T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
103.1 | | MRKTNG::TOMAS | JOE TOMAS @TTB | Thu Dec 19 1991 08:40 | 18 |
| Steve,
Penn makes excellent reels. One model that is specifically designed for
wire is the Penn Model 49L. I inherited my father-in-law's 49L after he
passed on, but I've never used it. He used it on a deep sea pole which I
eventually plan load up with 30# mono.
I see the 49L as overkill for freshwater anything, including trout, as it is
a large reel. When I do go for trout, I use a Little John downrigger to get
down deep. That allows me to use light tackle which is a lot more exciting
than using wire and heavy rod/reel combos.
If you get up to TTB in Nashua, let me know and I'll bring it in for you to
look at.
Regards,
Joe
|
103.2 | Lake "O" outfit ??? | VICKI::DODIER | Food for thought makes me hungry | Thu Dec 19 1991 09:07 | 6 |
| re:-1
I don't think it would be too big for lake "O" (i.e. 30+ lb.
salmon.)
RAYJ
|
103.3 | match tackle to prey | USRCV2::GEIBELL | KING FISHING ON LAKE ONTARIO | Thu Dec 19 1991 10:49 | 15 |
|
While I lived in NH I used PENN 9 M levelwinds for my lead core
trolling, along with 7 ft light action poles, they worked great and
with the size of salmon in NH about anything would work, heck I also
used a 4 ft super ultrlight & 4 lb test there for their salmon.
Now here in NY you are talking a whole different ballgame!! big
water, big baitfish, ======BIG FISH !!!! so you adjust your tackle to
meet your needs, I do still use the 9M set ups for spring fishing,
there is just something about getting a 9+ lb brown or rocket on a
light outfit that makes a guys heart flutter.
Lee
|
103.4 | down-Rigger vs leadcore | SALEM::ORLOWSKI | | Fri Dec 20 1991 06:43 | 8 |
| Thanks for the info. The reason I thought a lead core might be more fun
is cause a down-rigger seems to be more involved to set-up,,,cost more,
some assembly required,,,set-up time to use it. Also my father-in-law
uses one and always catches more trout (3 colors) than myself (3
splitshot).
?????? What's a good Down-Rigger at a good price????
-Steve
|
103.5 | I have electric's ..... I'm lazy | USRCV1::GEIBELL | KING FISHING ON LAKE ONTARIO | Fri Dec 20 1991 10:48 | 28 |
|
RE: last
I think the best info you will find is gonna be in the old fishing
file, but if the doctah wants a new downrigger note in here I will let
him post it.
I for one would think of no other rigger than BIG JON, I have 4
and I have never had a problem with them, and I have seen them punished
beyond belief and they still work! they are all metal,
(aluminum/stainless) as apposed to plastic cannons.
Prices will vary depending where you are and what the demand of them
is., I will say that I dont think I would of ever gotten the deal on my
electrics out here in NY like I did in NH, because the demand for elec
riggers in NH isnt high.
another point is where are you going? small ponds,lakes manuals would
do fine for you, lake Ontario now thats a different story would you
want to crank a 10 lb ball up from 150 ft every time you got a fish or
just a false release? believe me its mighty nice to flip a switch and
wait 1 minute and rerig lines and hit the switch again to lower the
ball!!
Lee
|
103.6 | Cheaper Solution | MRKTNG::VARLEY | | Fri Dec 20 1991 14:51 | 6 |
| Ah hell, just buy a couple of Luhr Jensen "Dipsy Divers." You can get
'em at Zyla's for under $10. They're kinda "Low Tech, but for what
you're using 'em for, they should be fine. There is more info on 'em
elsewhere in this file.
--The Bandit
|
103.7 | lotsa choices out there | USRCV2::GEIBELL | KING FISHING ON LAKE ONTARIO | Fri Dec 20 1991 15:53 | 28 |
|
Bandit,
not to rag on you but, the dipsy divers are not a good choice, there
is so many things that change the depths these buggers run at, ie;
speed, current,line diameter,and settings, plus you have to keep very
close watch on how much line you put out. and also you have to use some
heavier equip. if I put a dipsy on my light action poles and had a good
size fish hit I may heaar the dreaded sound of graphite shatering.
Although during the summer/fall I run 2 dipsey's most of the time,
but then again I am out over 100 foot of water, We did an experiment
this fall, went out to 200 foot, set 1 dipsy on #2 setting and ran it
out 425 feet , the other dipsy set out on setting # 2 and 225 foot of
line. we then headed for shore. at 68 +- foot of water the dipsy out
400 foot hit bottom, at 63 foot the other hit bottom.
