T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1097.1 | | DTRACY::STORM | | Mon Aug 09 1993 13:31 | 23 |
| I HATE fog. As a small boater, I've been stuck at the ramp on several
occassions because of the stuff.
My most amusing fog story (actually, the only amusing one), was a few
weeks ago when my partner and I arrived at the Salisbury ramp at 3:00
a.m. to find it VERY foggy. The amusing part was that 2 other boats
had launced before us and took a right off the ramp. I hope it wasn't
any of you! For those of you not familiar with Salisbury, that leads
to a very small dead end cove.
Anyway, the two boats were going round and round yelling at each other.
Within a hundred yard of the ramp, they had completely lost their
bearings. It was amusing because it was a very calm area with no
current, rocks etc. It could have been very dangerous in differnt
places.
We noticed that though the fog was thick, it was also very low and we
could clearly see the moon to help us keep our bearings, so we
carefully crept across the river. As we moved into the wind, the fog
got thinner and thinner.
Mark
|
1097.2 | Fog at 30 MPH | ASDS::BURGESS | Waiting for ZEUS to come | Mon Aug 09 1993 13:44 | 24 |
| re <<< Note 1097.0 by SALEM::GILMAN >>>
> -< FOG >-
> This string is to discuss fog and your experiences with it and
> solutions for coping with it.
I try to avoid it whenever possible, however it is sometimes
worth going out in fog just because the chance of other boats being
there is less.
> Buoys are an excellent reference if you can FIND them.
right; if I can find the gates I can usually figure out where
# 1 is likely to be, from there I know that if I take a sharp turn to
port then #2 will soon hove (heave ?) into view and if I can get so I
pass it a few feet to starboard.... another sharp turn, this time
to starboard... ah, there's # 3.... and so on.
Reg
|
1097.3 | It's not fun | BLUEFN::GORDON | | Mon Aug 09 1993 14:09 | 16 |
| I have been caught a few times and it's never fun. Each time you have more
confidence in your instruments. You are seldom where your mind tells you.
Once I was somewhere between the Isles of Shoals and Boars head trolling for
blues in thick haze (about 1/2 mile). When heading for home Newburyport, I
recalled the LORAN numbers for the Mouth of the merrimack. However, the
LORAN told me to head in another direction. I had recalled the wrong waypoint
and was heading to Portsmouth. I thought the LORAN was down and used the
compass, when I finally figured out what I had done I could see Hampton Beach and
was headed in the correct direction.
It is very easy to get disoriented in the fog and reduced visibility. Remain
calm and trust your compass and loran. If you're lucky you will come across
someone with radar and can follow them in.
Gordon
|
1097.4 | Fog | SALEM::GILMAN | | Mon Aug 09 1993 15:44 | 15 |
| By using compass and accurate charts and a stopwatch one can do a
credible job navigating in fog. But.... the currents, and wind can
throw quite a curve into your calculations. With a small open boat
with no chart table its quite a trick to keep track of compass heading,
time run at speed, AND reference the chart accurately. Thats why I
didn't try it last week.
I have been out in fog navigating via stopwatch, compass, and chart
before and I found that trusting the instruments is a mind game... a
tough mind game too, your instincts tell you one thing and the
instruments another. Visual references if you have ANY tend to be
almost as disorienting as no visual aids because often the 'aid'
(island, or whatever) is out of perspective. Sounds are tricky too.
Jeff
|
1097.5 | Trust your electronics and yourself | LEVERS::SWEET | | Mon Aug 09 1993 17:32 | 15 |
| I noticed that folks immediatly homed in on trying to find there way
in fog. The real danger in fog is not of getting lost but one
of avoiding collision. With a loran and compass your can find your
way most anywhere with 100ft of visability. Radar lets you
stay out of the way of other bozo's going way to fast for the
conditions or way to big to notice you or change their direction.
Having radar, loran and compass all which I have learned to trust
to within there limitations I can run 20knots in 100ft visabity in
the dark and feel comforatble. Under calm conditions I know my radar
will show me most boats within a 1 mile of me and even a small tin
boat within a 1/2 mile. I can also see lobster pots within a 1/4
mile.
