T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1145.1 | fun looking! | BUSY::CLEMENT | Smells like Nirvana | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:38 | 10 |
| The latest issue of Popular Mechanics has once again featured this
lineup of jet boats.
They look like a lot of fun to drive. Obviously not an all purpose
craft though. Seems like a nice boat for short duration uses. Does
not look large enough for gear and accessories. You notice all the
pictures its just the studly guy and foxy babe, no coolers, skis, gear,
etc, etc...
I'd love to try one! Mark
|
1145.2 | At Worc Centrum boat Show | CAPL::LANDRY_D | Warbirds 1939-1945 | Fri Jan 21 1994 13:48 | 18 |
|
They had some at the boat show. First time I saw them.
I don't like Jet Ski's at all.
I place them in the same catagory as Ski Doo's.
Limited use vehicles for folks that like to throw $$$ away
on a toy that is non flexable and weather dependent.
But these looked pretty neat.
They are low to the water but are wide and seem stable.
Can hold 2 or ? passengers and are rigged for yanking a ski-er.
Very stylish. Seems you could even fish from it to a degree.
More so then those folks I've seen fishing from jet-ski's in
the Merrimack 8^0
Prices were around $9K as noted before with 90hp engines.
-< Tuna Tail >-
|
1145.3 | Hot new boating segment | SALEM::LAYTON | | Mon Jan 24 1994 10:03 | 7 |
| There are two mfgr's of the powerplants; Merc with the 90 hp, and OMC
with 90, 100, and 110 hp choices. Look to this segment of the market
to really take off, since it combines the ease of maintainence and
light weight of the outboard (these are ob 2 stroke powerheads hooked
to a jet pump) with the esthetically pleasing good looks of an inboard.
Carl
|
1145.4 | | SALEM::NORCROSS_W | | Mon Jan 24 1994 12:28 | 3 |
| Also, most of the fun of a jet ski without being banned from every lake
and pond around.
Wayne
|
1145.5 | Full speed 360s in a fishing boat!!! | SUBPAC::CRONIN | | Tue Jan 25 1994 08:47 | 8 |
| They come in more variety than most people realize. I'm personally
more familiar with the Boston Whaler versions which come in a 14 footer
w/90 hp (rated for 5 people) and a new this year 15 footer w/115 hp.
Also, Pro Craft (I think) has a 15 footer that they are marketing
as a combo fun and flats fishing boat. Rod holders, livewell, ability
to run on plane in -4 inches- of water... This one is also available
in a standard OB.
B.C.
|
1145.6 | May be just the thing... | NZOMIS::FINLAY | Only at work if its raining.... | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:23 | 16 |
| Thanks for the input, I have now received some brochures from Boston
Whaler, IMC (Baja) and Dynasty Boats.
The Guy at Dynasty looks interested as he hand wrote a complete page
and has advised me to wait intil the end of May when they are putting
the oil injected 120 hp unitinto their boat.
As for the use of the boat, its just for fun and skiing. We live on an
inlet and I have no interest or time for fishing. I usually get home
from work (late) look at the water, grab the kids and the wetsuits and
go for an hours skiing. So something low, wide, stylish and fun is what
I am after to replace my conventional boat and 85 hp Suzuki outboard.
Cheers
Richard
|
1145.7 | Ganges Eaters | ANNECY::HUMAN | I came, I saw, I conked out | Wed Feb 09 1994 10:10 | 3 |
| I once saw a tv documentary about some guys taking jet boats up the
ganges into the Himalyas via the most awesome rapids.......is that
enough power for water-skiing?
|
1145.8 | Any Jet Setters out there ?! | POLAR::MONTEITH | | Thu Aug 11 1994 17:28 | 11 |
| Jet Setters,
Has anyone had the opportunity to drive one of these babies ? Is the 14'
length a little too small ? How about the 90hp powerplant, is it enough to
get a 185 lb guy up on one ski ? ...I know...I know...but I'm now drinking
light beer, on Sundays and holidays. I saw the Sea-Doo addition to this market,
it had twin 80hp engines, went like a little stinker.
Any info would be great.
Rev'in Rob
|
1145.9 | Jet Motor for BASS Boat? | NETCAD::BIRO | | Fri Dec 01 1995 12:47 | 17 |
| Any new information about the Jet boats.
TRACKER makes an 18 ft BASS boat with a 90 hp jet motor.
It seem like it might have an advantage in shallow water for
fishing. I can not afford a large motor to keep up with the
big BASS boats so I thought this might give me an edge in shallow
water.
What speed can a 90hp 17 ft Jet motor reach, and how many gallons of
Gas per hour do they use.
Should I look at one or would I be better off looking at the same
package with an strandard outboard motor. (? 40 hp)
thanks john
|
1145.10 | Think numbers | PENUTS::DSULLIVAN | | Mon Dec 04 1995 09:51 | 20 |
|
Mr. Biro,
Please remember one rule of thumb.
THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR MEER CUBIC DISPLACEMENT.
I know the jet boat that Roland Martin used to win the CT river
in Hartford tourney was only capable of 35mph. He was not the only one
way up the river. Guys with props were there too, although they had to
have complete knowlege of the channel and some moxie.
People have watched me navigate the Northfield stretch of the CT river to
the Brattleboro Dam, as well as the merrimack from chelmsford till you
can;t get much further. The Northfield to Brattleboro run @70MPH over
gravel bars and hairpin turns is sure exiting. I should have a few fish
in the boat before I hear you coming.
- Dave
|
1145.11 | are you a riverrat? | CPEEDY::MACINTYRE | Terminal Angler | Mon Dec 04 1995 10:14 | 21 |
| Dave, If I recall correctly Roland also said he lost a lower unit
and some gelcoat during practice with his big Ranger 8^)
John, unless you plan on spending a great deal of time in the
shallowest sections of some of our rivers, I'd suggest sticking with
the prop. From what I've heard you'd probably end up spending twice as
much on gas with a 90hp jet, compared to a conventional 40hp. And with
the waters around here in New England, I'd say that 99% of the time a
flat hulled tracker with a prop is going to be able to get you just
about as shallow as you want to go - the exception being some of our
rivers. It'd be alot safer running up rapids with a jet than with a
prop. (Not to say that it can't be done, I've gone from Nashua to
Manchester on the Merrimack with a prop, in high water 8^)
Also, properly maintained conventional outboards will last a long time,
I'm not convinced the jets have been around long enough to provide the
same level of relatively maintenance free durability.
BTW, the 40hp on the 18' tracker might be a little underpowered.
-donmac
|
1145.12 | jet outboards | CPEEDY::MACINTYRE | PATHWORKS Server Engineering | Tue May 06 1997 13:40 | 15 |
| Does anyone have any first hand experience with Jet powered outboards?
I know the displacement to HP ratio is terrible compared to props and
they suck up alot of gas.
How is the maintenance?
Do that hold up in the salt?
Can they slow troll?
Has anyone heard of any 4 strokes in the works?
-donmac (not planning on repowering with a jet at the moment but
curious on how they are performing in the real world)
|