T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1169.1 | fill 'em or don't make 'em | SALEM::JGREEN | Living beyond my emotional means | Tue May 17 1994 13:21 | 10 |
| I suspect that sanding would remove the scratches but would also
remove the protective outer layer of "gelcoat". The graphics are one
layer of the compression molded aqua-toys. Sanding would remove the
scratch from the outer layers at the expense of exposing the graphics
on the inner layers.
Other option would be to fill the scratches using "clear" something,
gelcoat,paint, ?
~j
|
1169.2 | Try a corvette repair shop near YOU ! | NOTAPC::BURGESS | | Tue May 17 1994 15:21 | 19 |
| re .0
Well, it kinda dependzzzz what you want fer a new bottom (-:
If you don't care abpout the existing graphics (viewed mostly
by fish and sand fleas anyway) but do care about having a smoothe
surface then you could go the standard auto repair route.....
bondo, etc.
If I wanted to preserve what's left of the graphics, I'd
probably take it along to the local body shop and ask if they know how
to "clear fill" the gouges and scratches.
Or, if they're not so deep as to cause a steering effect - I
might just leave 'em and look sorry for m'self...... given that
fathers' day is raBidly (intentionaly typo) approaching (-:
Reg
|
1169.3 | On slalom skis the rough bottom belongs there | TRIGG::VOGEL | Steve Vogel - Ralston/Eveready & Emerson Sales Support | Tue May 17 1994 16:25 | 6 |
| Most slalom skis have a rough bottom to assist in deceleration for
turning. I know that some of the pros tinker with their skis using
sand paper but I wouldn't recommend it for the rest of us.
/Steve
|
1169.4 | Sailors use "bumpy paint" (-: | NOTAPC::BURGESS | | Tue May 17 1994 18:12 | 23 |
| re <<< Note 1169.3 by TRIGG::VOGEL "Steve Vogel - Ralston/Eveready & Emerson Sales Support" >>>
> -< On slalom skis the rough bottom belongs there >-
> Most slalom skis have a rough bottom to assist in deceleration for
I agree, its there - but I thought it was to somehow break up
the contact surface area and prevent/reduce "sticking" ???
They do something similar with sail boats too, "rough" surface
finishes are actually "faster" than "smoothe". There's prolly a
class rool re lump/dip size and spacing (-:
> turning. I know that some of the pros tinker with their skis using
> sand paper but I wouldn't recommend it for the rest of us.
This rank amateur used to sand his - on the beach, til I got
double high wraps.
> /Steve
Reg
|
1169.5 | Slip sliding away!!!! | SWAM2::OCONNELL_RA | wandering the west | Wed May 18 1994 19:57 | 6 |
| re:.
The last I read the rough bottom was to break surface tension of the
water. This "helps the ski stay under control", not sticking or
sliding.
My $.02.
|
1169.6 | less drag | SNMFS::BOWMAN | | Thu May 19 1994 02:54 | 8 |
|
with a race ski a light sanding underneath can mean 1-2 mph higher
top end and less pull on the skier.
the other reg
|
1169.7 | breaking cohesion and stiction? | NUBOAT::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Thu May 19 1994 10:59 | 5 |
| I'm learning something.
Would this effect apply to boat bottoms also?
Art
|
1169.8 | Yes, almost any surface with almost any liquid. | NOTAPC::BURGESS | | Thu May 19 1994 15:18 | 29 |
| re <<< Note 1169.7 by NUBOAT::HEBERT "Captain Bligh" >>>
> -< breaking cohesion and stiction? >-
Yeah, right - - ^ ^ that stuff, up there (-:
> I'm learning something.
> Would this effect apply to boat bottoms also?
Yes, its a phenomenon that doesn't care what the surface
belongs to.
Sailors know a lot more about it, you can probably find some
notes on it in their conference. There is some kind of bottom paint
that has little thinggies in it, not sand - but about the same grain
size {"granularity" ? Nah that's a dec'ism} almost like sand thats
been used too many times in a sand blaster and become 'blunt'.
I read an article that described the effect as producing lots
of little areas of turbulence very close to each other. It intruduces a
very thin layer of air/foam between the hull and the water - which the
hull then rides on {lay terms...}
> Art
Reg
|
1169.9 | | SALEM::NORCROSS_W | | Fri May 20 1994 10:57 | 6 |
| So, the whole idea of "TEFLON-based" bottom paint is probably nothing
more than marketting hype making you think that a slippery bottom paint
will make the boat go faster? This is about the best excuse I found so
far to be lazy and not paint the bottom of my boat. For the third
season!
Wayne
|
1169.10 | Don't fix it if it's working better! | KAHALA::SUTER | Never too Hot! | Fri May 20 1994 14:44 | 11 |
|
Ahh... you guys always come up with great ideas... I hadn't
even thought of filling the scratches. (one of my brighter days, huh?)
Wouldn't be too tough, just a real thin coat of fiberglass resin. The
stuff flows pretty smooth....
Rick
ps Gee is this why my Velocity seems to slow down quicker this spring?
Maybe I shouldn't attempt to fix it! :-)
|
1169.11 | graphite | SNMFS::BOWMAN | | Tue May 24 1994 02:48 | 10 |
|
Teflon props are supposed to go harder however im not so sure about
teflon paint.(ive never seen it)
the other thing some people do is rub their running boards and gearbox
with graphite powder however the graphite does come off during a run.
tks
the other reg
|