T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
319.1 | | LIONEL::SAISI | | Tue Dec 20 1988 11:12 | 7 |
| What? Jeff, is this actually an attempt to be objective? I thought
your test for the best all-around dog would be to look at the
registration and if it says "Laborador Retriever" then you found
it. :-) How about a timed test for how many finds the dog makes
and either puts up within gun range or holds for the hunter. I
realize this would be hard to duplicate for each dog.
Linda
|
319.2 | It's All Relative | PCCAD1::RICHARDJ | Bluegrass,Music Aged to Perfection | Tue Dec 20 1988 11:19 | 9 |
|
The best all-around dog is the one that is best for what you do.
A guy I know has a brit that is overwieght, can only hunt for a couple
of hours etc. For him its perfect because he is overwieght and can
only hunt for a couple of hours. A champion dog would run him to
the ground.
Jim
|
319.3 | Tsk, Tsk | DECWET::HELSEL | I'm the NRA | Tue Dec 20 1988 12:03 | 8 |
| Fortunately, I already have great dogs and don't have to give them
aptitude test to prove to myself that I ought to keep them. This
is one advantage of not having labs. You don't have the paranoia
of thinking, "Gee does everyone think my dogs are wimpy?"
Let me know if your dogs pass.
Brett.
|
319.4 | | NACAD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Dec 20 1988 12:53 | 5 |
| the perfect dog is one who dos'nt shit all over your house.... ;^)
and can fetch the paper, and the slippers, and can take himself
for a walk.... ;^)
Fra
|
319.5 | | BPOV02::PERRY | Every Dog Has His Day ! | Tue Dec 20 1988 12:54 | 14 |
|
Jeff,
Before you define how to test the best all around dog. Can you
define what the best all around dog would do ????
I noticed you had tracking as a test, do you expext the all
around dog to hunt like a hound, or do you want the dog to trail?
All of the all breed hunting trials, I have heard of are all
done on upland game. I haven't seen much emphasis on working through
decoys, or sitting in a blind, however they usually have at least
one retrieve in the water.
Should such a dog be measured on efficiency, or style, or ???
pat.
|
319.6 | Labs set the std by which all others are measured! | BPOV06::J_AMBERSON | | Tue Dec 20 1988 13:25 | 9 |
| Brett,
Yawn....... Those parlor pups that you call gundogs wouldn't last
ten minutes up against a real dog like a Lab. Little Fifi would
panic at thought of getting her totseys wet. And God forbid if
the naturally curlly hair were to get a burr in it! Do yours wear
camo ribbons when out in the field?
Jeff
|
319.7 | | BPOV06::J_AMBERSON | | Tue Dec 20 1988 13:33 | 13 |
| Pat,
Actually I beleive that the all around dog should be just that,
and all around hunting dog. He should be at home in the field flushing
game. He should be able to trail cripples. He should be able to
handle blinds on land and in the water. He should be able to handle
multiple retrieves on land and in the water. He should be able
to work out of a boat, a blind, and through decoys, etc. They should
be able to hunt in weather from -20 to 80 degrees.
Come to think of it Linda, your right, a Lab is the logical choice.
Jeff
|
319.8 | Try and stay inside more. | DECWET::HELSEL | I'm the NRA | Tue Dec 20 1988 14:13 | 27 |
| Jeff, Jeff, Jeff,
The frost is eating your brain. If you want to talk about wimpy
dogs wearing ribbons, let's talk lab. I have two neighbors with
labs. One is a run of the mill lab and the other is from some famous
kennel in North Carolina owned by some guy named Kirby.
Both of these neighbors have come and knocked at the door to ask
me to keep Willie from beating them up. They said that Willie play
too rough. It is kind of funny to look out the window and see Willie
standing over this 80 lbs galloot cowering on his back like he's
begging for mercy. Boy is my neighbor embarrassed.
I got really embarrassed though when I saw my 6 month old puppie
biting the other dog as she ran him off the lawn. Comically enough,
this lab's name is "Buster". My wife and I get a good chuckle out
of that. The neighbors are quite concerned and fearful of letting
their 80 lb. pussies out to play.
The thing is this guy with the Kirby kennels dog thinks he has the
greatest dog in the country. We took him out and ran him against
my run of the mill springer that I got for free in 1985. Willie
flushed six birds and retrieved the four we shot. Lab should have
stayed in the truck, but then again I guess he liked following Willie
around. It was his only chance to see a bird.
|
319.9 | Cabin fever for Willie? | BPOV06::J_AMBERSON | | Tue Dec 20 1988 14:30 | 8 |
| "...Willie standing over this 80lb galloot cowering on his back..."
