T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1577.1 | Weigh In | DEMING::MATTSON | | Tue Apr 30 1991 09:20 | 16 |
| Steve,
The fish are brought to the weighin, a team or person at a time.
They're usally taken from the livewell and placed into a specially
designed plastic bag filled with water. Some of the bigger tournaments
have big tubs of water you can dunk your bag of bass into while
awaiting your turn at the scale.
Once at the scale the fish are dumped into a basket and immediately
weighed. Then their usally put back into the bag and brought over to
the water by the team or person who brought them up to the scale and
immediately released. Most tournaments have the weigh in right at the
ramp and that's where the fish are all released.
regards,
Gary
|
1577.2 | SOUTHERN SPORTSMAN | ODIXIE::SHADDIX | | Tue Apr 30 1991 13:36 | 7 |
| I dont know what they do in a BASS tournament but when I fished in a
local bass club we would weigh-in at the boat ramp and release all
live fish right there at the dock/ramp. From what I can tell by
watching the Bassmasters show, they have the game and fish comm on hand
to check the fish for length, weight, disease, etc. In some cases they
even tag the fish with transmitters to monitor their travel then they
release the fish there at the dock.
|
1577.3 | Ok here... | TOTH::ORLOWSKI | | Tue Apr 30 1991 14:25 | 7 |
| I would think it would be safe to say that will not return to where
they were caught.
The Release Site could even cause death if too many bass for area,or
maybe Pickerel Zone,or not enough bait fish,or not enough "hiding
spots",,,any condition that bass cannot live in.
-Steve
|
1577.4 | Don't think it really matters | SEMIU5::MATTSON | | Tue Apr 30 1991 17:20 | 15 |
| Steve,
That's a point that has been debated many times. B.A.S.S.
and other groups have done studies on fish released from the weigh in
sites. I remember reading one article where one fish traveled 11 miles
and ended up at the site it was originally caught. But obviously not
every fish will do this. There still isn't enough hardcore facts to
support either way if catching and releasing Bass in seperate areas has
any significant impact.
Around here (Massachusetts) I don't believe that the bodies of
water are big enough to cause any notable impact. I believe that the
Bass is a pretty rugged fish and can easily adapt in a new area. I
don't think they get killed off.
Gary
|
1577.5 | Some are always on the move | JUPITR::NEAL | It was good | Wed May 01 1991 07:39 | 6 |
| Gary, I have also read about the studies. One went on to say that
most bass will return within a day or two, and some bass are roamers
anyway, and that may explain why all bass do no return to the area
caught.
Rich
|
1577.6 | B.A.S.S. test via transmitters.. | DELNI::JMCDONOUGH | | Wed May 01 1991 12:26 | 24 |
| Re .4
I'd like to see that article....reason being is that about 2 weeks
ago on one of the sports shows on cable,they went through a
"transmitter" implant on Bass caught in a tournament...and released ALL
of the fish right near the weigh-in site.
The transmitters had a 1.5 month life...and a month after the
release, all but 1 out of the original 150 transmitters were found to
be within 150 yards of the ramp they were released on. 7 were not
detected anywhere, and this was consistent with expected failures of
the units. The 1 that was further away was found on shore....probably
because someone had cuaght the bass and eviscerated it before taking it
home to eat is.
The obvious question asked was: "What does this indicate about the
% of released fish that lived?" Answer was "Nothing!" All of the tagged
Bass MAY have been dead, in fact...this only indicated that released
Bass don't move very far..
I'm not dsputing the fact that there may be a few "Lassie Bass" that
will 'go home'....but the test that they performed at this B.A.S.S.
tournament sure didn't bear this out...
JMcD
|
1577.7 | ? | GEMVAX::HICKSCOURANT | | Wed May 01 1991 12:44 | 9 |
| I think it makes a difference which species of bass we're talking about
here, time of year, and size of the body of water.
If the bass were released in a convivial habitat, it makes sense to me
that they would hang around. Bass are not territorial except when
nesting. Before and after the spawning season, they are as pelagic as
lake salmonids.
