T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
686.1 | This Might Help | USRCV1::FRASCH | | Fri Apr 22 1988 11:40 | 8 |
| Don't know about your area, but in the Finger Lakes they are usually
along the edge of steep drop offs, off points and near the mouth
of streams. Lures that have been good; silver/black and silver/blue
Rapalla (floaters), Alpena Diamond (small silver spoon) silver/blue
Cleo (spoon) and any good action silver spoon about 2"long.
good luck!!!
Don
|
686.2 | | BAGELS::DILSWORTH | Keith Dilsworth DTN 226-5566 | Fri Apr 22 1988 11:40 | 4 |
| A Rapala size 7 floter in silver (7S) is the most effective lure
I have found. Use no weight and 4-6 pound test line.
Keith
|
686.3 | More ideas | SCOMAN::ZILINSKY | | Fri Apr 22 1988 12:03 | 5 |
| You might try shinners or mooselick wobblers 1/4 oz copper.
I go up to maine and catch them on shinners and seen them caught
on the mooslick wobblers.
Bartender
|
686.4 | Sprins?? Whats that??? | SKIVT::BATES | Salmo Salar | Fri Apr 22 1988 12:14 | 9 |
|
I use EVIL EYES quite a bit, and I also use the salmon type RAPALA's
or REBELS. I have heard that a lure called the "needlefish" works
pretty good,
but I haven't tried one yet. I use these off the downriggers or
planer boards. If it ever stops snowing up here in VT, I may get
a chance to go out and try some of this stuff.
RB
|
686.5 | Landlocks...Hold onto Your Hats...er Fins! | MODEL::DOWNING | | Fri Apr 22 1988 12:54 | 4 |
| Try tandem streamers such as Grey Ghost or Joe's Smelt. Also Mooselook
Wobblers, Flash-Kings, Dardevles all copper finish or Rapalas. All
the above works even better if you put them behind a dodger. See
replies on trolling techniques a few notes back.
|
686.6 | My LL opinion | VENOM::HOUTZ | | Fri Apr 22 1988 13:47 | 21 |
| Use either lead-core line (2-3 colors out), or full sinking fly
line with a fly rod. Any streamer pattern that looks like a smelt
will do the job. Gray Ghost, Joe's smelt, Rainbow smelt...all tied
as tandem streamers with maybe a few red body beads for flash.
Use a long leader (6 LB.) of maybe anywhere from 10' to 25' and
troll near structure. This includes ice pack edges, shoreline,
or drop-offs if you know where they are. Regardless, don't go out
in the middle of the lake and expect to do well unless you're real
lucky.
Fishing on Winnipesaukee is off and on right now. I had good luck
last week in Saunders Bay and the Governor's Island area with streamers
trolled at a VERY slow rate of speed with a lot of rod tip twitching.
Friends tell me they're catching quite a few smaller fish right
now. When the water warms up a few more degrees, things will improve
(the smelt start their spring runs and the salmon follow them).
Good luck,
The "Missouri Midge"
|
686.7 | Got one, anyway...! | CASV05::PRESTON | | Mon Apr 25 1988 14:21 | 55 |
| Well, since you guys were so helpful with suggestions, I ought to share
the results with you:
We left Saturday morning (I wanted to leave Friday night, but the pregnant
wife - in her delicate condition - didn't feel up to it) The weather was
perfect! I had the canoe, motor, battery, and all the gear loaded up the
night before, and off we went...
By the time we got there, unloaded, bought our licenses and set up the
canoe, it was lunch time! (Argghh!) So we had lunch... THEN it was time to
go fishing! Well, of course by then, the weather got cloudy, windy, and
kind of raw, so the little woman wasn't up for it, so the intrepid
fisherman launches off on his own to seek the mighty Land Locked Salmon! I
wasn't even out for 15 minutes when something started pulling the line off
one of the reels at a pretty good clip! Well, I fought the monster for
10-15 minutes before I figured out that I had in fact hooked something on
the bottom! At least I got it free after all that time. Oh well, exciting
for the moment...
The next 2 hours were spent learning to coordinate all that stuff out on a
windy lake, adn trolling everything I could think of, but to no avail...
