T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1409.1 | May be unfit for human Consumption!!! | SKIVT::WENER | | Thu May 17 1990 17:13 | 7 |
|
I understand that you should be careful with Walleyes from
Champlain. The state just reported that they contain high levels
of Mercury and it may be unsafe to eat them. Anyone got any more
info on this??
- Rob
|
1409.2 | from what I've read | HPSTEK::HAUER | | Fri May 18 1990 06:25 | 16 |
|
Rob, I read an article in Yesterdays Worcester paper and it stated
that an adult should limit themselves to one meal per month [if
I remember correctly] Pregnant women and children should not
eat any at all.
It seems that the natural items [rocks...etc] in the lake coupled
with the acid rain have over the course of many years brought the
level up to an "unsafe" level, since mercury breaks down very
slowly.
Certainly doesn't seem fair............is that an understatement
or what?!
Gitzit'
|
1409.3 | That's hard to believe | SKIVT::WENER | | Fri May 18 1990 08:43 | 16 |
|
Hi Gitzit'
I seem to have missed you when you've been up in the BTO area,
Kevin tells me that he's talked to you a bit. That's pretty wild
about the Acid rain if that's what you've read in the paper. I
have some information on Vermont waters and acid rain that was
provided by the State, and Lake Champlain is a non-sensitive lake.
It has one of the (if not THE) highest acid buffering capability
of any lake in the region. The whole area around the lake is
limstone in fact, and there are Marble quarries throughout the
whole Champlain Valley. If I remember correctly the water is
even on the Basic side, PH ~ 8.0 ...
- Rob
|
1409.4 | from the Telegram and Gazette | HPSTEK::HAUER | | Mon May 21 1990 13:37 | 17 |
|
Hey Rob....brought the article in today. I will send it to you so
you can read the whole thing but the first paragraphs is...
"An analysis of walleyes taken from rivers in the Lake Champlain
basin recently revealed that the mercury levels in the fish continue to
rise. That has prompted Vermont Health commissioner Jan Carney to
issue an advisory on limiting consumption of the fish."
The article goes on to state how they gathered the numbers and
where they are surmising that it is coming from.
Anybody up there that you can call.........
Gitzit'
|
1409.5 | Poultney River... | SKIVT::WENER | | Mon May 21 1990 15:40 | 12 |
|
Hmmmmmph, I'll bet a million to one, "rivers" means the Poultney
river! There was a thermometer factory in Poultney for many years that
I believe was closed down recently. Many of the workers there
complained of unsafe working conditions, i.e. Mercury was everywhere!
The State had to even go into some of these peoples' homes and clean
them up because these people were carrying the mercury everywhere.
It wouldn't surprise me to see that some of it ended up in the river.
I'm interested to see what they'll find...
Thanks, Rob
|
1409.6 | Tastes OK ! | WJOUSM::MAZEROLLE | | Tue May 22 1990 10:25 | 10 |
| They really had a big splash on the news the night before opening day
about limiting the number of walleye you eat on monthly basis because
of the Mercury content. I figured, hey I only catch a few a year so I
paid no more attention to it than that. I also heard Memphramagog
Walleyes had the same problem but I can't verify that for sure, that
could blow the thermometer theory. We did eat the fish and it tasted
great - though we were kind of left with a "heavy stomach" after our
dinner ;>)
Don
|
1409.7 | Pickeral retains contaminents | KAOFS::DAOUST | Work is for people who can't fish | Tue May 22 1990 12:31 | 10 |
| The Ontario government publishes a "Guide to eating Ontario Sport
Fish". Regardless of what body of water your fishing in, it appears as
if Pickeral is the worst species for retention of contaminants. Any
size Pike is edible but pickeral starts getting unsafe (women of child
bearing age and children should limit consumption) at anything over 14
inches. It's really a bummer as I find Pickeral probably one of the
best eating fish available.
There still fun to catch!
