T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
301.1 | Say it ain't so! | GLITTR::JOHNHC | | Fri Jun 04 1993 10:59 | 14 |
| Where did you hear this?!?!?
This could be a real disaster.
Nobody knows enough about these fish to be able to tell whether they
might screw up the gene pool of the Salmon Restoration Project.
Regardless of the gene pool issue, if these are freshwater salmon, they
will be feeding in freshwater, which means that any young salmon coming
downstream on their way to the ocean will be food for these feeding
freshwater salmon.
OUCH!
John H-C
|
301.2 | | XCUSME::TOMAS | I hate stiff water | Fri Jun 04 1993 11:12 | 10 |
| It's true. F&G stocked 1500 salmon in the 8-16# class that are no longer
being used as breeder stock in the Merrimack. Don't recall all the details,
but a $10 permit is required to fish for them (or is it to "keep" them),
daily limt is something like 1 fish with annual take of something like
5-7 fish.
Sorry for the vague details, but since I'm not that into fishing for salmon,
I didn't pay a lot of attention to the daily/annual limits.
Joe
|
301.3 | Glad to read .2 | GLITTR::JOHNHC | | Fri Jun 04 1993 11:26 | 8 |
| Whew!
So they're the saltwater variety. Good. Maybe a few of them will make
it back out to the ocean. I've often wondered how these fish are caught
other than by snagging unless they've been trained out of their genetic
trait of not feeding in freshwater.
John H-C
|
301.4 | I've heard shad don't feed in FW either... | GNPIKE::NICOLAZZO | Over 5,000,000,000 served. | Fri Jun 04 1993 12:26 | 7 |
| re: .last
I think its still a bit of a mystery why they hit - nothing to
do with training though - wild fish will also hit in fresh
water.
Robert.
|
301.5 | Easy solution to dilution.... | BUOVAX::SURRETTE | | Fri Jun 04 1993 14:44 | 8 |
|
Oh my, this *is* bad news. Better put up lots of jersey barriers
at all of the boat ramps on that stretch of the river, so the nasty
F&G people can't dump fish in the river and dilute the gene pool of
all those carp!
Gus
|
301.6 | over time | RANGER::MACINTYRE | Terminal Angler | Fri Jun 04 1993 15:23 | 14 |
| I don't think they dumped 1500 6-8lb salmon into the hooksett section of
the river.
I'll try and remember to look up the article in NH F&G Highlights, but if I
recall this is going to be a staged release of breeder stock over the next
few years. And they'll be stocking in waters above Hooksett as well.
Don't know if there is a difference between brood stock for landlocked release
and stock for sea run salmon. My assumption was these were the breeders
for landlocked, I may be mistaken.
I'll try and look up the article and reply.
-donmac
|
301.7 | They're putting them in the lakes too!! Oh No??? | SUBPAC::CRONIN | | Fri Jun 04 1993 16:07 | 15 |
| FWIW:
Landlocked Salmon = Atlantic Salmon that has no access to
the ocean. Before those who know more than the F+G about these issues
go off the deep end, think about it a little...
They're putting the brood stock from the salmon hatcheries into the
river where they might actually get a chance to breed naturally.
Doesn't sound very frightening to me.
Trained Salmon??? Sounds like you need a little reading up on the
subject of fresh water habitats as related to salmon spawning.
B.C.
|
301.8 | | DTRACY::STORM | | Fri Jun 04 1993 16:09 | 6 |
| I'm almost certain it is broodstock from the searun salmon. I believe
the landlocked salmon are netted, milked, and returned fairly
quickly.
Mark,
|
301.9 | | GLITTR::JOHNHC | | Fri Jun 04 1993 17:03 | 8 |
| In MA, they end up in places like Quinsigamond. When I called F&W and
asked for an explanation from the state salmon expert, he said
something incomprehensible to me about not wanting to spoil the sea run
gene pool. I didn't get it then, and I don't now. Makes much more sense
to me to put them back in the river from which they came to let them
take their chances.
John H-C
|
301.10 | facts | RANGER::MACINTYRE | Terminal Angler | Fri Jun 04 1993 22:08 | 20 |
| I was mistaken in my earlier reply when I said I thought that it would
be 1500 over time. I found the article, and it will be 1500 annually
"between 1993 and the turn of the century".
They'll be released from the Eastman Falls Dam on the Pemigewasset in
Franklin (headwaters to the Merrimack) to the Mass border.
All fish will be tagged and anglers are required to report each fish
caught. Joe was right, there's a 1 fish daily limit, and a season
limit of 5 fish. $10 permit required. Season is 4/1-9/30.
These are the 'searun' broodstock used in the Merrimack River
Cooperative Atlantic Salmon Restoration Program which has set
a goal of releasing 3 million fry into the river's main stream and
tributaries.
-donmac
ps: the nh fish and game publication that i often refer to is nolonger
f&g highlights, it's now called NH Wildlife Journal
|
301.11 | Yes! | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Sat Jun 05 1993 18:18 | 14 |
| I'm more than pleased that they are the sea run salmon and that they are
getting a chance to make it back to the ocean instead of dying of
starvation in a lake. (Yes, I've come across more than my fair share of
"large" dead salmon on the bottom of Lake Winnipesaukee.)