(I was probably going too fast). Eventually I made my way back - against
the wind - because I was afraid I might drain the battery downwind from
home and have to paddle back against the wind (turns out I had 3/4 charge
left!). I got back and messed around near the docks for a while before
finally calling it quits due to the wind. I tied up the canoe at the dock,
and thought "Oh well, maybe I'll just cast a few off the dock before I go
in..." So I tied on a Rapalla gold and black countdown minnow and in less
than 5 minutes I spotted a salmon following it just up to the dock, but
turn away at the last moment. After trying a few more times with the
Rapalla, I switched to a cheapo 1/4oz Kastmaster lookalike that I got at
K-Mart, and a couple of casts later I had a 16" LL salmon on the line!
Yow! I should have just stayed at the dock!
He made a nice side dish to dinner that night... mmm, mmm, good!
You guys were right, silver seems to be the color. A kid caught one
from the dock a few minutes after me, on a black and silver rebel...
Thanks for all the suggestions, I know I'll be back up there again before
the season's out...
Ed
BTW, Yesterday, fishing off the dock, I saw a pretty big (18"+) fish
swimming leisurely around one particular area, as though looking for food.
I dragged everything I could think of past him, and he only showed mild
interest in a black jitterbug (by circling it) but never tried to bite
anything! Had no interest in Rapallas at all... I have no idea what he
was, except he wasn't a bass or salmon. He was kind of mottled
gray/black/silver, dark across the top, and resembled a shark, with three
sets of side fins, and two, maybe three, dorsals. I don't think it was a
catfish, because I thought they always lived on the bottom, and his mouth
didn't look as wide as a cat's. I have misplaced my little guide to
fishes, so I haven't been able to look him up. Any ideas?
|
686.8 | | VICKI::DODIER | | Wed Apr 27 1988 08:52 | 5 |
| re:-1
A sucker maybe ?????????????????? I know their in there.
RAYJ
|
686.9 | | COLORS::MACINTYRE | Don MacIntyre | Wed Apr 27 1988 09:42 | 1 |
| A lake trout possibly?
|
686.10 | Spinning equipt approach.. | CASV05::PRESTON | Better means to worse ends... | Mon May 15 1989 13:17 | 15 |
| My brother and I will be fishing for ll salmon next weekend, and
I was wondering if any of you experienced guys can comment on what
depth they will probably be at this time of year. Will they still
be near the surface, or do they go progressively deeper as time
goes by? We're hoping that they won't be too deep, since we only
have spinning equipt - no downriggers, dipsy divers, or dodgers.
I bought a couple of Rebels designed for Salmon (said "Salmon Series"
on the box, that's how I knew!) and I plan to mostly troll them
onthe surface or just below. Does this sound like and effective
startegy?
Thanks,
Ed
|
686.11 | where are you fishing? | DNEAST::DANFORTH_DAN | | Tue May 16 1989 09:31 | 9 |
|
re: .10
try some Mooselook Wobblers in silver or copper, they
seem to work real well. As far as depth it's hard to
say but usually fishing the surface or just below will
get you plenty of action. [ providing they are biting]
|
686.12 | thanks.. | CASV01::PRESTON | Better means to worse ends... | Tue May 16 1989 11:18 | 8 |
| Where? Oh, I guess I forgot to mention that little detail... We'll
be at Paugus Bay, Lake Winnipesaukee (for the Derby, of course!)
I'm glad to hear that surface fishing may do the trick. I wasn't
too keen on the idea of needing downriggers, etc...
Ed
|
686.13 | Winni Derby Report: YUK! | CASV01::PRESTON | Better means to worse ends... | Mon May 22 1989 16:12 | 18 |
| The fishing at the Winni Derby was TERRIBLE! My brother and I were out
most of the day Saturday and Sunday, and caught four fish: two bass and
two perch. The only reason we caught the bass was because we were bored
out of our gourds from trolling up-and-down-up-and-down-up-and-down, and
decided to cast a few gitzits along the shoreline. And it was HOT, 85-90
both days... yuck! The water was full of debris and rough every afternoon
from the insane boat traffic (not fisherman, the "recreational" boaters).