How were the transmitters attached to the bass?
|
1577.8 | .... | DELNI::JMCDONOUGH | | Wed May 01 1991 12:58 | 15 |
| Re .7
All Largmouths..transmitter was inserted into a small slit in the
back, aft of the dorsal fin, with trailing wire antenna about 3 inches
long..
B.T.W....has anyone wh participates in this conference CAUGHT
anything this spring??
I've had SOME success...3 five-pounders, a 7 pounder, between 30 and
35 1-2.5 pounders....all Largemouths..all on 8" 'Producto' plastic
tournament worms, Texas-rigged.... Answer to "Where?": In a lake.....
JM
|
1577.9 | Help I'm Drowning... | TOTH::ORLOWSKI | | Wed May 01 1991 13:45 | 5 |
| .....here's another thing that I would like to say. Just because a Fish
is in a "bag" full of water does not mean he/she/it is breathing,,,in
fact it probably is drowning.
-Steve
|
1577.10 | Hey, I'm not the enemy. | SEMIU5::MATTSON | | Wed May 01 1991 13:55 | 11 |
| Steve,
You asked a question and I gave you an answer. I don't want to get
into a big debate over this. This file is too full of that type of
stuff already. Everyone has an opinion and is entitled to it, but
remember everything in life can be interpreted much different by two or
more people seeing or hearing the exact samething. That's what makes
like so intresting.
regards,
Gary
|
1577.11 | Thats something, how often have you been out | JUPITR::NEAL | It was good | Wed May 01 1991 14:45 | 8 |
| re .8
Wow your one cool dude man...... I'v been fishing in a lake too.
Hey with the big sucsess man, your should get in the DEC touney's.
You would be in the big $$$, or have you and I just didn't see you
in the winners circle.
Rich
|
1577.12 | Fish must go through hell... | DELNI::JMCDONOUGH | | Wed May 01 1991 14:52 | 22 |
| Re .10
True enuff... I don't really think he was trying to start an argument
though...it seems that he may feel the same as I do about the "catch 'n
release" tournament idea... I don't have any doubt that the majority of
fish caught and immediately released (well, maybe after a bit of
awe-struck admiring...) will survive and live to a ripe old age.
However, I--and I do not think I'm alone by any means--have serious
doubts about the survial rate of Bass caught and hauled around in a
live-well for four or five hours or more, bounced off the sides as
these muscle-boats make 6-G turns at 80+ mph, then stuck in a plastic
bag, or put into a laundry basket with a board on top as we see at all
of the B.A.S.S. tournaments...maybe held up so the crowd can see them,
and THEN released into an area miles from his/her home habitat... Hell,
if this was a PERSON, the chances of death would be high...so I wonder
really how many of these "live released bass" are alive a day or a week
or a month later...
I'm not advocating a "fish fry" at all of these tournaments, but
there MAY be some better way...like putting an authorized official in
each boat, and/or photos and IMMEDIATE release after catching..
JMcD
|
1577.13 | Interpretation Malfunction | TOTH::ORLOWSKI | | Wed May 01 1991 14:59 | 5 |
| ...wah-did-i-say ??? I was not referring to any note when I made my
blerb,,,,,,,,,I guess an interpretation malfunction occured. Sorry Gary
and thanks for your intial input.
-Steve
|
1577.14 | Just fishin' for the fun of it.. | DELNI::JMCDONOUGH | | Wed May 01 1991 15:07 | 34 |
| Re .11
3 times...and all of these were caught within a distance of about 30
feet of one another..a small stream enters this lake right there....
Hope I catch the big 4 next year again.. Did take 4 of the 2.5
pounders home and stuck 'em on the old grill though..wrapped in
aluminum foil, little butter smeared on them...stuck a piece of
kielbasa in the stomach cavity...and some onion and garlic powder,
little salt and pepper, and a couple of "Silver Bullets" to wash 'em
down.....MAN!!, it don't GET any better than that!!!
