said so. There's a whole
topic on this in the Mormonism conference as well.
|
509.6 | | EVMS::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for His security-GAIN both | Thu Jun 23 1994 09:45 | 7 |
| I haven't read this book, but my understanding of it is that it very much
denies any concept of judgement at all. It appears to be completely
universalist - everyone is 'saved,' or 'embraced by the light.'
That's second hand, but I'd read it myself before I recommended it to anyone.
Paul
|
509.7 | a spiritual preexistence | BROKE::VIVIAN | | Thu Jun 23 1994 10:10 | 24 |
| I read this book awhile ago but will need to dig through my notes on it.
I liked some of it, disliked other parts.
What was refreshing was that she was uncompromising about that fact that
the being of light (similar to what many describe in their near-death
experiences) was really Jesus, whom she described as the savior. Other such
widely publicized experiences have left out any specific identity of this
being and I remember the commentators on the TV airing were uncomfortable
with this particular stance of hers and maintained that a Buddhist would
have identified the being as Buddha, the Moslem, Mohammed, etc.
While there were a lot of far-out sounding things, most of which I could
neither substantiate nor refute with the bible, one theme was brought up
over and over, namely our pre-existence in a spiritual form and personal
decision to be born into this world for whatever reason. This part
struck me as anti-biblical, citing God's response to Job, "where were you..."
as a possible contradiction.
I was asked by someone recently to provide scriptures which would either
support or refute her claims about this spiritual pre-existence to life on
earth and, from those who have actually read the book, I'd appreciate
such input.
- steve
|
509.8 | | DPDMAI::HUDDLESTON | If it is to be, it's up to me | Thu Jun 23 1994 11:03 | 13 |
| My mother-in-law, who's heavy into new age, just loooves the book.
Notice how the author of the book never does seem to test the being she
saw to see if it was of God or not. People who are more knowledgeable
than I have torn this book to pieces. FYI--many new agers use the name
Jesus--this doesn't refer to the Jesus you and I know. It's a
"prophet". Hey, my mother-in-law's heard him talk through a channeler,
so it must be real! After all, we're all God's. (geesh)
(flame off)
Donna
|
509.9 | For One Like Me... | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Thu Jun 23 1994 12:21 | 6 |
| For one who believes that man is mortal and that there is no
conscioussness after death until Jesus resurrects, the book
is simply an example of the deception of spiritualism which
deception is sometimes very powerful.
Tony
|
509.10 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Thu Jun 23 1994 12:26 | 25 |
| Many people will use wonderous experiences to validate their own view
of things, just as many can use statistics to advantage, or fund a
study to find proof of their hypotheses. For example, I can see
where all people go to heaven... to see what it is like at judgment.
After all, where will the sheep and the goats be separated and how
much more will the torment of one be in Hell after seeing heaven
and missing it. All of it is speculative reasoning - based on an
expereince, a feeling - which is fleeting. These people need no
convincing and do not need to convince others because their
exerience is all that is necessary. However, this is a very dangerous
position to take to the exclusion of other things. (Meaning, experience
is valid WHEN CORRABORATED by such things as the Word, the tradition, and
reason.)
Now, FWIW, my mother-in-law claims a near-death experience (which she
doesn't go around telling people), from the Dentist's chair; her heart
stopped. She went to heaven and it was "very beautiful"; so beautiful
that she wanted to stay, but a person whom she took to be Jesus said that
she needed to go back for her family. I should ask her is she applied any
real significance to this experience. Apparently, if she did or does,
she kept it largely to herself. I learned about it through my wife,
years after the fact. I still like the scripture that says that
Mary pondered these things in her heart.
Mark
|
509.11 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Thu Jun 23 1994 15:55 | 25 |
| >While there were a lot of far-out sounding things, most of which I could
>neither substantiate nor refute with the bible, one theme was brought up
>over and over, namely our pre-existence in a spiritual form and personal
>decision to be born into this world for whatever reason. This part
>struck me as anti-biblical, citing God's response to Job, "where were you..."
>as a possible contradiction.
