T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
258.1 | | ODIXIE::RHARRIS | work to live, not live to work! | Thu Feb 04 1993 13:31 | 4 |
| On May 21, it will be the new moon.
bob
|
258.2 | Pacific Publishers | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Thu Feb 04 1993 14:02 | 18 |
| Well, my moods are often decribed as "mercurial," so there's no point
in trying to chart them except in retrospect.<g>
But, if you're looking for something that will tell you about the moon,
the tides (heights and times), and unusual celestial events, I suggest
you pick up a copy of the _1993 Tide Book_ from Pacific Publishers.
Illustrations by Escher. I don't know where you are, but Pacific
Publishers puts out tide books for (I think) eight areas of the US,
including the Boston area, with tide corrections for the entire region.
In the Boston area, REI is just north of 128/95 on 129 in Reading, MA.
Good luck.
John H-C
It costs about $11 at REI. I haven't seen it anywhere else. It's a
great little book.
|
258.3 | | MSBCS::HURLEY | | Thu Feb 04 1993 14:35 | 4 |
| mood charts=moon charts.. typo's ooops..
How are the tides differant between a new moon and a full moon?? if
any?
|
258.4 | Rules that only apply on CALM days..... | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Thu Feb 04 1993 18:14 | 10 |
| Big moon equals big tides, in my experience, and new (no) moon means
mild tides (if there are such things where you live). This is a rule of
thumb sort of thing, though, and should be taken with a grain of salt.
A series of large storms in the middle of the ocean will play havoc
with your tidal expectations a few days later, regardless of what NOAA
predicts.
JMHO
John H-C
|
258.5 | Full *and* new, isn't it? | RUNTUF::HUTCHINSON | | Fri Feb 05 1993 10:42 | 15 |
| Don't have the charts here, but I believe the strongest tides are just
after the full moon *and* just after the new moon. At these times the
sun and moon are working in concert (though on the full moon from
opposite sides of the earth). The weakest are just after the half-moons
(waxing & waning). Then the vectors are 90 degrees apart, so the solar
gravity attenuates the effect of the lunar.
Agreed that storm surges add another factor.
The differences in seven days - say from a no moon to half waxing - are
about three feet at each end (high and low) here in New Hampshire. It is
a considerable factor in the currents & holes we fish off the beaches.
Jack
|
258.6 | Extrapolate away! | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Fri Feb 05 1993 10:57 | 17 |
| Well, today I have my "DES Baggage" with me (business card book,
address book, tide charts, calendar, etc.) and I can offer this info:
On the night of May 5/6, there is a full moon, and the high tide in
Boston that night happens at 23:24 and is a 12-foot tide.
On May 21, there is a new (no) moon, and high tide occurs at 12:05 with
a height of 9.2 feet.
The lowest high tide of the month occurs on May 16 at 08:16 with a
height of 8.7 feet.
So....
Draw whatever conclusions you can.
John H-C
|
258.7 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Rocka Rolla | Fri Feb 05 1993 13:35 | 8 |
| > Don't have the charts here, but I believe the strongest tides are just
> after the full moon *and* just after the new moon.
That's what I thought, too. The highest tide swings occur on the full moon.
They decline from the full moon height to a low on the half moon, then
increase until the new moon (which is still not as great as during the
full moon.) Then the tides decrease again until the half moon (on the wax)
at which point they increase up until the full.
|
258.8 | dangerously small sample? | RUNTUF::HUTCHINSON | | Mon Feb 08 1993 08:12 | 7 |
| re .6 - John, would you be willing to increase your sample size and
report back?
It staggers my faith to think that you might be drawing that conclusion
er... "unscientifically".
Jack
|
258.9 | Well, I don't know about dangerous, but.... | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Mon Feb 08 1993 10:01 | 20 |
| Ok, let's see what this suggests...