So your depths are really limited to +- 65 foot, I know that in NH
you dont often go below 30 - 40 foot , but heck with small fish you
wont have any fight except for the dipsy, and have you ever tried to
get a dipsy in the boat in a hurry? its not easy.
there are alot of inexpensive means of trolling, dipsy's, jet planers
monkey balls, drop sinkers, and probably a hand full of other means but
to each their own.
Lee
|
103.8 | A low bucks but effective rig | DNEAST::OKERHOLM_PAU | | Fri Dec 20 1991 16:05 | 16 |
| Steve,
Getting back to your original questions about lead line and Penn...
Penn is an excellent reel manufacturer, I have a pile of them for salt water
fishing, but I don't use them for lead line. I use a Pfleuger reel that looks
like an overgrown single action fly reel. It has a large hub which may be
better for the line. I really don't know why, but its kind of the traditional
lead line setup, at least here in Maine.
I use a low bucks, light weight salt water rod. No need to get fancy
because all you need is something strong enough to do the job. The extra
sensitivity found in expensive rods is wasted in this type of fishing. The
terminal gear and weight of the line absorb a lot of the fight.
The good news is this is not an expensive rig. Its been a few decades
since I bought mine but I imagine the whole thing shouldn't set you back more
than $50.
Paul
|
103.9 | Buy,Buy,Buy | SALEM::ORLOWSKI | | Mon Dec 23 1991 06:58 | 8 |
|
After reading all the answers from y'all,,,,I'm going to sell my boat
and take up scuba-diving,,,,no,,just kidding.
Because I loose so much line on my mono reels,,,I may stay away from
leadcore and get a DownRigger first. " I have only begun to buy" so
we will go for the best..............................................
-\steve
|
103.10 | penn 330 gti/30lb. rod | AIMHI::LAVERDURE | Ron `WHAT NODES MY MIND ON' | Wed Jan 08 1992 22:16 | 48 |
|
I use a penn 330 gti levelwind with 50 yds. of dacron backing and 100
yds. of 18 lb. lead core. I then attach about 10 feet of 4,6 or 8 lb. mono
as a leader between the lead and lure.
I recommend the mono leader length be adjusted to match the distance
between the tip of your rod and your hook keeper . If you do not have a
hook keeper use your reel as a substitute .
The rod I use is a 30 lb. medium action . Using this weight rod when
trolling for state of N.H. size landlocked salmon offers what I
consider satisfactory rod/line sensitivity. When playing in a 2 lb.
salmon/trout/bass or larger , even a light line purist will be wetting
their pants.
A 30 lb. rod with 18 lb. lead on it is probably as light as you would
want to go, going with any lighter a rod would just plain overstress
the rod and ruin the sensitivity balance between rod and line weight.
Each to thier own though.
The Penn 330 GTI is a beaut. I love it, on the other hand its going to
set you back 55 or so big ones. I also have a Penn 309m level wind that
I used to use for lead before I "just had to have" that 330 gti dt's.
The difference between the 330 gti and the 309m is in the smoothness of
operation and drag setting. To me its a day and night comparison. The
330 gti is just plain sweet when it comes to adjusting drag up and
down, setting the drag for bite alarm, reel in smoothness, and auto
line release.
I did try a season of 36 lb. lead on the 330 gti and found the
combination to work fine, on the otherhand I do not believe i'll ever
use 36 lb. lead for anything ever again. I just couldn't get use to
measuring depth with it. 18 lb. I do well with , I know that 7 colors
down with a salmon troll is putting me around 35 feet . I just never
could feel that comfortable while using 36 lb. lead.
If you are going to use lead core , I strongly recommend that any reel
you do choose be a levelwind reel. Thar jus taint nuttin worse than
reelin in a 4-5 pounder and havin yo lead line pile up in the middle of
yo reel stoppin you from a continueing to play that baby in.
I plan on outfitting the little lady this year and I am not sure
whether or not I will rig her with another Penn 330 GTI or try the Penn
49L. I keep thinking 49L , probably because thats the one I do not know
yet.
|
103.11 | lead core colors vs. depth control | KOLFAX::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:26 | 21 |
| < I did try a season of 36 lb. lead on the 330 gti and found the
< combination to work fine, on the otherhand I do not believe i'll ever
< use 36 lb. lead for anything ever again. I just couldn't get use to
< measuring depth with it. 18 lb. I do well with , I know that 7 colors
< down with a salmon troll is putting me around 35 feet . I just never
< could feel that comfortable while using 36 lb. lead.