This is a Mormon doctrine and they usually point to Job 38:7 as their
"proof." If you check some references on Job 38:7, you'll discover
it's not a proof. Strong's Exhaustive Concordance with Hebrew, Chaldee,
and Greek Dictionaries provides some interesting insight into the phrase
"sons of God." The Hebrew word for God is Elohim in this verse. Elohim
is defined as:
- the plural of Eloah?, El?. It's translated "gods" in the ordinary sense; but
specifically used in the plural to refer to the supreme God.
- occaisionally applied by way of deference to magistrates (John 10:34-35 as
well as in Exodus).
- sometimes used as a superlative for angels.
- there are no other alternatives (i.e., pre-existent spirits).
It's pretty obvious that's what Job 38:7 is referring to - angels. The angels
of heaven were rejoicing in God's creation.
Mike
|
509.12 | | ODIXIE::BAILEYS | | Fri Jun 24 1994 16:28 | 8 |
| This book and many other NDE books hold a positive experiences. My
paster did a series on NDE experiences in Janaury and used the
interview Oprah did with Edie to talk about her book he also had Dr.
Maurice Rawlings come speak who wrote the book, "To Hell and Back" he
is a Heart Surgeon who was saved through one of his patients negative
NDE it is an interesting read from a different perspective.
Sasha
|
509.13 | it's New Age and should be treated as such | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Fri Jun 24 1994 17:33 | 1 |
|
|
509.14 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Fri Jun 24 1994 17:37 | 1 |
| Is "new age" like "rock music"?
|
509.15 | | DPDMAI::HUDDLESTON | If it is to be, it's up to me | Fri Jun 24 1994 18:01 | 1 |
| What does rock music have to do with new age?
|
509.16 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Fri Jun 24 1994 18:03 | 16 |
| No New Age as in the occult, white magic witchcraft, denying
accountability to God and a need for a Savior, secular humanism,
calling faith a force you can manipulate instead of a manifestation of
the Holy Spirit that distributes it as He wills, calling Jesus a
Shaman, (W)Holistic medicine, Religious Science, Science of Mind,
rebirthing, reincarnation, hypnosis, visualization, psychotherapy, etc.
Speaking of (W)Holistic medicine and doctors who practice it... If you
have such a doctor, (this title implies that he treats the mind, body,
and the spirit) ask him these 3 questions:
1. What medicines are effective on spirits?
2. How many spirits has he treated in the past?
3. How do you know when a spirit is sick?
Mike ;-)
|
509.17 | | DPDMAI::HUDDLESTON | If it is to be, it's up to me | Fri Jun 24 1994 18:45 | 5 |
| Oh. Yes, I agree. Speaking of Holistic medicine, I would hesitate
going to a Holistic doctor, but I don't think that herbs in and of
themselves are harmful. Do you agree or disagree?
dh
|
509.18 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Fri Jun 24 1994 18:58 | 1 |
| No I don't see anything wrong with natural herbs or homemade remedies.
|
509.19 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Mon Jun 27 1994 11:44 | 19 |
| .13 Title: it's New Age and should be treated as such
.14 Is "new age" like "rock music"?
.15 What does rock music have to do with new age?
.16 Clarification...
.17 "...I don't think that herbs in and of themselves are harmful.
Do you agree or disagree?
.18 "No I don't see anything wrong with natural herbs or homemade remedies."
The point of .14 is that not everything that is labelled "new age" is
along the lines of Mike's clarification in .16 ('of the occult'). I
was referring to a debate in this conference a while back where rock
music was cast in a "baby and bath water" view versus those who proposed
that not all rock and roll was bad. Mike, if I remember correctly, was
one of those who argued that not everything "rock and roll" was bad,
which prompted my question: "Is 'new age' like 'rock music'?"
Now you know what rock music has to do with new age. :-)
Mark
|
509.20 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Mon Jun 27 1994 14:42 | 5 |
| Well I totally missed where you were going with that. I thought you
were asking about rock music styles as compared to new age music
styles (yes there is such a thing).
Mike
|
509.21 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Mon Jun 27 1994 19:06 | 6 |
| Nope. That's why I used quotes around the two issues, to highlight
them as issues. To subtle, I suppose. Sorry.
How should new age music be treated? Do you like (some of) it?