Bruce
|
1097.6 | at 20 knots you have 1.5 seconds to stop... | MASTR::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Tue Aug 10 1993 09:54 | 20 |
| re 1097.5
(20 knots in 100 foot visibility)
20 knots is 33 feet per second.
Every book I have read on fog and every course I have taken (including
USPS boating course) says that you need to be able to stop in half the
distance that you can see.
Can you stop in 50' when you are doing 33 feet per second?
I think you will find that by the time you think you see soemthing,
decide what it is and react, your 50 feet will be gone.
I have successfully negotiated 10 miles of Casco Bay
(from Cape Elizabeth to Orr's Island) in 100' visibility
using dead reckoning (calibrated compass), with loran and depthsounder
for backup in calm weather, but it was at 5 knots and not 20.
Bill
|
1097.7 | who's the bozo here? | MASTR::BERENS | Alan Berens | Tue Aug 10 1993 10:04 | 14 |
| re .5:
>>> ..... I can run 20knots in 100ft visabity in the dark and feel comforatble.
Maybe ***YOU*** feel comfortable about doing so, but ***I*** don't feel
comfortable about you doing so. With all due respect, I think doing so
is reckless in the extreme, foolish, stupid, ill-advised, and will all
too likely result in a serious accident. It is also in clear violation
of Colregs. As holder of a Coast Guard license, you really ought to know
better and do differently. Should you ever have an accident, you won't
have any defense at all, either civil or criminal. I wouldn't hesitate
to report any boat being operated like this to the Coast Guard.
Alan
|
1097.8 | You'll see one if you're looking, but I'm not. | GLITTR::JOHNHC | | Tue Aug 10 1993 11:13 | 14 |
| re: .7
I'll bet Bruce is talking about being on the open water. I can
understand the usefulness of 20 knots out in the open water, and I can
testify to the accuracy of the loran/radar combination in <20-feet of
visibility.
I'll also bet Bruce is one *very* careful boat captain when inshore in
the fog.
Been there, seen that, and fully respect a boat pilot who knows how to
handle the equipment.
John H-C
|
1097.9 | Fog | SALEM::GILMAN | | Tue Aug 10 1993 12:46 | 24 |
| So far you guys are all talking about dealing with fog WITH THE HELP OF
LORAN and sometimes RADAR.
Any comments about dealing effectively with fog with JUST a compass and
charts? All I had last week was a compass and chart (but with no chart
table), i.e. no place to spread the chart out and REALLY use it right.
I choose to stay in and not go out in the fog. It made me feel as if I
should have pushed my personal limits a bit and learned to deal with
the fog by going out in it with just my compass and chart. But I
figured if I called it wrong you could have wound up reading about me
in the papers under 'boating accident', so I didn't do it.
20 knots in the fog: WOW! How about the occasional log or other
flotsam you normally would spot visually but is too low in the water
for RADAR to pick up? All it would take would be one piece of timber
to do you in. Lobster buoys... your RADAR sees them? I am impressed,
but does it see ALL of them, and at 20 knots? Ok, so your running
offshore away from buoys but the logs are still out there. I think
if you keep that speed up its not a case of whether you will hit
something but when.
Jeff
|
1097.10 | slow(er) is safe(r) | MASTR::BERENS | Alan Berens | Tue Aug 10 1993 13:47 | 41 |
| I don't go sailing in the fog by choice, but I've had to do rather a lot
of involuntary piloting in quite dense fog -- one of the "joys" of
Maine.
Getting around in the fog isn't difficult in conditions of not much wind
and sea, but it is certainly an activity with much anxiety. I'm far more
fearful of being hit by another boat than I am of running into a ledge.
There are far too many people out there going much too fast.
Anyway, with a calibrated compass (ie, the compass deviation is known to
a degree or so), a depthsounder, a calibrated log (or a stopwatch and a
knotmeter), charts, and a loran if available one can cope quite nicely.
Going very slowly (in my case less than 5 knots) adds greatly to safety
and provides more time to check the chart and instruments.
I preplot all the courses I expect to need and enter bouy coordinates in
my loran. The plethora of bouys is very nice -- tax dollars at work.
