T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
271.1 | I LOVE EM | FXADM::MESSIER | | Fri Mar 06 1987 12:56 | 24 |
| < GO ELECTRIC >
HAVE YOU EVER tried to start a gasoline motor in a canoe and the
motor won't start.the canoe starts rocking and the next thing you
know is that your swimming with the fish.i like electric because
it is less frustrating,less noisy,and is lighter to carry.if you
like to troll, its best with a electric with a variable speed thrust
also the constant sound of the trolling motor has been known to
attract fish.gasoline can be a problem if you get it on your hands
it might meen the differance of you catching any fish.you will also
find that trolling motors are far cheaper.a 20-25 lb thrust should
let you go as fast as you want in a canoe.if your the type to fish
long hours 10-16.then i would suggest that you get a maximizer
also.buy the biggest deep cell you can find and match the motor
accordingly.what i mean by this is that each motor will eat up a
surtain amount of juice according to the lb thrust.try to find a
motor that does more lb thrust than than juice.for instance mine
is twenty lb thrust and at twenty it only uses 18 amps of juice.
i hope this helps some.
creator of "tobacc"
|
271.2 | ELECTRIC MOTORS ARE THE BALLS! | BURREN::WATERSJ | THE LEGEND OF THE LAKES | Fri Mar 06 1987 14:15 | 27 |
| I own a 15' Mansfeild Canoe and a 14lb thrust sigma! I picked the
motor up two years ago for $50.00 at Zyla's. I love having the motor!
I've own a canoe since the age of 15 and I don't know what I did before
I got the motor! I never use my anchor! I just fish the shore line and
when I drift away from the HOT spot I just flick the switch and it moves
me right back to spot I want to fish! They are great to have when you
hang a lure up and you need to get to it! If you've never tried holding
a rod and trying to steer a 15'canoe with one hand on the paddle against
a choppie water surface you haven't lived! When I launch the canoe,
instead of paddling to the desired spot I lock the motor down so I'm
headed in the general area then I have time to rig my rods before getting
to the spot. Electric is the way to go! I extended the cable coming out
of the motor which allows me to place the battery under the front seat!
This helps keep the front of the canoe in the water!
John
|
271.3 | never again | ANYWAY::WAITKEVICH | | Fri Mar 06 1987 14:37 | 2 |
| re .2
Motors are also nice if you just want to take a ride.
|
271.4 | Weee...what a breeze! | BURREN::WATERSJ | THE LEGEND OF THE LAKES | Fri Mar 06 1987 14:43 | 3 |
| Why not go for a ride! You weren't catching anything!
The U boat captian
|
271.5 | | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Fri Mar 06 1987 16:39 | 9 |
| I started out a couple of years ago by buying an ESKA 14 lb. thrust
for my canoe and took it up to the Merrimack River in Hooksett above
the damn. The combination of the current and a little headwind
made upriver travel almost impossible. I flew down river. So I
took it back and stepped up to an ESKA 25 Lb. thrust and now I can
battle the rapids (well...almost). With 2 people on board, I can
still move right along. I love it!
-Joe-
|
271.6 | Go Electric | TORCH::MACINTYRE | Impatiently waiting for ice-out. | Sat Mar 07 1987 13:23 | 18 |
| I have had both, and for fishing, the electric is *much* better.
The outboard is much too noisy and clumsy for fishing.
The only time the outboard worked better was when I was traveling
a fair distance with 2 people aboard. When the wife and I wanted
to go for a joy ride, the power of the outboard won hands down.
(although Minn Kota now has 3 and 4hp elecs!)
That point about trying to start an outboard is a *good* one,
especially when your alone, REAL tipsy. An electric is also
much more reliable.
If and when you get a larger boat, you can turn the head around
and slap it up front for a trolling motor. I bounce mine back and
forth between Ol' Stump Jumpa and the canoe all the time.
Don Mac
|
271.7 | get an electric | HPSCAD::WHITMAN | boves::whitman MRO1 297-4898 | Mon Mar 09 1987 08:56 | 25 |
| I also have tried both an electric and a Gas motor. I've got an
Evinrude 2hp outboard and a Sigma 12 lb electric. The only advantage to the
gas engine is that once you're out of juice (gas in this case) it only takes a
few minutes to refill the tank and you're on your way again. However when you
run out of juice in the electric, you're paddling for a few hours while the
battery recharges.
The biggest disadvantage of the gas engine is that you have that 15 -
25 lb off to one side of your canoe (if you're like me and have a standard
stern) and high (above the gunwale) which throws your trim all out of whack.
My outboard is direct drive (no neutral) so as soon as the engine starts it
gets the canoe moving. This creates some tense moments at times. Contrastingly
the bulk of the weight of the electric is in the battery and will be low in the
boat, and as pointed out in a previous reply probably up front to help keep
your bow down.
I use the gas engine only on calm days when I want to do a lot of
cruising. The hassle and noise of the gas engine in all other situations just
is not worth it. I have found in the wind that I would rather fight with a
paddle than screw around with trying to get the engine started under those
conditions.
Good luck with your new electric...
Al
|
271.8 | What's in a brand name? | MORRIS::MLOEWE | Low_in_sugar Low_in_salt..Lowenbrau | Mon Mar 09 1987 08:59 | 7 |
| Thanks for all the replies. Sounds like electric is the way to
go. Are all electric motors pretty good, or are there some I should
stay away from?
3 and 4hp electrics???? Must take *some* juice to power them.
Mike_L
|
271.9 | Enough to get you up on a plane | TPVAX3::DODIER | Dead tomycods don't wear plaid | Mon Mar 09 1987 10:24 | 23 |
| Someone in an earlier reply mentioned a maximizer. These are
supposed to extend the amount of running time on a battery
dramatically. They are also not cheap (about $99). The way they
work is instead of supplying steady current, they send pulses. The
pulses are so fast, they are not even noticed by the electric motor.
You may wish to hold off on one of these as I am starting to see
electric motors with maximizers built right into them.
Some of the new electric motors are really getting upgraded to
state of the art. I was just looking at Pluegers (sp?). They range
from 25-50 lb. thrust. They also have a built in battery charge
indicator, time of day clock, water temp., and stall indicator. These
are all LCD displays on the top of the motor head. It also has a built
in maximizer. Very sharp looking unit and 50 lb. thrust is impressive.
Unless you intend to tow water skiers behind your canoe though, 14-22
lb. thrust is plenty.
As far as a motor mount goes, I built my own out of scrap wood.
It was very easy, very cheap, and saved me about $100. If you want
more info, send me your mail stop and I'll send you some rough plans.
