T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
585.1 | | SALEM::PAPPALARDO | | Fri Jan 05 1990 16:47 | 6 |
|
Answer?
To comemmerate the Henry Repeating Rifle??????
|
585.2 | So Soon? | MAIL::HENSON | | Fri Jan 05 1990 17:17 | 11 |
| Wow, that didn't take long. Was it a WAG or did you know the
answer all along? Actually, though, it was to comemorate John
Tyler Henry, the inventor of the Henry Repeating Rifle, but
you answer is close enough. By the way, I got this information
from "The Complete Book of Shotguns and Rifles" by Jack
O'Connor.
Your turn.
Jerry
|
585.3 | Okay you armchair ivory hunters... | BOSTON::HICKS | | Tue Jan 09 1990 18:29 | 9 |
| Okay, try this one on for size...
What ONE cartridge has accounted for more dead elephants than any
other? Hint: Jim Carmichel fans may have a leg-up on this one.
("now lets see... how long was 600 Nitro Express popular in the great
white hunter circuit???")
<<< Tim >>>
|
585.4 | | WJOUSM::PAPPALARDO | | Wed Jan 10 1990 08:57 | 5 |
|
The 375 H&H ?
Rick
|
585.5 | .458 Win. Mag. | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Wed Jan 10 1990 09:54 | 2 |
| .458 Winchester Magnum. Jim Carmichael's favorite.
Bret
|
585.6 | gotta hunch | CADAM::OAKMAN | | Wed Jan 10 1990 10:37 | 5 |
|
Either a .303 british or possibly a 7X57 mauser. Mr Bell used
both in Africa early in the 1900s.
|
585.7 | Is .30-30 enough for elephant? | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Wed Jan 10 1990 11:48 | 3 |
| .30-06 Springfield.
/brett
|
585.8 | it's too bad | INDEV1::GSMITH | I need two of everything | Wed Jan 10 1990 12:16 | 5 |
| It's a real shame.. but poachers use machine guns now... I'm not
sure what caliber.. 350?
Smitty
|
585.9 | MY GUESS IS: | SHRFAC::MASSICOTTE | | Wed Jan 10 1990 12:24 | 7 |
| The .416 RIGBY in a double rifle.
( I believe the .600 NITRO EXPRESS went out of existence in the
early 50s.) They were still available in 1948 thru Stoeger.)
Fred
|
585.10 | < The "BIG GUN" > | WALLAC::M_MOORE | Moose in the desert | Wed Jan 10 1990 12:47 | 5 |
|
My guess would have to be a 4 bore throwing solids.
Mark
|
585.11 | welll... | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Wed Jan 10 1990 13:33 | 3 |
| How bout the .416 Rigby?
Fra
|
585.12 | yous guys is sharp! | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Wed Jan 10 1990 13:34 | 1 |
| awwww someone beat me to it!!
|
585.13 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | Mail SPWACY::CHARBONND | Thu Jan 11 1990 08:40 | 2 |
| I believe the 7x57 was correct. Solids & brain shots
were Bell's specialty.
|
585.14 | General stuff | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Thu Jan 11 1990 12:49 | 10 |
| Okay,
1) Has the right answer not been given, hence the long delay in
signalling the winner?
2) What's the reference for this question?
3) Wasn't SALEM::PAPPALARDO responsible for the next question?
/brett
|
585.15 | Close... but no cigar... elephants hate .308!
| BOSTON::HICKS | | Mon Jan 15 1990 13:24 | 16 |
| The long delay was entirely due to my inability to get back on the net.
You were all close... many good candidates out there...
The guess of 458 Win Mag was close as it IS Mr. Carmichal's favorite African
caliber. However, the reference to a machine gun caliber was pretty close, too.
The answer 7.62mm NATO/308 Win!
JC says that currently, because rag-tag armies of underpaid soldiers in
third-world African countries (redundant description, eh?) are armed with
7.62mm NATO, these guys run around poaching to make up for short salaries.
At the very end of the chapter on African rifles, in The Book of the Rifle
Jim expresses his firm belief that beyond a shadow of a doubt, more poaching
is carried-out with 308/7.62mm than any other, and this one caliber may
ultimately be used to wipe elephants off the face of earth.
|
585.16 | what was Jack's favorite pre-.270 | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Mon Jan 15 1990 14:33 | 5 |
| How about this for a trivia question; Before Jack O'Connor settled
on a .270 for what he called "the best all-around rifle" what was
his favorite caliber? I hope I didn't step out of line here, but
I would like to keep this trivia topic going.
Bret
|
585.17 | 30-06? | MAIL::HENSON | | Mon Jan 15 1990 15:43 | 1 |
|
|
585.18 | My guess | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Mon Jan 15 1990 16:12 | 13 |
| Answer to Bret's question:
7mm Mag.
/brett
P.S. on the elephant question, I thought that my guess (.30-06) was
pretty close (especially since .308 and .30-06 are .30 calibers). I
figured that .30-06 wasn't the *best* cartridge for elephant but I also
figured that it would be some very common utility cartridge like a
.30-06 used in military rifles. Close?
|
585.19 | ??? | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Jan 16 1990 08:52 | 3 |
| how bout .257 roberts
fra
|
585.20 | .257 Roberts is correct | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Tue Jan 16 1990 09:03 | 5 |
| Fra has it. The .257 Roberts is the correct answer. I guess I didn't
come up with a hard enough question. But then Fra is such an advocate
of Jack O. that I kind of new in the back of my mind he would get
it. Got a good question in mind Fra?
Bret
|
585.21 | short notice quickie | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Jan 16 1990 09:59 | 5 |
| OK.... Here goes!
Whats the favorite caliber of Alaskan big game outfitters?
|
585.22 | | GIAMEM::J_AMBERSON | | Tue Jan 16 1990 10:07 | 1 |
| .300 WBY MAG?
|
585.23 | .338 Win Mag? | BOSTON::HICKS | | Tue Jan 16 1990 10:48 | 1 |
|
|
585.24 | next ones gonna be brutal! | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Jan 16 1990 10:53 | 3 |
| .338 win mag has it.... boy that didn't take long!
Fra
|
585.25 | quickie | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Jan 16 1990 15:48 | 6 |
| well, while were waiting for a new trivia question, i have another.
What is the added benifit of the extractor claw on the mauser bolt
action?
Fra
|
585.26 | here tis | CSCOA5::LIBS_C | | Tue Jan 16 1990 16:45 | 4 |
| Posative feed control so that you cannot double load if the bolt is not
closed on the first round and the action is cycled.
Carl
|
585.27 | Don't just stand there... | MAIL::HENSON | | Fri Jan 19 1990 10:01 | 0 |
585.28 | ...do something!!! | MAIL::HENSON | | Fri Jan 19 1990 10:56 | 15 |
| re. .27
There was more to that reply than meets the eye. Unfortunately,
I lost my connection while I was writing it. I'll try again.
