T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
318.1 | What was that number? | VELVET::GATH | | Mon Dec 19 1988 13:30 | 3 |
| Why don't you try calling them. You gave us there number.
Keep us imformed.
|
318.2 | | BOMBE::BONIN | | Mon Dec 19 1988 14:02 | 46 |
| Here's what you need to send:
o Bird-band number (that's what the number on the band is)
o Date when the bird was recovered
o Location where the bird was recovered
o How recovered (found dead or shot)
Unlike the surveys where hunters mail in goose tails, duck
wings, and woodcock wings, the bird-banding program sends you
information about your bird. In a few weeks you'll receive a
certificate telling when and where the bird was banded and
its approximate age when banded.
Waterfowl sometimes wander onto different flyways and even
continents. It can be fun to learn that your duck was banded
in some faraway place like Greenland. For this reason, I
anxiously awaited the reports on my bands. I was disappointed
to find that my Canada goose and my black duck where
yearlings that were banded exactly where I shot them.
In your letter or postcard, ask for the interesting pamphlet
that explains the bird-banding program.
As to the address, just "Bird Band, Washington DC" will get
you there. I've got the complete address of the bird banding
laboratory and I'll post it if I manage to find it.
As to the actual metal band, some hunters straighten the band
and sent it in, however, you're free to keep it. It makes a
nifty souvenir attached to the lanyard of your duck or goose
call.
I asked about the word "avise" when I sent in a band number.
I received a letter explaining that "avise" is for
Spanish-speaking Mexican's and South American's who
understand it to mean "advise."
I'm glad to hear that you want to participate in this
worthwhile program. Believe it or not, there are more than a
small minority of waterfowlers who don't bother reporting
banded birds. An article in one of the sporting magazines
noted that such hunters are "either ignorant or lazy." It's
only a postcard and two minutes of your time.
Doug
|
318.3 | thanks | CLUSTA::STORM | | Mon Dec 19 1988 15:17 | 8 |
| Thanks. I will mail it to that address and see what happens. I
will also let you know if the bird has an interesting history.
Bear, I had already started to "call" and discovered I was short
a few digits.
Mark,
|
318.4 | Response may be slow | DNEAST::AVERELL_MICH | | Tue Dec 20 1988 10:03 | 9 |
| I have sent information in several times on bands taken from
Cormorants. I received a postcard, confirming that they got the
information, about a month later. The certificate, with all the
bird's history, did't arrive for about six months.
BTW: Yes, I did legally shoot the Cormorants, as part of the Cormorant
Depredation Program here in Maine.
Mike
|
318.5 | | BOMBE::BONIN | | Tue Dec 20 1988 10:35 | 9 |
|
That's interesting. Care to tell us about this Cormorant
Depredation Program?
Were the cormorants causing some kind of damage? Was the
hunting restricted to certain zones? How did you hunt them?
Finally, did you try eating them?
Doug
|
318.6 | Eat them!!!???........No Way!!!! | DNEAST::AVERELL_MICH | | Wed Dec 21 1988 07:31 | 45 |
| About 5 years ago an Atlantic Salmon hatchery on the coast was raided
and practically wiped out by Cormorants. This along with the
tremendous population of these birds prompted a special program
to hunt them.
Cormorants, Shags, Sh*tboats, will eat anything from eels to baby
Black Ducks. They are found mostly near the coast, but they can
usually be found in almost any lake or pond. They look like an
ugly Loon from a distance and weigh 4-8 pounds. They are divers
and can cover an awful lot of distance under water.
To get a permit, one had to fill out a form stating where you wanted
to hunt and why you wanted to hunt them. This form had to be signed
by your local Warden and approved by the DIFW. The permit was free
and valid from early April to late June.
You had to hunt during daylight hours, with a shotgun, away from
other boaters and towns. You couldn't hunt in a Cormorant rookerie
or wildlife reserves. You could, however, use lead shot and a power
boat. You were supposed to examine the stomache contents of each
bird and dispose of them properly.
My father and I hunted them on the Kennebec and Eastern Rivers in
the towns of Richmond, Bowdoinham, and Dresden. On our best day
we got 26. The stomaches contained small Striped Bass (6-12 inches
long), Eels, Perch, and some kind of parasitic worms.
The part that bothered us the most was the number of Stripers that
they were eating. It was not uncommon to find one with 2 or even
three Stripers in its stomache at one time. The State was/is trying
to increase the Striper population which lead to an increase in
the minimum legal length limit from 28" to 31".
I know the 50-60 we shot each spring didn't even dent the population
and I don't think there was more than 20 or so people in the state
hunting them. I havn't even checked on a permit in 2 years, so
I don't know if the program still exists. Hopefully this spring
I will have some time to hunt them again.
BTW, no we didn't eat them. There is not that much meat on them
and they don't keep well in the bottom of a boat during that time
of the year.
Mike
|
318.7 | | NEBVAX::PAPPALARDO | I'm the NRA | Thu Dec 22 1988 10:53 | 20 |
|
RE:6
"You had to state why you wanted to hunt them"
What did you say ?
You know, We have the same problem here in N.H. LOTs of them.
It seems like all of a sudden I noticed thousands of them everywhere.
Ive never shot one as I did'nt know the law, Are they a pretty bird
forwhat they are ? Can anypart of the bird be utilized ? I don't
think I would want to eat them as there pure fish eaters..
Are they tough to kill, what # shot do you use ?