Musically speaking, was synthesizer music a precursor to some new
age-style music? (Sorry for the tangent.)
|
509.22 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Mon Jun 27 1994 19:46 | 10 |
| Yeah I like some of the New Age style music. Some refer to it as the
classical music of the '90s. Phil Keaggy's "The Wind & The Wheat" is
sometimes classified as New Age and selections from it can be heard on
the New Age stations in various cities.
New Age music can be anything from just plain acoustic guitar to synth
music. It's usually gentle and reflective instrumental music. The
"Praise" collection could be classified this way.
Mike
|
509.23 | | GENRAL::INDERMUEHLE | Stonehenge Alignment Service | Tue Jun 28 1994 10:40 | 12 |
| I have really enjoyed Otmar Liebert and his semi flamincoSP? releases.
Great music and it is hard not to start moving with the beat. Even for
a beatless person like me.
His music is always classed as "new age" and he objects to the class.
I saw an interview with him somewhere and although it was not stated
outright, I got the feeling he was a christian and simply the term
"new age" bothered him. He classed his music as accoustic insturmental.
John I.
Sorry folks.......... Back to read only....... Click
|
509.24 | | ICTHUS::YUILLE | Thou God seest me | Tue Jun 28 1994 10:47 | 7 |
| � Sorry folks.......... Back to read only....... Click
Unclick and rejoin us, John, before we come apart. Good to see you around
still.
...Now back to your scheduled discussion...
&
|
509.25 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Tue Jun 28 1994 12:44 | 10 |
| The point is that some things associated with new age are avoided by some
because of the association. The rainbow is one example. Now come on;
who had it first? (You'd get some arguments from some people that it wasn't
Noah; that Noah's story is folklore of a specific culture.)
It ain't what a thing is, it is what is done with the thing.
Now let's see if I can tie this back to the book "Embrace by the Light"....
Nope. Sorry, I can't. :-}
|
509.27 | | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Tue Jun 28 1994 14:03 | 14 |
| .26
While reading your note, it reminded me of someone saying go stand on
the train track at the exact hour a train is scheduled to come plowing
down. If you die, it was God's will.
I see scripture saying things like "Be watchful" "Be Careful" and of
course to also protect our souls through Godly fellowship.
I believe that God requires us to get knowledge, but with that
knowledge gain understanding, for this leads to wisdom.
In His Love,
Nancy
|
509.28 | Taking every thought captive | ODIXIE::HUNT | | Tue Jun 28 1994 14:20 | 68 |
| RE: .26
>>I have found that I am permitted to view all things from
>>a childs perspective with interest and fascination. As
>>a child there is no need for fear for I know that my Father
>>protects me, guides me and grants me wisdom.
I wasn't real sure how to take your note. Are you saying we should
just take everything into our minds. Scripture has a lot to say about
what we put into our minds and what we think on. The Lord protects me
by giving me wisdom not the allow a lot of junk to enter my mind in the
first place. Its true that I am free to think on anything, but the
bible also says that many things are unprofitable.
1Co 6:12 All things are lawful to me, but all things are not
expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be
brought under the power of any.
1Co 10:23 All things are lawful for me, but all things are not
expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify
not.
>>I am not in fear that I would be sucked in, deceived or fooled for
>>through everything I go Jesus is with me to help me grow.
The bible says that Satan is like a roaming lion, seeking whom he may
devour. Satan is a deceiver. 2 Cor 10:5 says that we are to take
every thought captive to the obedience of Christ. This happens at the
threshold of our mind. Our brain is like a computer (GIGO). If we put
garbage in, the output will be garbage as well. We should allow our
thoughts to dwell on His Truth, not error. We are guided by the Truth
of His word. If we rely on our "feelings" (emotions) we will wind up
falling. Below are several verses which deal with thoughts, and
what we put into our mind.
Ro 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye
transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what
[is] that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
Php 4:8 Finally, brethren, whatever things are true, whatever
things [are] honest, whatever things [are] just, whatever things
[are] pure, whatever things [are] lovely, whatever things [are]
of good report; if [there is] any virtue, and if [there is] any
praise, think on these things. {honest: or, venerable}
2Co 10:5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that
exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into
captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;
{imaginations: or, reasonings}
1Co 13:11 When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood
as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put
away childish things. {thought: or, reasoned} {put away: Gr.
vanish away}
1Pe 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil,
as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:
Christ WILL protect us, but sometimes He protects us by giving us
wisdom not to put certain things into our mind in the first place.