Full Moon/Tide Height New Moon/Tide Height
Feb: 2-7/11.9 ft 2-21/10.1 ft
Mar: 3-7/11.5 ft 3-23/9.8 ft
Apr: 4-6/12 ft 4-21/9.5 ft
Jun: 6-3/11.7 ft 6-19/9.1 ft
Jul: 7-3/11.1 ft 7-19/9.7 ft
That's all the time I have at the moment....
John H-C
Here's a quote from the standard DES Report Introduction:
"This report is anecdotal. Any information gleaned from these
observations should be subjected to scientific testing before use."
|
258.10 | When to be Fishing? | WFOV11::CERVONE | | Mon Feb 08 1993 11:56 | 6 |
| So then with all this info when is the best time for being out there
fishing.
During new moon, between new and full, etc. etc. etc.
Frank
|
258.11 | Talk about one of those timeless questions! <g> | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Mon Feb 08 1993 12:43 | 1 |
|
|
258.12 | A scientific approach... | ELMAGO::MWOOD | | Mon Feb 08 1993 13:11 | 8 |
| In Fisherman Magazine did an article last year on when the best
times to fish were. They obtained dates as to when state records were
set, then plotted it against moon phases for the past x number of
years. The results were amazing. The records just about all clustered
within a day or two of the new and full moon. I forget which one was
the best. I'll try and dig out the article tonight...
Marty
|
258.13 | the best time to fish is anytime you can | RANGER::MACINTYRE | Terminal Angler | Tue Feb 09 1993 12:01 | 4 |
| My rule of thumb is fishing is best during the day around the new moon,
and at night around the full moon.
-donmac
|
258.14 | | XCUSME::TOMAS | I hate stiff water | Tue Feb 09 1993 14:48 | 7 |
| Well...
MY RULE OF THUMB IS...
fishing any time you can get out is the best time!!
-HSJ-
|
258.15 | | ODIXIE::RHARRIS | work to live, not live to work! | Tue Feb 09 1993 16:39 | 3 |
| AMEN!
|
258.16 | beat ya | RANGER::MACINTYRE | Terminal Angler | Tue Feb 09 1993 17:48 | 3 |
| joe, i beat ya to it, you didn't read the subject line 8^)
-donmac (who scheduled the santee 93 trip around new moon, again)
|
258.17 | | XCUSME::TOMAS | I hate stiff water | Wed Feb 10 1993 08:41 | 5 |
|
Yup, you're right. I didn't see the subject line.
In any event, it makes no difference what the moon, sun, tide or weather is
doing...just getting out to wet a line is fun.
|
258.18 | My inputs | LEVERS::SWEET | | Wed Feb 10 1993 11:08 | 10 |
| First, what I learned in studying for my CG license is that the new and
full moons are the strongest tides. Also spring tides on those moons
are the hardest running.
In general fishing seems to be better (it is definitly easyier) when
the tides aren't at their strongest. How it effects the fish I
don't know, but during a strong tide it is much harder to keep the
boat or bait over a given spot.
Capt. Bruce.
|
258.19 | Ahah! A little clarity! | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Wed Feb 10 1993 13:00 | 13 |
| During a strong tide -- there is a distinction between a strong tide
the relative height of the tide...higher does not mean stronger -- the
visibility under water is always lower. It is a lot lower on an
outgoing tide than on an incoming tide, but in either case, the water
column fills with particulates on a strong tide. Maybe that's why
fishing is less productive: the fish just can't see the lure as well.
Now that Bruce has reminded us all that there is a difference between
the height of the tide and the strength of the tide, maybe what you all
remember about the new and full moon and the tides had to do with the
force of the current rather than with the level of the water?
John H-C
|
258.20 | | LEVERS::SWEET | | Fri Feb 12 1993 13:31 | 7 |
| John the height of the tide is directly propotional to the strength
if the current (ie. the duration of the tide comming in and out remains
fixed (apprx 6 hrs) but the ammount of water (ie. height of tide)
varies, thus the higher the tides the stronger the current since more
water needs to move in the same time span).
