[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference wahoo::fishing-v2

Title:Fishing-V2: All About Angling
Notice:Time to go fishin'! dayegins
Moderator:WAHOO::LEVESQUE
Created:Fri Jul 19 1991
Last Modified:Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:548
Total number of notes:9621

71.0. "Seabrook Station Nuclear Plant spill" by POOL::JMCLAUGHLIN () Wed Oct 02 1991 12:32

        Yesterday on the way into work, I heard on the radio that there was
        a spill at SeaBrook. They really didn't give many details but said it
        was Minor. Some waste water from the Planet was released into the
        Bay. Do to a value being open, that should have been closed !!!

        Does any have any more detail.

        I didn't intend for this to get into a rat hole about Seabrook but
        I fishing out of the Mouth of the Merrimack and am concerned about the
        enviromental / fishing affects on the area.

        I was planning on going out this weekend but not sure now.

                                                Thanks for any info
                                                        Jim
  

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
71.1A minor spill? There is no such thing!LEVERS::NPAREWed Oct 02 1991 13:1911
    
    	RE -1	It seems that approx. 2000 gal.of radioactive coolant water
    escaped through some valves into a 750,000 gal. mineral free pool used
    to clean tools by workers.Then about 45,000 gal. of that water was
    dumped through the plant's normal cooling outlet 7,000 feet offshore.
    They called it a minor spill!
    
    	Frenchy
    
    PS: At least the striper will be easier to find now that they will be
    	glowing in the dark.  :-)
71.2Any warnings about fish ??POOL::JMCLAUGHLINWed Oct 02 1991 13:3614
>> A minor spill? There is no such thing!

>	I agree 100 %



Have there been any warning ?

I don't think I'll be Blue fishing any more this year, from things people have 
said in this conference. Blue hang out around these outlets. 

But do Stripes ?

						Jim
71.3WAHOO::LEVESQUEA glint of steel & a flash of lightWed Oct 02 1991 16:329
 The amount of radioactive water released into the ocean was less than 1/1000th
of the amount that they are allowed to dump per federal regulations on a
monthly basis. The amount of radioactivity released was insufficient to even
file an "unusual event" report with the NRC (the least important classification
of accident.) It is impossible to measure any increase in the level of 
radioactivity at the outflows. Based on these facts as reported by the media, 
I conclude that there is no real danger posed by the mistake.

 The Doctah
71.4shouldn't affect the ocean habitatCARROL::YELINEKWITHIN 10Thu Oct 03 1991 15:0312
    
    My understanding of the "event" was that it went totally undetected 
    UNTIL the workers affected with radiation passed through a checkpoint.
    An excess level of radiation was detected on some workers and the cause 
    investigated leading to the ~2000 gal spill.
    
    NO EVACUATION POSSIBLE 
    Citizens "WITHIN 10" a Ten Mile Radius
    
    /MArk
    I'm not against nuke energy but do wonder abit about this type of
    news when it happens in my backyard.
71.5I worry more about logging the old forests...DELNI::JMCDONOUGHTue Oct 08 1991 11:335
       2000 gallons of water irradiated to this level, diluted in the
    ocean, would present a problem about 1X10-to-the-10th LESS than you'd
    experience walking to your car on a sunny day through the parking lot..
    
    JM
71.6How much water was really dumped ??POOL::JMCLAUGHLINTue Oct 08 1991 14:0522
I friend heard on the radio friday.

That the entire water supply at Seabrook was contaminated.  People were
taking showers in it. Also the ear wash machines were contaminated.

5 people were hospitalized.

	What was the real amount of damage ??



I did go out friday night and we did pretty good. There wasn't many caught
but the ones that were all were big.I didn't catch any of these but I'll give 
it another try this weekend.

We cut a 32lb, 39lb and a boat next to us cut about a 35 lb, all were released.
No one was to sure about there health.



				Jim
71.7WAHOO::LEVESQUELet us prey...Tue Oct 08 1991 16:2812
>That the entire water supply at Seabrook was contaminated.  People were
>taking showers in it. Also the ear wash machines were contaminated.>

>5 people were hospitalized.

 That's ka-ka. The water supply and the cooling water are not even the same
KIND of water. What is supposed to have happened, workers transported the
contaminated water and dumped it into the reservoir?!!

 Be a kind soul and buy your friend a hearing aid.

 the Doctah
71.8Slow down, Doc....GEMVAX::JOHNHCTue Oct 08 1991 17:2817
    re: .7
    
    I heard the same report. No hearing aid required. 
    
    The implication was that more than just one piece of the Seabrook
    system was contaminated. 
    
    I grinned when I heard the report, imagining the consternation on the
    face of the Seabrook PR person when he/she realized that the "damage
    control" pablum handed to the press hadn't worked.
    
    For the record, though, I don't remember anything about numbers of
    workers being hospitalized. I remember that the contamination of the
    freshwater supply was discovered when workers passing through a
    checkpoint after a shower set off the contamination alarm.
    
    John H-C
71.9I just he can hold off on the hearing aidPOOL::JMCLAUGHLINWed Oct 09 1991 11:168

	Thanks for comfirming this John.

	Doctah maybe you should review your plans for Seabrooks water system.
	

					Jim