| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 375.1 | get it now before price increase | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Sat Mar 11 1989 11:16 | 6 |
| I can't understand why they would raise it in November instead of
at the beginning of a calender year. I know I will buy my license
a long time before that happens. But your are right about the last
increase, that is alos when they came out with the new licenses.
Was that $5 a license or $5 for the combination?
Bret
|
| 375.2 | I'm not sure | 12GAGE::DERIE | I'm the ABA | Sun Mar 12 1989 11:40 | 11 |
|
The way the article is writen it sounds like $5 each. The state
sells about 100,000 hunting licenses a year. This alone would
create about $500,000 towards the goal of $800,000. I'm not sure
but I think they sell well over 100,000 fishing licenses each
year. With these figures it seems that the increase is split between
both.
Steve
|
| 375.3 | No added $ for Hunting | ATEAM::AYOTTE | | Wed Mar 22 1989 10:29 | 16 |
| Another article in the same newspaper stated that the $5.00 increase
will apply only to fishing licenses. Of course if you purchase
a combination fishing/hunting licence you will pay an additional
$5.00. Someone was quoted as saying that no additional charges
would be added to hunting licenses because the money wouldn't be
added to hunting related funds.
Just a thought.......... maybe the $5.00 will be used to fund search
parties for all the ill prepared folks that get lost or die in our
mountains. It certainly won't go towards reclaiming any trout ponds
or repairing any of our "4X4" boat launches. Sorry... wrong file!
I don't really have a problem with the extra $5.00. I just have
a problem with not being told exactly what the money will be used
for.
Dave
|
| 375.4 | how are search parties paid | SALEM::MACGREGOR | I'm the NRA/GONH/NAHC | Thu Apr 20 1989 14:39 | 6 |
| I had always thought that if there was a search party for someone,
that it was paid for by that someone. Unless of course that person
was not around anymore, then maybe insurance might take over. I
had always thought that it was along the same lines as ambulance
services.
Bret
|
| 375.5 | not by money | WFOV11::DRUMM | | Thu Apr 20 1989 14:48 | 3 |
| In Mass the search party gets paid with a thank-you
Steve Search_and_rescue
|
| 375.6 | NH Search/Rescue Funding | ATEAM::AYOTTE | | Mon Apr 24 1989 11:33 | 9 |
| In NH Henry Mock budgets for search/resue in his law enforcement
budget. However, in cases of criminal negligence, the states
prosecutor is going after the loosers for retribution. Seems only
fair to me.
Maybe the states should issue hiking licenses and require a mandatory
safety education program????????????????????????? semi- 8^)
Dave
|