T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
299.1 | Truth stranger than fiction | MARY::DODIER | | Fri Mar 27 1987 11:41 | 26 |
| I use it all the time on my worms. I use Fish Formula (I think)
in the "original scent". Since then the same company puts out a
variety of scents. I started using it because a friend gave it to me.
He had tried it on a plastic rebel and the rebel bowed (warped) on
him. He wasn't sure if it was the Fish Formula or the sun but he
wasn't going to ruin any more lures to find out.
As far as it making a difference, it's hard to say. I believe
it does. If my friend uses it and I don't, he tends to catch more
fish than me. That can be caused by a lot of things though.
I remember reading an article (don't remember the magazine)
about fish scents. They sent fish up a single man made channel that
came to a fork. By putting different scents in the different forks
and noting which fork the fish took, they came to the conclusion
that certain scents "appeared" to attract fish and other scents
definetely repelled them. One of the scents that repelled fish was
human scent (skin oils). One of the scents that appeared to attract
them was human saliva (hence proving truth in what some regard a
myth).
The biggest thing about the scents seems to be the ability to
mask your scent with something that the fish appears to like. If
used to do that, probably any of the ones on the market will work.
RAYJ
P.S. I can see it now, "Hey Joe, pass me the saliva scent, will
ya !".
|
299.2 | monkey on your back | WLDWST::GARRISON | | Mon Mar 30 1987 14:41 | 6 |
| Be advised that once you catch a fish on a bait that had fish scent
on it you'll never know if it helped or not but you can't take the
chance that it didn't help. personally I don't really know if they
work but i believe that human scent will definitely scare away fish
that would normally take the bait. this is reason enough for me
to use the stuff.
|
299.3 | Student catches more than Teacher | GENRAL::HUNTER | from SUNNY Colorado, Wayne | Mon Mar 30 1987 15:41 | 16 |
| I really don't know if it works or not. I sometimes use it
and don't at others. I do know that different people's body scents
(or the soap they use or ?????) does make a difference. A case
in point:
I used to fish with my Uncle on the Blue River in the high country
of Colorado for trout. We could both fish the same stretch of water
using the same flies and drifting them the same. I could catch
more fish than he could. If I tied on the leader and flies for
him, he could out-fish me on the same stretch of river. If we swapped
rods, he could out-fish me for about 20 minutes until the scent
washed off the equipment. Then we would both catch about the same
amount of fish. If he touched the fly, he would again catch less
fish. Since he taught me how to fish, he should have been able
to catch more fish than I could. I used to wonder why he would
always let me tie on his leader and flies. I think I understand
why now.
|
299.4 | THEY WORK | FXADM::MESSIER | | Tue Mar 31 1987 10:30 | 24 |
|
I'M A believer in fish scents.last year i fished all year with fish
formular 2 and caught more bass than i had in the last four years
put together.now it could of been that i found some better ponds
to fish in,but it really does't matter cause i'll still use it this
year.there was one thing i did notice was that towards the end of
the year i wasn't catching as many bass until i switched to fish
formular crawdad scent and i started hitting more fish than i did
with fish formular 2.so this year i will use both on and off to
see which one is better throughout the year.
over the winter i read some articles on certain fish scents and
some sounded very interesting.there is a product by mann's called
fs454.it comes in a tube and it also is made in the mann's worms
<fs454 mann's worms>.this product has been around for abought 2
years and i have heard some good things about it.I will try it out
this and see how it works.
There is also a new product call DR. ELIXER. this product is
supposibly made from sex enzyms and other fish ingredients,don't
remember what though.the articles said that this stuff should work
good so i'll probably try this stuff out also.
GOOD LUCK WITH WHATEVER YOU USE.
CREATOR OF "TOBACC"
|
299.5 | don't wash | FXADM::MESSIER | | Tue Mar 31 1987 10:43 | 5 |
|
I FORGOT to say something in rep 4.
if i plan to go fishing the following morning i don't wash the night
before or the morning of fishing.i think this helps but boy will
i smell after a day of fishing.
|
299.6 | more on FS454... | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Tue Mar 31 1987 11:39 | 13 |
| More about FS454...
My understanding of this stuff is that it IS NOT a fish attractant
like Fish Formula, Berkley Strike, etc., but it is designed such
that once a bass has a bait (typically a worm) in its mouth, the
FS454 formula stimulates the bass into believing that the bait is
real and not artificial. This means that a bass will keep the bait
in its mouth slightly longer before spitting it out, thereby giving
the angler more time to set the hook. I would suggest using whatever
scent you use on top of the FS454.