Bruce
|
258.21 | tide experiences | RIPPLE::EDRY_PA | | Fri Feb 12 1993 14:19 | 24 |
| As a recent transplant to the Northwest I have read and experienced
that strong tides around full and new moons can limit fishing success.
The window of slack tide does become more critical when supposedly
hungry fish unable to fight the stronger current go off the feed
for longer periods. Also, in the many islands it becomes more
important to fish eddies out of the stronger currents. The plus of
higher tides vs. soaker tides is that with greater tide movement
plankton, baitfish have to move more and fish need to move more to locate
food, again more easily at slacker tidal movements.
My experience with full moon tuna fishing has not been that positive,
especially in the canyons. While it is easier to night chunk with
more moonlight I believe the added light can give yellowfin and other
leader shy fish an advantage. Best success has always been on moonless
nights or overcast nights for me.
As mentioned by a prior noter I would not plan a long trip to the
canyon at the peak of the full moon.
Regards
Paul who_misses_canyon_fishing_but_finds_steelhead_a_challenge
|
258.22 | $0.02 | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Fri Feb 12 1993 17:13 | 13 |
| re: .20
Bruce ---
If the current runs especially fast at a new moon, then the notion that
the height of the tide is directly related to the strength of the
current just doesn't hold water. <grins>
The new moon tide is the average-height tide. A few replies back I
listed the heights of the full- and new-moon tides for six months of
1993. The full-moon tide is the highest, whereas the new moon tide is
almost two feet lower, or in other words, average for the area.
|
258.23 | Not so fast with the answer here! | RUNTUF::HUTCHINSON | | Mon Feb 15 1993 11:54 | 20 |
| Not so fast, John - looking at a 1992 calendar my daughter made for me,
I see that January through May the highest tide of the month occured
within a day or two of the full moon. June through November it was
within a day or two of new moon. December was back to full moon.
Also there are two highs each ~25 hour period, and one is sometimes
considerably higher than the other, so it is important to look at both.
All of this varies by where on the coast you are. On the west coast of
Florida there is only a single high in each ~25 hour period. In
California, I understand, there is one high-high and one low-high,
markedly different, in each ~25 hour period. In the equatorial west
coast of South America, the tides are irrelevant, so little movement
that no one notices or cares.
I'm going to get ahold of some charts and look at the local situation
(Boston/Portsmouth NH) more carefully, but saw you running here with a
conclusion that may not be well founded.
Jack
|
258.24 | Ok, slowing down a bit more every day.... | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Mon Feb 15 1993 12:51 | 18 |
| Well, I ought to tell you about yesterday. The tide was a low one
(8-something feet maximum height), there were no whitecaps on the
water, and the rollers were low and easy looking.
It was the roughest rough-water dive of my life. I've never been in a
stronger ocean current around here, and the subsurface forces at play
bore no relation to the apparent calm on the surface. In a few minutes,
you'll be able to read about the experience is GOOFOF::SCUBA, if you're
so inclined.
*I'm* reaching the conclusion that height of tide and size of moon do
not necessarily have much of anything to do with the strength of the
current.
I'll be interested in seeing what conclusions you reach after looking
through a whole year's worth of charts.
John H-C
|
258.25 | Not surprized | LEVERS::SWEET | | Mon Feb 15 1993 13:00 | 11 |
| John,
Given we had a major leauge noreaster on Sat with storm warnings
(wind 50-70mph) along the coast it does not suprise me that
the ocean currents were tough at all regardless of the surface
conditions.
Get a copy of Eldredge if you want tides and currents for the
NE coast.
|
258.26 | Fun facts to know and tell.... | SPARKL::JOHNHC | | Mon Mar 08 1993 10:41 | 56 |
| Article: 5859
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.tw.space,clari.news.weather,clari.news.trends
Subject: Highest tides of year expected as moon makes pass
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 93 7:41:53 PST
MIAMI (UPI) -- The highest tides of the year are expected
Monday and Tuesday along the North American East Coast as the Moon
becomes full and makes its closest annual approach to Earth, a Miami
astronomer said.