Uh Brett, I don't know quite how to break this to you but they
weren't fighting. Sounds like Willamina had the hots for that Lab
and was trying to show her affections.
Jeff
|
319.10 | data | CSC32::WATERS | The Agony of Delete | Tue Dec 20 1988 15:48 | 72 |
|
Here are some stats from tests on certain dogs to find the versatile
hunting dog. These are the only ones I have. Never heard of the
NAVHDA either. I just found these last night.
At least it will give you the fields they where tested in.
Tests where made by the North American Versatile Hunting Dog Association.
(average scores out of maximum 4 points)
NATURAL ABILITY TESTS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Pudelpointers 55 3.0 3.1 3.7 3.2 2.0 3.5 3.2 3.1
Griffons 119 2.7 2.7 3.0 2.6 1.8 2.8 2.9 2.6
German wire- 121 2.5 2.6 3.1 2.7 2.0 2.8 2.9 2.6
haird pointer
Brittany 22 2.6 2.7 3.2 2.4 1.7 3.1 2.6 2.6
German short- 85 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.3 1.8 2.9 2.7 2.5
haired pointer
Weimaraners 14 2.4 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.4 2.1 2.1 2.0
columns
1= number of dogs entered
2= nose
3= search
4= water love
5= pointing
6= tracking
7= desire to work
8= cooperation
9= combined average
UTILITY FIELD TEST
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Pudelpointers 28 3.7 3.6 3.3 3.2 3.4 2.9 3.3 3.0 3.1 2.3 3.1 3.4 3.4 2.6 2.9 3.1
Griffons 27 3.0 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.5 0.8 2.2 2.0 2.2 1.2 2.6 2.2 2.4 1.3 1.6 2.8
German wire- 46 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.0 2.8 1.5 2.4 2.8 2.5 2.0 2.9 2.9 3.1 2.0 2.1 2.2
haird pointer
Brittany 7 3.6 3.6 3.1 3.3 3.1 2.0 3.1 3.3 3.6 0.6 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.9
German short- 32 3.3 3.5 3.1 3.1 2.9 1.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.0 2.9 3.2 3.2 1.8 2.3 2.6
haired pointer
Weimaraners 16 2.4 2.9 2.3 1.7 2.6 0.4 1.5 2.6 2.3 3.1 2.8 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.9 2.2
(these number kind of run together a bit, only fit so much in 80 columns)
1= Dog Entered
2= Desire to work
3= Stamina
4= Nose
5= Search
6= Pointing
7= Steadiness to wing and shot
8= retrieve of shot bird
9= cooperation
10= obedience and handling
11= retrieve by dog track
12= walking at heel
13= remain by blind
14= behaviour by blind
15= search for duck
16= retrieve of duck
17= combined average
|
319.11 | Notes on mating | DECWET::HELSEL | I'm the NRA | Tue Dec 20 1988 16:04 | 5 |
| Oh! I get it. The fact that buster's throat was lodged between
Willie's choppers was part of the mating ritual. Huh. I thought
Buster looked ****ed.
;-)
|
319.12 | | BPOV02::PERRY | Every Dog Has His Day ! | Tue Dec 20 1988 16:55 | 12 |
|
Re: .10
At last someone has really touched on the versatile hunting
dogs !!!!!!!!!!
Jeff, if you want a versatile all around hunting dog, get
one of the breeds mentioned in .10 , and give your lab to a
duck hunter !!!!!!
Ha HA hA !!!!!!!
pat.
|
319.13 | | BPOV04::J_AMBERSON | | Wed Dec 21 1988 08:07 | 6 |
| Pat
With the exception of the pointing, it sounds like a NAHRA or AKC
hunting trial for Labs. Interresting how evryone is _trying_ to teach
there dogs what a Lab already knows!
Jeff
|
319.14 | | BPOV02::PERRY | Every Dog Has His Day ! | Wed Dec 21 1988 15:46 | 20 |
|
Jeff,
You've made a good point about NAHRA and AKC hunting
tests. They really are expanding the requirements of the retriever.