Mt 4:7 Jesus said to him, It is written again, Thou shalt not
tempt the Lord thy God. {tempt: or, try, or, put to trial, or,
proof}
Love in Him,
Bing
|
509.30 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Wed Jun 29 1994 09:19 | 27 |
| >I am merely obeying the LAW.
Legalism is a danger, no doubt. So is reckless living. Where is the
balance? Living in the Spirit of the Law, not the letter, as you say,
"Christ living them through me."
Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I
am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one
tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
So the law is not abolished, but brought to fulfillment by the spirit
(or intent) of the law. When Jesus commented on the law regarding
divorcement, he instead spoke of "what was intended from the beginning."
Further, Jesus summed ALL of the law thusly:
Matthew 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all
thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as
thyself.
40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Find the balance and intent of the law and cling to its fulfillment.
Mark
|
509.32 | Grace | ODIXIE::HUNT | | Wed Jun 29 1994 11:07 | 69 |
| re .30
::Poland (sorry I don't know what your name is),
I am anything BUT a legalist (If you read some of my other writings in
this conference, I think you can see this). My favorite verse is
Rom. 8:1,2 "There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in
Christ Jesus. For the law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus has
set you free from the law of sin and of death". Christ has set me
FREE! I am no longer under law (the power of sin).
I don't read the bible to find out HOW to live my life as much as I do
to KNOW Christ and to allow Him to speak to me through His word. Its
not me learning to live a holy life by DOING what the scripture says,
but by BEING (or Abiding) in Christ and allowing Him to live His life
through me. Yes, I am FREE to do all things, but if I am allowing the
Holy Spirit to truley live in and through me, I won't WANT to do all
things. I will want to live a life that is dependant on Him. (Rom 6:1
"What shall we say then, are we to continue in sin that grace might
increase? May it never be! How shall we who died to sin, still live
in it?"
An example, Should I go into a strip bar, since I am free to do all
things? I may be free to, but I believe it will be UNprofitable to do
so. Rom 6:13 "And do not go on presenting the members of your body to
sin as instruments of unrighteousness; but present yourselves to God as
those alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of
righteousness to God. vs 14 For sin shall not be master over you, for
you are not under law, but under grace. vs 15 What then? Shall we sin
because we are not under law but under grace? May it never be! vs 16
Do you not know that when you present yourselves to someone as slaves
for obedience, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin
resulting in death, or of obedience resulting in righteousness? vs 17
But thanks be to God that though you were slaves of sin you became
obedient from the HEART to that form of teaching to which you were
committed, vs 18 and having been FREED from sin, you became slaves of
righteousness".
When I became a Christian, Christ gave me a new identity. I have been
crucified with Christ and Christ now lives in me. Does that nullify
scripture? No way. There has been a lot written in here about testing
the spirits. Christ lives in me and speaks to me. But Satan is a
deceiver and will speak to me in my own voice to introduce a thought to
me. How do I know who is speaking? The first way I know is "does it
line up with scripture?". God's word is a plumb line to keep me on
line. So, I see a nice looking lady in a tight sweater. A lustful
thought comes into my mind. Is that sin? No, I haven't allowed my
mind to dwell on that. I then "take the thought captive", to discern
"is this thought from Christ or from the flesh?". By testing the
thought against scripture, I know its not from the Holy Spirt. So, I
choose by my will to set my mind on Christ and who I am in Christ. In Him
I am Holy & Blameless, I am Righteous, I am a new creature. Is that
legalism? No! Christ is living inside me, it is my Desire to live
righteously. My prayer every day is "Lord live YOUR Life in and through me
today".
I am saved by God's GRACE. Nothing that I do can make me anymore of
any less acceptable to Him. Its only when I understand how
unconditionally God loves me, that I can trust Him with my whole being.
