T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
66.1 | | RANGLY::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Wed Feb 19 1986 11:37 | 5 |
| I have never fished it, but would like to as the waters look very
trouty. The saco is reputed to be superb just a few miles upstream
in teh North Conway area. I suspect that the fishing is quite good.
dave
|
66.2 | fish the NH side | CANDY::MOLLOY | | Tue Feb 25 1986 10:02 | 8 |
| the saco river on the NH side is an excellent trout stream, mostly
brookies. there is a FLY FISHING ONLY section from LUCY BROOK to
MILL BROOK in n. conway or conway which holds 6+ lb browns. the
water is very cold so don't expect anything too early. the staff
of NORTH COUNRTY ANGLERS in N. CONWAY could give you more accurate
info including the MAINE side.
john
|
66.3 | | MOSAIC::FISHER | | Tue May 06 1986 13:22 | 8 |
| Last year I caught 2 brookies right at the falls (near the fairground)
in Fryburg while waiting for others in our party. You can get a
license right in Freyburg at one of the local markets. Also downstream
I caught a mess of perch and several good size pickerel. I was
fishing the spot that opens into a pond on the left. Can't remember
the name, but I'll look around for my map.
Guy
|
66.4 | It's the Sacco River | JACOB::JORDAN | | Thu Jun 12 1986 16:10 | 25 |
| My friends and I (4 of us in all) have gone camping and fishing on the
Sacco River the past 2 years and we are going up for the 3rd year at the
end of this month. We put our canoes in at Glenn, which is the next town
north of N. Conway. We finish up 4 days later at Fryeburg, Maine. We just
take our time and fish. The whole trip is about 22 river miles.
The Sacco is cold in the Glenn area even at the end of June when we go.
The water table has been low up there the past couple of years also.
From my experience I have found that the fishin' is best just before
you get to Conway. The water level is a little deeper there and the water
temp. is much warmer than up in the Glenn area. In fact none of us have
caught any fish the first day on the river! The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th days
are Fantastic! We've caught mostly trout and some small mouth bass.
THEE lure for catching trout and bass on the Sacco is the Mepp's Aglia.
Over the last 2 years all four of us have used everything in our boxes
but we all end up with the Aglia on our lines. We also found that the
fish are NEVER swimming around in open waters. They love swimming around
fallen logs. We caught all of our fish near logs or under trees, and 90%
during the dawn and dusk times.
I can hardly wait for this year's "3rd Annual Sacco River Run".
Fish Beware!
Tony.
|
66.5 | Getting my Mepps ready | TORCH::MACINTYRE | Life's great, then u live forever. | Fri Aug 08 1986 10:24 | 11 |
| I'm doing the Saco for Labor day weekend and I'm considering tossing
my elec on the canoe...
Do any of you mainiacs know if this has to be registered???
I'm pretty sure that a canoe w/ elec should be registered in NH,
but I don't use mine often enough to warrant it...
Don Mac _hopefully_trout_for_supper_
|
66.6 | | MTBLUE::BOTTOM_DAVID | | Fri Aug 08 1986 11:00 | 6 |
| Any powered boat must be registered if you use it in Maine, if you
already have a registration I would check out whether or not that
registration is considered valid in Maine (I don't know). Hope this
helps.
dave
|
66.7 | The Beautiful River | DOJO::TONY | | Fri Aug 08 1986 11:22 | 31 |
| Be careful of your motor in the river on the N.H. side. There are
quite a few places where the water is no deeper than 6 inches. If
you put in at Saco Bound or further down the river you'll be ok.
This year my buddies and I put in at N. Conway and went down to
Brownfield, Maine (about 40 miles). The best fishing was in the
Conway area. The first night we had 7 nice rainbows for supper
between the 4 of us. They averaged about 3/4 lb. and 12 inches
in length. For the Saco that's good size. The biggest fish caught
was a 15 incher that weighed in a little over 1 lb., using a cheap
tackle box spring weigher so it might of been more.
We've been going up there for the past 3 years and it's evident
that the fishing goes downhill after Conway. My advice is to put
your canoe in at "The First Iron Bridge". When you get to Conway
Center ask for directions. Everybody knows where it is.
To be honest with you I haven't seen a single motor on the river
in N.H. and the only one in Maine is a motor boat parked on the
river between Fryeburg and Brownfield. I recall seeing a sign about
a River Ranger there......
I wouldn't reccomend a motor in N.H. not only because of the low
water but the river flow is sufficient to keep you moving. After
Saco Bound the water is very slow and deep (ave. about 6 ft. ?).
A motor there would work out nice.
I'd be happy to talk if you want to give me a call.
Happy Trouting!
Tony Jordan.
|
66.8 | drift'n & dream'n | TORCH::MACINTYRE | Life's great, then u live forever. | Fri Aug 08 1986 12:10 | 26 |
| Thanks for the info. The canoe's not registered, so I'll probably leave the
elec at home. If it didn't have to be registered, I'd bring it for the heck
of it.
One year, because we had such a large party (most rentals), Saco Bound
wouldn't put us in at Fryeburg, our route was moved down stream a few miles,
and the take out was changed to Hiram damn, we ended up paddling our buns off
the entire third day, until dark to get to the take out - an electric would
have been REAL handy then! [although the other 20+ canoes probably would have
tried to make me tow them 8^)]
In previous trips, I've covered from the put-in a few miles upstream of Swans
Falls, Fryeburg - to Hiram, but I've never done anything above that. How is
up there? Is it as nice as the Fryeburg area? Nice sandy beaches to camp
on, etc...?
We usually have between 5 and 25 canoes and go for three days. DRIFT for
approximatley 4-8 hours on the first day (what a sight, 20 canoes tied up,
party barging it down the river), then camp on one of the sandy beaches until
the morning of the third day, then paddle 3-5 hours to the take out.
So, if anyone has any suggestions for a route with good camping and fishing,
I'll look into it. Oh yea, we don't do portages or anything above a LOW
class II rapids... we dump canoes on rips, let alone rapids...
Don Mac
|
66.9 | | DOJO::TONY | | Fri Aug 08 1986 15:08 | 27 |
| No matter how you look at it, the Saco is a beautiful river; good
fishing, nice camping beaches, and serenity are there. I remember
the first year we went up there, it was about 10pm and we were camping
on the side of the river just drinking beers and relaxing. I was
laying on the beach looking up at the stars on a clear night. I
couldn't believe how many stars were up there. Being a Mass. city
boy, I wasn't used to the lack of light-pollution!
Don, there is a difference between the Fryeburg waters and the N.Conway
waters. Up in the Conway section the water is *crystal* clear and
alot colder than the Frye area. About a mile or two before Saco
bound the water starts turning greener than upstream. It's not
polluted or anything but since the water is warmer the plant growth
turns the water green. Up in N. Conway area there is no growth
and the water is clear. The first two years we put in at the covered
bridge in Glenn (next town up from N. Conway) but the water level
was too low and there were no fish - but the water was like it just
came off the mountain. This year we moved downstream. The Saco
is nice this year. With all the rain we've had this summer the
water level is good.
I can tell by all the notes you've written in this file that you're
really into fishing Don. Do yourself a favor and fish the Conway area.
That's the best area on the whole river for trout. <--- my opinion
Tony.
|
66.10 | saco bound | RAINBO::MACINTYRE | Fish are rising up like birds | Wed Jul 06 1988 13:13 | 6 |
| Has anyone been up to the Saco recently? I'm thinking of doing
a weekend canoe trip in the next month or so and I'm curious of
the water levels and fishing reports from up there.
Don Mac
|