I spoke with some guys who were there all three days, and they caught one
small salmon on Friday, one small laker on Saturday, and one small perch
on Sunday, and they had a big boat with downriggers, special rods,
electronics, etc., etc...
Salmon fishing is B-O-O-O-O-O-RING!!! Next weekend I go BASS FISHING!
Bummed-out-Ed
|
686.14 | when they ain't hittin' it sure is boring! | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | TBD | Mon May 22 1989 16:56 | 9 |
| With the warm weather, my guess is that the water temp was probably on
the high side for lakers and salmon. In addition, the bright sunshine
tends to put the fish down. I was tempted to fish for salmon this past
weekend; instead I opted for trout (ponds and stream) fishing with no
luck. I ended up catching smallmouths instead!
Better luck next time.
The Doctah
|
686.15 | Heard the salmon fishing was tough | VICKI::DODIER | | Tue May 23 1989 09:27 | 10 |
| I have a couple friends that fished it all three days without
a salmon. He said without a down rigger he really didn't have a
chance. He could see them on the fish finder and pounded this one
spot for 3 hrs only to have a guy with a downrigger come by and
catch one on his first pass through the same spot.
One of them did happen to catch a 5lb. smallmouth so it wasn't
a complete failure.
RAYJ
|
686.16 | What do you use for salmon? | DECWET::HELSEL | A thousand points of lightwt threads | Tue May 23 1989 13:05 | 7 |
| When you folks troll for salmon, what kind of plug/setup
do you troll with.
Rayj, when you buddies were "pounding the bottom" how were they
fishing. I assume they were doing something similar to mooching???
/brett
|
686.17 | Mooching ??? | VICKI::DODIER | | Tue May 23 1989 13:44 | 12 |
| re:16
When I said they were pounding the area what I meant is that
they kept going back and forth over the same area. They didn't have
down riggers so I'm not sure how far they were able to get down.
They did have two rods with lead core line but evidently this
didn't get them down far enough either.
What is mooching ???
RAYJ
|
686.18 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | TBD | Tue May 23 1989 16:57 | 5 |
| Mooching is a method of using cut bait (herring) to catch salmon. My
understanding is that you cut the herring's head off at an angle, and
very slowly troll the "plug cut" herring or jig it. Brett?
The Doctah
|
686.19 | Interested in what your salmon bite | DECWET::HELSEL | A thousand points of lightwt threads | Tue May 23 1989 16:58 | 24 |
| I was interested in what you troll with if you use a downrigger.
In Puget Sound they use a number of things but the most common is
squid. This makes sense because there is a pretty good squid
population. But they use other lureslike Tomic plugs, which are
real popular and they use "hoochies" etc. I have never heard of
anyone trolling for salmon in these parts with a rapala. This
makes me think. I mean we're basically talking about the same
fish.
Mooching is the option to trolling. To mooch you first tie on a
weight that will take you almost straight down to the bottom. This
is a trolling shaped weight with swivels opn each end. Then you
run about 6 feet of leader back to a double hook rig which is usually
a #3 hook with a #2 hook trailing 4 inches behind. Then you use cut
plug herring. You take the herring and cut the head off at a "double
angle" so that is spins like a propeller. You want a nice tight "roll"
as opposed to a spin. Then you lower that to the desired depth and the tide
makes the herring spin. Of course there are lots of little details to this.
Would the Land Locked Salmon be considered "Kokanee"?
/brett
|
686.20 | beat me to it | DECWET::HELSEL | A thousand points of lightwt threads | Tue May 23 1989 17:19 | 4 |
| Yes. Or what the Doctah said.
/brett
|
686.21 | Different fish ??? | VICKI::DODIER | | Wed May 24 1989 10:00 | 11 |
| No, they definetly weren't mooching. They used live bait
(smelt/shiners) while drift fishing and trolled streamer flies in back
of dodgers.
I don't think the landlocks get anywhere near as big as the salmon
your fishing for. The methods you mentioned sounds more in line for
fishing for atlantic salmon out here. Someone correct me if I'm
wrong but a 3-4 lb. landlock (at least in Winni) would be considered
a big fish with most fish ranging in the 16-19" range.