He has given LIFE to my spirit. That motivates me all the more to seek
Him. As Paul said, "To live is Christ". Or in the words of the old
hymn, "the things of earth will grow strangely dim, in the Light of His
glory and grace",
Love in Christ,
Bing
|
509.33 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | Friend will you be ready? | Wed Jun 29 1994 11:23 | 9 |
|
AMEN, Bing...
Jim
|
509.35 | Discernment was my concern | ODIXIE::HUNT | | Wed Jun 29 1994 12:12 | 31 |
| Robert,
Its always more difficult for me to know what someone is really saying,
when I am just reading, rather than being able to talk face to face.
I have never read "Embracing the Light" and the depth of my knowledge
of the book is about a 20 second "what's coming up" blurb on the 20/20
news show.
My response what not to that, but to your original note which stated
that we don't have to worry about protecting ourselves or being
deceived. I didn't mean to imply that there was anything wrong with
reading "Embraced by the Light" per se. I was responding more from the
stand point of some Christians I have known, who basically fill their
mind with any and everything. I know from my own experience, that when
I have viewed or read things or allowed my mind to dwell on thoughts
that are not from God, that I have become desensitized (sp?) the Spirit
speaking to me.
I think your note in .31 clarified better for me where you were coming
from. I agree with you that God will give me His discernment, through
His Spirit within and the knowledge of His word, to know if something
is of Him or not.
Love in Him,
Bing
I also wasn't trying to imply that I was a spiritual giant (Its only by
God's free gift of grace that I am anything). I was responding to one of
the earlier notes about being under the law.
|
509.37 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Wed Jun 29 1994 12:48 | 10 |
| Bob,
Surely you're not saying that people shouldn't "strive toward the mark,"
"study to show themselves approved," "seek first the kingdom," "diligently
seek him," and "work out your salvation." Just need some clarification
from you on .36 because it sounds as if getting to heaven is a whimsical
affair. And certainly I do not mean to sound as if it is a mechanical
or prescribed thing. No! But there is a place for discipline in the
Christian life.
Mark
|
509.38 | I agree there is an agenda, when being deceived | ODIXIE::HUNT | | Wed Jun 29 1994 13:11 | 31 |
| Robert,
You're absolutely right that only if we have another agenda, do we have
to worry about being deceived. I believe this can be call spritual
warfare. In Romans 7 Paul talks about, "That which I want to do, I
don't do...". Satan wants us to live in the flesh and he will do every
thing in His power to deceive us into living by the flesh (trying to
meet my own needs), rather than in a dependant relationship upon the Lord.
I find that whenever I have an argument with my wife, that it is
usually over a "rights" issue. The flesh will tell me that my wife
needs to meet my needs it a certain area. The Spirit will tell me that
I need to love my wife as Christ loved the Church and trust Him to meet
my needs. The only thing is that sometimes, I don't take the thought
captive (or recognize that its indwelling sin [or flesh] that introduced
the thought to me in the first place), because the thought to get my own
needs met "feels" and sounds just like my own voice.
I think we agree that when our focus is on Christ and allowing Him to
live in and through us (living in the Spirit) that God will give us
discernment. Its been my experience that when I am in the Spirit that my
spriritual attennas are up and when error comes into my mind (whether it be
spoken, written, etc.) the Holy Spirit will allow me to recognize it
and reject it. I think my only point is that, If I'm not focusing on
God (& filling my mind with the Truth) when Satan lies to me (in first
person singular) its easy not to recognize that spritual warfare is
even taking place.
Love in Him,
Bing
|
509.40 | | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Wed Jun 29 1994 13:40 | 9 |
| .39
There is a time for labor as Martha did...
Too often Martha is criticized for her role... I find this to be
lop-sided. She fulfilled a purpose, she tended to things.. and if she
hadn't Christ would have used someone else to tend to things...
|
509.41 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Wed Jun 29 1994 13:44 | 6 |
| I'm too lazy, but if I wasn't Bob, I'll pull down Strongs from off my
shelf and find out just what the context of "work" and the others
actually was, no matter what you or I understand it to be. Would
that be acceptable?