RAYJ
|
271.10 | MINKOTA | FXADM::MESSIER | | Mon Mar 09 1987 13:17 | 8 |
|
I have heard alot of minkota and all good.although i own a diehard,
i have had no problem with it.I would go with a minkota.They seem
to be better built and you will find there price range can't be
beat.they start from aprx.$99-259 and come with all kinds of options
to suit your needs.I hope this helps.
creator of " TOBACC "
|
271.11 | more ponds to fish | BEES::HARACKIEWICZ | Stan Harackiewicz (MLO) | Tue Mar 10 1987 12:24 | 6 |
| Another reason for electric over gas (that I haven't seen in these
replys) is that on some ponds gas motors are not allowed..ELECTRIC
is. Thus more ponds to fish !!!!!!!
stan
|
271.12 | Electric is the way to go! | MORRIS::MLOEWE | Low_in_sugar Low_in_salt..Lowenbrau | Tue Mar 10 1987 12:46 | 7 |
| You make a good point Stan, one of favorite fishing holes last year
was one with no gasoline engines allowed since it is owned and operated
by the MDC. This is especially great during the summer months when
there's just too many boats tearing the big lakes up. You can fish
all day in a great and peaceful setting.
Mike_L
|
271.13 | HOW LONG?? | HEFTY::LEMOINEJ | ANOTHER VIEW | Tue Mar 10 1987 14:14 | 8 |
| What I'd like to know is on an average, how long will say a
17lb thrust electic run ,using your average deep cell battery
and the motor being run at full speed...
JjL
|
271.14 | recharge tip | CAD::BROPHY | | Tue Mar 10 1987 14:28 | 13 |
| re .13
I can usually get about 6 hours of trolling, with my 15' Coleman
and 20 lb. Shakespeare set at 2 or 3 depending on the wind. when
the charge does eventually die, We paddle back to the truck, start
it up, disconnect the truck battery and connect the die hard. We
then have a couple of pops,and fish from shore for about 20 minutes.
this usaally gets us about 3 more hours of trolling.
So far its been working like a champ.
Good luck
Mike
|
271.15 | Remote Control Question | WORSEL::DOTY | ESG Systems Product Marketing | Tue Mar 10 1987 14:46 | 12 |
| I've been looking at the new Minn Kota remote control unit -- the
one that has an electric remote at the end of a wire. This unit
is the 65 series motor (28 lb thrust), with built in maximizer and
the remote control.
The remote control is a small box that allows foot control of the
steering, and is at the end of about a 20 foot lead.
It looks like this would be a great motor for canoes -- does anyone
have any experience or thoughts on the subject?
Russ Doty
|
271.16 | about this long<-------> | FXADM::MESSIER | | Tue Mar 10 1987 14:50 | 15 |
| REP.13
acording to the manual i got with either the motor or battery,i
don't remember which.IT said that i could get 5 hours of trolling
at 20 lbs thrust and 22 hours at 5 lb thrust.I usually start out
with a high thrust,maybe 15-20lb to get to were i want to fish then
i practilly stop it and and drift leaving the thrust at maybe 1-2lb
thrust and move along the shore that way.I perfer to keep the engine
running very low so that when you start to drift the wrong way,you
need only to use your elbow on the steering columm to straighten
you out again.I normally fish for at least ten hours at a time and
have not run out of juice yet.I always charge as soon as i get home.
ps when does wachussetts open?
creator of "tobacc"
|
271.17 | variable speeds | FXADM::MESSIER | | Tue Mar 10 1987 15:07 | 12 |
|
I forgot to mention in .16 is that in order to save extra power
you must have a variable speed not a 3 or 5 speed.with the speeds
set up for factory specs they will draw a certain amount of amps
per speed.also with a variable speed you can cut down on the amps you
use by going as slow as you want providing that it is not too windy.
I'm not a expert on trolling but i would think that the variable
speed would serve a better purpose in finding the speed you need
to be at.from what i have seen trolling motors with fixed speeds
usually start at 3 or 5lb thrust and when starting these motors
at 5 lb thrust it may jolt the canoe and scare the crap out of the
guy that doesn't expect it.
|
271.18 | batteries | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Tue Mar 10 1987 15:07 | 24 |
| I've gone 8 hours and longer with my 24 lb thrust ESKA on my canoe
and still had plenty of juice left for a "high speed" (??) run back
to the dock. I use an 80 amp/hour battery and I don't think I've
ever drained it down more than half way. Most of my fishing is
stop 'n go with very few hi-speed runs, so there's very little battery
drain.
If you plan to do a lot of trolling or travel some distance, I'd
suggest investing in the 105+ amp/hour batteries. Although they're
a little heavier, you'll get about 20-25% additional use per charge
from it. For those of you that are considering an electric, DON'T
skimp on the battery! And DON'T use a conventional car battery.
They are designed to provide heavy current drains for short periods
of time, not lower current drains over sustain periods of time.
You need to get a battery designated as a "deep cycle" battery.
A deep cycle battery is specifically designed for elec. motors and
if properly maintained, can be recharged many, many times. Car
batteries can't take repeated recharging.
By the same token, you shouldn't use a deep cycle battery to start
your gas motor. It isn't designed to take heavy current drains
that a starter motor requires. You can quickly destroy the battery.
-Joe-
|
271.19 | vari-speed motors! | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Tue Mar 10 1987 15:13 | 8 |
| re .17
That's what I like about my Eska...it's variable spped. I can set
the speed down to where the prop is just barely turning. This makes
it real easy to crawl along or simply hold my position in a head
wind or current. It's great!
-Joe-
|
271.20 | $.02 worth times 2 | TPVAX3::DODIER | Dead tomycods don't wear plaid | Tue Mar 10 1987 15:29 | 23 |
| re:13
The ball park figures given so far (4-6 hours) are probably
close. I just got a new deep cycle battery. I was using a car battery
and getting about 3 hours running time from that.
There are a lot of variables in affect here. Weight of the canoe,
surface area of the bottom, payload weight, wind conditions, battery
size (in amps), and motor current draw. The sears diehard's come
with a little chart on the side and indicate how long each of their
batteries lasts while drawing 1,5,10,15,20,25, or 30 amps (as I remember).
This will allow you to select the battery size to fit your needs.
Although I did mention I used a regular car battery, this is
not recommended unless you have a battery that you don't care about.
Car batteries are not designed for this type of use.
re:15
The motor your talking about involves a flat area to mount it.
It is set up to be bow mounted. You could probably find a way to
mount it on a canoe but it wouldn't really be worth it. I may be
mistaken but I only remember that box having steering and an on/off
switch. If it does not have the speed control also, I wouldn't buy
it for a regular size boat, never mind a canoe.