What I said was,
Fra,
How about giving us a clue or something? Is reply .26 right?
Is it even close? How about giving us the answer and asking
another question, or giving us a clue, or SOMETHING!!! I'd
kind'a like to see this topic continue.
Jerry
|
585.29 | shall we continue? | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Fri Jan 19 1990 12:40 | 6 |
| While we are awaitng Fra's answer, we might as well continue. If
you guys/gals don't mind I will ask another question. Of the lower
48 states which one state has a herd of caribou? I hope nobody minds
me continuing this subject.
Bret
|
585.30 | | NHL::PAPPALARDO | | Fri Jan 19 1990 12:52 | 5 |
|
MAINE
Rick
|
585.31 | Gettting smaller? | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Fri Jan 19 1990 13:04 | 4 |
|
Maine, but I believe it is shrinking quickly?
--Bob
|
585.32 | Keep guessing | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Fri Jan 19 1990 13:32 | 7 |
| a few years ago Maine got 28 cows from Quebec so as to start a new
herd. Once separated from the herd they slowly starved themselves
to death. Maine is not the answer. I think the last native caribou
was seen on Mt. Katadin in 1911. But I think there is actually 2
states, but one herd migrates back and forth across the border.
Bret
|
585.33 | | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Fri Jan 19 1990 13:33 | 1 |
| I forgot to add this to .32. All of the cows were impregnated.
|
585.34 | 2 Cents | LUDWIG::STEVENS | Bear It All | Sat Jan 20 1990 00:06 | 15 |
|
My EX-Brother-inlaw is a teacher at the U.M. in Orono. He was
telling me about the Caribou they released. When they first got
them a few died right off,,, I believe about 7 died. They released
6-8 a few years back and then i separated freom the wife and never
got to talk to him again about the Herd. Mabey i should call him..
Also did any hear about the 2 hunters that were pulled from
some bay south of Boston Friday Morning? I guess they were duck
or goose hunting.... Also they were in Bad shape..
Jeff
|
585.35 | Idaho? | MAIL::HENSON | | Mon Jan 22 1990 09:46 | 6 |
| My guess is Idaho. A few years ago, when I was living in Salt Lake
City, there was a report that a woodland caribou was sighted near
the Utah-Idaho border. I guess,though, that Washington and Montana
are also candidates.
Jerry
|
585.36 | Idaho is correct | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Mon Jan 22 1990 09:59 | 5 |
| Idaho is correct. Somewhere in the Selway/Bitteroot wilderness area
is a herd of woodland caribou. Also I think (I could be wrong here)
I was told there was a small herd located in the northern part of
Michigan. I am not sure about this. .35 what is the next question?
Bret
|
585.37 | Next Question - M88 Winchester | MAIL::HENSON | | Mon Jan 22 1990 10:08 | 9 |
| It's about time. Not bad for a WAG. OK, my question is a two
parter, and more related to guns than hunting. It's also easy.
In how many calibers was the Winchester Model 88 rifle chambered?
Name them.
Just for fun, give the years that the Model 88 was in production
and the years that it was manufactured in each caliber.
Jerry
|
585.38 | how about these dates? | CSCOA5::LIBS_C | | Mon Jan 22 1990 14:02 | 9 |
| MFG 1955-1975 WITH PARTS CLEANUP ASSEMBLED IN 1976.
CAL .308 1955-END OF PRODUCTION
CAL .243 1956-END OF PRODUCTION
CAL .358 1956-1964
CAL .284 1963-END OF PRODUCTION
Regards
Carl
|
585.39 | Another one bites the dust | MAIL::HENSON | | Mon Jan 22 1990 14:16 | 6 |
| See, I told you it was an easy question. However, I thought
that the .358 was discontinued in 1962, no 1964. Oh well,
your turn.
Jerry
|
585.40 | WALKER PISTOL | CSCOA5::LIBS_C | | Mon Jan 22 1990 18:08 | 4 |
| Who manufactured the WALKER COLT pistols??
Carl
|
585.41 | ????? | SSDEVO::BOURBEAU | | Tue Jan 23 1990 09:42 | 1 |
| re. .40 Eli Whitney
|
585.42 | Hiram Walker | AKOV12::LORENTZEN | | Tue Jan 23 1990 10:13 | 2 |
| Duhhh, Taurus?
|
585.43 | good answer | CSCOA5::LIBS_C | | Tue Jan 23 1990 10:39 | 3 |
| .41 is correct. your turn
carl
|
585.44 | Hunting Question | SALEM::PAPPALARDO | | Tue Jan 23 1990 14:47 | 16 |
|
re.14
Its been a while to think of somthing good.
Since the decade (80's) is over and more and more attention has come
upon the scoring of "Antlered" game animals let see who may have been
paying attention to whats happened.
Question: What are the top 3 states (U.S.) in total number of Bucks
--------- taken with a minimum score within the Boone & Crockett
guidelines both Typical(160) & Non-Typical (185) combined?
Guy
|
585.45 | My guesses | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Tue Jan 23 1990 14:54 | 3 |
| Montana, Wyoming and uhhhh....uhhhh.....Idaho.
/brett
|
585.46 | How about these three | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Tue Jan 23 1990 15:01 | 2 |
| Iowa, Ohio and Wyoming? Those would be my guesses.
Bret
|
585.47 | Keep Trying....... | SALEM::PAPPALARDO | | Tue Jan 23 1990 17:21 | 14 |
|
Based on a listing of 25 states posted in the survey i'll post answers
to the states replied.
Iowa #2
Ohio #4
Montana #15
Idaho #23
Wyoming #22
Well you guys have one (1) of the top three (3) so far.
Guy
|
585.48 | AND THE NEXT TWO ARE? | MTADMS::PAUL | | Tue Jan 23 1990 18:44 | 3 |
| Michigan and Minnisota?
Mike
|
585.50 | did I win,huh did I? | ROULET::BING | The midnight train is whinin' low | Wed Jan 24 1990 06:35 | 4 |
|
Pennsylvania and Alabama?
|
585.51 | ?? | SKIVT::WENER | | Wed Jan 24 1990 07:27 | 6 |
|
I agree with someone else, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Montana
- Rob
|
585.52 | Oops | SKIVT::WENER | | Wed Jan 24 1990 07:30 | 3 |
|
- after re-reading Guy's msg (.47).... I meant to say
Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Iowa...
|
585.53 | | GIAMEM::J_AMBERSON | | Wed Jan 24 1990 08:29 | 3 |
| I'll guess Nebraska and Illinois.
Jeff
|
585.54 | | MFGMEM::MROWKA | | Wed Jan 24 1990 09:26 | 4 |
| Illinois and Minesota.