I prefer whistle/gong/bell bouys since my engine is quiet enough (if I'm
not sailing) that I can hear them. The loran cross-track function can be
used to detect currents. Bottom depth contours can be used to great advantage
to check position. The log gives distance run (mine reads to 0.01 mile) and
allows speed changes without having to do a lot of arithmetic that a
stop watch and knotmeter would require.
In many places the bottom depth contours are continuous and you can
simply follow them into shelter or to whereever your going. You should
stay well away from dangers such as isolated ledges even if it means a
longer distance to travel. You can't depend on seeing them in dense fog
and the bottom often rises too abruptly for a depthsounder to give
enough warning.
It is difficult (for me anyway) to judge distances in fog and objects
that look far away often are in fact dangerously close -- another reason
for going slowly. If you're going from bouy to bouy go close enough to
the bouy to be sure it is the one you think it is.
Practice in clear weather is also a good idea. So far in 16 years I've
only hit a ledge once (in clear weather many years ago) but I always
keep in mind that only one mistake can be disastrous.
Alan
|
1097.11 | Yes, you can do it, carefully, slowly. | MASTR::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Tue Aug 10 1993 14:22 | 32 |
| Jeff,
Yes, you could safely go out and play in the fog with just a compass
and a chart, and extend your horizons, providing the following
were ALL true:
o You have an accurate compass that you have calibrated on
many points of sail.
o You have good chart skills, and can deal with magnetic
bearings and time-speed-distance probelms ("60 D Street")
o You have someone else along. In my case it was a 14 year old
son, who was paying good attention and was holding a compass
course well. You can't (especially as a novice) navigate with
your face in a chart and steer a compass course at the same time
o The weather is good. No big wind, waves etc.
o You proceed carefully. Start by going out 1/4 mile and finding
your way back. Or maybe 1/8th of a mile
o You pay attention to current and make at least some minor
seat of the pants adjustment for what the lobster bouys are
telling you.
Go for it - carefully.
Bill
o You study the hell out of the chart beforehand.
|
1097.12 | Seamanship | SALEM::GILMAN | | Tue Aug 10 1993 15:45 | 27 |
| Alan... your talking about LORAN again. I was interested in the
comment cross drift function, it imples that LORAN is capable of
detecting sideways drift accross your intended course... that sounds
VERY useful to me when your dealing with unknown cross currents. You
can do all the dead reconing you want with stop watches, charts, and
corrected compasses.... throw in a cross current and wham your on the
rocks.
Bill... all good points about your list of must haves to safely
navigate in the fog. I was missing a reliable SECOND person to let
me concentrate on either maintaining an accurate compass course or
the chart. To do BOTH at the same time accurately would try an
experienced fog navigator I suspect.
I did have one opportunity to navigate in fog as you described and I
took advantage of it a few years ago. But reliable fog navigation
requires practice..... lots of it.
I think that knowing ones' (and ones' boats) limits is as important a
part of good seamanship as anything else one can name. I felt
'chicken' to not have gone out in the fog last week. But in hindsite
I see that I made the wise choice given my lack of a navigation partner
electronic aids (I have compass and depthsounder only) and more
experience on my part. So I guess I DID practice good seamanship..
by staying ASHORE in the fog.
Jeff
|
1097.13 | | MASTR::BERENS | Alan Berens | Tue Aug 10 1993 16:24 | 26 |
| Yes, lorans do give cross-track error (mine to 0.01 nm), so that it
doesn't take long to detect a steering error or a current at an angle to
your course. You can also get an indication of currents by watching the
water flow around lobster pot bouys. If the loran says you're heading to
right of your course and the wake around the pot bouy says the current
is coming from the right, then something is amiss. Like perhaps your
compass is off. As always, the usual caution: loran is an aid to
navigation and like any other may mislead you.
One of the advantages of going very slowly is that you do have time to
look at the chart even while steering. I once (of necessity)
singlehanded my 32' boat into the north side of Richmond Is Harbor off
Cape Elizabeth and anchored right where I wanted to be (I found after
the fog thinned to 1/4 mi visibility the next day) using only compass
and depthsounder in fog with about 100' visibility. I never saw the
ledges and land. Not fun. One advantage that I had was that heading
offshore for the night was an option, which I would have taken had it
been other than near calm.
