[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference vmszoo::vmsmail

Title:VMS Mail Utility Suggestions and Discussions
Moderator:EPS::VANDENHEUVEL
Created:Thu Feb 13 1986
Last Modified:Tue Jun 03 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1943
Total number of notes:8236

186.0. "New mail count wrong - can't be reset" by PULSAR::SILVER (CSSE, RSX Problem Management) Mon Nov 17 1986 16:53

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name		DateLines
186.1PSWAPM::POSNIAKRob PMon Nov 17 1986 17:187
186.2Wishing for another way to do itHGOS41::SIMONSZETOSimon Szeto@HGO, ABSS/HongkongWed Mar 09 1988 23:0510
186.3SET NEW_MAIL_COUNT is a disappointmentCASEE::CLARKWard ClarkFri Mar 11 1988 12:0323
186.4is there a fix planned for V5?DYO780::DYSERTBarry DysertWed Aug 24 1988 11:1623
186.523220::SZETOSimon Szeto, ABSS/FER, HongkongWed Aug 24 1988 11:497
186.6an editorialDYO780::DYSERTBarry DysertWed Aug 24 1988 14:2511
186.7An editorial on the other sideULTRA::HERBISONLess functionality, more featuresWed Aug 31 1988 13:2137
186.8GOTO 550 for programDYO780::DYSERTBarry Dysert, DTN-433-2420Wed Sep 07 1988 10:105
186.9SIR for SET NEW_MAIL_COUNT coming?HWSSS0::SZETOSimon Szeto @HGO, HongkongSun Sep 24 1989 06:5780
186.10One "yes" vote hereHWSSS0::SZETOSimon Szeto @HGO, HongkongSun Sep 24 1989 06:595
186.11Amail has "set new_mail N"TOHOKU::TAYLORMon Sep 25 1989 10:236
186.12better late than neverPROXY::CANTORHide, Cecil, here comes Uncle Captain!Mon Sep 25 1989 16:395
186.13can we get rid of this FAQ?SIMON::SZETOSimon Szeto, International Sys. Eng.Mon May 25 1992 09:5428
186.14possible reasons why things aren't so simpleSIMON::SZETOSimon Szeto, International Sys. Eng.Mon May 25 1992 10:5923
186.15GotchaSIMON::SZETOSimon Szeto, International Sys. Eng.Mon May 25 1992 11:039
186.16the reply I postedSIMON::SZETOSimon Szeto, International Sys. Eng.Mon May 25 1992 23:5073
186.17READ/NEW is a separate command from READSIMON::SZETOSimon Szeto, International Sys. Eng.Tue May 26 1992 09:218
186.18STAR::CANTORDave CantorTue May 26 1992 11:3517
186.19MU::PORTERdisadvantaged networksTue May 26 1992 12:476
186.20Time-consuming procedureSTAR::CANTORDave CantorTue May 26 1992 14:2418
186.21MU::PORTERdisadvantaged networksTue May 26 1992 16:5016
186.22MU::PORTERdisadvantaged networksTue May 26 1992 16:532
186.23STAR::CANTORDave CantorWed May 27 1992 00:395
186.24READ/NEW with no MAIL.MAI doesn't reset countSIMON::SZETOSimon Szeto, International Sys. Eng.Wed May 27 1992 08:3757
186.25<Return> with non-zero newmail countSIMON::SZETOSimon Szeto, International Sys. Eng.Wed May 27 1992 09:0229
186.26messages in newmail are not always newUTRTSC::KNOPPERSOswald KnoppersWed May 27 1992 12:068
186.27SIMON::SZETOSimon Szeto, International Sys. Eng.Wed May 27 1992 12:2714
186.28STAR::CANTORDave CantorWed May 27 1992 14:5719
186.29user doesn't buy itSIMON::SZETOSimon Szeto, International Sys. Eng.Wed May 27 1992 15:5124
186.30MU::PORTERdisadvantaged networksWed May 27 1992 16:242
186.31QAR it.STAR::CANTORDave CantorThu May 28 1992 18:1212
186.32FIGS::BANKSThis wasFri May 29 1992 11:309
186.33ImplicationsSTAR::CANTORDave CantorFri May 29 1992 12:2916
186.34decrement the count when removing the newmsg attibute56649::TOHOKU::TAYLORFri May 29 1992 12:4422
186.35can MAIL drop the user a hint?ALLOUT::STEWARTBob StewartTue Jun 02 1992 10:5927
186.36I think it would be inappropriate in most casesSTAR::CANTORDave CantorTue Jun 02 1992 12:0413
186.37FIGS::BANKSThis wasTue Jun 02 1992 12:2232
186.38MU::PORTERJustified Ancient of MuTue Jun 02 1992 13:1218
186.39don't have to be accurate always, just fix the stupid caseSIMON::SZETOSimon Szeto, International Sys. Eng.Tue Jun 02 1992 15:5716
186.40Maybe we can just change the misleading messageSTAR::CANTORDave CantorTue Jun 02 1992 17:378
186.41FIGS::BANKSThis wasTue Jun 02 1992 17:4413