Can I assume from this that I get about 5' of depth for each color (10 yds of
line)? or is the color/depth non-linear?
I've got 25# lead-core on a Penn 209M levelwind and and otherwise similiar
setup to -.1. I've never used it ('91 XMAS present) and would like some more
info on how this system is supposed to work.
Are there any tricks (besides letting line out until it drags bottom) to knowing
how deep you're running for a given color, and how does the speed of the boat
figure into the formula?
Thanks,
Al
|
103.12 | | MRKTNG::TOMAS | JOE TOMAS @TTB | Fri Jan 10 1992 08:05 | 10 |
| Al,
I've seen (in BPS?) trolling depth indicators that give you the approximate
depth based on the angle of the line to the water surface and the amount of
line that is out. Basically, it's a protractor type of device, probably
with some type of level bubble. You hold it up to your line, read the
angle, and then knowing how many colors of line are out, read the depth off
a chart. Uses simple trig math.
-HSJ-
|
103.13 | Elementary my dear Watson | KOLFAX::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Fri Jan 10 1992 12:05 | 16 |
| <I've seen (in BPS?) trolling depth indicators that give you the approximate
<depth based on the angle of the line to the water surface and the amount of
<line that is out. Basically, it's a protractor type of device, probably
<with some type of level bubble. You hold it up to your line, read the
<<angle, and then knowing how many colors of line are out, read the depth off
<a chart. Uses simple trig math.
Jeeze!! My folks dressed me up, sent me to school, I even graduated with a
minor in math and Hole-shot had to tell me how to solve this most basic of math
problems. Word problems never were my strong point. Just like in school, the
answer is obvious after someone tells you how to do it...
Thanks Joe,
Al
|
103.14 | ex | AIMHI::LAVERDURE | Ron `WHAT NODES MY MIND ON' | Mon Jan 27 1992 21:59 | 79 |
| re: .11
you can judge the speed of your boat with a simple two point in the
water reference .
tip your rod tip into the water twice about a second apart. The
distance between the point of reference in the water will give you the
approximate trolling speed you have set.
proper trolling speed for a specific species is an important
consideration . Lake trout are by far the laziest of the cold
water species. Pass to fast by a 10 lb. laker and he's jus gonna wait for
a more feeble and less energetic meal to go by.
a rule of thumb I use for cold water species is as follows;
lake trout 4 feet per second
brown trout 4-5 feet per second
brookies 5-7 feet per second
rainbows 5-7 feet per second
salmon 7-8 feet per second
I must appologise for not listing the warm water species common to the
area. I do not feel confident on making such statement since I dont
spend much time persuing them. I catch warm water fish by accident
while attemting to convince some people that cold water fish can be
caught all summer long.
keep in mind that time of year such as ice-out vs end of july , water
temperature, time of day, oxygen content in the water , and barometric
pressure will affect your judgement on tweeking your troll speed for a
specific species.
In case no one ever mentioned it to ya yet I'll clarify the barometric
pressure statement. A barometric high is not ideal and a barometric low is
not as bad and a barometric medium is preferable. Actually a falling
barometric preassure is the most ideal, going from a high to a low as
when a storm front is rolling through. I have caught my largest and
most energetic fish during these falling barometric pressures.
depth of your lure is just as important as troll speed . at ice-out in
the spring time you will want to be trolling with the lure just under
the surface. right after ice-out all the feed fish such as smelt come
to the surface for the oxygen rich water and plankton. the larger
predators come up after them and once the predators feel the oxygen
rich water thier appetite is wet.
As the water temperature warms , cold water fish start seeking deeper
colder waters. Lakers are the first to disappear from the surface ,
then salmon , then browns , then rainbows, then brookies.
Lakers in the mid luly to mid august can be found as deep as 150 feet
of water, salmon can be found at about 35 to 40 feet of water , browns
and rainbow can be found between 15 to 30 feet of water. brookies being
the hardiest can be found from 5 feet to 30 feet.
Judging how deep your lead is can be judged by the rule of thumb as you
previously stated in .1as 5 feet per color considering a color of lead
is 10 yards and of course you are using 18lb. test lead core line.