``Two celestial occurrences will happen just 46 minutes apart,''
said Jack Horkheimer, executive director of the Miami Planetarium. ``On
Monday, March 8 at 4 a.m., EST, the Moon will reach its closest point
for the entire year and will be only 221,000 miles away.
``Then 46 minutes later, the Moon will become precisely full.
Coupled together, these two occurrences will cause the highest tides
of the year in many areas.''
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said the
high and low tides during the week could be hazardous for boaters on
North American coasts, especially if they arrive during coastal storms.
Horkheimer said apart from providing the extra gravitational
effect, the Moon will also be 14 percent larger and brighter in the
night sky.
While the Moon plays the primary role in tidal action,
Horkeimer said, the Sun would also contribute to the higher tides.
``Since the Moon is in a direct line with the Sun during a
full Moon -- and also at new Moon -- we always have two days of the
month where the Sun's gravitational pull contributes to higher tides
than usual,'' Horkeimer said.
He explained that those events are referred to as ``spring
tides,'' which has nothing to do with the spring season, but rather as
an event where the tides ``spring'' higher than usual.
When the Moon's gravitational pull is weakest, at first- and
last- quarter, the tides are smaller, and are termed ``neap'' tides.
Horkheimer said the Moon's orbit would take it to its farthest
location from Earth Sept. 30, when the orbit will be 31,000 miles
further out, 252,000 miles from Earth.
The Boat Owners Association of the United States advised
boaters to take extra precautions.
At the dock, adjust the tie lines and add chafe protection,
the association said.
``Rising water may also threaten dry-stored boats in low lying
areas. If possible, move your boat to higher ground,'' it said.
|
258.27 | Santee `94 | RANGER::MACINTYRE | Terminal Angler | Tue Nov 09 1993 13:22 | 2 |
| That time of year again, can anyone tell me when the new moon will be
during the mar/apr 94 period? thanks -don
|
258.28 | New moon dates... | SUBPAC::CRONIN | | Wed Nov 10 1993 08:00 | 7 |
| RE: .27
Don,
My calendar shows March 12, and April 10 as new moon dates. Just
as an FYI, sunrise for those 2 days are at 6:17 and 5:30.
B.C.
|
258.29 | sun up/down times | ECADSR::BIRO | | Wed Nov 10 1993 10:52 | 12 |
| my Casio watch... says...
for southern NH
12 March 1994 sunrise 6:05 am and sunset 5:50 pm
10 Apr 1994 5:15 am 6:25 pm
I have never check to see how accuract the watch is..
I think I have a computer program at home that will
do this, if so I will post the results if someone
else does not do it first.
jb
|
258.30 | update | ECADSR::BIRO | | Wed Nov 10 1993 11:20 | 17 |
| I guess the Casio watch is not bad,, I check it with
a orbit prediction program for the sun and got the
following for the MA/NH area
12 March 94 6:08 - 5:42 vs the watch at 6:05 - 5:50
10 April 94 5:18 - 6:16 5:15 - 6:25
so the watch is well within 15 mins...
They have two,, one calculates the tides
and one for the SUn... sorry I dont think they
have one for the moon yet... It would be nice if
they could put it all in the same package.
Typical sale price for the watch is about $30.
|
258.31 | Go in April, the days are longer... | SUBPAC::CRONIN | | Wed Nov 10 1993 11:26 | 4 |
| Just to clarify... My sunrise times are for 40 deg North
latitude... No guarantee of the accuracy, just reading it from the
calendar.
B.C.
|
258.32 | my .02 | ESKIMO::KERSWELL | Gill_Raker r r r r r r | Wed Nov 10 1993 13:36 | 4 |
| Its been well below 40 degr. so it should be right?
