T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
51.1 | RTL Petition | QETOO::SCARDIGNO | God is my refuge | Wed Mar 10 1993 08:45 | 4 |
| I have copies of the RTL petition to stop FOCA. Send me mail
if you need a copy.
Steve
|
51.2 | can you say "socialism"? | FRETZ::HEISER | Komm Gott, Sch�pfer, Heiliger Geist | Wed Mar 10 1993 16:40 | 10 |
| If I understand this properly, FOCA will also force organizations (such
as Catholic hospitals) to perform abortions against the moral will of
said organization. Is this true? If so, it's really ironic that they
feel they can impose their morality on us when they've been crying to
"fundamentalists" over that very same issue for centuries.
I'm a regular contributor to our local RTL, but would like a copy of
the petition too.
Mike
|
51.3 | | PCCAD::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged To Perfekchun | Wed Mar 10 1993 16:44 | 7 |
| RE:2
I heard the same thing. Many don't realize it, but hospitals that
perform abortions, ask nurses and doctors if they will be able to
assist in abortions if hired. Guess what happens if they say no ?
Jim
|
51.4 | | MSBCS::JMARTIN | | Thu Mar 11 1993 12:49 | 7 |
| It seems to me that by the definition the looney left uses, this would
be a direct violation of "separation of church and state." The sad
thing is that the overall public is unaware this bill even exists. It
is being down played tremendously. I don't think it will fly in its
current text.
Jack
|
51.5 | FOCA will probably pass... | GUCCI::BPHANEUF | On your knees! Fight like a man! | Fri Mar 12 1993 12:05 | 25 |
| re: <<< Note 51.4 by MSBCS::JMARTIN >>>
Jack
> The sad thing is that the overall public is unaware this bill even
> exists.
What is even sadder is the fact that the majority of those who *do*
realize its existence (*including* those in the Church) don't really
care. Not since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has *any* proposed Federal
law so clearly and directly sought to impose Federal will on the
States, overriding and steam-rolling whatever state-level statutory
hinderances there may be. What will be next? Federally mandated day care?
> It is being down played tremendously.
Of course. If you wanted to hit your opposition with a knockout punch,
would you telegraph it to the opposition?
> I don't think it will fly in its current text.
You watch - it will fly through Congress like the bat out of Hell that
it is.
Brian
|
51.6 | What's it say? | NWD002::RANDALL_DO | | Fri Mar 12 1993 13:06 | 7 |
| Can someone who has seen the FOCA summarize it for me? I've only seen
references to it, or third hand statments of what it implies. I've
never actually heard what it contains.
Thanks
Don Randall
|
51.7 | | TLE::COLLIS::JACKSON | Ferris wheel | Fri Mar 12 1993 15:39 | 8 |
| I don't have the text, but it is touted by
those who are pro-abortion as
"Abortion without apology"
Indeed.
Collis
|
51.8 | FOCA from a previous session of Congress | LGP30::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (381-0899 ZKO2-2/T63) | Tue Mar 23 1993 13:42 | 39 |
| re Note 51.6 by NWD002::RANDALL_DO:
> Can someone who has seen the FOCA summarize it for me?
<<< LYCEUM::DISK$NOTES:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CATHOLIC-THEOLOGY.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Catholic Theology >-
================================================================================
Note 253.197 Abortion 197 of 226
COVERT::COVERT "John R. Covert" 45 lines 26-OCT-1992 20:59
-< The Freedom of Choice Act >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
102nd Congress S.25
1st Session A B I L L
To protect the reproductive rights of women, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled:
Section 1. Short Title
This act may be cited as the "Freedom of Choice Act of 1991".
Section 2. Right to Choose
(a) In General -- Except as provided in subsection (b), a State
may not restrict the right of a woman to terminate a pregnancy --
(1) before fetal viability; or
(2) at any time, if such termination is necessary to protect
the life or health of the woman.
(b) Medically Necessary Requirements -- A State may impose
requirements medically necessary to protect the life or health of
women referred to in subsection (a).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[The rest of the note is commentary by John Covert and can be
read in the CATHOLIC-THEOLOGY conference.]
|
51.9 | So what does "viability" mean? | EVMS::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Mar 23 1993 14:33 | 15 |
| Define "viable." If that means the ability to live on one's own, then it sure
doesn't include newborn babies, 2 year olds, the mentally retarded, the elderly,
paraplegics..... I get very nervous defining humanity in terms of the ability
to support yourself.
The only thing that a newborn baby can get by themselves that an unborn baby
cannot is air. They can't get water, food, shelter, or any of the other
necessities of life. They are 100% dependent on adult humans to supply all of
their needs, except for air.
So what's so special about air? And if not being able to get your own air makes
you not "viable," what about the elderly who need oxygen? Or people who have
had an illness that requires respiratory support, or.........
Paul
|
51.10 | | AOSG::YACKEL | and if not... | Thu Mar 25 1993 10:42 | 7 |
|
True enough Paul! There is one other thing that a new born baby cannot
live without even if it has all of the aforementioned things, that is
love. Documented studies show that feeding and breathing are not
enough to keep a new born alive, they must be loved.
Yak
|
51.11 | | MCIS2::BERNIER | Quit Ye Like Men... 1 Cor 16:13,14 | Mon Apr 05 1993 17:35 | 36 |
| I found a little card by the offering box at church. It's entitled:
Key Facts about FOCA, the Freedom of Choice Act, prepared by: National
Conference of Catholic Bishops. It contains the following summary of
the bill.
- The "Freedom of Choice Act" (FOCA) would forcibly impose a policy of
abortion on demand on every community in all 50 states
- After viability, throughout the ninth month of pregnancy, FOCA
requires every state to allow abortions for "health" reasons. Health
reason include any social or emotional concerns a mother has about
being pregnant or raising a child.
- After 20 years of virtually unrestricted abortion, fewer than 10% of
Americans support unlimited, unregulated abortions (Wirthin Group
2/1/93). FOCA ignores Americans' serious moral concerns about
destroying unborn human lives and protecting women.
- **FOCA WOULD ABOLISH** many existing laws which Americans support,
including laws which:
- Ensure that children born alive during post-viability abortions
receive the care any newborn deserves.
- REcognizing a husband's right to know if his wife is planning to
abort their child.
- Ensure that women have the information they need and deserve to
make an informed decision on abortion.
- Require parental notification or consent. FOCA may prevent
communities from ensuring true parental involvement by allowing a
parent's right to be exercised by any "responsible adult" - a teen's
18-year old friend or an abortion clinic counsellor.
- Ensure that only licensed **physicians** can perform abortions.
|