Dont forget that the faster the troll the shallower your line will be ,
the slower the troll the deeper your line will be . Practice is the
mother of all confidence and success , enjoy it .
With a salmon troll of 7-8 feet per second and its july 15th , you want
to have 8 to 9 colors out , maybe even 9 colors.
For rainbows on july 15th you may want to try 3.5 colors to 5 colors.
Of course all my ramblings here are subject to other opinions, on the
other hand these are the guidelines I have learned to use that do work
well for me and companions I have shared them with.
I will be interested in controversial rebutal , I do enjoy a difference of
opinion, I sometimes learn something wether or not I admit it immediateley.
Hope this info can help in your persuit of the devine fish gods .
ron
|
103.15 | | MRKTNG::VARLEY | | Tue Jan 28 1992 09:17 | 12 |
| Ron, real good info. I just wanna mention one thing - regardless of
depth, you won't find fish below the thermocline. If you have a GOOD
paper graph (I don't know about electronics...) you can see it, an
oxygen meter (For the few that have 'em) can spot it, and a good
temperature probe will work too. I'm not trying to be too technical,
because I'm ill equipped to do so. I guess my point is that there still
are a few guys that think like this: "Let's fish for lakers. The
deepest part of the lake is 100', so let's go there and fish the
bottom." If that particular lake is stratified, and the thermocline is
at, say, 75', there won't be any game fish below it.
|
103.16 | experience is the best teacher but electronics help. | USRCV2::GEIBELL | IN SEARCH OF ELUSIVE SALMON | Tue Jan 28 1992 11:08 | 19 |
|
re: last reply;
I would have to disagree with the statement thet you wont find
any gamefish below the thermocline, I have graphed and caught fish
(almost all salmoniod species) above and below the thermocline, I have
caught salmon in 70 degree water and even caught them in 40 degree
water, lotsa times 40 degrees is 20-30 foot below the thermal break.
I will say that if you fish the thermocline your going to put more
fish in the boat more often, but if you know how to read a graph, a
temp prope, you fish where the fish are. we have taken some nice lakers
off the bottom at 90 foot when the thermo was at 55-65 foot down.
FWIW
Lee
|
103.17 | whatsa.... | CSLALL::BORZUMATO | | Tue Jan 28 1992 13:34 | 6 |
|
re; .16
whats a temp probe? something you lower over the side to a depth??
JIm.
|
103.18 | ex | AIMHI::LAVERDURE | Ron `WHAT NODES MY MIND ON' | Tue Jan 28 1992 20:17 | 16 |
| your right, typically you would want to lay your lure 3-5 feet above
that thermocline , where ever it is.
On the other hand which thermocline are you after?
I do agree that my statement of lakers being able to be found in 150
feet of water could be misinterpreted as thats where to go for em. I
must apologise for my lack of foresight while pounding out my
statements in .14.
aaahh regarding your statement of not having the latest high tech gear
available on the market , if you did , wouldn't you have to call it
harvesting instead of fishing? Somethings ( to me at least ) are more
rewarding the old fashioned way ... I URRRRRRRNNNNNEEED IT.
ron
|
103.19 | description of a temp probe. | USRCV2::GEIBELL | IN SEARCH OF ELUSIVE SALMON | Wed Jan 29 1992 07:42 | 40 |
|
To answer the question of a temp probe.
A temperature probe is a piece of electronic equipment that has 2
parts, a receiver unit and the sending unit. the receiver part can be
placed just about anywhere on the boat, there is a transducer and
speedometer that mounts on the transom.
the transducer on the back of the boat receives the signals from the
down probe. the speedometer is used for surface speed, and surface
temp.
Now the probe itself looks like a large bullet, approx 12" long and
about 2-3" around, it has a wire through it with a snap swivel on each
end so when its hooked up it can swivel around. there is a speedometer
wheel and a temp guage, this unit is operated by a 9 V battery. this
unit send th info back to the receiver at the boat.
This unit is worth its weight in gold, since you need to know what
temp you are in and even more important, what speed your lures are
running at. contrary to belief just because your boat speed is 3 mph
the lure speed may be 0, there are underwater current that can play
havoc with your tackle. one day last fall we hit a bad current, going
east we had to run the boat at 5.5-6 mph to have the lures at 1.5-2 mph
but when we turned and ran west we had to idle down to .5 to keep the
lures under 3mph.
so if it wasnt for a probe we would of been running at 1.5-2.5mph and
when we were running east the lures would of been hanging staight down
and when we turned around they would of been spinning.