-Joe- (who_wants_to_be_UPWIND_of_Mr._Messier_at_all_times!)
|
299.7 | Fish Scent | CNTROL::SWINEHART | | Tue Mar 31 1987 13:03 | 5 |
| Well, thanks for all the replys. I bought a bottle of Berkly Bass
Scent and will give it a try. I sure couldn't do any worse than
I did last year.
Dan
|
299.8 | use formula better than strike | HPSCAD::BPUISHYS | Bob Puishys | Wed Apr 01 1987 09:58 | 10 |
| After all the advise on fish formula you bought Berkley strike!!!
Trust me I did a side by side comparison with thesame worms on the
same structure at the same time. Fish Formula is better.
FS454 is great on worms. It now comes in a aerasol can.
Bassin Bob'
|
299.9 | Fish Formula vs Strike | CNTROL::SWINEHART | | Wed Apr 01 1987 11:04 | 7 |
| Re .8 --I didn't see anyone comment that one type was better than
another until too late. I thought fish formula was generic for
any scent. Maybe I'll try FS454--I have seen that one, or Fish
Formula, which I haven't seen.
Thanks,
Dan
|
299.10 | And Another One.....or two | TORA::SCHOLZ | Ron....and thanks for all the fish | Wed Apr 01 1987 11:17 | 15 |
| Bobs right, Fish Formula is the better of the two. Dr. Juice is
another one that is worth a try...very concentrated stuff, just
a drop is all you need. I think that it works as good as F.F.
I just got Wiskers Kit on a promo from Bass Pro. Don't know if it
works as well, not as well or not at all, or even better than the
others, but I will find out this year and let you all know. Maybe
someone else has already tryed this stuff????? I got five bottles
of different scents and a few worm weights with a cloth rap on them.
This where you are suppose to put a drop on. The idea is that it
will last longer. They have an entire sytem of baits that have this
little patch of cloth (looks like velcro, but it isn't) on them
for the purpose of holding the scent. We'll see........
Tight lines, Ranger Ron
|
299.11 | | ABACUS::MACINTYRE | Impatiently waiting for ice-out. | Wed Apr 01 1987 11:33 | 8 |
| Strike is also a pain to put on. I bought a bottle last year that
ended up going bad (What a STENCH!) becuase I didn't use it all. You
have to squeeze it onto everything. They sell lettle foam pellets
that are supposed to hold the scent well, but I never used them
either. Fish Formula and others in the spray bottles, are much
easier to use (although you do tend to waste more).
Don Mac
|
299.12 | Give me a break! | GRAMPS::LASKY | | Wed Apr 01 1987 17:05 | 15 |
| Fish Scent, you guys have to be kiddin!!
I really don't want to start any long winded arguments but it seems
to me that you guys will do almost anything to catch fish. What
ever happen to fishing without depth finders, fish scents, and fish
eggs!!
If catching fish is your only objective well then fine, but for me
I recieve as much enjoyment from the sun, the hunt, and the outdoors.
Last but not least if your goal is to catch as much fish as possible
then at least practice CATCH and RELEASE!
Bart Lasky
|
299.13 | | JAWS::WIERSUM | | Wed Apr 01 1987 17:41 | 10 |
|
Bart, Bart, Bart, Read more of this file. We strongly advocate
catch and release. re: all the toys, give us a break! What else
is there to spend money on?
Garry (the guy who swore he woudn't buy another reel this year)
Oh yeh, game fish II makes graet after shave lotion!!
|
299.14 | "Just read and laff Bartsky" | MTBLUE::BLUM_ED | | Thu Apr 02 1987 08:22 | 11 |
|
RE: .12......Bartsky......These are Bassassassins...remember. The idea
is to hook em and drag em in as fast as possible..hopefully fast
enuf to win "bucks"...the faster they are dragged, the "better"
the "fisherman"...darn good thing bass are so easy to catch!!!!!
Cheers
"Ed, who's wearing NOMEX today!"
|
299.15 | A Little Understanding Goes a Long Way | CANDY::MERCURIO | | Thu Apr 02 1987 11:15 | 37 |
| Bart,
I just had to put a word in here to defend the use of all the
"things" we use to catch those bass.