Jim
|
585.55 | SWAG | WALLAC::M_MOORE | Moose in the desert | Wed Jan 24 1990 09:32 | 2 |
|
Arizona and Utah ???
|
585.56 | Here's the Stats....... | SALEM::PAPPALARDO | | Wed Jan 24 1990 11:55 | 37 |
|
RE.52 Is the winner, He has all 3 but not in the correct order.
#1 Minnesota 1051 of all time in both catagories
#2 Iowa 929
#3 Wisconsin 850
#4 Ohio 683
#5 Michigan 444
#6 Indiana 402
* #7 Nebraska 365
* #7 Missouri 365
#8 Illinois 354
#9 Kansas 300
#10 Maine 287
#11 Georgia 246
#12 New York 236
#13 Texas 178
#14 South Dakota 160
#15 Montana 157
#16 Oklahoma 100
#17 Kentucky 89
#18 West Virginia 86
#19 Tennessee 72
#20 Mississippi 39
#21 Washington 38
#22 Wyoming 21
#23 Idaho 13
#24 Colorado 12
All info was taken from a published article without permission from
the February 1990 edition of North American Whitetail.
Now its SKIVT::WENER (re.52) turn to put something in............
Guy
|
585.57 | Where's PA. N.H. & VT.? | CUERVO::GATH | | Wed Jan 24 1990 13:56 | 18 |
| Guy,
Do I understand that these stats are for the period of jan 1980
thru dec. 1989?
I find it interesting that Pennsylvania was not in them at all.
There are parts of Pa with some really big dear particularly the
area's near West Virginia and Ohio.
also where might Vermont or New Hampshire be? I realize the
total deer kill is down but there are some really nice deer.
Also I wonder how many deer that would qualify are never really
examined or measured for the points.
Good info.
Bear
|
585.58 | Herooooonk | GIAMEM::J_AMBERSON | | Wed Jan 24 1990 14:13 | 12 |
| So I didn't get the question correct, here's one anyway.
Fish and Game personel in MA and other eastern states have noticed
a "new" breed of geese. These birds are aprox. 30% larger then
normal Canadian Geese. They also tend to stay put in one general
area all year, rather then migrate. These are the larger geese
that you see in local lakes and on golf courses throughout the
winter. Now for the question:
Where did these geese originate and why don't they migrate?
Jeff
|
585.59 | | GENRAL::WADE | The 68 Jets, 88 Dodgers, 89 Broncos! | Wed Jan 24 1990 14:26 | 6 |
| re. the top states for bucks
I assume you meant white tail bucks. Do you have any stats
for real deer (ie muley's ;^) )!
Clay_who_hunts_muley's_in_Colorado
|
585.60 | Finally, onme I can answer | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Wed Jan 24 1990 15:59 | 8 |
| re .58:
Jeff, that's easy. They originated in Boston, Wellsley, Concord,
etc and they stay in Massachusetts because there's no cultcha anyplace
else.
/brett
|
585.61 | 8*) | GIAMEM::J_AMBERSON | | Thu Jan 25 1990 07:56 | 3 |
| Yea, they send the rejects to Spokane.
Jeff
|
585.62 | golf balls | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Thu Jan 25 1990 09:12 | 4 |
| Actually the reason they don't get up and fly away from the golf
courses is they eat all the golf balls and the weight from them
is too much for them to fly.
Bret
|
585.63 | | SALEM::PAPPALARDO | | Thu Jan 25 1990 10:27 | 21 |
|
re.57
Bear, I don't know why all states aren't listed, in the
breakdown the catagories list "Typicals of all Time", over 160 pts.
in the 80's, over 180 pts.in the 80's, "Non-Typicals of all Time",
over 185 pts in the 80's, and over 210 pts. in the 80's. Also they
do list in the notes that even though B&C score entries start at
170 Typical and 195 Non-Typical information was taken when it was
available for 10 points below minimum.
re.59
I believe if you check again you will see my info came from
the North American Whitetail magazine. Now if Whitetails aren't "Real
Deer" how come I've never seen a regular publication of "Muledeer"!!
When I go out West my plans are to hunt Elk & Mule Deer and from
talking with the guide he says that past history hunting with them
in Montana there success rate was about 99% on shots.
Guy
|
585.64 | Dumbo w/antlers | GIAMEM::J_AMBERSON | | Thu Jan 25 1990 10:30 | 4 |
| Mule deer, aren't they them deer with the funny looking ears?
I heard that there so stupid that Stevie Wonder even shot one.
Jeff 8*)
|
585.65 | It's a secret | SSDEVO::BOURBEAU | | Thu Jan 25 1990 11:35 | 7 |
| I lived in New England for forty years, and was able to wlk up on
many whitetails, I haven't had that kind of luck on Mulies.
There are no Mulie publications because we've been trying to keep
them a secret to avoid getting neck deep in Eastern hunters. :^)
George
|
585.66 | Vermont B&C, what's that? | SKIVT::WENER | | Thu Jan 25 1990 11:51 | 13 |
|
re: .57
Bear,
As for Vermont, as far as I know there has only been one official
B&C recording, Taken in Canaan... There have apparantly been several
(not sure exact number) found dead for whatever reason. The Largest
Vermont Buck was found in Pittsfield and scored somewhere near 180.
I need to think of a good question....
- Rob
|
585.67 | on vaca... sorry | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Mon Jan 29 1990 10:59 | 8 |
| JERRY,
re:.28
Sorry bout not getting back with the answer... was out for a week on
vaca, positive fed control was the answer... don't know bout the double
cycling thing though...
Fra
|
585.68 | refuge? | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Mon Jan 29 1990 15:20 | 3 |
| Whats the answer to the goose question? I haven't a clue other than
they are getting domesticated and find good refuge in these places.
bret
|
585.69 | | GIAMEM::J_AMBERSON | | Mon Jan 29 1990 15:50 | 8 |
| Well since no one even attempted a guess, heres the answer. These
"super" geese are direct descendants of the live decoys that market
hunters use to use. They bred them for size so that they were more
visable.(same reason we use Magnum decoys). They also tried to
breed out the instinct to migrate, so that they wouldn't leave.
When live decoys were outlawed, alot of these domesticated birds
were let loose. They ended up breeding with truely wild geese,
but maintained there large size.
|
585.70 | How about this? | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Wed Jan 31 1990 15:03 | 5 |
| Two days later and no one has come up with another question? I'll
give it another shot. This one is probably too easy. Why in the
past 20 years or so has the coyote population grown so fast? There
is one BIG reason for this.
Bret
|
585.71 | wag | GIAMEM::J_AMBERSON | | Wed Jan 31 1990 15:17 | 4 |
| I'll wager a guess. There are no longer people trapping and poisoning
them?
Jeff
|
585.72 | Buggs Bunny? | CSC32::J_PEDERSEN | Jim - DTN 592-4670 | Wed Jan 31 1990 15:30 | 3 |
| Has the rabbit population been high the past few years??