RAYJ
|
271.21 | wachusetts | AKOV75::SHANAHAN | I'd rather be fishin' | Tue Mar 10 1987 16:05 | 4 |
| re.16
Wachusetts opens april 1st.....if the ice is out....
Denny
|
271.22 | High Speed Run? 8^) | TORCH::MACINTYRE | Impatiently waiting for ice-out. | Tue Mar 10 1987 16:24 | 7 |
| The point on the type of speed control is a good one...
For a canoe, I'd reccomend an elec with a variable speed control,
my 21lb Mercury Thruster is a 5 speed, and the lowest speed is still
a bit too much for the canoe. A Maximizer would allow total speed
control, as well as prolonging battery life, but that's rather costly.
Don Mac
|
271.23 | RECHARGE IT! | BURREN::WATERSJ | THE LEGEND OF THE LAKES | Wed Mar 11 1987 09:20 | 6 |
| Regardless of how long you use your troll motor on any given
fishing trip its a good idea to throw the battery on the charger
and bring it back up to the fully charged range!
This will help extend the life of the battery;-)!
John
|
271.24 | Which one do I choose? | MDKCSW::HICKS | Chas Hicks | Thu Mar 12 1987 18:11 | 37 |
| I, too have been looking for a motor for my canoe for a while.
I have a Merrimack 13' (that I bought while in N.H.) that I use
to fish out of all the time. So last nite I toured then entire
circuit here (K.C., Ks. now) shopping around for a motor and battery,
using all the aquired knowledge from this note about what to get.
What I found, in my (wife's) price range was: 1) Sears 20 lb thrust
VARIABLE speed motor for $149; or for the low end 2) MinKota 35
(17 lb thrust) for about $88 (but is 4 or 5 speed - not variable).
The best I found on a medium sized battery was a 105 amp deep cycle
RV/Marine battery for $44.
My real question at this point is it worth the extra $60 for the
variable speed (assuming 20 lb thrust vs 17 lb thrust for a canoe
isn't critical)? When I compare the 4 speed range on the MinKota
to what I have now (paddle, cast, paddle into wind, cast, drop anchor
to hold position, pull anchor, paddle like crazy, cast, cast....)
any mechanization has got be wonderful!!
CAN I ASSUME that 17 lbs vs 20 lbs thrust is negligible? I figure
my gross weight (canoe, self, battery, motor, gear) will be around
400-425 lbs. I would imagine that 17 lbs of thrust will get me
across a given distance at a pretty good clip.
By the way, how fast does one of these electric motors push a canoe
along?
thanks... --chas {Flatlander_who'll_be_on_the_lake_come_Sat}
ps: re: note 265 - I bought a Hummingbird 3004 and mounted it on
a board. I bought two 6v lantern batteries and wired them in series,
mounted the trasnducer on a 1/2 x 1-1/2 and C-clamped that to the
side of the canoe... all works great! What a difference an LCR
can make in your fishing! I would encourage anyone who has not
used one to budget for one - pronto! Thanks for feedback from everyone
on the LCR's...
--chas
|
271.25 | I'd go for the Minn Kota | TPVAX3::DODIER | Dead tomycods don't wear plaid | Fri Mar 13 1987 07:54 | 21 |
| I fish with a 14 lb. thrust, 3-speed shakespere. I weigh about
200 lbs. and my friend about 170 lbs.. I fish out of a 15' fiberglass
canoe and we each bring gobs of tackle along with at least 1 six
pack of Bud bombers (standard equipt.). The motor pushes us along
fine.
As far as the variable speed goes, you can only hold against
a wind if it's blowing constantly. If it's gusting, your still going
to go forwards and back unless you keep adjusting the motor. I think
the one big advantage with the variable speed is being able to fine
tune your trolling speed. If however you just want to be able to
work slowly up/down a shore line, the 3-5 speed will be fine.
Personally, the extra 3 lbs. of thrust and the variable speed
are not worth it to me. The price on the Minn Kota is a good one
and I'd take that. The battery price sounds excellent. You won't
find either much cheaper.
RAYJ
BTW - By next year, I expect the maximizers to be around $70. If
you really want variable speed, you can always pick up one of these
and also get the benefit of longer battery life.
|
271.26 | ITS UP TO YOU | FXADM::MESSIER | | Fri Mar 13 1987 10:09 | 19 |
|
ITS always nice to have a little extra power when needed.having
to little power may be a disavantage.If for some reason you need
extra power,well you will have it.if you buy the lower lb thrust
and need extra power your out of luck.the variable speed i think
you will find handy.In certain circumstances you will prabably not
want to move very fast along the shore line and thats when the variable
speed is at its best.for the money you are spending on the 17 lber
vs the 20 lber is quite a differance and you could buy yourself
some new gear and wait for next year when the maximizers come down
in price.the 17lb will be fine for a year and then maybe you might
want to get more power.the decision is up to you.
by the way are you talking about the diehard battery.i bought
the 105 amp and spent $90.the battery weighs 61lbs.I like the way
it lets you know how much time you got left on it.
creator of "tobacc"
|
271.27 | | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Fri Mar 13 1987 10:47 | 25 |
| I think I mentioned this earlier, but I'll repeat it. I first started
out with a 14lb thrust Eska for my 14' Old Town canoe. The first
time I tried it was on the Merrimack River above the falls in Hooksett.
The combination of the current and only a slight headwind made it
VERY difficult to make much headway up river. I returned it and
got a 24lb Eska and it made a BIG difference.
It also has variable speed which I love. Both DonMac and Cris Fletcher
bought the 22lb thrust Merc Thrusters, and I know on Cris' canoe
that even the low speed setting (non-variable) moves the canoe too
fast for simply trying to "creep" along of fight a head wind. Chris
is always turning it off and on to position his canoe. For a larger
and heavier boat, it probably would be fine, but for the lightweight
canoe, variable speed seems to make more sense.
I did build a resistor pack for Cris' Merc to drop the voltage and
it works pretty good. Whenever he wants lower speeds, he simply
clamps it onto the battery post and switches one of the power leads
to the motor to put it in series. Once in place, he has 4 low speeds,
all of which are lower than the normal low speed without it. The
only problem is that because they are power resistors designed to
reduce voltage, they do get quite hot, bit at least he can "crawl"
along.
-Joe-
|
271.28 | You Need To Heat Sink Those Resistors | CANDY::MERCURIO | | Fri Mar 13 1987 12:12 | 9 |
| There's got to be another way to reduce the speed of an electric
motor other than using resistors. That heat your feeling is power
being consumed which could better be utilized by the motor later
in the day when the battery or batteries are running low. Does any
one of you electronic wizards out there know a better way of
accomplishing the same thing without power resistors?