I'm really not into the tourney thing...too much pressure.. The day I
caught the 7+ pounder, I also caught one of the 5's....had 3 hits all
afternoon, caught these 2 within 20 minutes of one another, and the
other one 'felt' fairly substantial, but I didn't set the damned hook
right, so I lost this one...but that's one of the drawbacks with worm
fishing...I use weedless hooks,(the type with the safety-pin style weed
guard) and if you don't get the right snap on the rod tip, or if the
Bass grabs the worm so the hook's flat in his jaw, you just yank it out
of his mouth... The 7+ pounder was hooked on such a small section of
his jaw-skin that I was shakin' with relief when I saw how little he
was hooked on...
I just have a lot of enjoyment getting out there... Believe
me....there have been MANY days that I've gotten only 2 bites...1
mosquito and 1 tick!! But it's worth it to me just to get out in the
woods and enjoy the environment.. I have had soem real good days over
the past 15 years...but the day I believe I KNOW anything about
catching Bass is the day I hope someone will have me committed...it's a
lot of fun and a ton of luck...
JMcD
|
1577.15 | | JUPITR::NEAL | It was good | Wed May 01 1991 15:20 | 6 |
| re .14
Aint it the way, feast or famine. Good luck, but you may not need
it.
|
1577.16 | It beats the alternatives! | HPSTEK::BCRONIN | | Wed May 01 1991 16:54 | 21 |
| First let me say that this is not meant to start any argument.
Anyone who has not seen or participated in a tournament weigh in should
watch one before they talk about Bass being mistreated. I'm sure that
everyone can list alternatives to the system that is presently used
but it is the fairest system that anyone has come up with in about 20
years. This subject has been haggled for all those years and the best
anyone has come up with is weigh all the fish in the same place on the
same scale. Even with the small percentage of mortality that they
still have it beats the old days when the fish were brought in on
stringers and no one got penalized for dead fish.
Of course another alternative that I definitely do NOT recommend
but would be perfectly legal is for the fishermen to keep all of the
fish!
All in all I feel that the tournament Bass fishermen do a whole
lot more good for Bass fishing than bad. Try to remember that not too
long ago the F+G would just poison ALL of the fish in a pond so they
could fill it with trout whether it was suitable habitat or not! How
many so called reclaimed trout ponds are there?
My 2 cents...... B.C.
|
1577.17 | Comments.. | DELNI::JMCDONOUGH | | Wed May 01 1991 17:49 | 64 |
| Re .16
I don't think the analogy is a very valid one. The so-called
reclaimed trout ponds was a big mistake, and so was killing all the
buffalo.. I also know folks that have introduced carp to ponds and
lakes because they like to fish for them, but that doesn't mean it's
the best thing to do.
You're right....tournament fishing HAS done a lot FOR Bass fishing,
and it probably has done a lot to hurt it as well. I don't know if
having 50 or 60 humungous power boats churning up a lake's surface at
60-70 miles per hour does a lot of good to the lake...and I don't think
the average non-tournament sportsman appreciates the seeming arrogance
of many of the tournament people either. It seems that the tournament
"pros" have one very clear goal in mind---THEIR future. Sure, if enough
bass are around, and enough restrictions on the non-pros are levied,
then the pros get more secure... It's not really a matter of
argument..it's more a matter of who's got the power to control the
situation. I think that this Bass tournament situation has become much
more of an INDUSTRY in recent years than it has a SPORT. Sure, the NFL
is a "sport", but it sure as the dickens is an "industry" as well...
I can remember a time when NOBODY fished for Largemouth Bass simply
because they were considered extremely hard to catch and nobody wanted
to bother. Then the tackle makers and tournament pros got involved,
began to teach the basics, and somehow it became a "P.R." issue, and
the mass media got into it....more tackle makers got involved, more
clubs were formed....then EVERYBODY knew how to fish for bass and
everybody started doing so... Many of these folks are not real "sporty"
folks, and they'd take home 100 bass if they could catch them...and in
the spring that isn't at all impossible... So the pressures began to
mount on some lakes, the populations crashed, and who is really to
blame for that?? We can blame it on the symptom--the greedy pigs who
have no self restraint--but who or what is the root cause?? Maybe not
all lf the blame should go on those stupid people.....maybe some of it
should go on the possible overselling of the sport...
