T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
882.1 | Go for it! | FLYSQD::NIEMI | I'm the NRA | Thu Jan 03 1991 10:17 | 13 |
|
Les,
While I can't actually tell you about using the Mini-30 for deer,
I use the old Ruger 44mag carbine. I took a nice five pointer last
year with it. One shot through the chest just behind the shoulder
dropped it dead in its tracks. I don't feel undergunned and the
7.62x39 has to be as good as the 44mag. I just won't shoot unless
the range is under one hundred yards. Don't worry about the balistic
bangers in the gun notes. The secret is to get used to using that
rifle and get to feel confident with it. The rest will fall into
place.
sjn
|
882.2 | to each his own | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Thu Jan 03 1991 12:48 | 22 |
| I guess my biggest question is why??? when there are so many other,
more potent calibers out there...
...And if it's a well placed shot you have to take because of the
inadequacy of the round, then you don't need the semi-auto anyway...
It's the first shot that counts, after that your winging it.
I don't personally hunt with one and have never hunted with one, but a
guy in our camp did and is now selling it. Theres a note in here
somewhere with one for sale if your interested...
I've shot them, and they are a pleasure to shoot, not a tack driver by
any stretch, but easy on the recoil and light... little rambo'ish for
the woods in my opinion. He had a negative experience with it, and
does'nt feel it is a capable deer rifle... i can't elaborate more cause
I wasn't at camp at the time.
A Ruger mini-30 7.69x39mm russian, w/ mounted 4x bushnell scope and
extra 5 round clips and ammo in excellent condition asking $400
give me a call if your interested.
Fra
|
882.3 | Make sure you can hit what you want | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Thu Jan 03 1991 12:51 | 36 |
|
Lee,
I have been reading the note in FIREARMS, it really seemed to stray
from what you wanted.
I too don't use the mini-30, but there are a couple 44 mags and 1 mini
30 in the group I hunt with. The 44's have taken several deer, never
a problem, the shots have been out to about 125 yds. Deer never went
far if at all.
The one shot with a mini-30 was at about 120yds, the deer went about
3/4 mile. I should mention the shot placement was not ideal. It was
to far back for a lung/heart hit. I was not there for the
dressing of the deer, but I would guess maybe liver/stomach area
judging from the entrance hole. There was no exit hole, but the bullet
was just under the hide on the far side of the deer.
Don't know what bullet weight the guy was using.
When he bought the gun, he was looking for a Ruger 44 mag carbine, like
the others in the group. The person at the store told him of them being
discontinued but the mini-30 was the replacement. When looking at the
bullet, it is very similar to a 30-30. Don't know any ballistic
info on either.
One other point. When I was at a hunting camp in N. Carolina last
year. The lodge owner said he had had a couple mini-30's in. They did
fine for short shots in the woods, but once you crossed the 125-150
range the trajectory drops fast and they loose power fast.
I would say it is fine for New England type of hunting, just keep shots
short, and practice with it.
--Bob
|
882.4 | As personal as deodorant | OASS::SOBCZYNSKI_L | | Fri Jan 04 1991 07:44 | 24 |
|
Lee
Reply .3 sums up my personal feelings to a degree about the mini-30, or
the 7.62X39 cartiridge. I considered using it in the brush this past
season, but decided against it for a number of reasons. However if
seriously considering the mini-30 there are (in my opinion) serveral
considerations, in doing so be a realist. How well can I place a shot?
Where will the hunt take place, bush -vs- open field? What shot distances
are we talking about? Size of the deer being hunted, this would be
geographically dependant? Each individual shoots what they feel
comfortable with. Open fields I use a 30-06, for bush .444, again this
is my preference. Now that the season is over and finding that my
longest shot was 40-50 yards, I'm considering a .44mag, which would
more than fill the bill. However once again, its what you feel most
comfortable with. If hunting in the bush we could talk about bullet
deflection, the mini-30 -vs- .444 or .44mag, and probably a few other
things would pop up as well.
