T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
725.1 | Winona works | BTOVT::WENER_R | | Tue Aug 14 1990 10:45 | 23 |
|
I'm currently wearing the "Winona Camo" that I've had for the last
few years. I've had good luck with this pattern as well as it's being
soft and not noisy. I've got the brown camo which has large patterning
like yours; it's black, light brown, and dark brown. If I were to get
it again, I think I'd get the grey camo to blend in with the grey of
trees a bit more.
Has anyone ever tried the "mirage" camo. I like the looks of it,
big patterns and definately no symmetry in it (which is good IMO).
Soft camo like Winona's is good, but it does tend to snag on berry
bushes a bit more than standard cotton, and picks up things like
burdocks really well (too well!)
I also camo my face with make-up (yes, I have to primp before I
go out) and have found this effective up close. I have been within
6 yards of deer on several occasions and it works.
I have some skyline camo (just the top), but didn't get to use
it last year (no snow during bow season). I could've used it the year
before when I tracked a couple of does during a snow. I got close,
but I think the snow camo would've helped out.
- Rob
|
725.2 | Strips of cotton and canvas? | CSCOA3::HUFFSTETLER | Reckless Abandoner | Tue Aug 14 1990 17:03 | 17 |
| Maybe I read it here, but I there was something about a new camo
that the military used that looked like "the blob" mated with
"the creature from the black lagoon." It was standard pants and
a jacket that had strips of soft canvas or cotton sewn on them.
The strips were about 1" wide and 12" long. The strips were also
colored brown, black, tan, etc.
Since the camo was in strips and sewn on, it gave a 3-D effect
that worked much better (according to the military) for
concealment. I think the authors said they tried it in a State
park where there were a lot of people and that people would walk
right up to you and never see you until you moved. They also
said they scared the daylights out of the same people.
Anyway, it sounds like it might be neat to try...
Scott
|
725.3 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | in the dark the innocent can't see | Tue Aug 14 1990 17:18 | 4 |
| re .2 sounds like the old English 'Ghillie suits' that
gamekeepers used to catch poachers. Brigade Quartermasters
sells modern versions. Looks uncomfortable as heck, likely
to tangle in brush.
|
725.4 | | WJOUSM::PAPPALARDO | | Tue Aug 14 1990 17:38 | 9 |
|
I'll be wearing Green/Black checkered jacket, Green wool (Johnson from
Vermont) pants, with Green susspenders with green/blk chk cap,
all'n,all it's just plain old Yankee-Conservitive hunting gear that's
seen about 20 seasons come and go.
WHY: Because the freezer has, and always gets filled.
Rick
|
725.5 | Try a splash of color? | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Tue Aug 14 1990 17:53 | 10 |
|
Re .4,
Rick,
from what I've seen in the past several years, them clothes you got
on are pretty good camo.
--Bob
|
725.6 | army issue urban for snowy days | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Wed Aug 15 1990 09:59 | 8 |
| I've been using the standard issue army camo for years now and have
had pretty good success, besides I like how it fits and I love the big
cargo pockets.
I've seen that other camo with the strips, it'd be a bitch to use when
shooting a bow.
Fra
|
725.7 | During fireams season... | EUCLID::PETERSON | HR4079 Ask your Rep! | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:34 | 2 |
|
Don't forget the X00 in Sq. of Blaze Orange.
|
725.8 | it's an edge, not a guarantee | SA1794::CHARBONND | in the dark the innocent can't see | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:48 | 10 |
| re .7 Depends on the state you're in. Vermont has no Blaze
Orange requirement. Frankly, I prefer the freedom of choice.
re . a few back, the green-and-black plaid. The larger 'buffalo'
plaids are actually pretty good in breaking up your outline,
especially in the darker woods. I bow-hunted in plaid, grey
and drab green for a couple years, back when I couldn't
afford camo. Did OK. But I do think appropriate camo is
better. At least *I* feel more confident, don't know for sure
if the deer are impressed :-)
|
725.9 | CHEEP, WARM, QUITE WHITE CAMO | WFOVX8::CHANG | | Thu Dec 13 1990 12:07 | 13 |
| HI ROGER CHANG HERE
JUST THOUGHT I'D ADD MY TWO CENTS. I WENT OUT AND BOUGHT A WHITE
SWEAT SUIT PANTS AND HOODED ZIPPERED TOP FROM J.C.PENNEY. THEN WENT TO
FRANK'S NURSEY IN HADLEY MASS (THEY SELL WASHABLE PAINT FOR CLOTHING)
AND PICKED UP SOME BLACK AND BROWN PAINT. I THEN PAINTED IT WITH THE
BLACK SO FAR. I JUST PAINTED STROKES LIKE BRUSH OR SMALL TWIGS LIKE
LINES ON IT. I PUT THIS OVER MY OTHER CLOTHING IF IT SNOWS, IT KEEPS ME
WARMER AND IT IS SOFT SO NO MORE(ZIP) FROM TWIGS AND IT ONLY COST ME
TOTALY ABOUT $25.00, WHICH SURE BEATS $115.00 FOR A SNOW CAMO OUTFIT.
