T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
321.1 | agreed | POWDML::MOSSEY | | Wed Nov 17 1993 09:47 | 7 |
| re: -.1
Amen, Bob.
I had the exact sentiments after reading through some of note 320.
|
321.2 | Be careful | KALI::EWANCO | Eric James Ewanco | Wed Nov 17 1993 10:10 | 10 |
| I have heard rumors in fact that someone may be monitoring certain notes
conferences and marking the authors and timestamps of notes. I have known not
a few people who were avid noters and subsequently got laid off. Whether they
were laid off because they didn't do their job (because of the notes) or
whether someone noticed their frequent postings and recommended them for TFSO,
I cannot say.
Just be careful.
Eric
|
321.3 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Wed Nov 17 1993 11:09 | 4 |
| Checking the links, writers are not the only ones monitored (in case you
read-onlies think you're incognito).
MM
|
321.4 | You CAN make the DIFFERENCE | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Thu Nov 18 1993 01:58 | 7 |
| This conference is made up of individuals. You could make the
difference. Instead of taking up the time to write more derogatory
statements, why not take the time to write something edifying?
Each read-only, each participant has the power of the written word at
their fingertips in here.
|
321.5 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Thu Nov 18 1993 11:58 | 34 |
| > Besides, I personally don't think one can have a window open
> monitoring the notes file responses and also be focused enough
> on work for 8 hours to give Digital its due.
>
> I KNOW I can't, from experience.
Bob,
I have re-read your base note. This sort of admonishment comes up
occasionally in this conference and others, and at times we need it.
Having been a moderator for some time, there were days when the time
sink was more than it was worth, and other days where traffic was light.
There is something to be said for balance, though, which admittedly
is a difficult thing to maintain. And when it becomes too far out of
balance, it is time for a check up. The balance is that I *could*
have a window open all day (while I was a moderator), which was checked
periodically, such that it seemed as if things were current. I have
four decterms and other windows as well (monitoring my system, clock,
mail, etc). Balance can be maintained in a multitasking environment.
As for giving Digital its due, one can check my performance record.
I hear what you have said about appearance, and the counterbalance
of this is judgment on what is seen but not fully understood. Neither
extreme covers the whole. As some people in E-mail exchanges can testify,
I am one who can dash off 50 or 60 lines easily, and I apologize to those
who tire after 15 lines. Some labor to write 24 lines.
Your admonition is not out of line or wrong; in fact, it is correct, but
it also needs to take balance into account.
I've been tossing around a statement that I've been wanting to use:
Treat equals equally, individuals individually, and everyone fairly.
I don't expect this to sit well in today's politically correct society,
but I'd be willing to discuss it.
Mark
|
321.6 | | POWDML::SMCCONNELL | Next year, in JERUSALEM! | Thu Nov 18 1993 12:17 | 28 |
| The interesting thing to me about Bob's note is the affect it had upon
entries yesterday. I'm not pointing this out as a "gotcha". Rather,
it seems to me that it served its intended purpose; namely, to get us
all to think about our own individual witness (since it usually doesn't
do much good to focus on how everyone elses' witness is ;-).
Mark calls for a need to balance each side of the story, and I agree
(no surprise there; he used the "b" word ;-). But no doubt, in weighing
all things, many people found that Bob's admonishment was applicable to
them personally and they thought twice before acting. I know I did!
At different times in our lives, we may find ourselves on the end of
the scale in need of being admonished. At other times, we may find
ourselves being used in the role of the admonisher. Bob would probably
be the first to tell you that he's had his own struggles in this area
too (as you can glean from some of his comments in the basenote).
I think it was an imporant reminder and from my own perspective, one to
obey - NOT for the sake of avoiding some penalty, but for the sake of
giving *all* to my employer as giving unto Him. Since this is an area
in my life in which G-d is working these days, I thought it was very
timely.
My 2 cents for whatever it's worth...
Steve
|
321.7 | | PCCAD::RICHARDJ | Pretty Good At Barely Getting By | Thu Nov 18 1993 15:27 | 9 |
| Gee, the recent silence is the best atmosphere this conference
has ever had.
Hope your all praying !
Sometimes we need to be quiet and just reflect on Jesus.
Peace
Jim
|
321.8 | | CSLALL::HENDERSON | Friend will you be ready? | Thu Nov 18 1993 15:55 | 12 |
|
. Sometimes we need to be quiet and just reflect on Jesus.
Amen, brother.
Jim
|
321.9 | | SUBURB::ODONNELLJ | | Thu Nov 18 1993 17:01 | 1 |
| "Be still and know that I am Lord"
|
321.10 | More silence to come | TPSYS::WEST | | Thu Nov 18 1993 17:17 | 5 |
| Revelation 8:1
And when he had opened the seventh seal, there was silence in
heaven about the space of half an hour.
|
321.11 | | CHTP00::CHTP04::LOVIK | Mark Lovik | Thu Nov 18 1993 17:27 | 6 |
| Re: .-1
If you consider what the "normal" level of activity in heaven must be
like, that will be one *awesome* silence.
Mark L.
|