T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1147.1 | Don't just go for "symptomatic relief" (-: | NOTAPC::BURGESS | | Wed Jan 26 1994 13:26 | 16 |
| re <<< Note 1147.0 by UNYEM::FRASCH >>>
> -< All Things are NOT Equal >-
First the topic title... I think you might mean
"Not all things are equal" (-:
Anyway, you describe a symptom that another noter had a while
back - it turned out to be (can you b'leeve this ?) different pitched
props. So, before getting into cable adjustments I guess I'd check
some of the more obvious things first - like are both engines in a
comparable state of tune, etc.
Reg
|
1147.2 | H-m-m-m-m-m-m-! | UNYEM::FRASCH | | Wed Jan 26 1994 13:43 | 21 |
| Reg,
I think the tune is pretty good. I put in new parts in August, and set
the timing. They are electronic ignitions, so not much else to worry
about (I think).
I did take a couple of turns of adjustment at the Carburetor linkage
which made some difference for the better, which is why I think it's
mechanical.
There are two 19"X21" props that are only 2 years old ---- seem to be
OK.
As I said, I'm new to the big V-8, twin screw arena, so treat me like
totally stupid (shouldn't be too hard) and I'll soak up the info like a
sponge!!!
Thanks,
Don
|
1147.3 | it aint the throttle | MR3MI1::BORZUMATO | | Wed Jan 26 1994 14:20 | 43 |
|
let me agree with reg, and i'll explain why.
first: if the throttles are "x" much out (more than seems ususal)
it ain't the obvious, not the throttles.
and if your engines are in tune, oh well, no here.
i would definitley check your props, or for a loose shaft at the
coupler.
i had the same problem, when i bought the boat the previous owner
told me that new props had been put on the season before.
up to this point all he said seemed to be true.
my first season i went absolutley crazy trying to adjust the
throttles at the helm without luck. when i laid up,
i told the marina to pull the props and send them out.
about a week later ( i think it was H&H) called and gave me the
bad new. they should be 18x18, they were in dia. 16" and just over
17" no wonder one throttle had to be advanced ahead of the other.
you can check these yourself without pulling them, but not be eyeball.
i wound at their recommendation buying new ones. the difference
in throttle movement toady is miniscule, say a 1/4 to 3/8".
JIm
|
1147.4 | Another H-m-m-m-m-m-! | UNYEM::FRASCH | | Wed Jan 26 1994 14:31 | 5 |
| Well, It's on the cradle, so now is the time to check it out! I'll pull
the props and send them out to the prop shop for a look-see!
Thanks,
Don
|
1147.5 | Yup, now I remember, it was Jim B's boat. | NOTAPC::BURGESS | | Wed Jan 26 1994 15:36 | 38 |
| re <<< Note 1147.3 by MR3MI1::BORZUMATO >>>
> -< it aint the throttle >-
> let me agree with reg, and i'll explain why.
OK, I'll let Ya agree... (-:
> first: if the throttles are "x" much out (more than seems ususal)
> it ain't the obvious, not the throttles.
I was thinking along the lines that OK, maybe cables
wear/stretch, but not by very much. On the other hand, if one engine
takes a lot more throttle (actually "throttle lever angle" is all we
know at this point) then its more likely that either the load on it is
different or it just doesn't respond the same
A different load could be caused by, amoung other things;
prop size (diameter or pitch)
trannie rati<fergettit>
any difference in drag, e.g. shaft bearings, etc.
Different response... Well, I guess this is the symptom
you're seeing, so its difficult to isolate )-:
Twin screw boats aren't in my foreseable future, but I'd try
to somehow check the state of tune, maybe you could try performance
testing the boat separately on each engine to figure this out ?
Are there any differences of temperament in the two engines ?
e.g. is one a much better/worse cold starter than the other one ?
do they idle down equally smoothly ? Do they rev as freely in neutral ?
etc.