I'm glad the F&G folks have made this turn in their practice.
I harbor no animosity for you folks trying to catch them. (That's a
disclaimer for you who don't grasp my perspective.) Good luck.
Thanks for signing on and entering that, Don Mac.
John H-C
|
301.12 | What happens to the salmon that return to the Merrimack!!! | IBR2::AUGER | | Tue Jun 08 1993 15:16 | 35 |
|
Does anyone know what happens to the salmon that are captured in the
Merrimack at the Lawrence Dam?
According to my nephew who is a fish counter at the Lawrence dam, these
fish are shipped to the NH hatchery (possible in Nashua), injected with anti-
biotics and kept until the fall when they are milked. The injections are
necessary because of the high concentration of disease in a hatchery environment.
Because of the antibiotics, he says that the FDA will not permit the
release of these fish back into the water from which they came, due to the risk
to humans if they are caught and consumed. For the most part the males
are destroyed and/or dissected for study. I believe he said that the healthiest
females are kept for breeding purposes with the remainder meeting the same fate
the males.
Can anyone verify this information??? If this is true, what is the
source of the salmon that are being released into the Merrimack? It can't be
wild salmon that have been captured in their return to spawn. It must be
hatchery salmon that have past their reproductive prime????
Seems like such a unfortunate fate for those few fish that have managed
to survive to return to spawn. But I suppose it is necessary if the species is
to be reintroduced in the Merrimack and other northeastern rivers.
AS FAR AS THIS YEAR'S RUN IS CONCERNED - He said that as of this past
Saturday, they've captured about 30 salmon at the Lawrence dam. There have been
a few small stripers heading up past the dam, but the majority of the stripers
are staying below the dam and feeding on the herring as they make their run -
several keeper sized bass are being caught there again this year. He also said
that the number of herring is way down from last year - 14000 versus 300000 for
last year. The shad run is also smaller this year then last. Lastly he said
that they've counter a few good sized rainbows making the run this year thus far.
Dave (AKA Bait Master)
|
301.13 | | WMOIS::REEVE_C | | Wed Jun 09 1993 14:12 | 12 |
| FWIW, Atlantic salmon do feed in fresh water, but not before spawning.
After spawning, they stay in the river, under the ice until spring. As
they head back to the Atlantic, they feed voraciously on incoming
spring spawning fishes. Small salmon may be part of their diet, but I
don't believe it's a significant part like smelt, or other baitfish.
It's not considered "good form" to fish for these so-called "black"
salmon, but they are much easier to catch because they are actively
feeding. They tend to be dark colored and emaciated looking upstream
but begin to regain their silver color and weight as they near the
estuaries.
Chris
|
301.14 | No Feeding in Freshwater | AYOV10::JVEITCH | | Fri Jun 11 1993 12:07 | 21 |
|
Atlantic Salmon do not feed in Freshwater. Once entered into a river
whether in Spring, Summer or Autumn they cease to feed, and will use up
their energy and resourse they have gained at sea. They actually lose
their teeth and stomach after a few months in the river, and therefore
cannot feed.
It is through their feeding instinct at sea that will allow a Salmon
to snap at a lure/fly or bait, sometimes out of curiousity or the fact
that it feels threatened by the object.
Once spawned and making it's way back to sea, it will regain it's
silvery colour and will start it to regain its teeth and stomach
and eating habits.
John.
|
301.15 | | WMOIS::REEVE_C | | Fri Jun 11 1993 13:31 | 3 |
| Based on your last sentence, I think we said the same thing.
Chris
|
301.16 | Finally a big fish fishery | DEMAND::LAMPASSI | | Tue Jun 15 1993 14:25 | 41 |
| I have been out fishing for these monster fish. Since they have been
released they have been very aclamated to their enviroment. In other
words they are acting more like wild salmon every day.
I have had long conversations with the federal hatchery folk. This
program took about 4 years to pull off. For the longest time the work
was to convince the federal governement to give persmission for the
release of these salmon. One for a process to rid the salmon of the
anti-bacterial chemicals and non-interference of the salmon restoration
program.
The atlantic salmon upon entering fresh water discontinues eating.
The single purpose is to spawn. These fish were heavily feed and
started their fasting around the december/january timeframe, according
to the federal folks.
I have seen many hooked and caught and they are replicas of the
naturals from the ocean. They are truly magnificant.
About this time they are becoming very difficult to catch and one
has to put in a lot of time. Some have gone down river as far a lowell
and have been lifted back over again.
The law for fishing is single point only or fly. You need salmon tags
to keep a fish with 1 per day and 5 per season with a 17" min.
The program is being hailed as a success, but if you fish for them it
is requested that you buy the tags. All the money for the tags goes
directly back to the program for next year. The costs in this program
is in the special equipement to haul these things around. It is thought
that they would hire this task out to people in the trade and the tag
money would pay for it.
Up until two weeks ago there were over 500 tag sets sold. Starting
this program they felt only 200 tag set would be sold. More probably
would have been sold if the process and access to purchase them were
either better known or easier.
Yes there were 1500 released in two phases. They were released from
hookset to Franklin. The Letter "A" tags are the 1st stocking and "B"
is the second. The colored tags represent the stocking points.
Hope this helps. I am loving every minute of this fishery.
|