Jim
|
585.73 | night classes? | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Wed Jan 31 1990 16:17 | 4 |
| because their so adaptable? or because on the way east they mated with
wolves and have yeilded a larger breed?
gave it a shot. fra
|
585.74 | WAG | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Wed Jan 31 1990 17:09 | 3 |
| Greater deer population?
/brett
|
585.75 | ??? | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Thu Feb 01 1990 00:55 | 4 |
| No known pedator except man, and they have adapted well to
suburban/urban buildups.
Red
|
585.76 | .75 is correct | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Thu Feb 01 1990 08:37 | 6 |
| .75 has it. Coyotes only predator was the wolf, which has declined
in population. In turn Coyote populations have exploded, and also
the habitat loss due to delevopment has compacted animal herds making
it easier for the coyotes to thrive. Got a good question in mind
Red?
Bret
|
585.77 | | SAC::PHILPOTT_I | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Thu Feb 01 1990 09:52 | 5 |
| no no
the real reason is that coyotes are cute (like bambi).
/. Ian .\
|
585.78 | | AKOV12::LORENTZEN | | Thu Feb 01 1990 11:05 | 6 |
| Another reason is that all those nice city folks who move to the
outskirts of Tucson, Phoenix, El Paso, Las Vegas, Albuquerque, etc,
keep feeding them nice fat pet cats and dogs. 8-)
Len
|
585.79 | | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Thu Feb 01 1990 16:24 | 5 |
| What percent of the top 50 places in the Boone and Crockett
typical category were taken during the first 5 years of
the 1980's ?
Red
|
585.80 | longshot | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Thu Feb 01 1990 16:30 | 3 |
| 60% ???
Fra
|
585.81 | Lower.. | LUDWIG::STEVENS | Bear It All | Thu Feb 01 1990 21:27 | 4 |
|
Lower...... About 20%...
Jeff
|
585.82 | | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Thu Feb 01 1990 22:38 | 5 |
| Close, but no cigar........
Keep trying guys.
Red
|
585.83 | Do 1/2 % count?? | LUDWIG::STEVENS | Bear It All | Fri Feb 02 1990 01:31 | 10 |
|
37 1/2 ??????????????? (-: (-:
I can't wait to see this figure.....
Jeff
|
585.84 | | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Fri Feb 02 1990 02:54 | 5 |
| Jeff,
Evens only. Re-read the question. Your so high your illegal.
Red
|
585.85 | Last guess.. | LUDWIG::STEVENS | Bear It All | Fri Feb 02 1990 06:10 | 7 |
|
5%....
Jeff
|
585.86 | | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Fri Feb 02 1990 06:20 | 7 |
| I'm off until Sunday, so to keep things going, I'll let
Mr. Stevens go for the next question as his 5 % was close. The
actual % was 10.
Go for it Jeff..
Red
|
585.87 | Wolves in Maine Again. 100yrs+ | DNEAST::SCHNEIDER_JA | | Fri Feb 02 1990 08:23 | 6 |
| Re: .76
I heard on PBS last nite that the Maine fish and wildlife
dept. was considering the reintroductin of "timber wolves" in the
state. Hmmmmm!
what_happens_when_I_hunt_a_GSP_bitch_in_heat??? Jack
|
585.88 | HERE'S A COUPLE! | SHRFAC::MASSICOTTE | | Mon Feb 05 1990 17:34 | 14 |
| 1. What was "AD TOPPERWEIN" noted for?
2. Back in the mid 60s I used to hunt the Norwich, VT. area
a lot. There was a gun shop just off RT 5 run by Billy
Devoux. He had, for a few years, hanging on the wall a
tripple barreled weapon of which I cannot remember the
name of but it had 2 12 ga. barrels side by side and
centered underneath was a .30 caliber "ADOLF EXPRESS".
This cartridge looked to be about an inch longer than
than the '06. He only had about a dozen cartridges and
said they were collectors items going about $20 ea.
The gun had about a $1200.00 tag on it at that time.
ANYONE SHED ANY LIGHT??
|
585.89 | re .88 | HEFTY::CHARBONND | What a pitcher! | Tue Feb 06 1990 07:29 | 8 |
| Ad T. was an exhibition shooter many years ago.
What you saw was a European 'drilling' - twin shotgun
barrels over a rifle barrel. Useful for mixed-bag
hunting (like deer and pheasants at the same time.)
The '30. Adolph could have been a proprietary cartridge of
the manufacturer. Sorta like the Weatherby magnums.
|
585.90 | 30 ADOLPH = .30 NEWTON | CSCOA5::LIBS_C | | Wed Feb 07 1990 11:10 | 9 |
| Last night I was reading an issue of the Rifleman from '69 that refered
to this round in the dopebag. The .30 Adolph was developed by Newton
for a man named Adolph. Several years later, the cartridge was renamed
the .30 Newton. The article stated that the ballistics are very similar
to the .300 H & H magnum.
Carl
|
585.91 | Another Trivia Question | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Fri Feb 09 1990 09:41 | 4 |
| Since there has not been much activity here for a couple of days
I thought I would add another trivia question. What cartridge gave
Roy Weatherby the idea for the design of his famous Weatherby Magnums?
Bret
|
585.92 | .308 Norma, that's the ticket? | SKIVT::WENER | | Fri Feb 09 1990 10:59 | 5 |
|
.308 Norma Magnum ???
|
585.93 | survey says!!!! | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Fri Feb 09 1990 11:18 | 2 |
| 300 H&H!
|
585.94 | Keep guessing! | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Fri Feb 09 1990 12:41 | 4 |
| don't forget that the cartridge that gave him the idea already had
the now famous "double radius" design! So far the survey and ticket
are both wrong.
Bret
|
585.95 | My guess | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Fri Feb 09 1990 16:10 | 3 |
| .300 Win
/brett
|
585.96 | technically... | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Fri Feb 09 1990 16:14 | 4 |
| If the .300 Win is the answer, i'll be pi$$ed. 8^) cause the .300 win
was based off of the .300 H&H, as were a couple of others...
Fra
|
585.97 | .30 NEWTON | CSCOA3::LIBS_C | | Fri Feb 09 1990 18:01 | 3 |
| HOW BOUT THE .30 NEWTON??
CARL
|
585.98 | not a 30 caliber | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Sat Feb 10 1990 08:07 | 3 |
| Keep guessing. I will give you guys a hint though, it is not a 30
caliber round. That should make some people scratch their heads.
Bret
|
585.99 | .264 mag | FRAGLE::JOLLYMORE | I'm the NRA | Mon Feb 12 1990 11:50 | 4 |
| a wild guess .264 mag
Bill
|
585.100 | DYING TO HEAR THIS ONE! | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Mon Feb 12 1990 14:14 | 6 |
| .257 ROBERTS??? IT WAS WORTH A SHOT!
