T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
489.1 | inches or pounds???? | MSBCS::MERCIER | | Thu Mar 21 1996 09:29 | 7 |
| Did you mean to say 21lbs. and not 21"? If that's the case I really
screwed up at Moosehead lake years ago!!!! The State Record for Mass is
6.4 lbs caught in 1966 at Otis resevoir and I'm pretty sure that one
was well over 21 inches.
Just Wondering......
Bob M�
|
489.2 | Reporting for USA TODAY | STRATA::WOOLDRIDGE | Pleasure, Spiked With Pain | Thu Mar 21 1996 10:53 | 6 |
|
I am simply a reporter. 21-inch is how the article is stated. I told
you, you should not have EATEN that thing! Any Colorado boys out there
hear about this fish?
crawler~
|
489.3 | Tasty Records........ | MSBCS::MERCIER | | Thu Mar 21 1996 11:12 | 3 |
| It was worth it!!!!!
Bob M�
|
489.4 | | NIOSS1::REEVE | | Thu Mar 21 1996 15:02 | 7 |
| I have caught several brook trout (in Labrador) bigger than 21 inches
and none were bigger than 1/2 the world record. 21 lbs would be several
pounds over the world record. For a 21" trout to be over 10 lbs, it
would look like a large basketball, or have several pounds of lead in
it's stomach.
Chris
|
489.5 | I got the fever! | BSS::JACKSON | Powder Shuffle | Thu Mar 21 1996 20:15 | 7 |
| I'm from Colorado Springs, and I remember reading about this over
a month ago, but I can't remember the details, 'cause it showed all
other records for all fish that can be had in this state.
I will try to find the write-up on this and post it.
Tim
|
489.6 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | contents under pressure | Fri Mar 22 1996 07:54 | 2 |
| The NH state record is 25.5" and 9 lbs. The article is clearly not
reported by a fisherman. :-)
|
489.7 | Give him an opening...sheesh | STRATA::WOOLDRIDGE | Pleasure, Spiked With Pain | Fri Mar 22 1996 14:32 | 4 |
| You better not be insinuating what I think you are Doc... 8~)
I was simply copying verbatim.
NC~~~
|
489.8 | | BSS::JACKSON | Powder Shuffle | Fri Mar 22 1996 22:19 | 3 |
| I couldn't find the article on the brook...
Tim
|
489.9 | Just the facts... | ROBERT::CRONIN | Life's Short, Fish Hard! | Mon Mar 25 1996 07:54 | 13 |
|
According to my trusty old (1974) McClane's Standard Fishing
Encyclopedia the world record Brook Trout is:
31 1/2 inches long
14 1/2 pounds
The book says that both Rangeley and Moosehead Lakes (and a
couple others in that region) were regular producers of 9 - 11 lb.
Brookies! They didn't say where the record came from.
B.C.
|
489.10 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | contents under pressure | Mon Mar 25 1996 08:18 | 2 |
| I'd guess the record came from Newfoundland or Labrador. They have some
monsters up there.
|
489.11 | I amaze myself sometimes 8^) !!! | SUBPAC::MATTSON | | Mon Mar 25 1996 12:45 | 3 |
| re.9
Nipigon River, Ont., Canada, 1916
|
489.12 | Trout Magazine Article | MROA::RSCHOTT | | Tue Mar 26 1996 11:52 | 9 |
| There was a good article in Trout Magazine a while back about
"coasters", brook trout that spend at least part of their lives in Lake
Superior, and migrate in and out of rivers such as the Nipigon.
The same article talked about the 14 lb. world record, and
mentioned unconfirmed reports of larger fish having been caught in
South America.
Russ
|
489.13 | 111 lb. Blue cat!!!! | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Fri Apr 11 1997 05:27 | 1 |
|
|
489.14 | | BSS::DSMITH | I'LL GET UP AND FLY AWAY | Fri Apr 11 1997 10:12 | 8 |
|
Re:111 lb. Blue cat!!!!
From where????? How caught!!
What fish fry you could have..
Dave
|
489.15 | Main Street, Fargo, ND? | LEXSS1::JOHNHC | | Fri Apr 11 1997 10:40 | 1 |
|
|
489.16 | Here kitty-kitty.... | POLAR::KFICZERE | | Mon Apr 14 1997 06:01 | 6 |
| ...get this..."near the nuclear plant" in bum-f*$K nowhere
Arkansas! Appearently there are quite a few 100+ pounder taken from
here. The guy who caught it says he's quite confident that there are
even bigger cats than that one! ....very SssssKARY!
-k-
|
489.17 | 11lbers aren't that big | CPEEDY::MACINTYRE | PATHWORKS Server Engineering | Mon Apr 14 1997 17:46 | 6 |
| An an 11ln blue is not that big at all, we caught a 10+ and a 20
down at Santee this year.
Check them out at http://www.ultranet.com/~don-mac/1997.html
|
489.18 | only off by 100 lbs | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Spott Itj | Tue Apr 15 1997 09:24 | 1 |
| Er, that was 111 lbs.
|
489.19 | ok | CPEEDY::MACINTYRE | PATHWORKS Server Engineering | Tue Apr 15 1997 13:55 | 2 |
|
ahh, you're right...... never mind 8^)
|