T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1347.1 | | CSC32::W_TUTTLE | | Mon Feb 07 1994 12:50 | 29 |
| Janurary Report:Herds and Harvest
Colorado:
"This past winter was not as severe as the winter of '82-'83," says
biologist Rick Kahn. "Some areas were hammered, but statewide we don't
think there's been an appreciable effect." Kahn adds that in the
Piceance Basin herd, winter fawn mortality runs from 55 to 70 percent
in normal years. "We saw no change this spring." Colorado is in the
last phase of its three-year hunting program; regulations planned
for 1995-1999 will be sensitive to mule deer herds, which Kahn
contends are "young and female." He says deer numbers have changed
little over the past two decades (winter counts last year showed
607,000), but that hunters are complaining now because there fewer
mature bucks. "We're above carrying capacity on many of our western
ranges; herd reductions would improve productivity and fawn survival -
even boost buck/doe ratios." Getting more big bucks will require
regulations many hunters won't like. "The bountiful 1940s and 1950s are
history," concludes Kahn. But he is optimistic about the future of
mule deer in Colorado. "We're elk-oriented now; we can have elk and
good populations of mule deer."
This iformation was provided by the Mule Deer Foundations Janurary
Issue.
I have information on several other mule deer state, if requested.
.
William Tuttle
|
1347.2 | Oregon? | 31318::CORBETTKE | | Mon Feb 07 1994 17:40 | 10 |
| re .1
What are they saying about Oregon Muley's?
In the past 3 years we've had to draw for a tag because of fawn kill.
Last year only 30% drew. Winter, so far, hasn't been too bad I think.
I live in Western Oregon where there's mostly blacktail, but I've got
property and a couple of cabins in the Blue Mts so I go over anyway.
Ken
|
1347.3 | Oregon | CSC32::W_TUTTLE | | Tue Feb 08 1994 09:32 | 21 |
| Oregon:
"Mule Deer have been in trouble for several years here," says Dan
Edwards, acting big game staff biologist. "The '92-'93 winter hit
them pretty hard, especially in the central and southeast units."
The Oregon Department of Fish and Woldlife reduced tag quotas by an
average 23 percent (all mule deer hunting is by drawn permit); some
quotas were halved. Chopping hunter numbers may have helped deer herds,
but it didn't help riflemen, who found the animals widely distributed
following a banner forage year. "We had normal hunting conditions this
fall," Edwards says. "But low concentrations of both deer and hunters
limited the shooting. And we think a lot of hunters got discouraged
and gave up early." Edwards adds that the mule deer taken were, pre-
dictably, in top physical shape. "Were optimistic about fawn survival
this year. And our blacktail herds seem stable. A nasty winter won't
bounce them around like it will our mule deer."
.
William Tuttle
|
1347.4 | Today's Bucks, Tomorrow's Deer! | CSC32::W_TUTTLE | | Tue Feb 08 1994 10:00 | 12 |
| The Mule Deer Foundation needs your help. Now is the time to get
involved. Deer and deer habitat need your involvement of time and/or
money. Become a member, start and/or join a local chapter, contribute
to a great organization that is making a difference for mule deer,
blacktail deer, their habitats and future generations. We can make the
differnce.
The Mule Deer Foundation
1005 terminal Way, Suite 140
Reno, Nv 89502
(702) 322-2800/(800) 344-BUCK (2825)
|
1347.5 | I was afraid of that.. | 31318::CORBETTKE | | Tue Feb 08 1994 12:14 | 8 |
| re .3
Thanks for the input and the call.
As I said I look forward to going over to the cabin anyway, so if I
don't draw it's no big deal. Grouse hunting is good that time of year.
Ken
|
1347.6 | Anyone try Idaho ? | DV780::WINDLE | Jim Windle | Wed Feb 16 1994 14:29 | 16 |
|
Some of us couldn't even find sign this year on the western slope in
Colorado. Granted that may be more of a criticism of the hunter than
the hunted, but it seemed like a good enough reason to 'splain how I
just had to spend the kid's college money and get an Idaho deer
license.
Does anyone have any suggestions about the Idaho area? The out of state
fees were about the same as Colorado and can be ordered by phone and a
credit card. As of today ( 2/16/94) there were about 4,000 tags left.
BTW, I was just kidding about the kid's college money, it was the next
Jeep payment.
Jim Windle
|
1347.7 | | DNEAST::MAHANEY_MIKE | | Thu Feb 17 1994 04:01 | 10 |
|
I'am not sure where they go but I have some friends that go to
Idaho about every three years for Elk and Mule Deer. On one trip
about 6 years ago one friend shot an Elk which measured to be a new
state record, but after the drying period back home and they were
remeasured he missed by so little. They have their tags for this year
and I just made my mind up that I wasn't going. I beleive the tags
were $476 for both. If I was going I had palnned on flying out as I
don't call sitting in a cab of a pick up truck for 52 hrs non stop
much of a vacation.
|
1347.8 | | CSC32::W_TUTTLE | | Thu Feb 17 1994 11:21 | 26 |
| Idaho:
Staff big game biologist Lonn Kuck confirms that Idaho's mule deer
herds have been struggling since the late 1960s. "But numbers in late
1992 were up. That became a problem when drought-stricken winter
ranges couldn't provide the forage needed to keep all those deers
alive." Kuck says the winter was harsh in places, "but not brutal.
Had there been forage to fatten the deer in fall and give them
maintenance nutrition on winter ranges, we'd have seen the usual
30 to 40 percent fawn loss. Fawn mortality in central and southwest
Idaho averaged 76 percent." Though survival of adult deer last winter
was near normal (69 percent of males, 84 percent of females), IDF&G
canceled all its late doe hunts. The dip in yearling numbers this fall
kept many hunters from killing bucks. "Yearlings comprise about 60
percent of our harvest," Kuck points out, adding: "Deer were fat after
a summer of record rainfall. They didn't move nuch during the fall,
which was unseasonably dry. These factors, combined with low deer
numbers, depressed the kill." Southeast Idaho, for several years a
trophy-hunters honey-hole, may have taken a beating last winter. "We
won't know until later this spring, after we've tabulated hunter
success and finished our aerial counts," says Kuck. Reductions
in antlerless quotas appear likely for 1994. Buck tag allocations
are under scrutiny now.
.
William Tuttle
|
1347.9 | Thanks | DV780::WINDLE | Jim Windle | Fri Mar 04 1994 11:51 | 10 |
|
Thanks for the encouragement. I've made contact with a person here in
CXO who has friends up in Idaho who have pretty current knowledge about
current conditions.
Yeah, the $476 is a bit steep, but the $27.50 I spent here in colorado
last year was a total waste. Besides, I'm dying to hunt the same turf
as Elmer Keith did.
Jim
|
1347.10 | Ill drive for days.... | 16616::MELENDEZ | | Tue Apr 19 1994 17:59 | 12 |
| I have hunted Mulies in Utah, Colorado and Montana.
I have found that the cost of going to Montana is not so bad.
Mule deer populations in Utah have been affected by something called
red tonge or something like that. The herds have been devistated. I
did not hunt Utah last year because of this. In the past of ten
hunters 9 were successfull last year one scrawny buck was taken. It
will be years before the numbers come up. Colorado I think is two
commercial. Hay stay at the Hilton and we process your meat, great for
the wife (she also likes cricket records) but a little tame for me
thanks very much.....
JOe
|