Rk
|
258.33 | thanks | RANGER::MACINTYRE | Terminal Angler | Thu Nov 11 1993 13:00 | 3 |
|
thanks for the info!
|
258.34 | Moon phase = Tide | WSPBU::SAMARAS | New England: July-August & winter | Mon Nov 15 1993 09:55 | 11 |
| I always thought that for any given moon phase, high (or low) tide is always at
the same time at the same place. For example, for a full moon, high tide is
always at midnight in Hampton, NH.
So, if you know the moon phase, you know the tide and vice-versa.
Knowing this, there's no need to keep checking the tide charts.
Am I missing something?
...bill
|
258.35 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | life is a cabernet | Mon Nov 15 1993 14:58 | 7 |
| >I always thought that for any given moon phase, high (or low) tide is always at
>the same time at the same place. For example, for a full moon, high tide is
>always at midnight in Hampton, NH.
I don't think so. A full moon isn't always at the same time of day.
That's why a really complete full moon indication says the time of day when
it's actually full.
|
258.36 | I'm not sure, but... | WSPBU::SAMARAS | New England: July-August & winter | Tue Nov 16 1993 13:43 | 8 |
| I checked out the moon-phase and tide charts in one of the previous issues of
"The Fisherman". The full moon does tend to line up with high tide at the same
time of day. This doesn't mean this happens month after month, but I think it
does. If the moon causes the tides to happen in the first place, I'd think the
tides would be absolutely synchronized to the moon phase. I'm no expert on this,
but now I'm curious...
...bill
|
258.37 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | poleaxed out and burnt | Tue Nov 16 1993 16:00 | 5 |
| If you look at the full moon days, you'll see that there is a variation
in the timing of the high tides. This is caused by the variation in the
actual time when the moon is full (it's a little different each time) and
the varying effects of the sun. (The sun has a third of fourth order effect
on the tides.)
|
258.38 | Folklore seems pretty good in this case | DKAS::JOHNHC | | Tue Nov 16 1993 19:32 | 36 |
|
The following is a comparison of this year's full moon/high tide times,
based on NOAA data published by Pacific Publishers. In Pacific Publishers'
_TIDELOG_, the tide and the moon's states are depicted in graphic format,
but only the time and height of the tide's nadir and apex are noted in type.
The "Appr. Same" line item indicates that the depiction of the full orb
aligns very closely with the grid line that bisects the apex of the high tide.
Full Moon Apex High Tide Apex
January 7 Appr. Same 22:24
February 6 Appr. Same 22:48
March 7 Appr. Same 22:23
April 6 23:48
April 7 00:30
May 5 00:00 23:24
June 3 23:30 23:05
July 3 23:42
July 4 00:10
August 1 23:50 23:27
August 31 Appr. Same 23:49
October 1 Appr. Same 00:05
October 29 Appr. Same 23:36
November 28 Appr. Same 22:50
December 28 Appr. Same 23:05
John H-C
|
258.39 | Gee, wow, neat | WSPBU::SAMARAS | New England: July-August & winter | Wed Nov 17 1993 11:33 | 14 |
| This is great data. Thanks!
So if I understand this correctly, I can blindly say that when there is a full
moon, high tide happens at the same time at the same place. If I don't bother to
look at a tide chart, I'll only be wrong by ~30 minutes. Most of the time, the
time, high tide aligns very closely (almost exactly) to the time of the full
moon.
THERE IS A GOD!
So, to take this one step further, I'd suspect that at each phase of the moon
the tide will be aligned too. Hmmm.
thanks,
...bill
|
258.40 | ... | DKAS::JOHNHC | | Wed Nov 17 1993 12:33 | 13 |
| Well, remember that the moon is full for pretty much the entire night.
In fact, in summer it's full long before nightfall. What you need to
know is when the apex of the moon is (if you're using that as an
indicator of high tide). My inclination would be to use the high tide
as an indicator of the apex of the moon (should that data piece ever
become worthwhile to me).
BTW, I did not notice a straightforward correlation between the highest
high tide in the month and the fullness of the moon, though there did
seem to be a general trend toward a fair-to-middling high tide when the
moon is full.
John H-C
|