Jim
|
271.29 | Maximizer=SCRs | GENRAL::HUNTER | from SUNNY Colorado, Wayne | Fri Mar 13 1987 12:25 | 9 |
| Yup, the other way is the same way the Maximizer does it. Send
a variable frequency pulse to an SCR. Could probably be designed
without too much effort. LM555, darlington pair, and SCR, box to
house it in, heat sink, cables and clamps. Probably around $25.00
in parts. (A lot of cost of the Max. is in safety and testing.)
Am looking at the possibility of designing one for myself. If I
do, will make the plans available to all with disclaimer that I
am not liable for any screw-ups by manufacturers and am not selling
the device.
|
271.30 | A trolling we a go | MORRIS::MLOEWE | Low_in_sugar Low_in_salt..Lowenbrau | Mon Mar 16 1987 09:47 | 14 |
| I was just in Sears over the weekend looking at their Die Hard electric
trolling motors. According to their display, a way to figure out how much
thrust you need is to count on at least one pound of thrust for every 100
pounds of weight. This includes boat, equipment and passengers. If this
is true, then a 15 pound thrust electric trolling motor is good for a boat
and everything, everyone in it for up to 1500 pounds. This is plenty for
a canoe. A canoe up to full capacity including its own weight would still
be less than 700 pounds. In fact, I'm even wondering if I get the 15 pound
thrust for my canoe, will it be still too fast for trolling even on the
lowest setting. Any comments on this? 271.27 mentioned something already.
Would the 20 pound variable thrust motor set at the lowest setting troll
slower than the "fixed" low setting of the 15 pound thrust?
Thanks,
Mike_L
|
271.31 | 14-15 lb.thrust is fine! | BURREN::WATERSJ | THE LEGEND OF THE LAKES | Mon Mar 16 1987 10:57 | 8 |
| I think it will be fine! I have a 14 lb. thrust SIGMA that I bought
at Zyla's a few years back for $50.00 and when I have it set on
the low speed its at a real slow crawl! 14-15 lbs. of thrust will
be plenty! My canoe is 15' and it moves it just fine! Although
you may have to help it along with a paddle in a strong wind. That
has happened only once to me.
John
|
271.32 | | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Mon Mar 16 1987 11:14 | 18 |
| If you buy an electric w/variable thrust, then it shouldn't make
any difference what the max is because you can "throttle-down" to
next to nothing. My 24lb thrust Eska (they also make the Sears
units) has vari-throttle and I can turn it down to a point where
I can count the rpms...it goes slow.
As I mentioned earlier, as long as you don't plan to battle river
currents or headwinds, then 14lb should be enough.
Speed?? Well...I can't say that my 24lb Eska will tow any water
skiers but it moves my Old Town with 2 people along at a nice clip.
Certainly it has put some of the more remote spots within distance
where I would not have considered paddling to them before getting
the electric.
-Joe-
|
271.33 | Fast trolling in Maine | MTBLUE::BLUM_ED | | Wed Mar 18 1987 05:18 | 6 |
|
Nevah go too fast for trolling in Maine in any canoe..they troll FAST up
heah.
E
|
271.34 | remote pedals worth getting? | CSSE::PETERSEN | | Wed Mar 18 1987 13:06 | 2 |
| Has anyone had any experience with the remote foot pedals?
Which are good, bad or are they worth the extra $$ ???
|
271.35 | not on my canoe... | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Wed Mar 18 1987 13:40 | 20 |
| At first, I thought the idea of having an electric motor mounted
up on the bow of a canoe with a remote control sounded like a good
idea. But the more I thought about it, the less I liked it.
A lot of my fishing is done in v-e-r-y weedy waters, and despite
the weed basket, it still gets clogged up. I don't particulary
care to try to move from the stern of the canoe up to the bow and
then try to raise the electric to clear weeds. I've got far too
much $$$ invested in my gear to chance flipping the canoe. Also,
you end up running "blind" in that you can't see rocks, logs etc.
in the water. You'll hit them before seeing them.
On the other hand...if you meant a remote pedal while the motor
is stern mounted next to you, I think you'll find the control cables
will get in your way. Besides, I don't have enough floor space
at my feet to accommodate my tackle boxes, rods, and my big feet
as it is!
-Joe-
|
271.36 | not on your life | HPSCAD::WHITMAN | boves::whitman MRO1 297-4898 | Wed Mar 18 1987 15:00 | 13 |
| I've got a MinnKota on the bow of my bass boat with a remote foot pedal
control and there is no way in hell I'd be able to turn the motor from a seat
at canoe level. The new ones with the motorized control may be different, but
on mine while underway you sometimes got to stomp on that pedal to get her to
turn. If your idea of a 'remote control' is just an on-off switch with a hand
steering handle then I'd say sure no problem ( a dimmer switch for a car works
great). If you are like me and tend to stand in the canoe a lot I'd still say
no way on the remote steering foot pedal because of the balance problem (unless
you're good a standing on one foot in your canoe while cast and retrieve).
Just my observations...for what ever it's worth.
Al
|
271.37 | ohh my achin back! | CSSE::PETERSEN | | Wed Mar 18 1987 15:03 | 11 |
| The main reason that I am considering a remote (for my coleman Scanoe)
(that is the canoe with the motor mount capable of up to a 5 hp
motor) is that I get a wicked cramp in my back from being sorta
half way twisted around steering, with winds and currents I find
that I'm always adjusting the direction of the motor.
I am also going to look into mounting a cushioned swivel seat to
give me some back support (and more hours of relaxed fishing).
Are some remotes more sensitive than others?
Erik.
|
271.38 | | HPSCAD::BPUISHYS | Bob Puishys | Wed Mar 18 1987 15:19 | 5 |
| The try the new MinKota witht the telephone cable remote. It turns
with the aid of a motor not from cable turning.
Bassin' Bob
|
271.39 | outfitting a $400 canoe with$2000 gear? | CSSE::PETERSEN | | Wed Mar 18 1987 15:38 | 5 |
| I saw an add for that and it sounds GREAT, but does it work well??
Also I got the impression that it would cost mucho bucks $$$$$$$
and maybe run down the battery quicker?!
Any idea on the price range for that minnkota remote remote?
|
271.40 | Minn Kota 765mx | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Wed Mar 18 1987 16:08 | 23 |
| The new MinnKota 765mx sells for $297.97 thru Bass Pro Shops and
has a Maximizer built-in to extend battery life. The only thing
is...it's designed to be mounted on the bow of a boat and requires
a small mounting deck or platform. Definitely not intended for
canoes. However, I could have sworn that I saw a Minn Kota ad that
showed a stern mounted model with the same remote control system,
but no one seems to know anything about it...not even Bass Pro.