Hell, I'm not accusing nor convicting anyone...just pointing out some
of the possible reasons.
There's some good and some bad in this...and I don't pretend to have
all of the answers...but I haven't been presented with all of them by
anyone else either. I don't participate in tournaments by choice...and
I don't typically fish on the well-known and heavily fished waters. I
ain't adverse to walking 7 or 8 miles into the woods to get to a spot
that nobody wants to put out the effort to get to...(there ARE still
some of these spots...), and when I do this, I usually find a place
where there are an abundant supply of whatever fish I'm after....enough
so that if I "limit out" the population of remaining fish will probably
BENEFIT by my harvest rather than have the lake depleted. But I don't
think that I'm the typical fisherman...I happen to enjoy the sport, I
do turn a lot more fish loose than I keep, but I enjoy eating them
also. I even like to fish for carp...but I'd never put a carp or a
sunfish into any body of water...
So I guess the bottom line here is where you are coming from...and I
think there's room for both sides of the debate...and I don't really
see why it has to be an "argument"...I just don't necessarily think
that the Bass-Pros have ALL of the answers and the ONLY way things
should be.. And I DO have questions on some of their methods...and if
they think they have no reason to change anything would seem to me the
BIGGEST reason to examine it very carefully... I think there is plenty
of room to improve...and with newer technology it might be wise to
explore some new methods.
JM
|
1577.18 | Enough for Everyone... | TOTH::ORLOWSKI | | Thu May 02 1991 08:40 | 8 |
| It sounds like I opened a "Can of Worms" here (pun). I did not realize
there was so much controversy about Tournaments. I guess every subject
has a Left and a Right. I think if we land somewhere in the Middle we
all can enjoy this Stressed Planet.
OO
( > )
U -Steve
|
1577.19 | catch/release = proven affective 90+% | LUDWIG::KERSWELL | | Thu May 02 1991 09:29 | 7 |
|
I think the GREEN PEACE NOTE
some of you are looking for
is on...ANOTHER NODE?
|
1577.20 | They're Getting better all the time!! | PACKER::BASSCO::BACZKO | Now, for some fishin' | Thu May 02 1991 14:03 | 27 |
| Just to give some info that I have read over the past two years, BASS
and other trails REDMAN Etc... Have changed methods of at the weigh
ins based on data and research. They continue to do studies on
mortallity rate of tournament caught bass. They will fence off an area
or put the bass caught in a hatchery pond for a month or so. They
tipically get better than a 95% survival rate. Virgina took large
numbers out of the James River at recent Classics and used the fish to
stock ponds that have been fished out. If the State bioligists have
that much confidence in these fish I would agree that little harm can
be happening to the fish, in these live wells and weigh ins. BTW every
year you see the boart manufactures improving the livewells on there
products, Rounded corners, timers on livewell pumps, aerators, deeper
wells,
Is it perfected?? Probably not, but then what is!! They will keep
researching for improvements I'm sure. Its the best we got and the
survival rate is a major accomplishment over the past 20 years.
I think about the fact that 6 years ago I only fished for super!
most people I knew did the same. These organizations have now set a
trend in place that in the mid 70's was all but unheard of CATCH &
RELEASE. I am amazed at the number of people that practice this
I do a lot of shore fishing and most people I run into practice C&R
I have nothing against a meal, I have one or two every year and if
people want to take the fish they catch they have every right to.