STILL THINK ITS THE .300 H&H.
FRA
|
585.101 | Roy thought big | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Mon Feb 12 1990 16:19 | 4 |
| Given Weathery's mindset, if it wasn't a .30 caliber round I would
think it would be something big....like .475 or, whatizit?, .458?
/brett
|
585.102 | Total WAG | MAIL::HENSON | | Mon Feb 12 1990 16:37 | 1 |
| How about the .375 H&H Magnum?
|
585.103 | HOWZZIS | SHRFAC::MASSICOTTE | | Tue Feb 13 1990 07:36 | 4 |
|
.51 CALIBER SHARPS BUFFALO CANNON.
|
585.104 | 220 SWIFT | FRAGLE::JOLLYMORE | I'm the NRA | Tue Feb 13 1990 08:16 | 7 |
| Lets try this the first Weatherby production cartridge was
.270 Weatherby MAG made from a .300 H&H MAG case but developed
from the .220 Weatherby Rocket, which had its ancetry in the
.220 SWIFT.
Bill
|
585.105 | not the 300 H&H | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Tue Feb 13 1990 08:43 | 7 |
| keep trying. I will give you another hint. The round was mentioned
in this particular note before I asked this particular trivia question
and it is not the 300 H&H, and not a 30 caliber. I also said that
the round already had the double radius design on the shoulder which
Weatherby made famous. All of the guesses given have straight
shoulders. Does everyone give up?
Bret
|
585.106 | Roy did start out thinking BIG | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Tue Feb 13 1990 08:45 | 3 |
| One more hint, Brett is the closest so far. Look at his headline,
maybe that might help.
Bret
|
585.107 | final guess | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Feb 13 1990 10:45 | 5 |
| ok... heres a WAG
.458 Win Mag!
Fra, who will now concede on this one 8^)
|
585.108 | Really big | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Tue Feb 13 1990 11:59 | 10 |
| I already guessed .458.
I think the obvious answer is that Weatherby's biggest round was his
first round. I just can't remember what that is off the top of my
head. I meant to look it up last night. His early rounds were
for african game hunting, ie elephants, right?
Just one question. What's a double radius shoulder?
/brett
|
585.109 | .270 Weatherby Mag. | FRAGLE::JOLLYMORE | I'm the NRA | Tue Feb 13 1990 12:47 | 6 |
| re. .108
Weatherbys first commercial round was .270 Weatherby Mag.
in 1943 followed by .300 Weatherby Mag. 1944.
Bill
|
585.110 | 2pm | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Tue Feb 13 1990 12:51 | 10 |
| A double radius shoulder is rounded, not like a shoulder on a 30/06.
There are no sharp angles. In reloading manuals (I think Lyman or
Hornady has it) they show the shoulders as having 2 radius', one
one the inside of the shell casing and one on the outside. And I
think the radius is the same for both, not sure on that one. Actually
I think a .458 would be a straight shoulder, is it not? I don't
know if I explained it right or not. I am not sure what his first
round was, but I think it was the .300 Weatherby Magnum. If no one
has the right answer by 2pm edt I let out my secret.
Bret
|
585.111 | 270 1st, then 300 | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Tue Feb 13 1990 12:53 | 1 |
| I guess I was wrong on the 300WM.
|
585.112 | What time is it? | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Tue Feb 13 1990 13:11 | 5 |
| I hate to be picky, but it's now 2:12 edt.
2:00 est will be in 48 minutes, though.
:-)
|
585.113 | come on 2pm!!!! | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Feb 13 1990 13:17 | 8 |
| Well Bret you were right on the .458 win mag.... its a straight walled
case, no shoulder whatsoever... good guess huh! 8^)
Dying to find out what it is... it's driving me crazy here... I can
see it now, it's probably something goofy like a .600 Nitro express or
something!
Fra
|
585.114 | EST | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Tue Feb 13 1990 13:25 | 1 |
| I meant EST!
|
585.115 | .416 Rigby | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Tue Feb 13 1990 14:01 | 6 |
| Roy Weatherby took the .416 Rigby added a magnum belt and necked
down to his desired calibers. I don't know the reason behind selecting
this certain case style. But the .416 Rigby has rounded or double
radius type shoulders. But Roy did think big as this case will hold
lots of powder. Does this mean I get to ask another?
Bret
|
585.116 | want name of source for info | FRAGLE::JOLLYMORE | I'm the NRA | Tue Feb 13 1990 15:19 | 6 |
| Bret what is the basis for your info?
Catridges of the World 5th ed. states that his first round 270
and 300 are all based 300 H&H mag case.
Bill
|
585.117 | Shoulder's come from Rigby | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Tue Feb 13 1990 15:28 | 10 |
| I had read it earlier but don't know where at the moment. He may
have used the size of the 300 H&H but I do know that the shoulder
design on his cases came from the .416 Rigby. I will try and dig
it up tonight. As far as I know there were no other cases like the
Rigby shoulder except now with the Weatherby. Jim Carmicheal keeps
popping in my mind, I think from a shooting article from Outdoor
Life, this being from Weatherby's new .416WM introduced last year
and it's shoulders (along with the other WM's) coming from the .416
Rigby.
Bret
|
585.118 | the 300 H&H is the case! | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Wed Feb 14 1990 09:50 | 26 |
| re:.116 Agreed!
Bret, your original question stated: "what cartridge gave Roy Weatherby
the idea for the design of his famous Weatherby magnums?" No mention
of "double radius shoulders".
The 300 H&H case has formed the basis for many notable cartridge
developments, most important amoung them *THE ORIGINAL SERIES OF
WEATHERBY MAGNUM CARTRIGES*. The .270 Wea Mag was actually the
first case that Roy Weatherby derived from the necked down 300 H&H
case, it incorporates the Weatherby double radius shoulder.
A little know fact about the .416 Rigby is that it was the father of
3 larger weatherby cartridges; .378 Wea Mag, .460 Wea Mag, and the
latest .416 Wea Mag. In 1953 Roy, took the .416 Rigby, made a few
changes to the neck/shoulder, added his trademark to the base and the
.378 Wea Mag was born. Both the .460 Wea Mag and .416 Wea Mag were
based off the new .378 Wea Mag case.
These developments, though based off of the .416 Rigby, came many
years after his original series of weatherby mags.
I too am looking forward to hearing, where you got this double radius
shoulder info from.
Fra
|
585.119 | I agree but... | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Wed Feb 14 1990 12:54 | 11 |
| Fra,
I agree with aloty of what you said, but the only case at the
time that had a "rounded" or "double radius" shoulder was the .416
Rigby. But I guess I did word the question wrong. What I meant was
what cartridge gave Roy Weatherby the idea for his double radius
design. All of his Weatherby Magnum Cartridges have this. Wether
he incorporated this and others to make one of his designs I don't
know, but I do remember reading that the .416 Rigby played a very
big part in the designs of his Wetherby Magnums. I'll do some more
looking tonight.