As far as running the battery down quicker....it has to draw additional
current because the shaft is turned by an additional motor. However,
because the Maximizer is also built-in, I'd suspect that battery
life might be close to the same as a normal unit.
Re: your scanoe. Even though your motor is stern mounted and requires
that you "turn around" to control the motor, why not consider using
a conventional side-mounted bracket used on regular canoes. That
would place the motor almost next to you and require little turning
around. The way I see it, a swivel seat half swung around so you
can control the motor places your front-to-back body movement in
such a way that it might be very easy to tip the canoe (did that
make any sense?).
-Joe-
|
271.41 | defeating the purpose?! | CSSE::PETERSEN | | Wed Mar 18 1987 16:39 | 9 |
| Does a side mounted motor act much differently than a rear or bow
mounted one? ie. would it be harder to troll in a straight line
with it mounted on the side like that?
This sounds like a good idea, but I feel kinda stupid because I
mainly bought this kind of canoe due to the "flat back", as long
as I can troll comfortably I'll be very happy, and be out all day
instead of a few hours!
Erik.
|
271.42 | try this | FXADM::MESSIER | | Wed Mar 18 1987 16:52 | 23 |
|
REP.37
ERIC,these are my crazy suggestions to you.first i'll ask you,is
the motor centered in the middle.IF it is i would suggest that you
put it to the furthest side possible to what ever arm you use to
steer it.
second.this will sound crazy but you asked.at the very tip of
the throttle drill a small hole through it.attach a bar long enough
that it will sit under your arm pit or maybe further.it would depend
on what would make you comfortable.slip a cotter pin through the
bar and throttle and you have just made yourself an extension.you
will have to look at your throttle and make sure that the hole thing
turns before drilling any holes.the great thing about the cotter
pin is that you will have all controls on speed as well as direction
also you can take it off when you want.
let me know from anyone else out there if they think that this
can work.I have not tried this because i don't own a canoe.I thought
of this idea as i read the note .37. I hope that this will help
some.
creator of "tobacc"
|
271.43 | maybe a remote steering wheel? ;-) | CSSE::PETERSEN | | Wed Mar 18 1987 17:12 | 14 |
| I haven't bought a motor yet, but will keep that extension idea
in mind. As far as mounting it towards the side, I don't know
if i can do that cause it has a 1 1/2 inch (maybe thicker?) metal
mount molded into the back and it is centered on the flat part
of the back of the canoe, leaving an odd/small amount of space
to mount in the corner so to speak (did that make sense?)
looks like |---=====---|
^ ^
metal plastic does that help?
Erik.
|
271.44 | That makes better sense | HENRY8::DODIER | | Thu Mar 19 1987 08:18 | 19 |
| re:42
That sounded like a good idea. I also had the same thought when
I read .37.
re:43
Now that you further explained what your doing and why, it makes
a little more sense. I have a canoe with the side mount and don't
have that problem.
As I remember, the bow mount for the electric your talking about
needs less space than a traditional type cable steering unit. I
would suspect that you could easily build a mounting plate in the
back to hold it. A problem may arise though when you pull the unit
up as the head of the motor may wind up where your seat is. Your
going to have to physically look at one in the retracted position
(if they do retract) to see if it will fit.
The points mentioned earlier about the bow mount seem very valid and
for those reasons I would not put it there.
RAYJ
|
271.45 | limited success | HPSCAD::WHITMAN | boves::whitman MRO1 297-4898 | Thu Mar 19 1987 09:52 | 17 |
| re. 42
I have mounted a piece if 1/2" PVC pipe to my motor in the manner
described and the steering part of it works fine. My speed however
is controlled by a slide switch, so I can't comment on the speed
control aspect. The one thing I noticed about my rig is that it's
just slightly off top center so every time I let go of the extension
handle it swings out of reach. This became so aggravating to me that
I took the extension off the motor. With the rig described in .42 you
will definitly have this problem except perhaps at one speed. If this
motor will only be used for trolling and getting to and from the fishing
area , then it should not raise any problem for you, however if you are
expecting this rig to also serve as a mechanism to slowly work a bank,
then you'll run into the difficulty I described above.
Good luck,
Al
|
271.46 | How Long is It???? | TORA::SCHOLZ | Ron....and thanks for all the fish | Thu Mar 19 1987 10:34 | 12 |
| First I have to disclaim any real knowledge of canoes, except how
to tip them over....I can do that real well;^)
The idea of an extender on the handle seems to have some merits,
but I can't help but wonder if you make it long enough to fit under
your armpit, how will you be able to turn the the motor when you
want to go in the opposite direction your body is on. Won't the
handle come up against your body and therefore be blocked from turning
the boat??? Seems to me that would cause more problems than it solves.
Just thinking....Ranger Ron, (who_will_be_in_the_deep_south_fishing_
in_two_days)
|
271.47 | it's easy | HPSCAD::WHITMAN | boves::whitman MRO1 297-4898 | Thu Mar 19 1987 12:38 | 13 |
| Ron,
the way my PVC handled that little problem was with two 45 deg
elbows thusly"
======
\\
\\
============= trolling motor handle
Now when I swing it around the long handle rids up over the trolling
motor head...
Al
|
271.48 | Extension handles | MORRIS::MLOEWE | Low_in_sugar Low_in_salt..Lowenbrau | Wed Mar 25 1987 12:25 | 13 |
| All the talk on "extension handles" for an electric motor made me
remember one in the Sears catalog. It extends your original handle
length by 12 inches, fits all Gamefisher and Die-Hard electric motors
(I imagine it should fit all motor handles) and it sells for $4.49.
It's just a plastic tube with twist-grip handles, but for under
five bucks it's definately worth it.
As for wanting to go in an opposite direction, just put it in reverse.
Some electric trolling motors have all the control in the handle.
The more I think about it, that would be the kind of electric trolling
motor I would purchase. Having all control in the handle would
alleviate additional bending over to motor.
Mike_L
|
271.49 | | TORCH::MACINTYRE | Impatiently waiting for ice-out. | Wed Mar 25 1987 12:52 | 6 |
| I put a 2'8" exetension on my Merc Thruster. Took a piece of 3/4"
PVC pipe, put a 5" split on one end, slid it over the handel and
clamped it down with a hose clamp - works fine. To reverse the
head I had to take the head apart, knock out a couple pins and replace
them in the opposite holes in the shaft. It's now a bow mount instead
of a transom mount - piece of cake. Don Mac
|
271.50 | How is your motor mounted on your canoe? | MORRIS::MLOEWE | Low_in_sugar Low_in_salt..Lowenbrau | Thu Apr 09 1987 17:01 | 15 |
| I was just looking through my Coleman canoe assembly instructions
and according to their "Do's and Don't"; A gasoline outboard motor
should always be attached to the canoe with a canoe motor mount.