Well thats my two cents worth.
Cheers
Leonard
|
882.5 | Ruger Mini-30 | OTOO01::BELLONI | | Fri Jan 04 1991 09:17 | 35 |
| Thanks for the info. A Mini-30 for $400 you say, of course I am
interseted. The problem is I am in Canada. I will have to check how
much duty gets slapped on. A lot of this free trade cut in this month,
so maybe the standard 30% does not apply anymore. We are also elligible
for a $300 per year duty free trip.
I am going to be in Boston for NET U, and then I am going to be in
Bedford in March. Where is this gun located?
I should mention that the area that we hunt offers 100 to 150 yard
shots on an old hydro line and the rest is jungle country with possible
shots in the 40-50 yard max with lots of trees in between. I have been
using a 300 mag with scope for the last few years and taken my share of
deer on the hydro slash. Great gun, never look for anything. However,
trying to get a shot at bounding deer in the bush is another story.
I tried a Remington woodmaster semi in .308. Nice gun, but I don't like
block sightes so I thought of getting something that has peeps already on
it and a bit lighter if possible, a Mini-30 is the only thing that
seems to fit the bill. Since I would also like a nice plinker for
ground hogs it seems to fit the bill. Some of my neighbors have gotten
a bit crusty over me using the 300 Mag to curb the ground hog
population.
To engage in camp talk, I was looking at the ballistics for the 7.62X39
and it sure looks a lot like a 30/30 or .303 Savage.
My alternative at this point is the Remington-semi carabine, only in
30-06 unfortunatly, and have a peep installed. One of the guys in the
camp inherited on this year and it is a nice short gun, plenty of
power, I find it a bit heavy and would preffer a .308 but then life is
that way. I wish that Ruger would make the Mini-30 in .308, there were
rumours that they would, and then it would be a nobrainer.
Les
|
882.6 | 30/06 | WJOUSM::PAPPALARDO | A Pure Hunter | Fri Jan 04 1991 12:01 | 23 |
|
RE:5
You say you'll be shooting 100-150yds....40-50yds.....you want to hunt
varments...
To meet all your needs you should consider a 30-06 Bolt-action with a
scope of 3-9 power.
You'll be able to purchase or re-load ammo to hunt varments to Moose.
You seem to want one tool for many situations....don't under estimate
the versatility of the 30 caliber invented in 1906....
Do yourself a favor and check out the many loads this caliber has to
offer. You'll find a tool to meet all your needs that will last a
lifetime....not to mention the re-sale value if you should decide at a
later time to sell.
Good-Luck
Rick
|
882.7 | Carbine 30-06, I'm thinking about it | OASS::SOBCZYNSKI_L | | Fri Jan 04 1991 12:12 | 23 |
|
Hi Les
Ref. .5
Ironically I have considering going to the 30-06 carbine also, still
thinking about it. The one nice thing about the 30-06 is the number of
different loads available for it. Currently the only cartridge I've see
available for the 7.63X39 is a 123 grain bullet. I feel that balistics
are relative, in looking at the 30-30 and 7.62X39 and 30-06 the
alingnment factor would be the bullet weight. I believe that the 30-30
has 150 grain bullet, now comes the next thought. How much difference
does that really make when it comes to impact. Again this is relative
to bullet placement on target, and personal preference etc.. Putting
it another way if a freight train and an MG are traveling at 50 miles
an hour each, which would be the one delivering the most devestating
blow upon impact with a similar/like object? I tend to go with heavier
39 for plinking. The ammo is cheap and I don't have to reload it.
Weight factory, after walking for over three hours even my ithaca mod37
got heavy.
Cheers
Leonard
|
882.8 | Ruger mini-30 | OTOO01::BELLONI | | Fri Jan 04 1991 13:53 | 16 |
|
E=1/2 MVsq
I'll look tonight, but when I looked on the weekend the ballistic
tables had both the 30/30 and 7.62X39 at around 1000 ft/lbs of energy
at 150 to 200 yards. Like I said I'll double check. The AK round has a
bit more velocity which makes up for the difference in weight.