1] Unlike yourself, I'm not out there for fresh air and sunshine
(if I want that, I can stay in my back yard watching the lawn grow)
I'm out to catch fish (usually bass).
2] The use of the tools only enhances the catch experience not
necessarly the numbers of fish caught. The "numbers" we catch depends
mostly on how we apply the expertise and confidence when using these
"things". We have no guarantee of success.
3] I view these tools and techniques as a smorgsabord, to be picked
over and used as I feel like. If I have confidence in them and
they work for me than I use them. If not I don't scoff at others
who choose to, or not to use them for the same reason. At any rate,
it certainly is fun to listen to the experiences and to see what
conclusions people draw from them and how inventive they are in their
uses.
4] The best part of fishing is that even though we're doing the same
thing it can be done differently and the experience and the results
are always a suprise! (Heck, afterall fish are really stupid and
will hit just about anything you wish to throw at them!!!)
I hope this has shed some light on the whole subject and you
can go away with a better feeling of us fellow "fisherpersons" than
you started with according to your comments.
Remember "always catch and release"
Jim
|
299.16 | ditto | ABACUS::MACINTYRE | Impatiently waiting for ice-out. | Thu Apr 02 1987 11:22 | 4 |
| Yea! You tell `em Jim
Don Mac Don't the fly's legs fall off when ya tie that little
hook on????? 8^)
|
299.17 | It works | CUERVO::GATH | | Thu Apr 02 1987 12:09 | 16 |
| Fish Scents..
I'm not sure if they catch fish or not but one thing I am sure of is
that they catch fishermen....
But maybe that's all the product was designed to catch.
Are you sure you guys don't have a mark out side your house
someplace???
Maybe on the fence, or the door. Do you seem to have a lot of sales
men coming to your door???
IT is just another way of packaging snake oil.
Bear,
|
299.18 | All those formulas are useless! | AIMHI::FLETCHER | Who's running this place, anyway? | Thu Apr 02 1987 13:50 | 17 |
| Hey, you guys, I heard Mr. Doug "professor" at the Worcester Show
say that those formulas and concoctions have never worked for him.
He even said he did a test with some of the concoctions, fishing
a "loaded bait" and an "unloaded bait" and he found NO DIFFERENCE.
So he doesn't use any of that stuff! So you all are just wasting
your money.
I used Strike last year and I didn't see any difference myself.
I'm switching to Fish Formula.
Cris (hear that Joe?) 8-)
|
299.19 | I hear they got the cloaking device! | BCSE::JAHNS | Dean Jahns @MKO | Fri Apr 03 1987 10:23 | 15 |
|
re: .15
Have to agree. If it "enhances" the sport and catches more fish,
do it!! In fact why stop at scents, sonar, and 150hp rigs. Seining
would catch even more fish, and if that fails (shy little buggers
hiding behind logs and what not) stun grenades will bring 'em out.
What Sport !! _ _
( O O )
<
\____/
|
299.20 | | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Fri Apr 03 1987 10:50 | 8 |
| Ole Coonass offered the following idea some time ago...
*** USE DY-NO-MITE ! ***
P.S. He practices "BLAST 'n RELEASE"
|
299.21 | How times have changed, or have they ? | VICKI::DODIER | | Fri Apr 03 1987 11:51 | 17 |
| I wonder if the first spinning outfit got the same type of
response. I could just imagine a conversation of old going something
like,
(Some time in the past.....)
Yep Jed, this guy next ta me had one o' them thar new fangled
spinning outfits. What a waste o' money. I outfished em 3 ta 1 with
my ol' cane pole.
(The present.....)
Ya Joe, ya shoulda seen the look on this guys face when I held
up my stringer. Here I am in my canoe and this guys got a $20,000+
Ranger with the works and he didn't catch anything.
RAYJ
|
299.22 | New guy on the block | TARKIN::GOODY | | Fri Apr 03 1987 13:37 | 17 |
|
I had to put my two cents in here because I feel strongly about
this......
re.15 and .19
Hey, use what you like. The REAL important thing about this
whole business is the feeling you get being out on the water
or next to a stream shore and what happens to you when that
line starts moving around under the water.........
That's what it's all about --isn't it?
To each his own.......
But if I ever catch you messing up the place......
There will be HELL to pay.
Use what works for you and have fun,
Mike
|