RAYJ
|
686.22 | | CASV02::PRESTON | Better means to worse ends... | Wed May 24 1989 17:29 | 12 |
| I *heard* (at the donut shop - no verification) that a couple of
10 pound ll salmon had already been caught by Saturday morning in
the Derby. I'm not sure how big is considered big, but they're nothing
like the pictures I've seen of salmon out west.
Usually the water is much colder this time of year at Winni, and
the salmon fishing is much better. Trolling on the surface, when
the water hasn't warmed up much, supposedly will take salmon. I've
caught a few just casting off the dock...
Ed
|
686.23 | Salmon clarificcation | DECWET::HELSEL | A thousand points of lightwt threads | Wed May 24 1989 19:04 | 44 |
| Okay. "Out west", the record King Salmon is 93 lbs, which was
caught in Alaska about 2-3 years ago. I just saw the record
King salmon from Washington at a sportsmen's show this winter.
I think it was in the low 70's. Not a bad fish.
I'm kind of curious about this whole salmon thing now, so you guys can
help me out.
Isn't a Land Locked salmon referred to as a "Kokanee"? And isn't a Kokanee
or a land locked salmon a Coho (silver) as opposed to a King (chinook,
tyee, blackmouth etc) Salmon?
Now, isn't an Atlantic Salmon really just a cousin of the Steelhed who is
really a sea run rainbow trout?
I've seen multiple articles that have stated that an Atlantic Salmon
is more closely related to the Steelhead than the salmon.
Very confusing.
Now, to me, a 10 lbs Coho is worth fishing for. I think the biggest
Coho I've caught is around 12 lbs and I was *very* happy filleting it
at home that night (there is a law around here about filleting fish
before you get home too). I have heard of people catching much bigger
Cohos, but I have no idea what the WA record is let alone AK. AK
gets mucho big fish.
If the method of fishing for landlock salmon is with live smelt and
with a trolling weight similar to what the Doctah and I described, then
that sounds like mooching rayj (only you don't call it that)
I was interested to see that you all dsicussed fishing with rapalas etc
behind the downrigger. I have never tried this. I wonder how it would
work I'm thinking you could use real light tackle when fishing for
cohos and it would be lots of fun here.
/brett
P.S. The story on that alaska record salmon is interesting. It turns out
that biologists examined him and decided that he was in the (I think)
Kenai river (way up there) and decided that he was in the wrong place
and was on his way back down the Kenai to enter the mouth of the
Copper River. He was really from there and had erroneously took
a wrong turn.
|
686.24 | A LL salmon novice | VICKI::DODIER | | Thu May 25 1989 09:27 | 23 |
| I am by no means a land locked salmon fisherman and have only
caught a couple in my life. What I know about it is from talking
to people and watching those that are successfull.
When I was using the live smelt it was earlier in the year when
the water was cool and the salmon are near the surface. I would cast
a live shiner/smelt on a line with no weight. I let out some line
to allow the bait to get down a few feet. If it wasn't windy I would
drift fish this way. Would this be considered mooching also ???
You probably could use a weight to get the bait down to the fish
later in the year but I don't know how effective this would be trying
to troll this way.
BTW - I was using something only slightly heavier than an
ultra-light with 6 lb. test to do this. This is the same thing I
would use trolling a dodger with a tandem streamer fly in a grey
ghost, pink lady, joes smelt or similar pattern/s.
I believe on the whole that salt (brackish) water smelt are
typically larger than fresh water smelt. I have caught salt water
smelt in the 10-11" range.
RAYJ
|
686.25 | Schoodic Lake Brownville Jct. | GIAMEM::MROWKA | | Thu May 25 1989 10:30 | 19 |
|
I will be heading up to Schoodic Lake in Brownville Junction
Maine this weekend. My Granfather has a waterfront log cabin,
and he say's that this time of year is when they catch the land
locked Salmon. We are right near Knights landing (if you know the
area) I was wondering if any noters have heard any info on the
fishing there this time of year.
Also, thanks for the advise on baits and tackle. I have picked
up some copper Mooselooks, dodgers, black and silver Rapalas,
shiners and some streamers.
We will be stopping at LL Bean's on the way up do they sell
Licences?
