[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference wahoo::fishing

Title:Fishing Notes- Archived
Notice:See note 555.1 for a keyword directory of this conference
Moderator:DONMAC::MACINTYRE
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Sep 20 1991
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1660
Total number of notes:20970

797.0. "Artifical Bait vs Live Bait Fishing" by FENNEL::SLACK () Tue Jul 12 1988 15:14

    Note 792 made me think of this:
    
    While watching a PBS fishing show last Saturday the guy was saying
    that in the Adirondacks the ponds are identified/listed as either
    for artificial bait or live bait and that the right bait must be
    used in the right pond - or else...
    
    He also mentioned that many ponds are being restricted to either
    or scenarios, but not both and that the simple leisure sport of
    fishing is being more restricted.
    
    Does anyone know why states are starting to identify ponds for either
    live or articial bait?  What are the advantages/disadvantages for
    restricting ponds?  What is your preference.  Why can't live bait
    and artificial bait be used in the same pond?
    
    
    
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
797.1PERHAPS THIS IS WHY?SCOMAN::WOOLDRIDGEWorm fishermen have stiffer rodsTue Jul 12 1988 15:3011
    YO,
          It is more difficult to catch fish on artificials. The lure
    and the presentation must "fool" the fish into thinking, "humm,
    looks real, looks edible, looks good" More than likely the ponds
    you speak of are under a population control. Live bait can fish
    out a pond of certain species of fish is the population is dwindled.
    It is no guarantee, but it can help. Especially if the ponds are
    fished for eating ie; trout/salmon. Perhaps these ponds are not
    stocked either and natural reproduction is the sole source.
    
                                NIGHTCRAWLER~~~~~~~~~~
797.2License X 2NYJMIS::HORWITZBeach BagelTue Jul 12 1988 15:355
    re: .0
    
    Seems like the first step towards selling 2 licenses ;-)
    
    Rich
797.3TRASH FISH PROBLEM?GENRAL::HUNTERfrom SUNNY Colorado, WayneTue Jul 12 1988 15:4412
    	If it is anything like out West here, we have a real bad problem
    with the introduction of trash fish and etc. into clean waters by
    people fishing live bait.  Colorado has many different waters which
    you can't fish live minnows or bait in due to the effects of trash
    fish.  Might have something to do with that problem, also.  It also
    restricts and gets rid of some of the meat hunters from the water
    so that you don't have to use a 10 foot club to get to the water
    to fish.  We also have a LOT of waters that require a minimum size
    for keeping fish.  This allows the fish to grow and reproduce
    naturally.  In this case, it is MUCH CHEAPER to just stock the meat
    hunter water and give the fishermen some areas to be able to fish
    for native fish.
797.4and from the minnow came the carpSCOMAN::WOOLDRIDGEWorm fishermen have stiffer rodsTue Jul 12 1988 17:137
    YO WAYNE,
                 What's-a-matta,
                                 you don't like those minnows getting
                     dumped in Skagway or Rampart Range Rez and growing
                     up into CARP?! Who needs trout and salmon! ha ha.
    
                                                         NIGHTCRAWLER~~~~~~~
797.5It's a Plot I tell yaCASV02::PRESTONNO Dukes!!Wed Jul 13 1988 13:156
    Where have you guys been? Can't you see it's a capitalistic conspiracy
    between the live-bait monopoly and the artificial lure cartel designed
    to gain control over the monetary resources of the fishing masses
    through totalitarian oppression?
    
    
797.6WHAT HE SAID6177::WOOLDRIDGEWorm fishermen have stiffer rodsThu Jul 14 1988 14:064
    YO PRESTON,
                I could not have said it better. Commie pigs.
    
                                                    NIGHTCRAWLER~~~~~~
797.7Are PLants LIve BaitPCCAD2::RICHARDJBluegrass,Music Aged to PerfectionMon Jul 18 1988 12:438
    The indians use to crush the flowers and stalk of a mullien plant
    and place it into a pool of trout. This would temporarily intoxicate
    the trout so that they could pick them out with their hands. This
    would be considered live bait fishing, I guess. The drug isn't suppose to
    have an effect on the person who eats the fish, but remember indians
    used the bow and arrow against guns.

    Jim
797.8Live Bait in MaineCIMAMT::PANCHALThu Jul 21 1988 12:0922
    In Maine, the primary reason for designating waters as NLFAB (no
    live fish as bait) is to cut down on the introduction of rapidly
    reproducing and less desirable species (up noth that means anything
    other than trout, salmon, togue, and probably bass). There is much
    precedent for this since people were either knowingly or inadvertently
    introducing perch into small trout ponds (the result being that
    the perch spread like wildfire and the trout virtually disappeared). 
    
    Two years ago, the big news was that some idiot had dropped white
    perch (not a native Moosehead fish) into Moosehead Lake 
    (the white perch is a notoriously prolific
    breeder and tends to "take over" lakes and ponds). They fined the
    guy and I believe threw him in the slammer for a short period.
    Unfortunately, there are plenty of potential dummies ready to take
    his place. The effect on Moosehead so far is unknown.
    
    Of course, whether the law actually cuts down on undesirable fish
    introduction (seeing as it requires vigorous enforcement to really
    work) is open to debate. I've also seen people fish NLFAB waters
    with smelt or suckers that they thought they killed by tapping on
    the head once. More often than not, once they put the bait on the
    hook and cast it out it would still be swimming.