Bret
|
585.120 | still looking | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Thu Feb 15 1990 10:50 | 4 |
| I have not had much luck in locating the article nor have I had
much time. Whoever is next let the question fly. In the meantime
I will keep looking.
bret
|
585.121 | try this one on for size! | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Thu Feb 15 1990 14:32 | 10 |
| OK, I figure since I was the closest (dead on actually ;^)...) to the
correct answer... i'll put in another question till Bret turns up
anything.
Whats the worlds most accurate factory centerfire hunting rifle and
cartridge?
If your good... Who developed the cartridge?
Fra
|
585.122 | Am I close? | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Thu Feb 15 1990 15:51 | 8 |
| Let me guess.
Remington 700 BDL with a .270 Remington cartridge.
Designed by.......John Browning.
/brett
|
585.123 | any takers? | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Thu Feb 15 1990 16:37 | 7 |
| wise ass! 8^)
oh... and btw it's .270 Winchester... and another thing! your not
even close!!!! it was a marlin pump with 1oz slugs 8^)
Fra
|
585.124 | ? | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Thu Feb 15 1990 18:41 | 5 |
| Breneke slugs?
Then how about a .25-06 or 6mm in a Browning A-bolt?
Geez, I thought I had it there for a minute.
|
585.125 | ?? | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Thu Feb 15 1990 22:39 | 4 |
| How about the 22 Zipper ? I think that's what it was called ?
Red
|
585.126 | Is this on the right track? | CUERVO::GATH | | Fri Feb 16 1990 07:21 | 9 |
| How about that Add I saw 9 months or so ago about a new record at
300 yards. All 5 shots were in the same hole. I don't remember the
particulars of the add. Actually they had 5 shots in .310 inches
or something like that.
would it have any thing to do with that. The number above is not
acurate but the shooting sure was.
Bear
|
585.127 | ???? | BTOVT::WENER_R | | Fri Feb 16 1990 08:00 | 6 |
|
I have read that the .308 Nato cartridge is the most
accurate .30 caliber (alias .308 Winchester).
Whatever the rifle is, it's probably a match rifle... with mauser
action.
|
585.128 | Leupold add | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Fri Feb 16 1990 08:38 | 10 |
|
re .126
That may be the add that I have seen on the back of several hunting
magazines. The add is for Leupold scopes. The guy used a custom built
rifle and an off the shelf Leupold scope, something like a 39x scope.
Guess holding a 1-2 inch group would not impress this guy.
--Bob
|
585.129 | | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Fri Feb 16 1990 10:02 | 3 |
| Heres a couple of hints... it's not a .22 or a .30 caliber
Fra
|
585.130 | Let's talk about this | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Fri Feb 16 1990 12:10 | 8 |
| I saw a few old timers drilling 6mms through bullseyes without fail
at 200 yards at my club one day. I can't imagine that a gun could be
more accurate....maybe other than a .220 swift, which I don't count as
a hunting round.
Are you sure it's not a 6mm?
/brett
|
585.131 | .25/6mm | FRAGLE::JOLLYMORE | I'm the NRA | Fri Feb 16 1990 12:21 | 4 |
|
It wouldn't be a .25/6mm by any chance.
Bill
|
585.132 | 50 caliber? | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Fri Feb 16 1990 13:03 | 3 |
| How about a .50 caliber rifle fired from a browning automatic
reciolless rifle? my $.02
Bret
|
585.133 | no more hints... | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Fri Feb 16 1990 14:18 | 6 |
| ok.... it is a 6mm.... but which one? in what rifle? and who were
the wildcaters?
fra
ps... Bret any info yet?
|
585.134 | I'm out | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Fri Feb 16 1990 17:14 | 16 |
| Ha!
What do you mean which one? You mean there's more than one?
.25-06 That's the 6 mm, right?
It's got to be a bolt action, so I'll guess Remington BDL because
it's an OSF standard.
Wildcatters....there'se more than one? Is that a hint?
Smith and Wesson.
I give up.
/brett
|
585.135 | My WAG.... | DISCVR::FERRARO | | Fri Feb 16 1990 20:16 | 9 |
| My WAG....
Thompson/Center TCR rifle
T/CU Wess Ulgade (aka Mr. Wildcat)
My first trivia anwser, so please don't laugh too hard if it's
out in left field....
|
585.136 | 6mm PC | FRAGLE::JOLLYMORE | I'm the NRA | Mon Feb 19 1990 07:52 | 4 |
|
6mm PC
|
585.137 | Bills got it! | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Mon Feb 19 1990 10:09 | 7 |
| Well, Bills got the cartridge (close enough) 6mm ppc
re: Brett... 25-06 is a .25 caliber not a 6mm
any guesses on the rifle/wildcatters???
Fra
|
585.138 | How do it know? | MAIL::HENSON | | Mon Feb 19 1990 11:34 | 4 |
| How about an explanation of how this cartridge was determined to be
the most accurate. I'm not contesting your statement, just curious.
Jerry
|
585.139 | Rifle | TARKIN::AHO | Skeet addict... | Mon Feb 19 1990 12:21 | 8 |
|
re .137
How about SAKO?
~Mike~
|
585.140 | Sako Varminter 6mm PPC | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Mon Feb 19 1990 12:40 | 15 |
| Mikes got the rifle... Its a Sako single-shot Varminter in 6MM PPC
Anyone got the creators of the round just for sh!ts and giggles???
Bill your up with the next question!
As far as info... (American Ammo, E. Matunas)
It is without debate the worlds most accurate cartridge. It has
established almost every possible benchrest record. The phenominal
accuracy of this cartridge makes it no big task to put 10 rounds into
a group measuring less than 1/4" at 100 yards. Its accuracy is so
superior it has almost excluded all others from competition.
Fra
|
585.141 | | FRAGLE::JOLLYMORE | I'm the NRA | Mon Feb 19 1990 14:31 | 5 |
| I don't havethe names of the creators of hand there where two of
them and I can give them to you later along with the next question
which has to do with .30 cal.
Bill
|
585.142 | haven't a clue | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Tue Feb 20 1990 11:58 | 6 |
| re .133 Fra, I haveen't much luck or time for that matter. But I
may still yet as I am in the process of cleaning out my closet,
but in the meantime I will consider your answer correct and myself
wr..., wr..., wr..., allright wrong! Just kidding. Haven't a clue
on the latest question.
Bret
|
585.143 | next | FRAGLE::JOLLYMORE | I'm the NRA | Tue Feb 20 1990 20:38 | 11 |
| The 6mm PPc was developed bye Dr. Louis Palmisano and Ferris Pindell.