Another strategy that should not be overlooked is that you can always
(often/sometimes) anchor, assuming you have a good anchor and a long
rode (in Maine meaning at least 300'). If you do anchor, continue to
keep a lookout with foghorn at the ready and have a plan in mind for
what to do should you have to move.
Alan
|
1097.14 | Fog | SALEM::GILMAN | | Tue Aug 10 1993 16:37 | 12 |
| I should explain further. I have a 17' outboard.... not a 25 footer
with sleeping accomodatons. If the chips were down I could of course
'heave to' or anchor but it would be an emergency action rather than
a routine manuver as in a larger boat.
Yup, I know about buoys being an aid to navigation by observing water
flow around them.
Incidentally I grew up near Cape Elizabeth... I know the area well.
Jeff
|
1097.15 | LORAN helps in multiple ways... | MASTR::FRENCH | Bill French 381-1859 | Tue Aug 10 1993 18:03 | 45 |
| A couple of further thoughts about LORAN.
While motoring, my LORAN heading agrees with my carefully zeroed
compass to as close as I can read the compass. (This is an Apelco
6300, $259 variety). This is why I trust my compass. While under sail,
(oops - I said that word) the readings often vary by 10-15 degrees,
showing how much I am slipping sideways thru the water.
The cross track error from my LORAN is also good to .01 mile
(with a little wiggle in value normally occurring). If I'm under sail,
the cross track error is caused by both leeway and from current, but
if I am motoring, the error is just the current. Anytime I have
course/speed mode selected, it is also displaying cross track error
form whereever I was when I selected the current waypoint to the actual
waypoint.
The run up to Orr's I from Cape Elizabeth was made a lot easier by the
string of buoys every 1-2 miles up West Cod Ledge. They all appeared
out of the fog right on my bow, and this was my first time making
passage in the fog.
I'll second what Alan said about visual distortion. On at least 2
occasions, I said to my son "There's another sailboat just becoming
visible in the fog", and both times he informed (correctly) that it
was a lobster buoy. If you don't think you can confuse something
1 foot high (quite close) with something 30 feet high further away,
you haven't been in real fog.
It was very confidence inspiring to make our destination precisely,
but it was after a lot of practice in good weather with the loran,
after a lot of book learnin and under calm weather conditions.
It was also my very first time passagemaking up the Maine coast in
a 19' sailboat. We had sailed Harpswell Sound the previous 2 years
by trailering the boat up, but my first trip from West Cod Ledge
to Orr's was in serious fog. I had a sailboat twice my size follow
me to Mackeral Cove, because he wasn't prepared to use and trust
his LORAN.
Bill
(We had no fog this year Jul 10-15 on West Penobscot Bay, whe we had
trailered to. Too long a run to sail from Rye Harbor, especially with
a "fair-weather crew" (my wife))
|
1097.16 | Fog | SALEM::GILMAN | | Wed Aug 11 1993 09:19 | 16 |
| The visual distortion is unbelievable. One looses perspective. I can
easily believe you mistook a 1 foot high lobster buoy for another boat.
I went out to Isle au Haut on Penobscot Bay last week on a commercial
pasenger vessel. I was able to observe the skipper at the helm with
his RADAR and instruments as we proceeded through the pea soup fog.
Even though he had RADAR which showed no boats in our vicinity I saw
the skipper flinch and duck and spin the wheel 'violently' on two
occasions when he THOUGHT he saw other boats in the fog which wern't
really there. This was an experienced professional who had run this
boat all his life and HE was spooked by 'objects' in the fog.
He was running by stopwatch and compass heading in addition to RADAR.
Jeff
|
1097.17 | near collision just last week | MONTOR::GNPIKE::HANNAN | Beyond description... | Wed Aug 11 1993 11:38 | 50 |
| Here's an interesting fog story, as told to me by my mother just the
other day.
She had the week off, as well as her sister, my aunt, and both being widows,
they decided to do something different for a couple of days. they decided
to go to Martha's Vinyard. My mother is nervous about boats because it seems
like something always happens when she's on one! My aunt, who had done this
trip before, said it's a short ride and yes you can see land pretty much all
the way.
The trip from Hyannis to the Vinyard was problem-free. Nice day, calm seas,
and they had a nice stay. The way back started out good too. Lots of people,
packed to the brim, and decent weather.
