T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1011.1 | One man's opinion | SA1794::CUZZONES | Surfcasting with the Alien | Fri Mar 03 1989 11:21 | 19 |
| Gary,
I don't own one but I can start with a couple pros/cons
PRO's CON's
1) Proven Design 1) Old technology
2) Attractive 2) Designed by Chrysler
3) Lower priced 3) Often paired with inferior
quality boats.
I know someone here who powers his Bayliner (21 footer I think)
with a Force 85 horse and swears by it (not at it). My own impression
has been tempered by the boats that usually include a Force as part
of the package... usually glossy on the outside, corners cut on
the inside... Blue Fin is a good example of that. This is not intended
to insult any Blue Fin owners out there ... my opinion only FWIW.
-SSS-
|
1011.2 | vicki::boats | LEVERS::SWEET | Capt. Codfish...GW Fishing Team | Fri Mar 03 1989 12:33 | 3 |
| See the boats file on vicki for more info on force.
CC
|
1011.3 | A Force in the water | MRBASS::DSULLIVAN | | Fri Mar 03 1989 14:58 | 19 |
|
Easy does it!!
My boat is powered by a Force
I have a Force 125hp on my 18' Bayliner. I have had NO PROBLEMS
what so ever with it. 1 full bass season with only 2 speeds, One
stopped - you guess the other.
As stated in .2 older technology, YES. But, a back to basic's
approach for this company. Force is owned by brunswick which also
owns Mercury. When US marine took over the line from crysler the
first thing they did was rid the motor of crysler's power head.
A very affortable and dependable motor for the money.
Let the FORCE be with you !!
Dave "BASSMASTER" Sullivan
|
1011.4 | MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU | DPDMAI::VILLAROSA | | Mon Mar 06 1989 00:46 | 63 |
| The one thing to be said about the different brands of outboards
is that everyone has a different opinion or preference. In regards
to FORCE outboards here are a few facts that may help you.
The original design and manufacturer of these motors was Chrysler
Marine. When the first came out they were very dependable, and as
one person has stated, very basic in design. This meant they were
very easy to service and had less to go wrong. They did fulfill
the one requirement of an outboard very well and that was to move
your boat about on a given body of water.
The bad rap that these motors got came primarily when they were
still known as Chrysler outboards. When Chrysler decided to get
out of the marine engine business they got out quickly. What this
meant to the existing engines was that replacement parts became
scarce. This led to servicing problems and long periods of these
motors being down due to lack of parts, not because they were poorly
designed and manufactured.
A few years ago a company came along called U.S. Marine Inc. The
same company who builds Bayliner boats. What they set out to do
was offer a quality, low cost package to the boating public. This
consisted of rigged boat, motor, and trailer as a turnkey deal.
They also did not want to be tied in to someone elses motors without
any cost controls, although on their bigger models they currently
are using OMC stearndrives for power. Anyway, back to the otboards.
What U.S. Marine did was to buy the rights and manufacturing from
Chrysler outright. They only kept 5 of the original 15 to 16 models,
upgraded the design somewhat, and started producing these engines
under the FORCE name. Up until a couple of years ago they still
kept the old cowling design and color scheme. They also found that
people still remembered the bad rap the original Chrysler engines
got so they redesigned the appearance of the engine and gave it
a blue paint job. The heart of the engine, namely the powerhead
still remained pretty much the old functional Chrysler design.
What you know have with the Force outboards is large and successful
company building and standing behind these engines. They also have
a large dealer network across the U.S. to sell and service them.
Additionally, Powerboat Magazine has for the last several years,
rated Bayliner boats tops in its price class for durability and
performance. It si true they do not have all the extras on them
that Mercury, OMC, and Yahama have such as oil injection, and
instrument layouts that talk to you, they still provide the basics
needed in an outboard. This is to move your boat around on the water
in a reliable manner.
Over the past 15 years I have owned OMC (Johnson/Evinrude)engines.
This is due primarily to product loyalty and the fact that I have
become very familiar with their operation, upkeep, and maintenance.
I do my own work on these engines after the warranty runs out and
have acquired many of the specilized tools needed to work on them.
Is my outboard better than a Force? I doubt it. If your looking
for a large firebreather in the 200 to 300 HP. range than Force
is not for you. This is simply because they currently don't build
them. I do understand however, thy are comming out with a new 5
cylinder engine putting out 150 HP. This should be adequate for
most boating needs. If you run one of the larger boats such as the
25 ft. center console that I have, hang two on the back. The cost
per motor is less than the other manufacturers and should give you
long and reliable service.
|
1011.5 | | BOOTES::KEYES | | Mon Mar 06 1989 10:37 | 7 |
| As stated in the Bayliner Notes, You get what you pay for or,,
its what you want to spend.
As for Force ingines being made by Brunswick, its the same as
the NOVA being made by GM, so isn't a Caddy, again its what
you want to spend and the old saying go's - You get what you
pay for.
|
1011.6 | I'd be leary | DECWET::HELSEL | A thousand points of lightwt threads | Mon Mar 06 1989 12:06 | 25 |
| Since Bayliner is based here in Washington, you see a lot of
Force outboards. Interestingly enough, you rarely see a Force
outboard on anything other than a Bayliner. That is slightly
suspicious.
Anyway, my experience goes like this. I went to pick up my new boat
last July. While I was there, a family was taking delivery on a brand
new bayliner with a Force. They merrily drove off with boat on trailer.
I decided to make some changes to my boat and I wound up being there
for 3 hours while the modifications were made. The family drove back in
after about 90 minutes. They said the Force wouldn't start. I watched
the repair staff try averything in the book to start it until they finally
concluded there was no compression left. They told the people to leave
it while they fix it!
I told the guy working on my boat that I would have demanded a new motor.
He said that Force reserves the right to repair any engines under warantee
and that they wouldn't replace it. I just couldn't believe this.
The kicker is, he claimed that 1 out of 5 Force outboards ceases within
the first year of use.
And I was nervous about the dreaded Merc......
Brett.
|
1011.7 | GET FACTS, NOT OPINIONS | DPDMAI::VILLAROSA | | Tue Mar 07 1989 00:16 | 6 |
| As I said: " Opinions on outboards are like ??XXZZ!!?, everybody's
got one " Buy a microvax, have it not work right out of the box.
Demand that the engineer not fix it, but replace it. While you're
waiting for the replacement to arrive, take your Force outboard
out for a cruise.
|
1011.8 | NO PROBLEMS | CASV02::MCNULTY | | Fri Mar 10 1989 07:32 | 5 |
| I HAVE A 85HP FORCE ON A 17.6FT VIP THAT I PURCHASED LAST YEAR AND
HAVE'NT HAD A PROBLEM. I RUN IT IN BOTH FRESH AND SALT WATER, ALL
OF LAST SUMMER.FWIW
MIKE
|