Mark
|
509.42 | Identity Crisis?? | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Wed Jun 29 1994 13:47 | 4 |
| >I'm too lazy, but if I wasn't Bob,
You're not! :-)
|
509.43 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Wed Jun 29 1994 13:48 | 1 |
| Yes, I am. That would require me to "work." ;-)
|
509.44 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Wed Jun 29 1994 13:53 | 13 |
| > Christ has called us into His Rest. His Yoke is easy and His burden is
> light. I choose to sit at His feet as Mary and not labor in the
> kitchen with Martha.
It was Martha who ran to the Lord when he came to Lazarus' tomb. It was
Martha, not Mary, who declared "I believe that thou art the Christ, the
Son of God, which should come into the world." Do you remember what the
Lord said to Peter when he uttered this revelation? Mary remained with
the women, mourning. Martha ran to Jesus.
Choose your sister. I choose Martha! :-)
Mark
|
509.47 | | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Wed Jun 29 1994 14:02 | 3 |
| Actually we should choose both! :-)
Ecclesiastes comes to mind.
|
509.48 | | ODIXIE::HUNT | | Wed Jun 29 1994 14:10 | 6 |
| Re .45
Good Note.
Bing
|
509.49 | Rest/Work | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Thu Jun 30 1994 14:00 | 6 |
| Hi,
The only way to do the works of God is to rest in Christ.
"Labor to enter into that rest..." what a paradox!
Tony
|
509.50 | Paul in Ephesians | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu Jun 30 1994 14:34 | 4 |
| 2:8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is
the gift of God:
2:9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.
|
509.52 | He produces the good works through us | ODIXIE::HUNT | | Thu Jun 30 1994 15:18 | 5 |
509.53 | God's Word is clear | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu Jun 30 1994 18:44 | 2 |
509.55 | Mod Request | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Thu Jun 30 1994 19:09 | 11 |
509.56 | try it - carefully | HPCGRP::DIEWALD | | Tue Sep 12 1995 16:13 | 28 |
| After reading the entries it appears that no one here has actually read
this book. Well I have and I liked it. Actually thats an
understatement.
Let me give some background. When I first started doing this Christian
thing I found that reading the kind of books that got me to this stage
was now causing me to get off track so I stayed close to the Word.
Actually since that time I've only read two other books and this was
one of them. I prayfully consider now before picking up a book.
I read this book and it helped shake into place a lot of the concepts
of Christianity that I was still struggling with. In addition it
taught/showed/reminded me of where my true home was. That was the
first time I really understood this.
So I recommend that some of you who are firmly rooted in the Word read
this and let me know what you think. Its a very quick read - about 1
hour. Treat it as fiction. Please be careful, compare everything to
scripture and remember that you can get into trouble reading books
like this. However I really didn't find anything in it that felt wrong.
I think you might all enjoy it and grow from it.
Hebrews 13-9
Do not be carried about with various and strange doctrines. For it is
good that the heart be established by grace, not with foods which have
not profited those who have been occupied with them.
Jill2
|
509.57 | | CSC32::P_SO | Get those shoes off your head! | Wed Sep 13 1995 08:45 | 12 |
|
Ok, now my recommendation. If you are going to read this
book, I also recommend that you pick up "Embraced by the Light and
the Bible" a commentary on the book. I found it very interesting
the lengths that the author of "Embraced by the Light" has gone
to to cover up her church affiliations etc...
I can't really expound on it since it's been a while since I read
it but if anyone in the Colo. area wants to borrow it, I can get
it to them.
Pam
|
509.58 | Forgot to enter this... | CSC32::KINSELLA | | Wed Sep 13 1995 19:31 | 43 |
|
I was going to enter this note months ago and spaced it after asking
the MODs to open the string up again for discussion. Duh. I found
my original file though and will post it anyway.
As you all know my dad died in December. An acquaintance at Digital
gave me a book that she believes to be comforting about what heaven
is like. The book was "Embraced by the Light." Not wanting to be
rude I accepted it being extremely wary as I suspected this was the
same lady I had seen a year or so ago on Oprah. I started reading
the book with antennae up for untruth. After a couple of chapters I
couldn't stand the waiting and just skipped to the big NDE scene.
(While patience is a virtue, discernment is a gift! ;^)
Anyway...she talked about a bright light, she talked about being
carried on currents of air at high speeds towards the light, and then
she said Jesus told her there were so many churches because everyone
was on a different level of spiritually but it all lead to the same
place and that she realized she had no place criticizing any religion.
