T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1357.1 | Apparently true | 20263::PUSHEE | | Thu Mar 31 1994 11:03 | 8 |
| I think I saw this in the Telegraph a couple of days ago. My memory tells
me that the Wolf was shot last year, and that it took a lot (6 months?) of
scientific study to in fact determine that it was a Wolf. I believe that
final determination relied on DNA tests - certainly something that the
average hunter does not have at his disposal in the field. Wolves were
not thought to exist in Maine, and are probably not even mentioned in
the Maine hunting regs. The hunter, from PA I think, may be charged
under federal endangered species act laws.
|
1357.2 | | 5451::ROBERTS | Spring cleaning at the Whitehouse | Thu Mar 31 1994 11:39 | 5 |
|
If they can't tell it's a wolf without DNA study, what the heck do they
expect a coyote hunter to do?
Gary
|
1357.3 | | 17576::PAPPALARDO | | Thu Mar 31 1994 13:59 | 14 |
|
There was an article in the Lawrence Eagle-Tribune within the last week
covering the possibilities of Wolves & Cougars in the New England area.
The article went on to say though there have been MANY sightings and
plaster moulds made of tracks they do not have any carcasses to prove
the exsistance without a shadow of doubt. One thing that was mentioned
though was an interview with the Maine F&G and they said someone HAD
shot an animal and they were doing tests to see if they could factually
concluded it was a Wolf. On the average it seems each state has in the
area of 30 calls per year on sightings, and one of the latest sightings
was a logger working in a northern area of Maine who sighted 3 Cougars.
Guy
|
1357.4 | Something smells | 35186::VANDENBARK | Makes me happy! | Thu Mar 31 1994 14:22 | 5 |
| I would have to agree with reply .2, I think it is a crock of sh!t to
be charged if it took the Fish and Wildlife 6 months to tell.
Wess
|
1357.5 | | 33972::RHARRIS | I am the NRA, for life! | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:27 | 6 |
| That does stink. They should just wash out the charges. But, probably
due to all the publicity, this unfortunate hunter is going to be a
scapegoat. Government has no brains or kahunas!
bob
|
1357.6 | | DNEAST::CURAVOO_GARY | CRUZN II | Thu Mar 31 1994 21:43 | 7 |
| It was a wolf convirmed by DNA. It was shot for a coyote over bait
while bear hunting. They also now have a picture of a cougar in
Caratunk. A guide running 2 dogs got pictures of the cat and dogs...
Last summer a driver of a log truck watched a cougar in a clear cut
about 10 mile up the road from my place.
gary c
|
1357.7 | Expensive Lessons | 30029::MERCIER | | Fri Apr 01 1994 14:22 | 21 |
| I have family who works for the Department of Enviroment or whatever
they call themselves who work with the biologist on the case. The
hunter turned himself in. He went to the warden station and reported
that he was sorry but he thinks he shot a wolf. I guess that they
laughed at the guy until they saw it in the back of his pick up.
They ran tests in Maine but could not come up with anything decisive so
they cut off its head and sent it out to a place in Oregon. I haven't
talked with them lately but I guess, from what you guys are saying,
that the test came back conclusive.
I'm not sure what the state will do to the guy. He did turn himself in
but that doesn't usually matter. I once saw a guy get a $1000.00 fine
at the Winnipesaukee Ice Fishing Derby for attempting to weigh in his
Golden Trout. This Golden Trout was actually a large landlocked salmon
which are illegal to pull through the ice in New Hampshire. They sited
the perverbial "Ignorance is no excuse in the eyes of the law". I felt
bad for the guy because he honestly believed in what he had. Expensive
lessons to learn
Bob M�
|
1357.8 | | 4629::LEVESQUE | you irritate me and my friends | Fri Apr 01 1994 16:51 | 10 |
| Speaking of wolves, do you guys remember the photograph on the front page of
the Union Leader last year that was purportedly of a wolf? (The photograph
was taken in NH.) Well, apparently the NH F&G has stopped claiming it is
not a wolf. I saw the original photos, in large format. It so happens that
I know the lady who took them. It sure looks like a young wolf to me. The
snout and coloration just don't match coyotes. (The pics were beautiful, BTW.)
And apparently another one has been spotted, in the same area.
It sounds to me like these predators are quietly reestablishing themselves.
|
1357.9 | WOLF OR NOT | 3267::DAY | | Wed May 11 1994 17:48 | 8 |
| I heard a rumer last year that someone had hit a wolf with their
car on Industial Drive in Merrimack NH. If this is the case then
there could be Wolves on Digital property. They said that they
first though it was a cayote but later said it was a wolf. Since
this is a congested area the report was squashed. This could be
just someones active imagination. I though I mention it though.
Dave
|