Reg
|
1147.6 | yep it was mine... | MR3MI1::BORZUMATO | | Wed Jan 26 1994 15:50 | 16 |
| ain't it fun,
:>)
before you pull them take a measurement, look on the prop hub
to determine what dia and pitch, it should be stamped there.
if suspicious then pull.
check both shafts, especially the one that needs more throttle.
was nice of reg to let me agree>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
JIm
|
1147.7 | If so, then it ain't the cable! | KAHALA::SUTER | Never too Hot! | Thu Jan 27 1994 10:13 | 6 |
|
Assuming thisboat has dual Tachometers..... are the engines
running at different RPMs when this mismatch of throttle
controls occurs?
Rick
|
1147.8 | imho | MR3MI1::BORZUMATO | | Thu Jan 27 1994 11:28 | 18 |
|
Rick, whats happening from what i understand, is that the throttles
need to be mismatched in order for the engines to be synchronized.
If the throttles are matched one is running at a lower rpm..
Which me thinks is a set of mismatched props. Also if the throttles
handles are set even, the boat will turn in one direction, in favor
of the engine with higher rpm.
my 2.369c
JIm
in one direction.
|
1147.9 | Did you do visual on carbs? | SALEM::NORCROSS_W | | Thu Jan 27 1994 11:37 | 25 |
| I would think that with the help of one other person it would be easy
enough to determine if the carbs (you do have carbs, not fuel
injection ?) were both at full open position at full throttle position
on the levers. If not, then there must be an adjustment at either the
engine or where the two sets of cables (from the two helms) come
together. There is probably adjustment at both locations. The reverse
gears should be marked with their reduction ratios but I suppose
somebody could have modified one. If they are Warners (ie: hydraulic)
you would probably have to open them up to determine this unless the
engines could be run and you had a hand-held tach that could be used to
measure output shaft RPMs. (But don't do this dry with prop shafts
connected or you'll fry all your strut bearings, packing, etc.)
One last thing. Do you have counter-rotating engines/props? If no,
then there is a possibility that one prop could be sucking air from the
side of the boat and causing a cavitation situation. Ideally, the
right hand prop (when viewed from the stern) should rotate to starboard
(or clockwise) while the lefthand prop should rotate to port
(counterclockwise). If both props rotate in the same direction, I
would expect the engine that doesn't meet the above to need less
throttle because the prop is getting less of a "bite" on the water.
Wayne (who will probably never be in a position to worry about multiple
engines in the near future. 15' boat, 1 engine, 1 steering wheel, 1
throttle, 1 shift lever, no payments)
|
1147.10 | info please??? | MR3MI1::BORZUMATO | | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:45 | 9 |
|
By the way, what make and model yr is the mutha...
sounds like a luhrs or silverton.... the chryslers have a ring
to it..
JIm
|
1147.11 | | RTL::LINDQUIST | | Thu Jan 27 1994 17:22 | 18 |
| If one engine is sick, and producing less power, it will need
a 'bigger' throttle setting to achieve the same RPM under the
same load, as the other.
Same thing for load. If one prop were of a higher pitch,
that engine would need a 'bigger' throttle setting to
maintain the same RPM.
If it were my problem, I would (with the engines off) have
someone advance the throttle until the throttle-plate in one
engine is fully open. Then do the same with the other. If
the throttle controls are in very different positions -- it's
the cable/linkage. If the throttle controls are in a similar
position, the problem is either power produced, or load
presented.
Are there any 'accessories' being powered off one engine?
(alternator, generator, pump, etc.)
|
1147.12 | my .02 | GLDOA::DBOSAK | The Street Peddler | Fri Jan 28 1994 10:50 | 30 |
| My .02:
Do U have an enginer synchronizer? This would be a pointer to the
engines being in Sync and validate Tach readings.
ALternately, if the boat pounds and sounds for Sh#% when throttles are
equal, it says the engines are out of sync -- Ergo the throttle
mismatch.
Tis all load dependent -- You could have a sick engine (the one with the
most throttle)-- Do a compression check -- Wet and Dry -- If not that,
could be a problem with the fuel delivery system.
The shaft coupler (Flange that attaches to the back of the tranny)
could have the locking bolts backing out of the shaft (There are 4
Flange coupling bolts coupling the shaft flange to the tranny. There
are two bolts 180 degrees diplaced going into the shaft.)
You could have something wrong with your strut bearings on the high
throttle engine side.