Thanks
Johnny Roach
|
686.26 | | TYCOBB::WOOD | | Thu May 25 1989 11:11 | 24 |
| Brett,
A Landlocked Salmon is an Atlantic Salmon. They were trapped
in fresh water when the glaciers started to receed.
They have been introduced into many lakes and rivers in the
northeast, although only a few held them originally. Bioligists
can tell what body of water a Landlocked Salmon's strain originated
from as slight variations in scale numbers etc. have developed
over thousands of years. They are not the same as kokanee or
coho. In the ocean Atlantic Salmon grow frequently to weights that
aproach that of Kings although the species is generally considered
to be smaller in size on average. In lakes their size is very
dependent on the food supply available and the lakes general
size. On Lake Sunapee for instance a 4lb fish would be excellent.
On Winnipesaukee 5 or 6 lbs.. Lake Champlain a 6 - 7 lb fish would
be great, but on Lake Ontario a 12 lb fish would be something to
get more excited about (only for Landlocks as Kings in Ontario hit
40 lbs on occasion). Steelheads are sea run or lake run rainbow
trout. They grow much bigger then a rainbow that stays in a river
year round.
Marty
|
686.27 | Just too many salmon varieties | DECWET::HELSEL | A thousand points of lightwt threads | Thu May 25 1989 13:22 | 10 |
| Got it. So the llsalmon of the east are different than the ll salmon
of the west. We have ll salmon in places like Lake Cour d'Elene
in Idaho and those are called Kokanee.
Gee, I wonder if eastern salmon have red meat.
As for mooching, rayj, you don't move mooch. You just sit there
and let the current do the work. Then again, there is motor mooching.
/brett
|
686.28 | Sebago lake - they're jumpin' | LUDWIG::POFF | Fishing is a frame of mind | Wed May 31 1989 02:02 | 31 |
| A news flash, and a question-
I just got back from Sebago lake where I fished for 6 days
with lots of success! I caught 6 keepers, 3 that were too
short, and lost 3 at the boat (all but 1 of the keepers
were native btw). If anyone is interested in chasing a
few LL's, fish out of the state park right around the river
markers of the Songo. Another place that I was told was good,
even though I didn't go there, is "the second island down the
west shore. There's a shoal there that drops off to 60 feet or
more". The sizes ranged from 16 1/2" to 22", not huge, but VERY
strong and loved to break water.
I used lead-core(of course), and Dave-Davis spinners. I had
a night crawler on the end, and I trolled fast with 2 1/2
colors out. Now, what I found very interesting was that I had
no luck using smelt but the fish were full of smelt. Maybe it
was me, I don't know. But the guys that used tied on smelt,
or live smelt weren't doing as well. I don't know, but I had
a great time!!
My question-what does anyone know about tapeworm in these fish?
I talked to the ranger, and a few fisherman, and they all said
that the salmon in Sebago all had tape, and pin worm from some
bacteria, but that the meat was still edible as long as the
worms were only in the entrails. Does anyone out there know
more about this? I haven't eaten the meat yet, but I'd like
to. I'm just a little hesitant about it, considering the possible
consequences.
Leadcore (sunburned_and_sorry_I_had_to_come_back_so_soon)~8-)
|
686.29 | eat them worms! | TYCOBB::WOOD | | Wed May 31 1989 13:29 | 14 |
| My experience with LL salmon is that they all have worms in the
guts, but they are safe to eat...I've been eating them for years
without problems...I've never been to Sebago, but the fish from
Winnipeasauke, Sunapee, Lake Champlain and Lake Aziscohos all have
them. In fact so do most species that you catch, both fresh and
salt water. Many have them in the meat as well, and people eat
tons of them without knowing anybetter...cod has got to be the
worst...This really caused a problem with my SO when she found
out as she had a hard time bringing herself to eat fish for awhile...
but she's over it now...so, enjoy those salmon! They should be
great...
Marty
|
686.30 | Locations? | ROYALT::GAFFNEY | Gone fishin/racin | Mon Nov 19 1990 12:00 | 4 |
| Anyone know of any other lakes in Ma. that are stocked with
Land Locked Salmon besides Quabbin, Wachusett and Wallum?