I sat there incredulous! It's not that I don't believe in NDEs, it's
just that I don't necessarily believe that they all are from God and
if we take the time to look at God's Word, we'd know that.
1) The Bible says that Satan disguises himself as an Angel of Light!
Is he not the deceiver who would pull a scam like this sooner than
let you find out the truth?
2) The Bible also calls Satan the Prince of the Air. Is he not the
destroyer who would sooner wish for you to be rushed on currents
of air to your ultimate destruction?
3) The Word of God says to test the spirits and see if they are
teaching any other gospel than the one of Christ. If they are, they
are not of God. It bothered me that she just assumed in the book
that this was Jesus. She didn't even ask! And while as a christian
I would hope like Ananias (Acts 9) I would know the voice of my
Lord, but if the person I thought to be him was saying things that
disagreed with the Word of God, I wouldn't be listening to him.
I haven't read every word of this book. It is my prayer though that we
would all delve deeply into the Word of God to be able to discern right
from wrong and not be taken for fools by the #1 fool himself.
Jilla
|
509.59 | _Deadline_ | CIVPR1::STOCK | | Thu Sep 14 1995 16:28 | 22 |
| Hi Jilla,
Really don't want to rathole your topic, but mention of a book having
been given you for comfort after your dad's death prompts me to mention
another book I have just finished _Deadline_ [sorry, brainfade on the
author's name - a pastor from the Pacific northwest]
Story involves the deaths of two members of a "three musketeers" set
(since grade-school), one of whom is a Christian, and the detective
work of the remaining third member who is not saved and resents the
efforts of his Christian friends.
In his endnotes, the author makes it clear that the scenes in Heaven
are from his own imagination, but that he was careful not to let
anything in that was contrary to Scripture. The scenes are beautiful.
I thought of my dad a lot while I was reading it... Maybe you would
get some comfort from it, too.
In His love,
/John
|
509.60 | | PAULKM::WEISS | For I am determined to know nothing, except... | Thu Sep 14 1995 16:46 | 5 |
| A fully Christian version of one person's experience with life after this
life can be found in "My Glimpse of Eternity" by Betty Malz. Not only did
she return, but was miraculously healed in the process.
Paul
|
509.61 | Reading | CSC32::KINSELLA | | Thu Sep 21 1995 18:36 | 8 |
|
Thank you both John and Paul....Hey where's Ringo? HAHAHAHAHA
This has been a week of emotions as two women in my church had their
fathers die. Their loss touches my heart so deeply as my loss is
still so very real to me.
Jilla
|
509.62 | you forgot George (let's rip off the Chiffon's) Harrison | BBQ::WOODWARDC | ...but words can break my heart | Thu Sep 21 1995 20:09 | 8 |
| Guys,
> Thank you both John and Paul....Hey where's Ringo? HAHAHAHAHA
please forgive JillA. She's under a lot of pressure, and as you can
see, it's starting to take it's toll. She's becoming more and more erratic
- funny thing, ever since she's known me :') I wonder if there's a
connection :'/
|
509.63 | Where's Ringo? | CIVPR1::STOCK | | Fri Sep 22 1995 10:46 | 7 |
| Last time I saw Ringo, he was about four inches tall and wearing a
railroad conductor's uniform...
(Talk about *wierd* casting) Well, at least we got George Carlin's
language cleaned up a bit :^)
/John
|
509.64 | Ringo Update | CSLALL::HENDERSON | Friend will you be ready? | Fri Sep 22 1995 10:50 | 10 |
|
He was just in Boston this week as his daughter had surgery to remove a
brain tumor (which I understand was succesful).
Jim
|
509.65 | Ouch! | CIVPR1::STOCK | | Fri Sep 22 1995 10:57 | 9 |
| When will I ever learn?
Every once in a while when I get an attack of smart-mouth, something
like this will remind me that what I've said may be less than sensitive
to someone who is hurting.
My apologies, brothers and sisters.
/John
|
509.66 | | BBQ::WOODWARDC | ...but words can break my heart | Fri Sep 22 1995 20:04 | 3 |
| John,
forgiven
|