But C & R on tournaments is a must IMHO
Les
|
1577.21 | up in the 90'S | LUDWIG::KERSWELL | | Thu May 02 1991 14:29 | 8 |
|
well said les
like i said 90+% have no problems I myself only eat
trout so every bass i catch,goes back in for another
day,
(gill_raker)
|
1577.22 | Give them Maps | WMOIS::BOURGAULT_D | | Tue May 07 1991 14:17 | 31 |
| I would like to add a little to the statement made on 1577.6. If I am
talking about the same tournament St Lawrence River in 1989 B.A.S.S.
did place transmitters on bass and did monitor them. One issue that
clouded the results was that there was a very early cold fronts that
cooled the water temperature down and may have triggered the bass into
late fall early winter patterns. They also felt that there may be a
period of stress that takes away any homing tendencies for a time. I
tend to agree with all the info in here that there is no conclusive
evidence that answers all the questions. In New Hampshire we have
a period of immediate catch and release during the spawn. My concern
is we are allowed to apply for tournament permits to keep fish in the
livewell and must release them after weigh-in. If a study clealy stated
that a spawning bass would not spawn in another area after release I
would seriouly have to consider an alternative for tournaments during
this time period. The spawn is a great time to fish and affords us
an opportunity for plenty of excitment but if we are slowly destroying
our fisheries for this opportunity then we each have to make a value
judgement of how much we want to make available for the future. I would
hope somewhere in the near future we can have a definitive study that
answers our questions.
B.A.S.S. should be doing more to get these answers along with the
money being used out of the Wallop/Breaux funds. It appears this
organization and the states that benefit from the funds owe all of us
some concrete information. I'm going to get off this subject or
this note will end up in the "Rathole"
A concerned Basser
Don B.
answer
|
1577.23 | A data point of possible interest to some.... | GEMVAX::HICKSCOURANT | | Tue May 28 1991 14:12 | 19 |
| Now, there's no way of telling, but I swear the the same bass have come
back to the same places the last four years running.
If they are not the exact same bass, then the 8 bass nests are
magically located, and bass just can't stay away from the exact
locations of last year's nests.
But, indisputably, the same 8 nests that I monitored last year are all
there again this year, in the exact same places. The fish on them don't
look a whole lot bigger than last year, but several of them are about
as big as bass get. (These are smallmouth.)
I speculate that these fish head for specific places when the water
temp is right. I would not take this to mean that a bass grabbed off
the nest and transported 7 miles to the weighing-in area would be able
to find its way back. (It certainly wouldn't get back before its eggs
were eaten, at any rate.)
John H-C
|
1577.24 | Smallmouth = Homebodies | HPSTEK::BCRONIN | | Tue May 28 1991 15:45 | 11 |
| It is very possible that they are the same group of bass.
Smallmouth Bass are often described as homebodies. If they have all
that they need to get through the seasons in a small local area they
tend to stay there. If all of these bass were taken away it would most
likely take quite a while for the area to become repopulated by other
bass that move in from adjacent areas that become too crowded for them.
Also remember that a good nesting site is a good nesting site. They're
all looking for the same basic qualities. If you want to find out if
they're the same exact bass in each nest you could always catch and tag
them.
B.C.
|
1577.25 | | KAHALA::PRESTON | Beastly Rotter in residence | Wed May 29 1991 12:06 | 12 |
| I read an article in the In-Fisherman magazine which indicated that
8 out of 13 bass taken from a pool in a river and transported about
1.6 miles upstream found their way back within a relatively short time,
bypassing 13 other pools in the process. Possibly the other bass showed
up later, too, but the thrust of the article was that bass do display a
definite homing instinct.
(Although I'm absolutely sure that the smallie I caught in Lake
Waukewan and released in Paugus Bay will not find his way back!)
Ed
|
1577.26 | built in lorans | USRCV1::GEIBELL | NOTHIN LIKE FISH ON ! | Wed May 29 1991 12:28 | 13 |
|
Well I am not so sure about bass, but look at the salmon family,
they are released or naturally hatched in a stream go out into the
ocean travel thousands of miles but they still return to the mother
stream from which the origionally left from, they do this by smell.
Now for bass in a lake I wuold say for the most part the water
would probably smell the same unless there is a sewage or feeder stream
leading into the lake to change the smell.
Lee
|