And small electric trolling motors can be attached to the side of
the canoe by placing a small board against the side of the canoe
to clamp the motor against.
Is this advisable for trolling motors? Shouldn't all motors be
placed on some kind of motor mount than attached to a scrap piece
of wood? If the electric trolling motor is light enough to be
supported on a piece of wood, then I should save myself the 40-50
bucks and not buy the motor mount.
Mike_L
|
271.51 | motor mount prices | HPSCAD::WHITMAN | Al Whitman -- always ready to fish | Fri Apr 10 1987 09:35 | 10 |
| < If the electric trolling motor is light enough to be
< supported on a piece of wood, then I should save myself the 40-50
< bucks and not buy the motor mount.
Mike,
I got one of the canoe motor mounts a Gauch Bros in Shrewsbury a couple
years ago for less than $30. So you might be a little high on your
anticipated expense.
Al
|
271.52 | Tie em down | VICKI::DODIER | | Fri Apr 10 1987 13:01 | 10 |
| re:motor mounts
I've seen prices really vary on these. I've seen them for as
low as $22 (wooden) to as much as $90+ (aluminum and brass). As
I mentioned in an earlier reply, it's easy enough to make you own
with some scrap wood and a couple of bolts w/wingnuts.
One thing I would recommend on any kind of canoe mount is to tie a
piece of rope from the motor to the boat. I had the motor loosen up once
and had it not beEN tied, I may have lost it.
RAYJ
|
271.53 | \___I_canoe_it___/@ | ANGORA::MLOEWE | Low_in_sugar Low_in_salt..Lowenbrau | Thu May 21 1987 16:51 | 14 |
| Well now that we've covered electric motors with canoes, lets talk
about how you fish from them.
Can any of you stand up in your canoe and fish? Or do you sit down
the entire time?
I was thinking about making some kind of pontoon construction for my
canoe so I can stand up in it and be able to cast while patroling the
shore line with my new electric. Although my canoe (15' Coleman)
is *somewhat* stable enough to stand up in when I'm alone, I dare not
try yet to cast while standing. Has anyone else with a canoe given
any thought to this? What about other options out there for the canoe
so I can turn it into some kind of *poor man's* ranger or another
Stump Jumpa?
Mike_L
|
271.54 | Canoe + Standing = SUCK POND WATER TIME! | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Fri May 22 1987 09:19 | 22 |
| I fished from a canoe (Old Town 14') for many years and on rare
occassion, when my legs were real cramped or I got daring, I would
stand up. It is definately not reccommended unless you've got a
real keen sense of balance! And even if you did and were able to
cast while standing, what do you think might happen if a bass hit
your plug the moment it hit the water??? I wouldn't want to take
the chance of losing $500+ investment in tackle by going overboard!
When Chris and I were fishing a lot in our canoes early last year
(before I got my boat), we considered some sort of pontoon setup
to stabilize the canoe but figured it would end up being more of
an aggrevation than it would be worth...so...we just stayed seated
and occassionaly went up on shore to stretch.
Considering that you can pick up a 12-14' flat bottom "stump jumpa"
for under $400, I'd suggest you give thast some consideration.
It is much more stable...you can stand as long as you're careful,
and it's car-toppable.
Have fun...and don't get wet...
-HoleShot-
|
271.55 | OK for a joy ride maybe but..... | VICKI::DODIER | | Fri May 22 1987 13:29 | 5 |
| A big problem with a canoe and pontoon set-up is that you
effectively can't fish on the side with the pontoon on it. It would
just tend to get in the way and limit the fishability of the canoe.
RAYJ
|
271.56 | | JAWS::WIERSUM | | Mon May 25 1987 18:20 | 12 |
|
If what you are talking about is an outrigger type of setup, then
put it on right side and fish the pond in a clockwise fashion.
that should do it. I like the idea.
GW
ps. Ask me about placing in the SHAD derby.
|
271.57 | He's gonna tell us anyway... | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Tue May 26 1987 09:06 | 13 |
| Is anyone interested in how Gary did in the Shad Derby???
I'm not...so I won't ask.
...only kidding, Gary....so how'd you do??
|
271.58 | try standing under controlled conditions | HPSCAD::WHITMAN | Acid rain burns my BASS | Tue May 26 1987 10:13 | 31 |
| When I had my canoe (sold it after getting my bass boat) I stood in
it quite often when I was alone. I would suggest though that when you start,
go out wearing a swimsuit and don't worry too much about getting wet. This
tactic presumes that you can get back into the canoe by yourself in the event
that you dump it. I found casting a flyrod from the sitting position severly
restricted my casting distance, so I started standing. When by myself in the
canoe I would effectively turn the canoe around and paddle from the seat
closest the center of the boat. From here I could stand and plant my feet in
the curve of the hull, flex my knees a little and seldom had any trouble with
instability. On those few occaisions when I got shaky, I was quick to lower my
center of gravity and park my 230+ lbs on the seat again fast.
I believe I read into your question something about using the trolling
motor while standing. I can't speak to that, however with the weight of the
battery low in the boat, I think with some practice under controlled
conditions, you could probably manage. Try it in shallow water and let us know
how it went. The comment about losing expensive equipment was well taken.
May I suggest those items which won't float have some kind of line and buoy
attached, just in case.
NOTE: When it comes to canoes and the possibility of getting wet, I
am a firm believer in practicing the techniques under ideal and
controlled conditions until you can accomplish the tasks with
confidence. These tasks include, but are not limited to
1: getting back into your canoe from deep water
2: refloating a swamped canoe from deep water
3: standing in the canoe to fish, hunt or whatever
4: anything else THE DO-GOODERS OF THE WORLD
CONSIDER FOOLISH.... ( it's only foolish if you
can't do it with confidence or handle the
situation if you fail.)
|
271.59 | Better to sit than chance to tip | CHESIR::MLOEWE | Low_in_sugar Low_in_salt..Lowenbrau | Tue May 26 1987 10:35 | 10 |
| After thinking about it...better than setting myself up for standing
comforting...I'll set myself up for sitting more comforting.
A Coleman back rest I purchased has helped tremendously. Better
positioning of my electric trolling motor and battery would help
also so I can stretch my cramped legs and neck.
When you canoe guys use your trolling motor when your alone, do
still position it behind you? I'm wondering how it would work
in front of me and run in reverse.