Thanks
|
686.31 | Goose Pond in Lee, Ma. | GRAMPS::GSMITH | | Tue Nov 20 1990 12:28 | 3 |
| I believe the state used to stock LL salmon in Goose Pond in Lee...
Greg
|
686.32 | Greenwater (�Green Water?) | WFOV12::WHITTEMORE_J | Notes> Open Fly | Wed Nov 21 1990 07:55 | 13 |
|
I've been told that Greenwater Pond in Becket MA used to be stocked
with LL. Greenwater is at the roadside of Rt. 20 in Becket. There's one
DEEP hole and no public launch. It's popular for ice fishing - smelt
jigged out of Littleville are, as often as not, used as bait. There was
some question as to state stocking of a no-public-launch-site pond but
I don't know the status quo.
I've never heard of LL in Goose Pond but have taken beautiful Brown
and Rainbow both from open water and through the ice there (stick fish too).
JW
|
686.33 | Different fish / different lake | MSDOA::CUZZONE | Don't bust my cookies | Wed Nov 21 1990 15:23 | 5 |
| I heard that Kokanee Salmon were stocked in Laurel lake in Lee but last
stocking was early-mid eighties. The program was discontinued when so
few showed up in creel surveys. No one knows what happened to them.
-SSS-
|
686.34 | Access to Big Squam? | DATABS::STORM | | Fri Feb 22 1991 09:30 | 21 |
| I guess this is as good a note as any to put this in so...
Last night I read a short article in the Broadcaster (free weekly rag
in the Nashua area) that this past fall had been a record for the
number of salmon eggs collected.
What interested me the most was that a 2 year old salmon from Big
Squam avereaged 18.2 inches. From Winni, a 18.2 inch salmon was
4 years old!
I used to fish Winni a lot for salmon and had great luck. The last
few years I haven't been able to get out as much, but had much worse
luck than previous years. Has that been a general trend for others
or have I just "lost the tough"?
My real question is: Where can I lauch my boat in Big Squam? I have
4WD and a small 14' aluminum boat, so I don't need much of a ramp.
Thanks,
Mark
|
686.35 | squam lake is ok from what i hear | USRCV1::GEIBELL | NOTHIN LIKE FISH ON ! | Fri Feb 22 1991 11:25 | 37 |
|
Mark,
I have never fished big squam lake, but a couple friends have
and they told me if I do fish it be very carefull it is a very
dangerous lake the bottom is very inconsistant. there are many rock
piles which play heck on lower units.
From what they told me the access was very limited to this lake
but anythings gotta be better than winni at the present time.
Has anyone heard of the planned smelt polution coming up this spring
the F&G is planning to bombard the lakes of NH with smelt, I just hope
its not a one time deal the need to do it about 5 yrs in a row with
about 2 million smelt for the state then start worrying about getting
trophie sized salmon and lakers.
But back to squam lake they told me to head for the north end of the
lake and try and get into 60 foot of water or better and try sutton 44
c.s. or even try drifting smelt.
Mark have you ever tried Newfound lake? I spent some time there
last summer and I would definatly recomend it over winni, the access
is limited there also to only 1 launch at the marina,they dont open
till 7 am but the traffic is less th fishing is better and you can
beat the scenery there. If you do go there is a sunken Island about
200-300 yrds from the mouth of the cove at the marine almost direcly
from the mouth, it goes from 60 ft to 20 foot in no time flat so be
carefull but I took a nice 4lb salmon from there last fathers day, plus
numerous large rainbows.
good luck fishing
Lee
|
686.36 | | DATABS::STORM | | Fri Feb 22 1991 16:51 | 10 |
| Lee, thanks for the info.
No, I haven't tried Newfound. We have a vacation home in
Moultonboro, on the north end of Winni so that's where I've
fished mostly. A few years ago I could get up, catch a couple
of keeper salmon, and be home before the rest of the family woke
up in the morning.
Mark,
|
686.37 | Where are the 4&5 lbers they put in last year? | SALEM::JUNG | | Sat Feb 23 1991 07:10 | 16 |
| Last year I started fishing Winni. I was there a week before the Salmon
Derby, fished morning till night right through the tourney. And while
I didn't do bad, actually my wife and I did as good or better than
most. Biggest fish, 18 1/2 inch Salmon. For the whole week we picked
up 14 Salmon, of which about 75% were keepers, and lost 2 at the boat.
