| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 284.1 | Some answers. Maybe someone else can shed additional light | VIA::BAZEMORE | Barbara b. | Wed Nov 01 1989 13:43 | 66 |
| 284.2 | Image transparency/opacity is not specified in DDIF | 19751::SWATKO | Brother, can 'ya spare a Meg? | Thu Nov 02 1989 11:31 | 19 |
| 284.3 | Transparency and private data | VIA::BAZEMORE | Barbara b. | Fri Nov 03 1989 10:17 | 17 |
| 284.4 | not specifiable != opaque | 19751::SWATKO | Electrons are cheap. Trees are not. | Fri Nov 03 1989 16:14 | 16 |
| 284.5 | Common usage | VIA::BAZEMORE | Barbara b. | Mon Nov 20 1989 15:26 | 25 |
| 284.6 | see-through frames | ILLUSN::SORNSON | They stamp them when they're small. | Mon Nov 20 1989 16:21 | 24 |
| 284.7 | Current transparency flags not limited to graphics? | VIA::BAZEMORE | Barbara b. | Wed Nov 22 1989 10:48 | 15 |
| 284.8 | image frames have no background | ILLUSN::SORNSON | They stamp them when they're small. | Wed Nov 22 1989 11:21 | 25 |
| 284.9 | one way it's been done... | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | practicing my J�tulling... | Wed Nov 22 1989 11:54 | 16 |
| 284.10 | Colorless pixels | VIA::BAZEMORE | Barbara b. | Wed Nov 22 1989 16:12 | 41 |
| 284.11 | Printing partially transparent images is no sweat. | 19751::SWATKO | Electrons are cheap. Trees are not. | Mon Nov 27 1989 11:36 | 21 |
| 284.12 | THANK YOU!! | 58520::BEATTY | | Tue Dec 05 1989 11:12 | 8
|