Next question is Holland & Holland is bringing out a new Double Rifle
based on a cartridge developed by Jim Bell president of Bell Basic
Brass And William Feldstein the cartridge will be made by Bell Basic
Brass. This will be the most powerfull sporting cartridge in the world.
Now all we need is a name fore the bea?
Bill
This is not the .30 cal question
|
585.144 | no takers | FRAGLE::JOLLYMORE | I'm the NRA | Fri Feb 23 1990 12:19 | 4 |
| What nobody has any ideas, how about a guess on the caliber? If nothing
bye monday I will enter the answer.
Bill
|
585.145 | ????????? | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Fri Feb 23 1990 13:24 | 3 |
| DON'T HAVE THE FAINTEST IDEA....
FRA
|
585.146 | to big for woodchucks? | FRAGLE::JOLLYMORE | I'm the NRA | Mon Feb 26 1990 08:37 | 8 |
| Ok no guesses
so the answer is "700 NITRO EXPRESS"
this is a true .700 caliber the bullet is a solid copper clad steel
with a soft lead core and the weight is 1,000grs. The case is 3.5"
and the loaded shell is 4.2" long the charge is 180grs of 4831 powder
with a MV of 2000fps and ME of 8900fpe.
Bill
|
585.147 | NEXT? | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Wed Feb 28 1990 13:08 | 1 |
| any NEW questions?
|
585.148 | doggy trivia | AISVAX::SAISI | | Wed Feb 28 1990 13:20 | 4 |
| Okay, noone got the last question so I will ask one. What was the
last year that AKC sanctioned field trials were run for cocker
spaniels in the U.S.?
Linda
|
585.149 | 1940 ? | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Wed Feb 28 1990 17:56 | 3 |
| How about 1940 ??
Red
|
585.150 | | RUTLND::SAISI | | Thu Mar 01 1990 10:54 | 2 |
| Later than 1940.
Linda
|
585.151 | Second guess | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Fri Mar 02 1990 02:44 | 6 |
| Well lets see...Around the 1965 time frame, it had been almost
a quarter of year since they were used as such. After that time
the breed started to become a domestic house dog. I'll raise
my ante to the 1945- 1950 time frame. Close yet Linda ?
Red
|
585.152 | | AISVAX::SAISI | | Fri Mar 02 1990 09:37 | 3 |
| Well Red, now I'll have to go look it up to make sure that I
have the right answer.
Linda
|
585.153 | | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Fri Mar 02 1990 12:36 | 3 |
| Got you thinking on that one Linda .......
Red
|
585.154 | | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Tue Mar 06 1990 05:28 | 5 |
| Linda,
Still reasearching the right answer ?
Red
|
585.155 | Hello !!! | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Fri Mar 09 1990 04:06 | 3 |
| Did this topic die a slow death ? Where did everyone go ?
Red
|
585.156 | Top Whitetail Deer States? | MAIL::HENSON | | Mon Mar 12 1990 16:21 | 12 |
| All right, I'll pose a new question just to get thinks going again.
The question is: Name the top three states and give their rankings
in terms of annual whitetail deer harvest (that is, number of deer
killed) in recent years. The information on which I am basing my
conclusions is several years old, and may no longer be valid.
So, if you think you know, state your source and we'll go from
there.
Jerry
Hint: It's not Rhode Island, Mass. and Connecticut.
|
585.157 | Are any right? | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Mon Mar 12 1990 16:26 | 10 |
|
my source: my head (not to reliable, but maybe I'm close)
1. Texas
2. Alabama
3. Michigan or Wisconsin.
Ok, did I get any of them?
--Bob
|
585.158 | Close ? | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Mon Mar 12 1990 21:56 | 7 |
| My try....
1. Texas
2. So. Carolina
3. Alabama
Red
|
585.159 | I'll Guess | CUERVO::GATH | | Tue Mar 13 1990 07:23 | 27 |
| Lets try
Michigan
Wisconsin
Kansas ( I know the author is from Kansas )
Did you ever wonder how these stastistics were gathered.
For instance in Pennsylvania they have a volintary reporting system
and when I lived there Nobody would report a deer kill.
I beleive it was against the law not to report it but it effectively
was volintary. You had to tag adeer and when you got home in some time
frame you were to report kill to state which I would be surprised
if 30 % did.
Here in New England I think kills are more acurately recorded.
In my opinion hunter success rate is a better scale at judgeing
how good a state is for hunting than the total deer killed.
How could I omit Texas
How about
Texas
Michigan
Kansas ???
Bear
|
585.160 | how about these 3? | SALEM::MACGREGOR | | Tue Mar 13 1990 08:29 | 8 |
| 1. Iowa
2. Ohio
3. Minnesota
Did I even come close? bret
|
585.161 | SWAG | HEFTY::CHARBONND | What a pitcher! | Tue Mar 13 1990 09:11 | 3 |
| Texas
Pennsylvania
Mississippi
|
585.162 | Close, but no cigar | MAIL::HENSON | | Tue Mar 13 1990 09:21 | 9 |
| I'll help you out a little. Texas is number 1 and Michigan is number
2. So far, no one's even mentioned the state which is ranked number
3. So, let's change the question to what is the third ranked state.
The answer will probably surprise you, it sure surprised me.
Jerry
P.S. It's not Kansas, and by the way, I'm escaping here and moving
to Colorado in 2 weeks.
|
585.163 | heres my guess... | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Mar 13 1990 09:34 | 14 |
| hows this???
Texas (definately #1)
Michigan #2
Georgia #3
These others are right up there too, and depending on when your stats
were taken all could be relatively close...
#4 Wisconsin
#5 Alabama
Fra
|
585.164 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Alone is not a venture | Tue Mar 13 1990 12:27 | 3 |
| Texas
Michigan
New York
|
585.165 | Better late than never | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Tue Mar 13 1990 12:55 | 4 |
| How about Florida for #3.
/brett
|
585.166 | The Envelope, please... | MAIL::HENSON | | Thu Mar 15 1990 09:10 | 19 |
| Since no one has guessed the right state (or guessed at all for the
last day), I'll give the answer I was looking for. First of all,
my source is a 2 or 3 year old edition of Field and Stream, Midwest
edition. The part of the magazine where the individual states
are discussed is where I got the information. Now for the rest
of the story.
The answer is: Missouri
It surprised me, too.
Since nobody got this one, I'll ask another one. What state ranks
first in the number of non-resident hunting licenses sold. Again,
my source is a bit dated and if someone can prove otherwise, I'll
back off.
Jerry
Hint: It's not Kansas
|
585.167 | | GIAMEM::J_AMBERSON | | Thu Mar 15 1990 10:00 | 3 |
| Penn.
Jeff
|
585.168 | SWAG | WALLAC::M_MOORE | Moose in the desert | Thu Mar 15 1990 10:04 | 5 |
|
Wyoming.....