I have seen Winchester, Remington, Federal and PMC offering AK hunting
rounds in 123 to 125 grain weights all lead saber tip construction. I
don't know what bullets you can get from Speer or Nosler, I was going
to start cheking. The AK round is not all that popular in Canada, as
assault rifles are frowned on here and probably will get banned real
soon.
LEs
|
882.9 | A BLR maybe? | DECALP::HOHWY | Just another Programmer | Mon Jan 07 1991 05:32 | 21 |
|
Les, I know you are looking for a semi-automatic for those
quick follow up shots, but I still can't resist asking:
"How about looking at a Browning BLR in .308 - or even
in .284 Win these days". With an aperture sight installed
this would be a pretty deadly combination for heavy timber
hunting, and those 100-150 yard shots would still be a breeze.
But then again I don't know if you like levers? Prize wise
you would not be too much over the $400 (US) you mentioned
as acceptable. Weight wise you would be OK too - 7 lbs.
If an auto is really what you want, but you are looking for
a .308 then how about a Springfield M1A? Unfortunately it
is both more expensive (new around $800) and heavier too -
8 3/4 lbs.
Best of luck.
- Mike
|
882.10 | Ruger mini-30 | OTOO01::BELLONI | | Mon Jan 07 1991 13:35 | 8 |
| There is a number of fine lever guns out there, the 308 BLR being one
of them. Don't want a lever.
Used my brother's Woodmaster 308 last year, nice gun but I want it
lighter. I have been working this over for a couple of years now, and I
keep coming up with the Mini-30. So be it.
Les
|
882.11 | | COMET::ALBERTUS | goodnight, moonlit lady | Fri Jan 11 1991 21:30 | 9 |
| For deer shots under 100 yards you ought to fine with the proper bullet
and placement.
Peep sights for those chucks might pose a problem ... you can always
throw a (sorta) cheapy scope on it for that.
Re "why a Mini 30?" ... how 'bout 'cause that's what he wants?
AA
|
882.12 | more on the mini-30 | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Mon Jan 14 1991 09:59 | 10 |
| re:.11
> "'cause that'd what he wants?"
Correct, just prodding him for more details... people ask me why i'm
building a 300H&H when theres 2 other 300 mags available in a factory
rifle... I don't think theres any thing wrong with asking, it creates
discussion, and much can be learned by verbal exchange.
Fra
|
882.13 | 7.69x39mm x 110% = 30-30 | CX3PST::WSC151::J_PEDERSEN | A Bad Day at Work is BAD | Mon Jan 14 1991 11:57 | 9 |
|
In my new Peterson's Hunting rag, the author suggested keeping shots
under 150 yards and that the energy at that range was roughly 10% less than
a 30-30.
Another opinion, but from a paid resource (if that makes a difference).
I will stick with my 300 Win Mag.
Jim
|
882.14 | | COMET::ALBERTUS | tiny dancer in my hand | Fri Feb 08 1991 08:30 | 9 |
| > I don't think theres any thing wrong with asking, it creates
> discussion, and much can be learned by verbal exchange.
Fra,
You are right of course. Seemed he had already decided on the
Mini and was asking for popular justification. ;-)
AA
|
882.15 | Well I got one | OTOO01::BELLONI | | Fri Feb 15 1991 15:21 | 14 |
| Well, I went ahead and bought one. A mini-30 that is. A box of shells
latter, I am convinced that the bloody thing shoots too low and cannot
adjust for it. Never had any problem with any other Ruger I had, guess
there is always the first.
Posted my problem in the firearms conference, got a suggestion to file
the front sight. Come weekend I'll get filing.
I am going down to Bedford Mass in the next few weeks, anybody
recommend a good place for cheap AK loads and mags?
