T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
430.1 | Don't understand the question | KAHALA::JOHNSON_L | Leslie Ann Johnson | Wed Mar 09 1994 15:29 | 6 |
| I don't think I understand the question that is being asked in point 0,
can the anonymous noter clarify or give an example of what he or she is
asking ?
Leslie
|
430.2 | Is property ownership biblical? Was communism right? | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Wed Mar 09 1994 15:47 | 16 |
| I think I understand the question.
The first assertion is that the world is God's. 99% of the readers and
99.44% of the writers to this conference can agree with that.
The second assertion is that there are places we cannot go, because other
people have laid claim to certain tracts of land.
The question is, when did property ownership come into being?
The answer is: when mankind changed from a purely nomadic hunter-gatherer
society into a city-based agrarian society.
I'll leave Biblical issues associated with this to others.
/john
|
430.5 | topic is now write-locked | FRETZ::HEISER | impeach the President and her husband | Wed Mar 09 1994 17:29 | 1 |
430.3 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | Friend will you be ready | Wed Mar 09 1994 21:48 | 12 |
|
Th anonymous noter indicates that Mr Covert's reply answers the question to
their satisfaction.
Jim Co Mod
|
430.4 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | Friend will you be ready | Wed Mar 09 1994 21:50 | 9 |
|
Sorry for any confusion. This topic is write enabled. Notes referring
to the write locking of the topic have been either set hidden or deleted.
Jim Co Mod
|
430.6 | | ICTHUS::YUILLE | Thou God seest me | Thu Mar 10 1994 06:30 | 57 |
|
� This is God's world, we are all His children. In God's world we are not
� able to go from place to place and stop anywhere we wish. What I was
� wondering was at what point did God allow us to make claims to what part of
� His land we could keep for ourselves?
I felt I had to add to this one. Not necessarily for the anonymous
submitter, and overlooking the inaccuracy of 'we are all His children'; but
rather for completeness. There's a lot of verses which talk about the
allocation of land, and they combine to give a very real perspective on
God's plan for us, with us. I haven't time for more than a few just now,
but for what I have...
Acts 17:26
"From one man He made every nation of men that they should inhabit the
whole earth; and He determined the times set for them, and the exact places
where they should live."
Jeremiah 27:6
"Now I will hand all your countries over to my servant Nebuchadnezzar king
of Babylon; I will make even the wild animals subject to him. All nations
will serve him and his son� and his grandson� until the time for his land
comes and then many nations and great kings will subjugate him."
� Nebuchadnezzar's son (named Nabopoleser, I believe), not mentioned in
scripture, who preferred not to live in Babylon.
� Nebuchadnezzar's grandson Belshazzar, of the feast in Daniel 5, who was
overcome by the Medes and Persians as prophesied in Isaiah 44:27-45:3.
Genesis 9:1 - God's command
"Then God blessed Noah and his sons, saying to them 'Be fruitful and
increase in number and fill the earth'"
Genesis 11:4 - Man's rebellion
"Come, let us build a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may
make a name for ourselves and not be scattered over the face of the whole
earth."
Genesis 11:8 - God's overruling protection
"So the LORD scattered them from there over all the earth..."
Isaiah 45:18
"For this is what the LORD says - He Who created the heavens, He is God;
He Who fashioned it and made the earth, He founded it;
He did not create it to be empty,
but formed it to be inhabited..."
Then there's the promise of the land to Abraham and his descendents; the
laws given to prevent the moving of landmarks / property boundaries, etc,
the parable of the tenants the reference to Israel as tenants of the land,
rather than owners), all pointing back to God as the One Who apportions
who may live where. Which we break at our peril....
God bless
Andrew
|
430.7 | Laws Concerning the Land | KAHALA::JOHNSON_L | Leslie Ann Johnson | Thu Mar 10 1994 09:38 | 10 |
| Okay, now that I understand what this is about - to Andrew's list should
also be added the Biblical laws about the 7th year - letting the land
in Israel rest by not cultivating it, the law concerning returning the
land back to its original ownership - I can't remember if this is every 7
years, or only the year of Jubilee (50th year), and those concerning
allowing a kinsman-redeemer to buy back the land for someone who has lost
it. - Will have to look up Biblical references later - don't have a
concordance handy or the time to do it right now.
Leslie
|
430.8 | | HERR::crosbie | He's been in my shoes | Thu Mar 10 1994 09:48 | 11 |
|
Re: .7
Hi Leslie,
Leviticus Chapter 25 is the reference for the year of Jubilee. Land only
reverted to the original owner in the year of jubilee.
In Him,
Graham
|
430.9 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Thu Mar 10 1994 13:40 | 24 |
| Yes, and God also did allot land to Israel; the daughters of Zelophahad
also got land ownership.