All were caught between 10 & 20 ft. Also picked up 20...er 2 lake trout
that were under size...thought they Brook Trout...kept them and were
delicious. Ignorance: ya gotta like it! Anyway, the registerable Salmon
were very few and far between (20"min) during the tournament, with
many boats coming up empty, slow, real slow.
I also went up there the last day of Salmon season last year. Brought
home 1 18"er. Picked it up on a big black Rooster Tail right on top.
I will still be looking for that trophy this year.
Jeff (Captain)
Team Starcraft
|
686.38 | | DATABS::STORM | | Mon Feb 25 1991 10:26 | 21 |
| I don't think Winni produces many big salmon. I think there is not
enough baitfish and too much fishing pressure for them to get very
big. I've been fishing Winni for about 8 years now and I've noticed
a big increase in fishing pressure on salmon with downriggers. The
biggested I've caught, or seen was around 20". That's a nice
fish, but not huge. I'm sure bigger ones are caught, but it's
a very small percentage.
I fish with light spinning gear with 4 or 6 lb test line, so it doesn't
take a huge fish to be a lot of fun. I also used to catch 2 keepers
within about 2 hours so the action was hot.
I hope you were kidding about eating undersized lakers. It takes a
long time for a laker to get large enough to spawn. I believe they
are no longer stocking lakers, so no spawners = no more lake trout.
If you were serious, you should change your nickname from "captain"
to "deck hand" until you can distiguish between a brookie and an
undersized laker.
Mark,
|
686.39 | I ain't no Poacher | SALEM::JUNG | | Mon Feb 25 1991 11:12 | 6 |
| OK , so I put myself on report...It wasn't intentional and it won't
happen again, it was my first time on the lake...take it easy on me...
Wow, you guys are tough.
Jeff (still the Captain)
Team Starcraft
|
686.40 | Pike maybe ??? | DRUID::WOOD | | Wed Feb 27 1991 12:25 | 18 |
| It seems the state is once again trying to battle the
symptons without curing the source of the problem...First,
the big lakes saw a decline in salmon populations, so they
stock massive amounts of salmon, but the salmon were/are
enemic because there's not enough smelt to go around. Now
they're going to stock smelt. I think the real problem is
the water quality in the tributaries that the smelt spawn in.
Development over the years combined with the acid rain problem
has reduced the ablity of the smelt to reproduce...Until
they cure the root problem not much is going to help. It might
be time for the bioligists to rethink the management strategies
for the time being. There's an abundance of perch in the large
lakes. Maybe putting less ephasis on salmon and attemtping
the introduction of Northern Pike would work...I'm not sure,
but flooding the lakes with smelt that probably won't reproduce
anyway doesn't seem to be the cure...
Marty
|
686.41 | more $$$$$ = GREEDINESS | USRCV1::GEIBELL | NOTHIN LIKE FISH ON ! | Wed Feb 27 1991 14:31 | 47 |
|
RE: last note
Marty,
I do see your point on the water quality of the feeder streams but
I think the F&G really messed up a few years back.
My honest opinion of the matter is that since the fishing pressure
increased the F&G wanted every fisher person to not go home empty
handed which in turn means more license sales, more good recomondations
for NH which means more out of state license sales but what it all
boils down to is that almighty $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, and the
more they get the happier they are.
but anyway back to the stocking they increased the salmon stocking
because of the heavy fishing pressure and when you boost stocking you
should also componsate with bait fish, which they didnt do.
And remember the stocked salmon are about 6" when stocked in july
usually then from oct-april no salmon can be kept so now you have about
30,000 young salmon undersize limit still in the lake that are going to
be feeding on smelt, plus the other salmon that are still there, and
you cant count the smelt dealers out either.
So all in all I think they are on the right tract with trying to
establish a producing baitfish population because if they do that lake
has great potential.
I think there was a acidic test done on the lake but it was kept
kinda quite from the puplic, but from what I found out the lake wasnt
in bad shape in that respect, part of the problem is all the boat
traffic though.