About 1/2 way there fog started rolling in. It got to be *dense* fog, and
people were a little nervous. The captain was sounding the fog horn regularly,
and said over the pa that noone should worry, he can handle this no problem.
Then the captain is observed on the deck of the boat, looking manually ahead
and around him. People wondered why he wasn't at the helm.
Next thing you know, people start shouting there's a boat out there! We're
gonna crash!!! Some folks went downstairs and started handing out life
jackets.
I'm not sure where the captain was, but the boat's motors suddenly shifted to
hard reverse and people fell over.
I asked my mother how close were they to this boat (sometimes she exaggerates).
She responded "4 feet". (!!!) It was a larger ferry, larger than the one
they were on, the kind that ferries cars as well.
I couldn't believe what she was telling me. I asked well, did anyone complain
or report something to the coast guard ? My mother said all she wanted to do
was get the hell home, shaking, and have a stiff drink.
Does this story sound a bit unusual ? 2 ferries filled with people almost
collide in the middle of Hyannis and the Vineyard, and nothing on the news,
like it's no big deal.
Seems to me that the boats were probably on auto-pilot/loran. At some point the
captain saw that another boat was coming close on the radar. Too close. So
that's why the captain was seen on the deck looking out over the bow, to see
how close there actually were.
They avoided a collision and a potentially disasterous situation, and then
everyone went home.
Just in a days work ?
Ken
|
1097.18 | gonna see the fog..not much else | APACHE::BROWN | | Wed Aug 11 1993 11:59 | 12 |
| I take the ferry from either Portland,Bar Harbor Maine or St Johns New
Brunswick...when the fog bank rolls in on either of these instramented
boats you will observe two things(sure many other things are happening
as well):
Two look outs are posted in the bow, also look outs port and
startboard with periodic fog horn blast.
The ship slows down quite a bit.
And that with relatively little traffic once out of either harbor....
BB
|
1097.19 | Collisions | SALEM::GILMAN | | Wed Aug 11 1993 13:46 | 23 |
| It strikes me as unusual that TWO passenger vessels had not been able
to spot and avoid one another via RADAR. The chances of both vessels
having RADAR failures at the same time is remote. The Capt' was acting
as if the RADAR was down by going out and deck and trying to visually
sight other vessels.
BUT... modern vessels still collide in the fog modern instruments not
withstanding so I am not that suprised that there was a close call.
Thats what Alan was saying.... high speed in the fog is simply
dangerous no matter whether one has RADAR and LORAN or not. The larger
the vessel the less the room for error because of the increased time
required for the vessel to respond to helm and engine changes.
Since they were two ferries which almost collided it makes sense that
they were running in 'ferry lanes' perhaps the same route on opposite
runs.... i.e. one West the other Eastbound? That would make a collison
more likely if they wre on the same run.
But... nope... not suprised to hear it all. Not in the papers? There
was no collision, no news in that!
Jeff
|
1097.20 | Capt Bligh NOT! | LEVERS::SWEET | | Wed Aug 11 1993 21:50 | 23 |
| I feel a weak urge to defend my statements. First I only run at those
speeds in open water, not in a harbor or traffic situation. In fact
more often than not it is in the early AM when the only other traffic
is other fisherman. I stated I trust and know how to use my radar
to avoid collision and in these situations I can check that my radar
is operating properly by observing known buoy echo's. If for even a
moment I get dissoriented or question what I am seeing(or not) I cut back to
bare steerage speed. I do have a lookout posted.
Logs and other partially submerge debris are always a hazard. They are
near impossible to see in any sea over 2ft, or heading into the sun or
on a moonless night. There is no real defense for this, I won't
argue that it is not safer to go slower so if I did hit one of these
damage would be minimized. But the relality is the risk must be
similar to getting a blowout on the highway at 65MPH and I would be
willing to bet I am more cautious about watching the water than
are most drivers being prepared to do a panic stop when that tire
blows.
If boating did not have so many inherent risks it probably would not
be any fun.
Bruce
|
1097.21 | | MASTR::BERENS | Alan Berens | Wed Aug 18 1993 17:16 | 2 |
| See Note 1330.44 in the SAILING notesconference for a not completely happy
boating in the fog story.
|