They have set some standards that outline the work that a good
working retriever should be able to handle. As a matter of fact
the AKC has also set up similiar tests for the pointing breeds,
and the flushing spaniels. These hunting tests and titles are
good method of encouraging the breeding of truely tested hunting
dogs. This includes all breeds.
Another point to be made here concerns the breeds that
were once used for hunting and lost much of their hunting instinct
after being bred for other purposes such as shows, or just
overlooked becouse maybe a breed hasn't received much popularity.
I think the AKC hunting tests will really help these breeds
come along as top quality hunters and get many of their owners
and breeders more involved with hunting.
pat.
|
319.15 | | LIONEL::SAISI | | Wed Dec 21 1988 15:59 | 5 |
| I keep hearing all these wonderful things about hunting tests.
Where is this activity going on in Massachusetts? It seems
like the AKC trials keep the springer people busy, and there
is not much around in the NE for other spaniel breeds?
Linda
|
319.16 | | BPOV04::PERRY | Every Dog Has His Day ! | Wed Dec 21 1988 16:43 | 30 |
|
Linda,
You have a good point ! Unfortunately, I don't think
that we'll see any hunting tests or field trials held in
Mass. unless our laws change. New Hampshire, Maine, Conn.,and
Vermont are all active for field trials and hunting tests.
Another issue is getting all of the breed clubs to adopt/
support hunting tests. One reason for this is the fact that
field trials were started to do pretty much the same thing that
the hunting tests are trying to do. The thing that happened
in field trials is that as the breeds got better, the tests
got tougher or was it the other way around???
How many hunters require their dog to make a 350 yard mark,
or a 250 yard blind retrieve, or perform a channel blind without
cheating on the bank, or ....... ????? Another thing
that happened is that some of the breeds that used to be compete
in field trials were abandoned for field trials becouse it
reached a point where there just weren't enough entries to
justify a field trial.
The field trial folks say that their tests reflect the
quality required by a dog, and to test them with easier tests
would reduce the quality of the dog. The hunting test folks
say that their tests reflect what is really expected in a hunting
situation. Who is right ???????????
I think that the hunting tests are getting more and
more popular and as a result we should start seeing more and
more hunting tests being held in N.E.
pat.
|
319.17 | There are no easy answers, sorry | CSSE::KELLICKER | | Wed Dec 21 1988 17:52 | 28 |
| < Note 319.16 by BPOV04::PERRY "Every Dog Has His Day !" >
BTW: I love all dogs...except mops HA!
Which laws Pat? The one that stopped the Shorhair folks was "No Shoot to
Kill". However the Pointer and Setter folks have trials at Westboro and
down on the Cape, can't think of the name now. Second however, to have
trials you need people to support them, that means a number of clubs. You
do not have that in Mass or NE? I think. You usually don't run flushing
breeds against pointing breeds. So you have to travel if you want to trial
a dog, a pointing breed anyway. New york has at least 10 to 15 trials
in the Spring and the same in the Fall. That is 10 to 15 for GSP, Brittany
and etc. Pardon me, I used to travel every weekend to New York, Penn and
Ohio to run dogs. I have a very understanding wife.
Field Trial standards are very strict. A class dog must point, back
retrieve (land and water), have empeccable manners and must not bite the
judge. And if you think trial is hard try judging or shooting for the
handlers....but I loved it.
From trial dogs come hunting dogs and in some case vica versa, but not
often. And you know what the dawn hunter always gets the field trial dog
and the field trialer...you guessed it.
Have fun and good hunting,
Bill
|
319.18 | | BPOV02::J_AMBERSON | | Thu Dec 22 1988 08:13 | 11 |
| Pat is quite correct in his acessment of the attitude towards field
trials in MA. MA will not allow a shoot to kill trial. This
effectively eliminates any trials for flushing breeds or retrievers.
You have to kill birds in order to test these dogs. The interest
is here however. There are alot of dog owners in MA who would love
to be able to go to a trial in this state. As it is now the trials
are held 99% out of state. As Bill said,they still hold pointer
and setter trials in Westboro and at Miles Standish. Wonder when
the powers-to-be will put an end to those also?
Jeff
|
319.19 | NSTRA RESULTS | CSSE::KELLICKER | | Thu Dec 22 1988 09:03 | 33 |
| < Note 319.18 by BPOV02::J_AMBERSON >
< As Bill said,they still hold pointer
< and setter trials in Westboro and at Miles Standish. Wonder when
< the powers-to-be will put an end to those also?