The props are mis-matched -- The higher throttle engine has a bigger
pitched prop. The prop hub has a number stamped on it -- First # is
diameter, second number is Pitch (1918 = 19 inch diameter, 18 pitch"
Welcome!
Dennis
Welcome to the world of "Double-Trouble."
|
1147.13 | By golly, I think I've Got it!! | UNYEM::FRASCH | | Fri Jan 28 1994 15:24 | 32 |
| Boy, you guys are honing right in on what I have! Some details:
It's a 1978 Silverton "Sport Cruiser", 34' long, 12'9" wide with twin
Chrysler 360 Cube V-8s. They have 600 Hrs on them. There are no
differences in loads (generators, etc.) between the engines, they have
4 bbl carbs and electronic ignition.
One observation from your comments ---- the stuffing box packing on the
fast engine leaks too much and needs to be repacked (which might mean
it has less drag on the shaft than the other "slow" engine?).
I have a "Quest" electronic synchronizer on it which shows equal engine
speeds at different throttle positions. And, I can really hear them
come "in synch". At WOT, the starboard engine is about 150 RPM slower
than the port one. The throttle positions are then full open, and
against the mechanical stops.
At idle, the throttles are both even, and at the lower stops, and the
engine RPMs are equal. (about 600 RPM) The tachs and synchronizer
agree, and they sound right.
The difference in throttle positions gets increasingly worse going from
full idle to WOT (until I hit the stops).
I checked the carbs visually, and they both seem like they are full
open at full throttle --- but that's just an "eyeball".
The more I think about your comments, the more I suspect that once I
repack one stuffing box, the problem will basically go away!!!
Regards,
Don
|
1147.14 | me thinks not?? | MR3MI1::BORZUMATO | | Fri Jan 28 1994 16:50 | 14 |
|
i don't think so.... unless the other is so tight
to cause that much drag...
i still think its something els... but i'm not here to say i'm
right, you got a lot of good info here.
good idea to check it out.
JIm
|
1147.15 | Different carb jet sizes? A long shot. | SALEM::NORCROSS_W | | Mon Jan 31 1994 08:21 | 19 |
| Don, I also doubt that it is your stuffing box causing that much of a
difference but I might be concerned that the tighter one may be scoring
your prop shaft if too tight. I had to replace my shaft because the
prior owner ran it too tight.
Were both engines installed at the same time? If not, perhaps one carb
is jetted differently than the other. WOT position would seem the same
but one engine would be getting less fuel and run slower. Idle/slow
speed would not be effected by this due to the seperate idle circuit.
It wouldn't be a big deal to pull the jets and check there sizing.
Also, check for any signs of bent carb linkage past the throttle stop.
Even though it's hitting the mechanical stop it still may not be
opening the carb all the way. You need to observe the butterflies
inside the carb venturies to be sure they are wide open. One last
thing. I will assume that the secondaries open via mechanical linkage
and not vacuum but if they are vacuum, make sure that there are no
leaks in the vacuum line leading to the carb which would prevent it
from being fully opened at WOT.
Wayne
|
1147.16 | swap carbs for test! | MR4DEC::DCADMUS | happiness is a bigger boat | Mon Jan 31 1994 11:07 | 20 |
|
to see if it is a carb problem, why not swap the carbs between
engines. If teh problem follows the carbs- find out what's wrong. IF it
doesn't start running compression checks, check timing , valve lift
etc. Could be someone changed one of the engines at one time and it has
a different cam in it, or different compression ratio , or different
valve diameters.
I had a freind who bought a used boat with a 350 chevie- it wouyld run
lousy at hogh speed. She finally ble a head gasket and we discovered
two different heads- the vlave diameters were different, and from
examining the heads, IT appeared hat the volumes were different. We
ended up with matched heads complements of the local JY and the engine
ran beautiful.
There's lots of shade tree mechanics out there- seems to be more so on
boats for some reason.
Dick
|
1147.17 | The FERMI Zone | GLDOA::DBOSAK | The Street Peddler | Mon Jan 31 1994 11:25 | 12 |
|
WOw -- Now into the FERMI zone -- How about at WOT for one engine U
have valves starting to float -- Would that have a difference in WOT?
--ALSO -- What does your trim look like -- If one side is deeper in the
water, it will run slower than the one on the high side.
