Title: | The Hunting Notesfile |
Notice: | Registry #7, For Sale #15, Success #270 |
Moderator: | SALEM::PAPPALARDO |
Created: | Wed Sep 02 1987 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jun 03 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1561 |
Total number of notes: | 17784 |
I recently read an article which extolled the virtues a Sweet's 7.62 solvent. It claimed that it was by far and away the best solvent on the market for removing copper fouling from rifle and pistol barrels. So, I decided to try it. Since then, I have discovered that it is extremely hard to locate (at least here in Colorado Springs). I finally found some this weekend and thought that it might be appropriate to start a topic to post information on cleaning solvents and/or supplies. In particular, the experience one has had with a particular solvent, and even where you can find a local supply. The moderator may wish to consolidate this note with another. I have located two different shops in the Springs area which carry Sweet's 7.62 gun cleaning solvent. They are: Broken Star Trading Post 2340 Montebello Sq. Dr. (719)598-9091 and The Shootin' Den 420 W. Fillmore (719)634-3331 The owner of Broken Star has had some difficulty locating a source for this, but now has a supply. He told me that starting June 1, he will have all that anyone needs. The Shootin' Den seems to have trouble keeping it in stock. I have checked with them twice and they were sold out both times. I assume that they will re-order and attempt to keep a supply on hand. Apparently, this stuff is all the rage, now. I tried it out on my .270 this weekend. I have had the gun for about 15 years and have never used anything but Hoppe's No. 9 and gun oil. It took about 15 patches with the Sweet's before I got a clean run. However, the last 5 or so showed very little copper residue. The first several were pretty dirty. I really don't have a good feel for how well it works. Perhaps others can share their experiences with this or other products. Jerry P.S. Cross posted in the Firearms notes conference
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
963.1 | Tastes great - less filling? | CSCOA1::HUFFSTETLER | Thu May 30 1991 15:19 | 6 | |
Is the Sweet's stuff supposed to clean better or be better for the barrel? All I've ever used was (is) Hoppe's #9. I like the taste ;'). just wandering, Scott | |||||
963.2 | Beginner's comment | DECALP::HOHWY | Just another Programmer | Fri May 31 1991 04:53 | 25 |
Scott, check out the FIREARMS notes file, there was a recent discussion about Sweet's in there (note 4230). I have only recently started using Sweet's (on Corky's recommendation). I think the idea is that it allows removal of copper fouling without resorting to the use of a brush (Sweet's dissolves the bronze brushes!). It seems quite efficient insofar that it produces a lot of blue patches - although sometimes I get impatient... Sweet's and a number of other solvents intended particularly for copper fouling removal are made on ammonia basis. You will certainly notice the difference between that smell and good old Hoppe's #9 - and you do notice any little cuts or wounds on your fingers pretty quick! :-) I get the impression that Hoppe's #9 was designed as powder residue solvent, so with Hoppe's you definitely require a good scrubbing to get copper fouling out. One other difference, perhaps : Hoppe's #9 is made on an oil basis - you can actually use it as a bore protector - I am not sure Sweet's has oil in it or whether it requires separate bore coating? - Mike | |||||
963.3 | Both is Better | KEBLER::WSC151::J_PEDERSEN | Born Free - Taxed to Death! | Fri May 31 1991 10:35 | 6 |
I find that Sweets works well AFTER Hoppes; first the powder residue, then the copper fouling. Now, is Sweets just did not smell like s?it! Jim ;^) |