Thaks,
LEs
|
882.16 | | MADMXX::PELTONEN | I'm Deeply Touched | Fri Feb 15 1991 16:49 | 13 |
|
Not exactly "next door", but not too far away would be ARMCO
in West Boylston. They always have a lot of paramilitary stuff
and their ammo prices ain't bad. Be aware that AK mags have
come *way* down in price. Average price used to be about $25
and up, even before the panic. Now I see ads from a place called
CDNN on the back of the Gun List every month.....30-rounders
are now $6.95 and 5-rounders are about a buck more. So, don't
pay the big bucks. 7.62 X 39 has also come down quite a bit, I
see 1100-round cases for about $100 or so.
DAP
|
882.17 | | MADMXX::PELTONEN | I'm Deeply Touched | Fri Feb 15 1991 16:54 | 15 |
|
Oh, yeah, I'm assuming that you realize that the Mini-30
ain't gonna house them AK mags. The Mini-30 extended-round
magazine situation has also gotten a lot better lately. When
the gun was a fairly new item, there were few 30-rounders
available for it, and the ones that were out there cost about
$50 apiece! Now Fed Ord is cranking them out by the millions,
average price at gunshows is about $20 or so.....I think that
Gander Mtn even has them these days. The Fed Ord mags are OK,
I used on for awhile in my Mini-14. The Mini-30 mag might be
a 20-rounder, but I don't remember without looking it up.
DAP
|
882.18 | Directions to ARMCO | OTOO01::BELLONI | | Wed Feb 20 1991 10:39 | 8 |
| Re 882.16
You would'nt happen to know the general directions to get to ARMCO from
Bedford would you?
Thanks,
LEs
|
882.19 | Directions to ARMCO | ELWOOD::MONDOU | | Wed Feb 20 1991 11:35 | 15 |
| I'll take a stab at the directions from Beford.
First, if you have ever been to Digital's Headmaster House in Boylston
it's real easy as ARMCO is on the same road (Route 70), about a mile or
2 further west. It's located on the left side of the road, in the rear
of a house. There is a sign at the location.
Otherwise, my suggestion is Route 3 north to Route 495 South.
Follow 495 S to Route 290 West ( toward Worcester).
Get off 290 at Route 140 and take 140 North until you come
to Route 70. I think it's the first traffic light. Go left
and you will see the DEC facility on the right. Continue
another mile or 2 as I described above.
Have fun, but bring lots of $$$.
|
882.20 | | CSC32::D_PELTONEN | I'm Deeply Touched | Wed Feb 20 1991 17:43 | 17 |
|
Ernie did a fine job of finding ARMCO for ya. I would only add
that once you get off of 290, the RT 70 intersection is about
1.5 miles and its the first traffic light so it should be easy to
find.
Also, when looking for ARMCO after making the left onto RT 70,
don't be looking for an enermous storefront.....ARMCO is in the
basement level of a ranch-style home and their sign out front is
a little less than imposing. You see the sign and go down a fairly
steep driveway. It'll be on your left, so be ready.
Its a fun place to visit and stock up on goodies...their gun
prices would wake the dead.
DAP
|
882.21 | Thanks for directions | OTOO01::BELLONI | | Thu Feb 21 1991 10:45 | 4 |
| Much appreciated guys. I'll be sure to check it out in a couple of
weeks.
Les
|
882.22 | a little more help | BPO406::LEAHY | | Thu Feb 21 1991 15:09 | 5 |
| One little addition, after you get on Rt. 70 you will come to a fairly
sharp bend to the left, ARMCO is right there on the left. If you
come to the church you went by it.
Jack
|
882.23 | ARMCO | OTOO01::BELLONI | | Thu Mar 14 1991 13:04 | 8 |
| Well I found it no problem. Thanks for the instruction. You were right
about the gun prices, pertty good. I loaded up on a pile of ammo. Was
also looking for a bigger clip for my Mini-30. They had both a 30 and a
50 from American Clip, I believe, but quite pricie, 50 to 60 $.
Thanks again,
Les
|