It could be the tranny.
It isn't the stuffing box.
Dennis
|
1147.18 | 'Nudder thought | GLDOA::DBOSAK | The Street Peddler | Mon Jan 31 1994 11:34 | 12 |
| I just thought of something -- 600 hours -- 15 year old boat --
34 footer?
Hmmmm -- That says an average of 40 hours running per year -- That
ain't much -- If these are original engines, I'd be wondering about the
accuracy of the hour meter -- Of course the boat could have been used
by a little old lady who only drove on Sunday - and never over 20 MPH!
The plot thickens!
Dennis
|
1147.19 | sure, ok, absolutely | MR3MI1::BORZUMATO | | Mon Jan 31 1994 13:32 | 26 |
|
I guess i would make a list of all the good suggestions made here.
divide them into 2 parts.
in storage in water
check all the things on land you can, then launch and check the others
in the water. obviously some things can't be checked on land.
check/do one thing at a time to avoid confusion, ( isolate the fault)
and go from there.
the hours don't seem to have much affect here, the owner says
they run pretty good.
previous owners on unduly scruples, sometimes tend to spread it
on kinda thick.
like my new props, sure thing dude.
JIm
|
1147.20 | I'll get busy on ALL of it! | UNYEM::FRASCH | | Mon Jan 31 1994 16:42 | 12 |
| If I check ALL the things you guys suggested, I'll never get in the
water next year! (just kidding) After thinking about it, I couldn't see
how a 360 cube engine could be pulled down by a stuffing box either!
It should have some torque.
I suspect it is engine related somewhere. I know the previous owner
very well (original owner), but he had a guy trying to buy it for 5
years --- ran out of money two years ago and lost the boat. It looks
like one engine (the fast one) had a valve job, but the other one
didn't !!!!!! AHAH!
Don
|
1147.21 | Try some simple checks | SUBSYS::CHESTER | | Mon Jan 31 1994 18:54 | 18 |
| Take a look at the bottem of the controls. On some the cable can be
connected to to a different hole or screw on the level arm. This will
change the throttle angles.
A couple of quick checks. 1. Are the levers lined up at idle?
2. Are the levers lined up at WOT?
3. Are both flybridge and lower station controls acting the same?
A two person check would be to open the throttles until the secondarys
just start to open. Then check the throttle lever positions. If the
carb secondaries open at different positions then you will get the
large mismatch.
Try the simple low cost ones first after checking that the props are
the same and the trannies are the same.
Kc
|
1147.22 | One engine valve job? Do a compression test. | SALEM::NORCROSS_W | | Tue Feb 01 1994 10:55 | 6 |
| A valve job on one engine? I think you may know the solution to your
problem already. I wouldn't doubt that you would see a 150 RPM
difference between one engine with the valve job and the other engine
that doesn't (and now has 600 hours on it).
Wayne
|
1147.23 | oh yah valve job | MR3MI1::BORZUMATO | | Tue Feb 01 1994 15:05 | 6 |
|
I agree, one stronger than the other.... if this wasn't an issue
i'd stick with props. but props are losing out here.
JIm
|
1147.24 | | SALEM::NORCROSS_W | | Wed Feb 02 1994 08:00 | 2 |
| Even a compression test done at 1000 - 1500 RPM's may not show any
difference the non-valve job engine has weak springs.
|
1147.25 | Regroup | RCOCER::FRASCH | | Fri Feb 04 1994 09:59 | 21 |
| I think I'll step back a bit, make notes of all the suggestions, and go forward as
much as I can out of the water.
I had forgotten about a comment from the original owner that the other guy had a
valve job done on one engine --- "he thought"! It's hard to believe there could be
that much difference in two engines, but then I've never dealt with twin screws
before.
I'll do all the mechanical checks, including compression, on the cradle, and then do
a tune up including a vacuum test, timing, and carb adjust when I launch in April.
However, my gut still tells me it's mechanical! I've asked a couple of other guys at
the marina who have twin engines and the answer I get is " oh yeah, mine does it too,
I just live with it --- ".
Anyway, I have a lot of good ideas from all of you to go play with. After all, isn't
that why we buy these things in the first place??
T-H-A-N-K-S !!!!!
Don
|