T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
849.1 | Briaded Mono instead of Mono | CIMNET::DSULLIVAN | | Tue Aug 16 1988 10:09 | 12 |
|
The only mono line I have had any luck with, I've used on my
freswater baitcasters. Braided Mono-- I have never had a problem
with it. I'm not sure how high the test is...
I also have diawa sealine series baitcaster's for salt use.
Dacron is what I use...
Bassmaster,
Dave Sullivan
|
849.2 | A couple thoughts | VICKI::DODIER | | Tue Aug 16 1988 13:51 | 17 |
| I can only think of a couple reasons to use mono over dacron:
1. For lower pound test (i.e. 6 lb.) when using light tackle.
This allows you to put a couple hundred yards of line on a relatively
small spool. This also allows casting lighter lures.
2. Daytime topwater/clear water use, especially for smallmouth
bass. They appear to spook fairly easily and I don't think that
the dacron line helps matters.
As far as salt water is concerned, it sounds as if your better
off with the dacron/mono leader combo unless you want to go for maximum
size fish with minimum size tackle.
RAYJ
|
849.3 | Practice, practice, practice | SHIGEO::SASAKI | Marty Sasaki LTN1-1/D07 226-6011 | Tue Aug 16 1988 14:35 | 20 |
| It's just a matter of practice. I have a Penn magnetic braking casting
reel (I don't remember the model number) that I have filled with
12 lb. mono. With just a little practice I can cast as hard as I
want (assuming no headwind) without a tangled mess. I think it is
more a matter of timing than of educating your thumb.
Dacron is more sensitive for hookups and such but I'm not a good
enough fisherman to have the difference show up with more fish on
the stringer. I've also heard that graphite rods will make up for
the difference between dacron and mono. Of course, this leaves the
question of using graphite and dacron for ultimate sensitivity.
And on a completely tangential direction, ever notice that on fishing
shows when they are going after big gamefish and fighting chairs
and all of that that the person fighting the fish never thumbs the
line back onto the reel, they just pull back and then reel in? How
do they do that without having a big mess on their hands? I've never
seen a 6/0 reel with a levelwind...
Marty Sasaki
|
849.4 | YANK & CRANK | AD::GIBSON | Lobst'a Ayah | Tue Aug 16 1988 15:04 | 21 |
| Marty.
As far as hauling in the "Big One's" If I thumb the line on the
reel I must do it without knowing it, I'll have to ask someone to
watch next time. I never thought about it as I get caught up in
the excitment of the fight.
It really does make a differance in felling the fish and setting
the hook . Lot's more fish on the stringer!
I have a Abu-Garcia Ambassador with 2 lb Tri-line in it right now,
I've tried 10lb Stren, 8 lb Prime an am ready to go to a dacron.
It is a level wind but is just troublee. I have no problem with
any of my penn's. Sea Boy, Senator's, or Squidder's. Non of which
are leval wind. As far as backlash goes. One exception is with
a small senator with Maxama . It is so slippery it goes between
the spool and case. I just stripped it this week and put on ( Guess
what) Gudbrod Dacron
Walt
|
849.5 | each has its points | VIDEO::LEVESQUE | I fish, therefore I am. | Wed Aug 17 1988 10:28 | 19 |
| Dacron's advantage of more limited stretch is somewhat tempered by
its tendency to break in the hands of a less experienced fisherman.
Mono stretches alot more, thus giving a built in shock absorber
that helps prevent breakoffs.
Dacron is clearly better for bottom fishing; it has the hook setting
abilities that 200 ft of mono simply cannot match. With some big
game fishing, Dacron may help with hook setting, however, it also
may contribute to a lost fish unless the fisherman is used to using
it. Many experienced fishermen recommend mono for beginners at big
game fishing such as large sharks, marlin, and giant tuna.
The best way to avoid the potential breakoff problems is to set
your drag carefully, and avoid trying to horse the fish in by palming
the spool too tightly.
Tight lines (Dacron or mono)
The Doctah
|