Thanks,
Rick (A thousand questions, You have me wondering about summer hunts)
|
318.8 | "They're fun to hunt!!" | DNEAST::AVERELL_MICH | | Wed Dec 28 1988 12:38 | 18 |
| We used everything from #7 1/2 to #2 lead shot. The light loads
didn't work very well and I would suggest #4 or #2 waterfoul loads.
They are pretty tough to kill right out of the air. Usually, if
they have any life left once they hit the water, they will dive
and swim away under water. Once they surface you have to have the
bead right on them or they will dive as soon as they spot you.
At first, we were just dumping the carcasses in the river for the
Sea Gulls, but after we watched a Bald Eagle drive a Sea Gull away,
we decided we'd better take them home to the dumpster. It's bad
enough for Biologists to think that lead shot is killing ducks,
let alone Eagles. I suppose they might make do for Coyote bait.
As far as a reason for hunting them we just said that due to the
vast numbers of them we felt that they we having an adverse effect
on the fish and duck population.
Mike
|
318.9 | | BOMBE::BONIN | | Fri Dec 30 1988 09:46 | 8 |
|
Report banded birds to:
Bird Banding Laboratory
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Laurel, MD 20811
Doug
|
318.10 | good timing | CLUSTA::STORM | | Tue Jan 03 1989 14:04 | 14 |
|
Thanks for the more complete address, Doug.
The timing of this note was good. Although I had never gotten a
banded bird before the woodie earlier this year, a week after entering
this note Michael and I dropped 3 geese from a flock. All three
were banded.
I will be mailing the information in this week and will let y'all
know when I get any info back.
Thanks,
Mark
|
318.11 | results are in | CLUSTA::STORM | | Tue Mar 21 1989 17:25 | 13 |
| After approximately 13 weeks, I got my first reply back in the
mail last night. I assume the others will trickle in over the
next few days.
The goose we got was banded the June 30, 1988 near Plum Island. We
shot it at Parker River so this "migratory" bird wasn't more than
a mile from where it was born. I assume the other 2 geese will be
the same.
Will let you know about the woodduck when I hear on that one.
Mark,
|
318.12 | more on the geese | CLUSTA::STORM | | Fri Mar 24 1989 11:53 | 25 |
| I got the certificates for the other two geese. It wasn't quite what I
expected. We took the 3 banded geese from the same flock and they were
all the same size (small as geese go). I assumed they were all young.
two of them were banded on Plum Island last summer when they were too
young to fly. The 3rd was also banded on Plum Island, but was banded
as an adult in July of '86. That means it was at least 3 1/2 years
old (and still living in the same area).
Those geese weighed about 8 pounds each. If one of them was 3 1/2
years old, I wonder how old the bigger geese (11-12 pounds) we've
gotten were?
Anyone one out there have any idea how old these geese around here
(where they are hunted) get?
Another point of interst is that all three were female.
On the back of the return certificate it says that 34 million birds
have been banded in North America through 1976 (old certificats no
doubt) and nearly 2 million have been recovered. I was suprised that
is only a 5%-6% rate of return.
Mark,
Do any of you
|
318.13 | | BOMBE::BONIN | | Fri Mar 24 1989 13:38 | 19 |
| Mark,
I think there are several strains or subspecies of Canada
Geese which are distinguished mainly by size. The 11 to 12
pounders are probably the "Greater" Canada Geese. I don't
know the strain of your 3 1/2 year old bird, but I suspect it
would be full grown at that age.
Like your birds, my banded black duck and Canada Goose were
banded near Plum Island and shot at Parker River. Same goes
for my partner's banded goose.
In .11 and .12 you seem to imply that the geese may not have
been migrants. It's true that a lot of birds stay at Plum
Island year round, but I wouldn't assume that a goose shot in
December had no intention of flying south for the winter and
returning to the refuge in the spring.
Doug
|
318.14 | | VELVET::GATH | | Fri Mar 24 1989 14:49 | 18 |
| Mark I sorta agree with doug.
There are many dogs and a springer spaniel is a 30-50 pd
dog.( I just grabbed at these figures as an approximation)
Labs are usually much bigger because of Genetics not age.
Age can have something to do with weight as well as food
supply.
I have a book that has maybe 13 or 15 ( I forget ) strains
of Canadian Geese and they all are of different weights.
Purhaps because all these Geese pretty much look the same to the
untrained eye we assume thaey are all of the same strain
but in actuallity they are not.
bear
|
318.15 | sex of bird | DECWET::HELSEL | A thousand points of lightwt threads | Fri Mar 24 1989 15:41 | 5 |
| Could it be that the 11-12 pound birds were the same sub-species
but males as opposed to the 8 lb females?
/brett
|
318.16 | | CLUSTA::STORM | | Mon Mar 27 1989 12:34 | 21 |
| Bear, Doug,
You are probably correct about the different sub-species. I knew
there were some sub-species of canada geese, but I had no idea it was
as many as 12-15.
Bear, do you have any other interesting info in your book about canada
geese? I'm really curious about the average lifespan of hunted canada
geese. I had assumed most of the geese I got last year were young
(since they were foolish enough to let a rookie like me shoot them :-) )
Doug, you may be right that they would (or did) migrate south later.
Since this was late December, I assumed those leaving would have left
already.
I also got my wood duck info back. The bird was banded in 9/86 in
Deleware, so it was 2 1/2 years old when I shot it in Oct. on the
Souhegan River here in N.H.
Mark,
|