T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
716.1 | Yeah, I read it in the NH boating rules | CSMET2::CHACE | it IS warmer! | Thu Jul 12 1990 16:12 | 10 |
|
*AND* you are only allowed to have 2 skiers MAX in NH. I do not
believe there are such restrictions in Mass. I have read the Mass
rules carefully in this area and it mentions an observer, but there
is no mention of two observers for two skiers and no mention of
a MAX number of skiers.
I think it's a stupid law - but it *is* the law.
Kenny
|
716.2 | observers to be at least 13 years old | DASXPS::JEGREEN | Mass has fallen and can't get up | Thu Jul 12 1990 16:23 | 4 |
| and the observer(s) have to be at least 13 years of age in NH. A
permit is supposedly required to pull more than 2 skiers.
~jeff
|
716.3 | More than just an observer | TOOK::MERSHON | Ric - LAT/VMS Engineering | Thu Jul 12 1990 17:35 | 10 |
|
It may appear stupid, I agree. But you must remember that the
responsibilities of the observer go beyond observing. The observer
is also responsible for tending to the skier if she/he becomes
injured in the water. If two skiers become injured, it would be
desirable to have two capable people in the boat to help out. I
think that this is the purpose of the law, and probably the reason
for having someone over 13.
-ric.
|
716.4 | max capacity = observers + skiers. | BINKLY::SMITH | | Thu Jul 12 1990 18:27 | 10 |
|
Another rule with skiers that you may not think about is that you must
be able to legally have all persons observing and all those skiing able
to be in the boat and not have it overloaded. I have heard of a person
getting a *warning* (reasonable officer) for having 4 people in a boat
with a max. capacity of 5 and had 2 skiers in tow. For those of you
who start and stop skiing from a beach this may not be obvious since
the skiiers (generally) never have to get in the boat.
|
716.5 | Sound safety practice: one set of eyes for each person in water | 14752::GUNNERSON | | Fri Jul 13 1990 09:47 | 9 |
| To add a little to this, it is very difficult to keep your eye on more
than one person at a time in the water, unless they are close together
in calm conditions. Therefore to be safe you want one person keeping
their eye on each downed skiier, just as you would for each person that
went overboard. I think that that might also be some of the reasoning
for the law. It would be difficult to write the law with exclusions for
weather and water conditions, so they make it apply all the time.
john
|
716.6 | We'd need a twin screw for our pyramid! | LEDDEV::GAUDET | Ski Nautique | Fri Jul 13 1990 10:25 | 20 |
| Wow! These are fascinating thoughts. When we do our 6-person pyramid,
we sometimes have one person skiing on each flank (total of 8 skiers).
Yanking that many out of the water is hard enough with a Mastercraft
Powerslot (351 Ford, 255 hp with a 14x18 prop). I couldn't imagine
having 9 people in the boat as well (8 observers plus the driver)!
Talk about overload! :-) Thank God for "special event" permits.
But I agree with all the thoughts presented here. It makes perfect
sense that the rules are written the way they are. The "worse case"
scenario is that *all* skiers (be it 1, 2 or more) could need
asssitance, and I can't imagine a single spotter handling the
more-than-one-skier-down case!
I assume that the NH rules state that you can't have more than 2 people
behind the boat. Right? I ask this because with some of the new toys
available (4-person ski-bobs, double tubes that can easily handle 3 or
4 people though they're technically made for 2) you could easily be
towing just one thing, but have more than two people back there.
...Roger...
|
716.7 | Toys behind the boat in N.H. | SALEM::MOE | | Fri Jul 13 1990 15:04 | 12 |
| re-1
Roger,
You are correct in your last statement about toys in N.H.
waters. As defined in the boating laws of N.H. and I quote
directly from the book, "The term waterskier shall mean a person
being towed by a boat at the end of a line, regardless of the
type of device on which the person is being towed."
Greg
|
716.8 | when a skier isn't a skier? | BINKLY::SMITH | | Fri Jul 13 1990 16:24 | 26 |
|
re: -1
.....
>>being towed by a boat at the end of a line, regardless of the
>>type of device on which the person is being towed." ...
I guess that this would cover barefooters, since thay are not being
towed "on" any device? :-) As long as thay are wearing a USCG
approved flotation device! :-)
The other day when we were barefooting I was holding onto the boom
and a friend of mine was holding my feet while barefooting, IE:
"I was the rope". Now would we tecnically have needed two spotters
or just one since I was a rope and not a skier. ?
FYI: If you try this be sure to have the person skiing let go before
the person being the rope. I lost my grip, and let go before I could
tell the skier to let go and was basically "run over" It was not too
painful but something to avoid in the future.
Have a safe summer,
Mike
|
716.9 | But officer, *I* wasn't skiing! | ROGER::GAUDET | Nothing unreal exists | Mon Jul 16 1990 13:26 | 18 |
| RE: before .8
That's very interesting, if not vague. By strict interpretation (common sense
set aside for the moment) we 'footers can get away with lots of stuff 'cuz we're
not skiing on any type of "device". Heck, when we use the barefoot boom,
there isn't even a *line* (I'm talking skiing right off the boom rather than
with the 5' leader). Longline is the same way (not skiing on any "device"). Of
course, kicking the common sense factor into gear, we do fall into the "skier"
category, and as such should abide by the rule.
RE: .8 Hey Mike (you wild and crazy guy you)...to paraphrase Shakespeare
(warning, ample use of poetic license here): "A line, by any other name ... is
still a line!" So by this, you are technically *not* skiing, although I'd love
to be a fly on the wall when you try to convince the good officer of this! :-)
So, where's the video?
...Roger...
|