It seems to me that when the land becomes more filled, then people
either need or define space to call "home". To address the question of
the haves and the havenots, though, and the acquisition of say, millions
of acres where someone doesn't have even an eighth of an acre, we should
also consider that Abraham and Job were very rich and powerful men.
(While Abraham was a nomad, he did stake out his territory, giving
his nephew Lot the choice - and Lot chose towards Sodom.)
Buying and selling of land went on at the very beginnings of the OT, too.
Wasn't it Abraham who bought land to bury his wife? (Uh oh, caught me
in a question mark.)
Now, it is interesting that Jesus didn't own land or home base. He did
have some friends where he stayed from time to time (Mary, Martha, and
Lazarus) but by and large he was often "on the road."
With all this, I think the admonition to be content whatever the circumstances
we find ourselves in is very practical and keeps from failing the 10th
commandment test about coveting our neighbor's property, etc.
Mark
|
430.10 | | ICTHUS::YUILLE | Thou God seest me | Fri Mar 11 1994 05:01 | 39 |
| � (While Abraham was a nomad, he did stake out his territory, giving
� his nephew Lot the choice - and Lot chose towards Sodom.)
Interesting that immediately Lot had left for his alloted portion, God
promised Abram (as he was then) that he'd get the lot anyway ...
Genesis 13:14-15,17 :
"The LORD said to Abram after Lto had parted from him, 'Lift up your eyes
from where you are and look north and south, east and west. All the land
that yuo see I will give to you and your offspring for ever ..... Go, walk
through the length and breadth of the land, for I am giving it to you.'"
Abraham's purchase of the cave for Sarah's grave is Genesis 23:, where also
Abraham himself, Isaac, Rebekah, Jacob and Leah were buried (Genesis
49:29-33), but not Rachel (Genesis 48:7). More a family vault.
Places have significance in the LORD's plan. Like the temple site, pointed
to in Deuteronomy 12:5-7, 2 Samuel 24:18-25, 1 Chronicles 21:22...22:1.
Guess this gets away from 'where we can live', though. In a lot of places
it's underlined that aliens were welcome to come and live under Israelite /
God's laws. That seems to be the most significant point. The allotment to
to each tribe was to be in proportion to their numbers, and the perception
of the earth belonging to God to allocate in no way precludes movement - as
is evidenced by His leading the Israelites around before they came into the
inheritance of the land.
� Yes, and God also did allot land to Israel; the daughters of Zelophahad
� also got land ownership.
The significance of their ownership was that as he only had daughters, the
allocation of his area would be lost to his tribe if it could only be left
through the male line. This could have cumulated into horrendous
administrative complications - if tribes were likely to possess little
personal pockets of areas in other tribal zones, while similarly losing
ones of their own. So the ruling was that tribal land has to stay with the
tribe, even in the exceptional case of a family with daughters only to
inherit.
Andrew
|
430.11 | Leviticus 25 | KAHALA::JOHNSON_L | Leslie Ann Johnson | Fri Mar 11 1994 09:51 | 6 |
| Thanks Grahm, I was pretty sure it was in Leviticus somewhere. I just
read through it this morning - there is a lot more about land ownership/
redemption in that chapter as well, worth reading for those who want
to gain some perspective.
Leslie
|
430.12 | What happened to the dinosaurs | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Mon Apr 25 1994 14:10 | 23 |
| Creation Science Ministries recently held a seminar here in which I
attended. Ken Ham had some interesting things to say about dinosaurs
and where they went:
- He points to Job 40:15 and 41:1 as rock-solid descriptions of a
Bracheasaur and Plesiosaur (respectively). Job is the 2nd oldest
OT book.
- Before sin, there was no death. He uses this to claim that all of
God's creations were herbivores before the fall.
- *Every* land animal was brought onto Noah's ark.
- Ancient historical records show that creatures that were called
"dragons" were rock-solid descriptions of dinosaurs (a term invented
in 1841). Over time, they were glorified to the images we know of
today, but he maintains they were originally dinosaurs.
- He states that the "dragons" just gradually died off, but they aren't
all extinct yet. Man continues to discover new creatures all the
time, meanwhile thousands of species have become extinct.
- In 1977, a Japanese fishing boat recovered a Plesiosaur carcass from
the Pacific Ocean. There have been other instances of such
discoveries, but this is the most recent.
- Today there are reports of a huge dinosaur-like creature in Central
Africa. Ham played a recording of the sounds this creature makes and
it sounds just like something out of Jurassic Park.
|
430.13 | | RICKS::PSHERWOOD | | Mon Apr 25 1994 14:19 | 4 |
| re the fishing boat
they've been finding really "old" fish for a while...
some even more recent than 1977 - seems I recall reading about some in
a magazine or newspaper...
|