Mike_L
|
271.60 | Switch seats, at least. | AIMHI::FLETCHER | Wow, so this is spring! | Tue May 26 1987 13:40 | 17 |
| Boy, I wish there was a way to put the motor in front! The
really frustrating thing about canoe fishing with a trolling motor
is the wind blows the bow around. When I'm alone I switch seats
and sit in the bow seat (facing the stern!) so I'm more in teh center
of the canoe and hook up the trolling motor bracket behind me again.
The reach is a bit greater but I find the stability and reduced
blowing around far outweighs the reach. I have a 13' Mad River
Winooski and a Merc thruster. It has the low bow and stern to minimize
the wind impact. I think it helps from being blown around as does
at least some sort of a keel. The Sportspal or other keelless canoes
would be a real chore if the breeze is up...
By the way, my canoe is extra wide for fishing and hunting and I've
stood in it to flycast when I'm alone. I find it is actually harder
to stand in one when you have a partner because you two actually
balance counter to each other and make things worse...
Then it might just be my partner...
Eh, Joe?
|
271.61 | Jumper cables help | VICKI::DODIER | | Tue May 26 1987 14:13 | 10 |
| A little something I tried this weekend that may be of use to
some one. I usually bring a cinder block to place up front when
fishing alone. Since the battery easily outweighs a cinder block,
I put that up front instead. To reach my trolling motor I used a
set of jumper cables. To keep the free ends from touching together
and sparking, clamp them to a stick and then attach the motor clamps
to the jumper cable clamps. This did a pretty good job of keeping
the front end down. I didn't even have to switch seats.
RAYJ
|
271.62 | Motor too big or not ??? | FSBMS::MOSBORN | | Tue Jun 09 1987 12:47 | 6 |
| < 25lb THRUST ELECTRIC MOTOR>
One question, is a 25lb trust SIGMA too big for a 17' Coleman
canoe???
|
271.63 | Just an opinion | VICKI::DODIER | | Tue Jun 09 1987 13:58 | 15 |
| If you go from off to high (assuming this isn't a variable speed
motor) and you are off balance or not expecting it, you could flip
your canoe. You could of course also do this with a 17 lb. thrust
motor almost as easily.
I don't remember ever seeing any canoe (excluding scanoe types)
that ever indicated a maximum lb. thrust rating. Canoes do have
a maximum payload rating which you may have to take into consideration
as the deep cycle batteries weigh around 50-70 lbs.. There may be something
on the motor mount to indicate a maximum limit however.
I will not tell you that I myself recommend it but I myself
would not be worried putting that motor on my 15' canoe. If you
are concerned about it, try it with a life preserver on and in shallow
water with no tackle/gear in the canoe to start with.
RAYJ
|
271.64 | no problems... | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Tue Jun 09 1987 14:18 | 5 |
| I've run my 24 lb. thrust Eska on my 14' Old Town without any problems
at all. In fact, that's how I got my nickname...
"HoleShot" Joe
|
271.65 | it works for me | SCOTCH::CARR | | Wed Jun 10 1987 13:57 | 9 |
| I'm running a 25lb thrust on my 17' Coleman, and I love it! To get
around having the 60 pound battery in the back with all that other
weight (motor, me, tackle boxes, beer, beer and beer) I rigged up
a wiring harness so I can put the battery up front. I have the harness
set up with enough free cable in the front so I can place the battery
just behind the front seat if I have a partner, or just in front of
the front seat if I'm alone. That keeps the canoe pretty level.
Dale
|
271.66 | gauge or flexibility? | ANGORA::MLOEWE | Low_in_sugar Low_in_salt..Lowenbrau | Thu Jun 11 1987 09:39 | 4 |
| re .65
What size cable did you use to extend the length from the battery?
I might be doing the same with mine.
Mike_L
|
271.67 | | HPSCAD::BPUISHYS | Bob Puishys | Thu Jun 11 1987 09:57 | 3 |
| Use 6 gauge or lower. The lower the gauge the better the battery
life!
|
271.68 | | AIMHI::TOMAS | Joe | Thu Jun 11 1987 10:34 | 8 |
| It's not so much the battery life that's extended. The heavier
the gauge of wire, the less resistance there is which means more
"power" available to the motor.
It does make a difference. As much as 24-50% of the available current
from the battery can be lost by using lighter gauge wire.
-Hj-
|
271.69 | Fire Hazzard | GENRAL::HUNTER | from SUNNY Colorado, Wayne | Thu Jun 11 1987 10:43 | 3 |
| Not to mention the possibility of FIRE is you use too small
a wire. If it doesn't catch on fire, it can melt a fiberglass canoe.
Either way, it aint no fun swimmin'.
|
271.70 | moved | COLORS::MACINTYRE | In search of the Largemouth Bass | Fri May 20 1988 13:09 | 40 |
| ================================================================================
Note 732.0 Need Mini-Motor Gas-Powered 1 reply
MODEL::DOWNING 11 lines 20-MAY-1988 11:15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can anyone recommend a small, portable, light-weight gas-powered
outboard for a 14 ' light fiberglass canoe (not square stern)? It
has to be light enough so that it doesn't lift the bow clear out
of the water when one (160 lb.) person is seated in the stern. I'm willing
to do some front end ballasting as long as it doesn't mean carting
anvils into the canoe.
3-6 HP is fine. Already have an electric, which is great for slow
trolling, but a real battery hog, even with a large deep-cycle battery.
Need something that will last 3 or 4 days with minimum fuss (like
fumbling with chargers, etc.)
================================================================================
Note 732.1 Need Mini-Motor Gas-Powered 1 of 1
AD::GIBSON 18 lines 20-MAY-1988 11:56
-< Check out the Eska >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
read the note 241 from gary on the ESKA"S . I just ordered the 15
hp and a guy I work with here just ordered the 2 hp. The prices
are super and they are going fast.
Just the ticket!
When you put your motor mount on the canoe put it on the front and
run it backwards; Unless its Asymetrical in which case you wouldn't
want a motor on it.
This trims out the canoe for better operation. Just like when you
solo into the wind you paddle from up front to get the weathervane
effect of the trailing end of the canoe.
Can't wait to get my motor! ~~~~~~~~*\_______/
Now all I need is the Inflateble Dingy.
|
271.71 | | COLORS::MACINTYRE | In search of the Largemouth Bass | Fri May 20 1988 13:13 | 1 |
| You may also wish to check out note 637 also
|
271.72 | Weight of ESKAs | MODEL::DOWNING | | Fri May 20 1988 14:02 | 6 |
| Does anyone know how much the ESKAs weigh? The 1.6 HP and the 5.0
?