Mike
|
1409.8 | Who ya gona call .... | WFOV11::WHITTEMORE_J | Out for Trout | Tue May 22 1990 13:02 | 20 |
|
I made several inquires to NY State a couple o' months
ago when I first heard about more restrictive consumption
warnings being issued. NY F&W read me some extract over
the phone - as I recall; In referance to ALL GAME FISH
SPECIES from ANY Great Lake there was a max. of one meal
a month with NO CONSUMPTION by children or women of child
bearing age and NO CONSUMPTION of specific species above
a certain length. My impression of the lengths associated
with the given species was that they (the lengths) were
indicitave of the size a fish of that species would obtain
within two to three years.
Myself - I'm gona keep the charter dates I have this
August, I'm gona keep the BIG King Salmon I catch and I'm
gona eat um! As always I'm gona throw away the belly flesh,
clean the fat off the backbone and lateral line and I'm
gone ENJOY EVERY BITE! (Pun intended!)
JW-FwtWMtWBtWIH(MA)
|
1409.9 | Mike you know how to FISH!!!!! | CSSE::JUDSON | What do you mean it isn't supported | Tue May 22 1990 18:19 | 11 |
| Ref -7
Hey Mike, I didn't know you know what fishing was???When I made all
those trips to kanata you never said a thing about fishing for walleyes.
You must have known they were my favorite. How things going???By the way,
I had a bet with Bob Barr on the Capitals vs Bruins series, I bet 3 lobsters
against 5 lbs of walleye..Maybe the payoff isn't as good as I thought.
Take Care,
Bruce
|
1409.10 | Thanks | SKIVT::WENER | | Thu May 24 1990 08:16 | 10 |
|
Gitzit'
Thanks for the article, I just got it today. They do
mention the Poultney and Great Chazy that N.Y. has tested, and
the Lamoille and Missisquoi.... It looks like the levels are
just above what the FDA says is ok. FDA says 1.0 PPM and the worst
fish were at 1.1 PPM. I won't worry about it too much, there's
probably more crap in the junk food I've eaten!
- Rob
|
1409.11 | It doesn't go away | BTOVT::LANE_N | | Wed Jul 18 1990 07:39 | 4 |
| 12 years ago there was a mercury scare, blame was laid to the
Medical Center of VT. Seems the ones responsible said they
didn't think there'd be any harm since mercury is heavy and
drops to the bottom.
|
1409.12 | What's a Champlain? | CSG002::KADITZ | | Tue Aug 07 1990 14:47 | 4 |
| I'm unfamiliar with Champlain but will be on Willsboro Bay at the end
of August. What kind of fish should I look for where are they in
that area? Any tips would be greatly appreciated.
|
1409.13 | Lakers in Willsboro | BTOVT::WENER_R | | Tue Aug 14 1990 08:07 | 6 |
|
Willsboro Bay is on the New York side of Lake Champlain. Indeed,
it is part of Lake Champlain. Mostly lake trout in that area which
will be quite deep now.... Sorry I can't supply more, maybe someone
who's been to Willsboro can
|
1409.14 | Some VT ideas :>) | WJOUSM::MAZEROLLE | | Tue Aug 14 1990 15:35 | 12 |
| Hi, I was on the Lake again a couple of weeks ago. I've never fished
the NY side but have fished out of Vergennes (Otter RIver) and from
South Hero Island (Lemoille River). We have caught Bass, Walleye, Pike,
Sheeps head, etc. etc. THe last time we were there (about 3 weeks ago)
I caught a 3&3/4 lb. walleye off of a buoy using a white spinner bait. We
caught about 7 or 8 smallies (all over 2 lbs) using gitzits; we must
have caught at least 50 rock bass (red-eyes); a couple of decent pike
(one 24"). We usually look for points, buoys, docks and even boats
anchored in bays. We were letting our bait hit bottom then kept reeling
the line in slowly but not enough to let it drag the bottom - then WOW
HAVE FUN !!!!!!!! Don
|