CALL ME CHEEP BUT IF IT KEEPS ME WARMER AND DOES THE JOB AND QUITE TOO
HEY WHAT THE HELL
HOPE THIS HAS HELPED YOU SAVE MONEY TOO
ROGER
|
725.10 | Need waterproof undies... | DECALP::HOHWY | Just another Programmer | Thu Dec 13 1990 15:11 | 16 |
|
Roger, sounds like a nice way to save some bucks.
Only thing: do you wear water proof clothing
under your snow camo? The kind of material you
are using (cotton or cotton blends) tends to get
quite wet, and hold on to the water really well.
Watch out for hypothermia if you are in the snow
in wet clothing.
Cheers.
- Mike
|
725.11 | another idea | DATABS::STORM | | Fri Dec 14 1990 10:56 | 8 |
| I have a white "shell" jacket that I purchased from Cabela's. It
is just a cloth jacket and hood with no insulation or liner or
anything. I just got it big to wear over my water-proof and warmer
jacket and only use the white shell for camo in the snow. I don't
think it cost me much over $15.
Mark,
|
725.12 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | Fred was right - YABBADABBADOOO! | Mon Dec 17 1990 09:08 | 3 |
| If your facility has a 'clean room' you can sometimes get the
white garments that workers in the room use. Not made for durability
but the price is nice ! ;-)
|
725.13 | TWO HEADS ARE BETTER THAN ONE | WFOV11::CHANG | | Mon Dec 17 1990 11:46 | 6 |
| MIKE
SORRY FORGOT TO ADD THAT YOU SPRAY IT WITH SCOTCH GUARD OR EVEN THE
SPRAY WATER PROOFING FOR TENTS. YOU CAN WEAR YOUR FOUL WEATHER GARMENTS
UNDER IT AND NOT WORRY ABOUT THE NOISE OF BRANCHES ANYMORE. TKS
ROGER
|
725.14 | waterproofing Cotton | EUCLID::PETERSON | I know.., I said I was leaving. BUT...! | Mon Dec 17 1990 11:46 | 4 |
|
will Scotch-Guard do a decent job on the Sweatjacket stuff? I
picked up a white hooded pullover last year and love it-when it's dry!
|
725.15 | SO FAR SO GOOD | WFOV11::CHANG | | Mon Dec 17 1990 11:52 | 6 |
| THE SCOTCH-GUARD HAS WORKED FOR ME BUT I REALLY HAVEN'T GOTTEN INTO A
HEAVY RAIN OR SNOW STORM WITH IT YET. I GUESS IT WOULDN'T HURT TO WEAR
THE FOUL WEATHER GARMENTS UNDER IT. AND IT WOULD BE CHEAPER THAT GOING
OUT AND BUYING THE TENT SPRAY. I SUPPOSE THE WATER PROOFING FOR TENTS
WOULD COST PROBABLY UNDER TEN BUCKS HAVEN'T LOOKED INTO IT YET.
ROGER
|
725.16 | please and info | WFOV12::DRUMM | | Mon Dec 17 1990 13:54 | 12 |
| Roger,
I guess I could walk down to your office or even call you but..
Could you type in the lower case like I am doing? In notes when you use
upper case it implies that you are SCREAMING at us and it's hard to
read. Thank-you.
Scotch Guard will work for a short time in a heavy rain but will
fail within an hour. I found that out at a football game. It lasted
about the first hour then failed and boy did I get wet!!
Steve
|
725.17 | Waterproofing | BPO406::LEAHY | | Tue Dec 18 1990 11:09 | 10 |
| I recently read an interesting statement on waterprooofing, i don't remember
where it was, but it stated that the best way to test your garments for
degree of waterproofing is to stand under your shower at fullblast. The
article stated that you dont want to wait tillyour in the woods in a
downpour to find out it wont hold water (yuk yuk). Anyway it made sense to
me.
FWIW,
Jack
|
725.18 | Theory/practice | AKOFIN::ANDERSSON | | Tue Dec 18 1990 11:57 | 15 |
| RE LAST
I think something most people overlook is the *use* of a waterproof
item. Remember seeing the boot (Dunham I think) immersed in water in a
see-through container in the sporting goods window? That boot won't
leak in a hundred years in that store window but it will if you hunt
hard and don't take care of them.
Also, gore-tex pants won't leak unless you sit in them when they're
wet. The pressure forces the water through. I quess what I'm saying
is that theory and practice ain't always the same.
(And you ain't gonnah get clean unless you take off your clothes and
use soap!)
Andy
|