Mark
|
585.169 | How about... | TUNER::DINATALE | | Thu Mar 15 1990 10:33 | 3 |
| I'll try this,
Alaska?
|
585.170 | 1988 top ten | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Thu Mar 15 1990 10:41 | 24 |
| MISSOURI?!?!?!?!? Wow, they must have had a booming year
1988 they only took 150K deer... thats 150k less than the #5 state for
1988
#3 in what? 86-87?
1988 results:
Texas 480K
Michigan 375K
Georgia 330K
Wisconsin 310K
Alabama 300K
New York 204K
Pennsylvania 195K
*Missouri* 150K
Minnisota 149K
Louisiana 140K
Jerry, I don't doubt your data.... what a difference a couple of years
can make though...
Fra
|
585.171 | shot in the dark | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Thu Mar 15 1990 10:54 | 3 |
| how bout Idaho?
fra
|
585.172 | More questions | MAIL::HENSON | | Thu Mar 15 1990 11:45 | 9 |
| .re .170
Fra,
It appears to me that your data may be more reliable than mine.
It could very well be that I have some misinformation. Just
for grins, what is your source?
Jerry
|
585.173 | Colorado? | GENRAL::WADE | I'm an excellent driver..... | Thu Mar 15 1990 12:27 | 1 |
|
|
585.174 | My second guess is Maine | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Thu Mar 15 1990 12:38 | 4 |
| Montana.
/brett
|
585.175 | my second guess is Texas | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Thu Mar 15 1990 13:20 | 5 |
| Jerry, not to worry bout it....this is all for fun anyways...
I got my info from Peterson's Hunting (Oct 89)
Fra
|
585.176 | | DECWET::HELSEL | Legitimate sporting purpose | Thu Mar 15 1990 13:36 | 5 |
| Missouri might have been a good guess for someone that doesn't already
have two guesses entered.
/brett
|
585.177 | The answer is... | MAIL::HENSON | | Thu Mar 15 1990 14:04 | 27 |
| As this question seems to be a stumper, I'll go ahead and give the
answer and turn to floor over to whomever wants it. Surely, the
last two questions have revived some forgotten tidbit for someone.
The answer I'm looking for is Utah. When I first moved there in
1983, I remember reading a pamphlet published by the State Tourism
Commission. The pamphlet flatly stated that the state of Utah
sold more non-resident hunting licenses than any other state. After
living and hunting there for 4 years, I can believe it.
Utah is about 80% public land, much of it national forest. There
are plenty of places to hunt. In addition, a non-resident license
and deer tag is only about $120-130. Couple this with the fact
that it's the closest state to California with a easily huntable
Mulie population, and it all adds up. In fact, I knew one guy
who grew up in the southwest corner of the state (St. George)
who flat out hated California hunters just because there were
so many of them. Also, Utah attracts a lot of Texas hunters.
One other thing. You wouldn't believe the madness which precedes
the opening day of the annual rifle deer season. It seems like
everybody in the state hunts. They don't even call it deer season,
they call it the "deer hunt".
Now, someone else can take a turn.
Jerry
|
585.178 | exit | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Thu Mar 15 1990 22:35 | 4 |
| I'll bite. What state does NOT sell non-resident Deer permits/licenses
This one's easy....Just to keep things rolling.
Red
|
585.179 | | JUPITR::NEAL | | Fri Mar 16 1990 06:55 | 5 |
| Hawaii
Kansas??
Rich
|
585.180 | We talked about this one earlier. | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Fri Mar 16 1990 08:13 | 5 |
| The answer I believe was discussed in this notes file awhile ago.
Kansas.
|
585.181 | No place but... | MAIL::HENSON | | Fri Mar 16 1990 10:26 | 4 |
| Yeah, the answer is definitely Kansas. Also, until recently (1 or 2
years ago), I believe Iowa also did not sell non-resident licenses.
Jerry
|
585.182 | | CSC32::J_PEDERSEN | Jim - DTN 592-4670 | Fri Mar 16 1990 11:10 | 5 |
| Iowa STILL does not sell non-resident licenses.
I makes me so mad I could chew nails..
Jim
|
585.183 | Your on Rich | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Fri Mar 16 1990 15:09 | 9 |
| Re. 179
Rick,, you were the first right one ( Kansas ). Opps,
forgot it was discussed before, but what the heck, it keeps the
topic from becomeing stale/old.
Your turn Rich.
Red
|
585.184 | let 'em stay home | SA1794::CHARBONND | you have to open _all_ the doors | Fri Mar 16 1990 16:34 | 4 |
| For a solution to the problem of license fees in different
states, and 'resident only' hunting, how about reciprocal
fees ? Nonresident pays what *you* would pay in *his*
state ? You can't hunt there ? Bye, fella.
|
585.185 | wake up, test time! | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Fri Apr 06 1990 12:37 | 14 |
| ok....
just to revive some interest...
1. When icefishing, how much weight can 36" of ice hold?
2. Whats the only way to tell a male from a female pronghorn antelope?
besides the sex organs....
3. Name the 4 trophy judgement categories used on elk antlers by the
Boone & Crocket Club?
Fra
|
585.186 | | GENRAL::WADE | Mymamadon'tallownowoodenbatsinhere! | Fri Apr 06 1990 16:00 | 5 |
| #2 Well, a female can have horns, but they rarely extend past the
tips of the ears. The telltale sign is that the male has a
black cheek patch. What do I win?
Clay
|
585.187 | #2 down | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Mon Apr 09 1990 10:49 | 3 |
| Clays got the answer to #2... you win an all expense paid trip to....
fra
|
585.188 | | GENRAL::WADE | Aluminum roolz! | Mon Apr 09 1990 14:10 | 7 |
| To where Ray? I've got my suitecase packed! ;^)
I may be way off base, but, I think two of the categories for
#3 are "royal" and "monarch". Maybe I should quit while I'm
ahead!
Clay
|
585.189 | Oops, I mean Fra..... | GENRAL::WADE | Aluminum roolz! | Mon Apr 09 1990 14:11 | 1 |
|
|
585.190 | come on these are easy | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Apr 10 1990 13:48 | 5 |
| no more guesses????
i'll give ya till tomorrow...
Fra
|
585.191 | What to heck... | BTOVT::REMILLARD_K | | Wed Apr 11 1990 10:27 | 6 |
|
Fra,
I'll take a guess at #1, how about 2700 lbs.?
Kevin
|
585.192 | answers to re:.185 | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Wed Apr 11 1990 10:41 | 11 |
|
answers:
1. how much weight can 36" of ice hold... 100 tons!
2. only male antelopes have the black ring like pattern under the jaw.
3. four tropy judgement categories used on elk... beam length, spread,
circumference and symmetry.
|