Another thing that upset alot of people is the fact that last year
F&G stocked rainbow trout in winni reason for doing this I was told
that they survive better than salmon, and as long as fishermen catch
fish they are happy and keep quite! and this was from a person at F&G!
just some food for thought.
Good luck fishing
Lee
|
686.42 | | DATABS::STORM | | Wed Feb 27 1991 15:11 | 25 |
| I'm not so sure it's just the almighty dollar at work here. The
state did make a mistake of overstocking slamon in Winni, but that
was 8+ years ago. When I first started fishing Winni, I caught 8-10
undersized fish for every keeper. The state realized the problem and
reduced the stocking back to a more normal level. I think the current
problem is more from lack of smelt than too many salmon eating them.
Water quality in the tributaries certainly sound like a possible cause.
Maybe the smelt population just cycles like many other species. I
don't know. I am not real confident about stocking more smelt without
knowing what happened in the first place, but guess it's worth a try.
I think stocking rainbows is a reasonable option. I think there is
more to it than just having *something* for a fisherman to take home.
Salmon feed almost exclusively on smelt. If the smelt population is
down for any reason, there goes the salmon. Rainbows are more
opportunistic feeders. (maybe they will feed on some of the young
perch?)
I would hope the rainbows and salmon can co-exist in the lake, but I'm
not sure. If so, the rainbows would take some of the fishing pressure
off the salmon.
mark,
|
686.43 | diff temp ranges/ forage | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Phase III: Elimination of Saddam's threat | Wed Feb 27 1991 16:19 | 6 |
| The good part about rainbows and salmon is that they seem to coexist quite
nicely. The reason for this is the difference in the comfort ranges for
each species temperature wise. The rainbows are better able to subsist on
bugs and such than the salmon, who eat smelt almost exclusively.
The Doctah
|
686.44 | just my opinion | USRCV1::GEIBELL | NOTHIN LIKE FISH ON ! | Wed Feb 27 1991 16:46 | 24 |
| Mark,
Your right they did cut back the stocking but I still think it
happened too late, it wont take long to dimminish a smelt population
when you stock heavily plus the smelt fisherman out there also.
The rainbows will survive alot better than the salmon will because
of the reasons stated in the last 2 replies but in my opinion why would
they want to stock fish into a poor food based lake your just putting
more pressure on the species that are already there.
Forage fish are doing really well there look at the bass pop. heck
on any given weekend you will probably see more bass fisherman on the
water than salmon fisherman.
I think it just took alot of complaints from sportsmen for F&G to
start doing something about it, look at the winni derby last May there
were alot of people that said they were not coming back to it, if that
derby goes down hill the state of NH will loose alot of money,
something they dont really want right now. so they are going to make
every effort to change it.
Lee
|
686.45 | I like rainbows | RANGER::MACINTYRE | Terminal Angler | Wed Feb 27 1991 17:22 | 12 |
| Ditto on the rainbow comments. I recall reading an article in the
NH F&G newsletter about F&G experimenting with stocking rainbows in
lakes that were previously set aside for lake trout and salmon. They
had a number of reasons why they were doing this, including the reasons
already stated, plus they mentioned that they are often more exciting
to catch (better fighters), can handle warmer water, stay on-top for
longer (remaining more catchable for longer perioids of time), etc...
If I think of it while at home, and can locate the article, I'll post
additional some info.
-donmac
|
686.46 | | SALEM::MERCURIO_J | $set hook/fish_on | Fri Mar 01 1991 12:21 | 11 |
| Just to add a little fuel to the fire, I heard a couple of reports
about rainbows being caught loaded with fry smallmouths. Apparently
F&G didn't want to comment on this becauase these may have be isolated
cases... The reason I know this is a friend was up there this winter
and caught a 16 inch rainbow while ice fishing and took it home to eat.
When he opened it up to clean the fish was gouged with smallmouths...
food for thought
Jim
|
686.47 | | DATABS::STORM | | Mon Mar 04 1991 10:32 | 5 |
| re:.44 Lee, I agree that the state was probably slow to react to
the overstocking. I just hope the smelt stocking will help, but will
wait and see.
Mark,
|