After seeing the prices and/or the negative comments in other notes
about gas-powered in general, i don't think a motor purchase is
in the cards this year.
|
271.73 | | PERFCT::WIERSUM | The Back Deck Wizard | Fri May 20 1988 14:34 | 16 |
|
The 1.6 hp ESKA weights in at 18# with a full tank of fuel (1.4lt.)
I started the breakin (1 hour) last night in the garage. It is
air cooled but I thought sinking it into a bucket of water might be
good to keep the lowere unit cool.........
It aint got a nuetral.....on the fourth pull, it started and spun
about three gallons of water out and got me from the waiste down....
I have never seen my wife and six year old son laugh so hard....
Of course I beat the hell out of both of them for laughing.
I still think the ESKA at this price is the best deal going.
Oh yeh, I was convinced that synthetic oil is the hot ticket...
ant thought on the stuff?
|
271.74 | 2 hp is plenty | RANGLY::OKERHOLM_PAU | | Mon May 23 1988 08:31 | 12 |
| I run a 2 hp Evenrude on my canoes (17' & 18'). I used to use
a 5 hp Chrysler. The 5 hp was a little smoother because it was a
2 cylinder but it was heavy and had more power than I could use.
Both canoes are rated for up to 5 hp but anything more than two
is a waste. All you do is create more vibration and spray.
In general I think there are times that power is almost a
necessity, like crossing large wind swept lakes. There are other
times that I prefer paddle power because it is a lot more enjoyable
without the noise or smell of a gas engine.
I don't use my motor too often but I am sure glad I have it
when I need it.
Paul
|
271.75 | Go for electric !!!!1 | DR::HAIGH | | Mon May 23 1988 17:58 | 25 |
| I am the guy who put in the note 637 refered to by a previous reply.
Go with the electric.
I got the Minn Kota 3hp. for my Crawdad. Performance is excellent
even with 2 large people in the boat. I have paced with a 3Hp gas
V boat and the speed is comparable.
I have the 105 amp battery. If you need to spread the weight use
an insulated set of jumper cables so you dont get too much cable
loss.
The convinence of just turning the handle to switch on cannot be
over stressed over pulling the cord on a gas. The Minn Kota also
has a reverse. DOes the Gas, you will need it if you do any fishing
(that is for trees etc.)
The advices I received on electric was fantastic only now can I
appreciate how good it was.
When/if I upgrade my boat I also have the trolling motor.
David.
|
271.76 | | PERFCT::WIERSUM | The Back Deck Wizard | Tue May 24 1988 10:04 | 11 |
|
David, do you use that electris on the front or back? If the front,
how did you rig the transom? I was able to find a CRASHED CRAWDAD
that I took the transom from and with a small bit of cutting I now
have a cast alluminium transom on the front for electric and the
same in the back for gas. btw I payed $199.00 for the two hp ESKA
what did you fork out for the minn kota?
Where do you fish that CRAWDAD?
TBDW/TCDW
|
271.77 | $$$$$ | HPSCAD::BPUISHYS | Bob Puishys | Tue May 24 1988 10:17 | 5 |
| hay tbdw you have to add in the cost of cutting through the bottom
of that crawdad when you put in the other transom.
Bob
|
271.78 | | PERFCT::WIERSUM | The Back Deck Wizard | Tue May 24 1988 10:49 | 6 |
|
a YUP !!
big bucks
|
271.79 | | DR::HAIGH | | Tue May 24 1988 11:22 | 9 |
| I put the motor on the back (english for Stern).
With the help of Joe Tomas I paid $275 at Bass Pro, however since
I got it I have seen it on sale at Hermans and Service Merchandise
for $255.
David.
|
271.80 | motor size on 14' Sportspal? | SQM::THOMPSEN | | Wed Aug 03 1988 10:36 | 16 |
| I'm considering buying a 14' Sportspal canoe for fishing and general
recreation and am trying to find an electric motor to go with it.
I'm convinced that the MinnKota line with the maximizer is the way to go
but haven't decided how big a motor to get. Unfortunately its slim
pickings this time of year at the stores I've been to in the Nashua/Manchester
NH area. I've seen a 3hp MinnKota at a great clearance price ($259) but am
concerned that it may be too heavy and powerful for the canoe (the motor
would be on a side motor mount, I don't want a square stern canoe).
Any opinions? My original choice was the MinnKota 65mx (28lb thrust), but the
best price I've found so far is $249 which is only $10 less than the 3hp.
Are there other pros/cons on 3hp vs 65mx other than obvious weight & power
issues? Anybody know of other stores in the Nashua/Manchester area that have
good price and selection on MinnKota's?
Thanks,
Dave Thompsen
|
271.81 | 5.5hp worked fine | CIMAMT::HEROLD | | Wed Aug 03 1988 12:01 | 19 |
| I found an old 5.5 hp outboard and put it on my home made canoe,
It's my baby and NOTHING happens to her.
I also built the mounting bracket out of some scrap wood.
Anyway, it's not the power so much as the weight and the quality
of the bracket.
I was cruising around at max speed and then all of the sudden I
thought that I hit something and the motor dissapeared into the
lake. Turns out that I didn't hit anything, it was just the snapping
of the mounting as it departed from the rest of the boat.
Moral of the story, it's not the power (lets be reasonable) but
the weight AND the power.
Dave
P.S. Good thing I had the motor tied to the boat.
|
271.82 | Coleman 17' w. M65 | CASV05::PRESTON | NO Dukes!! | Thu Aug 04 1988 13:21 | 24 |
| I have a 17' Coleman canoe, and bought a Minn Kota M65 motor this
year to use on it, and I must say I'd never go back to the old way!
Depending on where you want to use it, I don't think the 3hp would
necessarily be too much. I go out on Paugus Bay in Winnipesaukee,
and even with 28lb thrust I find myself wishing it had a bit more
for the open stretches of water...
Like you, I was concerned a bit about the weight hanging off the
side of the canoe, but it doesn't really seem to be a problem, and
I doubt that the extra weight of a 3hp would be a big deal. It is
a pain mounting it, though, especially in the water. I cover the
infinite control that a Maximizer offers, since even the lowest
speed seems a bit fast in the canoe sometimes. If you can afford
the bucks, go for the 3hp, unless it is WAY heavier than the MX65.
and don't get the biggest marine battery, either. The middle size
sears DieHard will power my non-maximizer motor all day, and still
have � charge left - with a maximizer it should be no problem to
run a 3hp on a canoe all day and have something left, unless you
are going from one end of Winni to the other at top speed...
I say go for it,
Ed
|