The pointer folks don't have shoot to kill trials!
!!!!!REPORT!!!!!REPORT!!!!!REPORT!!!!!REPORT!!!!!REPORT!!!!!REPORT
NSTRA'S DOG OF THE YEAR TRIAL
This is an organization trying to do just what you folks are discussing.
See Gun Dog Volume 8 JAN/FEB, 1989 page 64.
There were 96 dogs entered in this years NSTRA Dog of the Year Trial.
You just cannot beat quality and the English have it.
1st Brandy'd Black Matt, a male English pointer owned/handled by Rocky
Weber of Effingham, Illinois.
2nd Reno Von Maggie May, A German shorthaired pointer owned by Dale
Anderson of Spokane, Washington and handled by Gene
Mahoney of Medical Lake, Washington.
3rd He's Just Right, a male English Pointer owned/handled by L Dale Loveall
of Columbia, Missouri.
4th Jay's Rolling On, a female English pointer owned/handled by Dave Jacobs
of Stomping Ground, Kentuckey.
|
319.20 | | BPOV02::PERRY | Every Dog Has His Day ! | Thu Dec 22 1988 13:23 | 19 |
| re: .19
The NSTRA is not the only pointer trial that shoots birds over
the dogs. The AKC hunting tests also shoot birds over the dogs and
they also have strict requirements for retrieving to hand.
Although I love to watch the big running bird dogs, they just
are not compatable with the hunting requirements in N.E. Although
they would be perfect for hunting in the south and in the mid-west
where you can actually see the dogs work.
Another point for NSTRA and the AKC hunting tests for pointing
dogs is their requirement for retrieving. The tradional AKC field
trials do not shoot birds over the dogs and as a result the dogs
are not required to retrieve.
How can you test a dogs hunting ability/skills without actually
shooting birds over them and requiring them to retrieve to hand???
I think the pointer folks are changing somewhat these days!!!
pat.
|
319.21 | Dogs do adapt | CSSE::KELLICKER | | Thu Dec 22 1988 14:21 | 21 |
| < Note 319.20 by BPOV02::PERRY "Every Dog Has His Day !" >
< The tradional AKC field trials do not shoot birds over the dogs and as
< a result the dogs are not required to retrieve.
AKC Trials for German shorthaired points, in most cases, are shoot to kill.
BTW: A shooting dog that does not adapt to terrain does'nt win. Mid west
dogs come East and those that come and work out several days before a trial
do well, those that don't work out usually get lost. And when we go West
our dog seem to say Oh God where do I run. Bottom line good dogs adapt.
They must think about it. Dogs purchased from the East like Elhew pointers
do well in New England, down south and out west. So its the dog making
adjustment for his environment.
Good hunting,
Bill
|
319.22 | | BPOV06::PERRY | Every Dog Has His Day ! | Thu Dec 22 1988 15:39 | 19 |
|
re: .-1
I did not consider German shorthaired pointers in my assessment
of traditional pointing dog trials. Although the german shorthaired
pointer does indeed run field trials, they have competed more so
with german shorthaired pointers in their own specialty clubs and
have not "at least to my knowledge", competed successfully against
english pointers and english setters. Two different games !!!
Yes dogs do adjust, but to what degree is another issue. Another
consideration is the norm versus the exception to the rule. Field
trial folks search far and wide to get that big running dog with
style, speed, stamina, and nose, and after they get them they're not about
to try to get them to hunt close , at least I wouldn't if I were
in their shoes !
Happy Holidays to All
pat.
|
319.23 | Certainly True! | CSSE::KELLICKER | | Tue Dec 27 1988 16:33 | 27 |
| < Note 319.22 by BPOV06::PERRY "Every Dog Has His Day !" >
< Field trial folks search far and wide to get that big running dog with
< style, speed, stamina, and nose, and after they get them they're not about
< to try to get them to hunt close , at least I wouldn't if I were in their
< shoes !
If there is an advantage to having a "bird field" this is it. It teaches a
dog that when I have a gun in my hand there are birds close by, so stay
close! I prefer to have a continueous course and kill birds on the back
course. This assumes that the person releasing birds knows where the
objectives are and can ride a horse well enough to get there...Ha..Ha!
I think a few Shorthairs have competed against the continintal breeds, but
those have been the exception and even the exceptions could not run in such
notable trials as the Grand National. The good Shorthair is at best an
hour dog.
See you later and good hunting,
Bill
|