As far as having to much eqiupment and not earning our fish, beleive
me there are alot of days that even with all the equipment we do pretty
poorly, ie; 4-5 hrs to hook up, only catching 1 or 2 fish all day, the
one thing all this equipment doesnt tell you is what lure to use, or
what color to use.
Lee
|
103.20 | you invited discussion! | ELMAGO::MWOOD | | Wed Jan 29 1992 20:49 | 22 |
| In response to Ron's method of determining the correct speed to
troll for various species I guess I'd have to nit pick over the
times somewhat, although it sounds like a great method and I plan
on trying it the next time I'm out and don't have a trolling speed
indicator handy! At 4ft per second for Lake Trout that would calculate
out to 2.7 mph, and 8ft for salmon would be almost 5.5mph. These are well
over the norms for these species. I believe the most hits for salmon
usually occur from 2.5 to 3 mph and lakers around 2....I guess it all
depends on how accurate you count the seconds and how good you are at
judging the distance between the swirls :-) Oh yeah, one more thing.
Don't brook trout like cooler water compared to rainbows and browns ?
I'd like to nail this down as they were going to stock Lake Sunapee NH
with I think brookies and bows and I'd like to know what depth to start
trolling for them this summer when I'm back east. Has anyone heard any
word on the stocking program ? I believe it was to supplement the
declining salmon population without hurting the basicly endangered
smelt stocks...of course it seems to be sort of a lame idea as the
brookies will munch down tons of smelt if there in a lake (rainbows
too). They're only full of flies when in a lake, pond or river that has
no smelt or minnows....
Marty
|
103.21 | brookies can take it | AIMHI::LAVERDURE | Ron `WHAT NODES MY MIND ON' | Thu Jan 30 1992 21:40 | 35 |
| Hmmmm. Miles per hour aaa.. I never gave a thought to the concept
Marty.
I'm not egemecated on trolling speeds measured in miles per hour , on
the other hand I wonder if 2.5 mph would offer a salmon plenty of time
to think about what that meal looks like .
I personally use streamer flies and spinners of one type or another ,
lets face , if you had a good look at it would you eat it. ( 8,>
I use the phylosophy consisting of a hungry fish capable of tremendous
bursts of speed far exceeding 5.5 mph spotting a potential meal
slipping by will hopefully attack that meal with ravenous and
instinctive reaction . My philosophy has so far faired o.k. Im no
great white fisherman by no means.
I agree with you Marty on the discretion of how you measure the
distance between two pools you have created , I usually use
approximate centers.
Your mention of brookies prefering cold waters , I agree with you . All
then reading and experience I have listened to and personal experience
says that all trout and salmon prefer and need cold water.
Brookies raised in the northeast also have the adaptability to warmer
waters which is contrary to thier cousins. Fish and game will
stock brookies in smaller and shallow ponds that are warm in the
summer where rainbows would not be able to survive. Brookies can
toleratea lower oxygen count found in warm water.
Looks like this conversation needs to be moved huh. The title of this
entry has nothing to do with what I got started. Sooorrrrry. :'(
ron
|
103.22 | Bigger is not always better | RENOIR::ORLOWSKI | | Fri Apr 17 1992 17:17 | 15 |
| Well,
I bought the 49L DownRigger Reel with a 8'6" Down Rigger Pole for 2
reasons. First,,this year I will use Lead Core Line with it until I can
get myself a DownRigger,,,and second,,,when I get a downrigger,,I will
switch to mono line.
The only thing about this reel is that it is TOOOOOO large for most
trout trolling. It even says on the reel side,,"DEEP SEA REEL" which it
did not say on the ad in the magazine.
I can't decide,,,,should I keep it,,,sell it to a interested 3rd
party,,,or return it to BASS PRO CATALOG for a smaller reel......
....boy,,it is a nice reel but a little OVERKILL for 1-2 pound trout.
-�teve �.
|
103.23 | Think light | SALEM::JUNG | half day?-> | Fri Apr 17 1992 18:42 | 15 |
| Jimmy, er...I mean Stevie
I thought "WE" agreed you were going to buy a downrigger this
year.
The 49L is definately "OVERKILL" for our smallish N.H. trout.
And @ 30 ozs. you would be exhausted just carrying it to the boat.
I would suggest a light to medium action spinning reel and rod.
When the water warms up and the fish go a little deeper, buy
that %#@%$ downrigger!
Jeff (Captain) aka Jungy
Team Starcraft
|