T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
675.1 | | THEBUS::THACKERAY | | Fri May 25 1990 17:21 | 18 |
| Peculiar.
1) Check your weight distribution. Move weight as far back as you can.
2) Don't lift your prop "out" too far, that's why it's running faster:
it's cavitating.
3) When you lift the motor "out", make sure it's the ANGLE that's
changing, not just moving further back at same angle.
4) If all the above fails, you may have to trim the fibreglass on the
bottom at the stern (assuming the "hook" you describe is downwards a
the stern).
5) If all the above fails, commit suppuku, or preferably, drink
yourself to death.
Ray
|
675.2 | 1st attempt | SPCTRM::BRENNAN | | Fri May 25 1990 18:11 | 2 |
| Thanks Ray, I'll try some of that advise this weekend, but I'm wary
that I may have to take up your last suggestion.
|
675.3 | Eliminate the motor as a problem first... | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Fri May 25 1990 20:54 | 5 |
| Try running the motor in a tank with a loose mount and observe if you
feel the motor taking off vertically under throttle. That would at
least eliminate some weird prop or shaft pitch problem or some water
pump impleller problem that's producing a downward water jet.
|
675.4 | Hook???? | BIZNIS::CADMUS | | Tue May 29 1990 11:16 | 40 |
|
It sounds like the "hook" is what is getting you into trouble. It's
hard to tell hoow bad it is from text- I would suggest getting a
straight edge or use a lien along the keel and along the chines-
an inch or two will really cause problems. I had an old 17' thompson
that developed a hook in the bottom after sitting on the trailer over
the winter- I ended up getting rid of the boat beacuse of a similar
problem .
Also- make sure the motor tilt is intact- i have seen people lose the
tilt pin(the pin that acts as a stop and keeps the motor from tilting
too far forward) and not bother to replace it.
I don't have any idea of your boating expereince, but don't confuse
the bow dropping as the baot gets up on plane with "plowing". If the
weight distribution is correct, tilit is correct and hull is straight,
the boat should stay on top of the water and be basically level.
my suggestions:
1. make sure the tilt mechanism is all there4 and adusted with the
motor tilted slightly out
2. Make sure you have even weight distribution- fules tanks/battery in
the stern, operator up forward- try out with one person (operator)
on board
3. if the above fail to giver satisfactory performance- look for a hill
defect- note that on some of these older F/G boats, they use a lot of
wood in the hull under the decks- wooden stringers and ribs were
frequently used to give rigidity. If they start to rot away- your hull
will be "springy" and change shape(deform with a pronounced hook) when
loaded up and in the water. I had a freind with a 16' F/G runabout
that this happened to-he ended up putting in new stringers, ribs and
deck- not as bad a job as it sounds- took us a weekend.
|
675.5 | Need more clues, preferably visual ones. | ULTRA::BURGESS | Mad man across the water | Tue May 29 1990 11:17 | 12 |
| re <<< Note 675.0 by SPCTRM::BRENNAN >>>
> -< Boat nosedive - help >-
Without seeing it, either on the trailer or performing it's
"stunt" its difficult to know where to start - other than the boat is
old, - OLD ! It sounds like the motor may be tucking in and lifting
the tail (stern, sorry 'bout that), the failed attempts to fix this
could be (could be) due to a weak (or sagged out) transom......
truely difficult to guess without a looksee - where is it ?
Reg
|
675.6 | | BIZNIS::CADMUS | | Tue May 29 1990 11:23 | 24 |
|
One item I forgot in the previous note- could be someone put a long
shaft motor on a boat designed for a short shaft- this will get your
prop 5"" lower than the boat was designed for. The cavitatiuon plate on
the motor should be flush with the bottom of the hull- if it is way too
low- you need to change to a short shaft. On these older OMC's they put
a 5" extension between the lower unit and the leg-
To change long shaft to short shaft:
*remove lower unit
*remove extension
*remove shift shaft extension
*replace drive shaft
*replace water tube (or cut 5" off!)
*replace lng bolt that connects rear of lower unit to leg(or cut 5" off
and re-thread
The parts should be available used at a reasonable price from any
dealer
Dick
|
675.7 | Confessions of a Hooker? | WOODS::WILSON | It's sum-sum-summa time! | Tue May 29 1990 12:19 | 31 |
|
My vote is for the nosedive being caused by the hook in the hull. If
the stringers are rotted or broken, that slight hook that you see on
the trailer may become *severe* with the hundreds of pounds of force
put on it while the boat is underway. Then the rear of the hull becomes
a giant trim-tab, forcing the bow down.
I would check the condition of the stringers at this point. Does the
boat have a raised floor? If so you may have to cut a few small "observation"
holes at strategic points to look for any signs of damage or rot. If
everything appears to be ok, the next test is to put the boat in the water
and use the observation holes to look for deflection in the hull while
the boat is plowing. Have someone else drive the boat while you observe,
or put some modeling clay between the hull and floor. Any deflection in
the hull will squash the clay.
If the hull and stringers are sound, the observation holes will be easy
enough to patch up. If you find rot or damage, just consider these holes
to be the first step in removing the floor for further repairs. 8^(
Good luck!
Rick W.
P.S. I know where there's an older model ~15 foot Glastron fiberglass hull
for $225. It has no motor or trailer, is set up for your OMC 40, and
looks to be in pretty solid shape. Swapping your motor and other
hardware to another hull may be easier and cheaper than fixing the
one you've got.
|
675.8 | EXPERIENCE WITH A 'HOOKED' HULL | AITG::KARR | | Wed May 30 1990 11:35 | 30 |
| I would have to side with the hooked hull theory. I had an old (1960)
DUO which also had a hooked hull. It sounds like I had a more serious
hook than what you described. (I had a 60 hp evinrude on it) I would
begin to plow at about 22 mph.
Is the hook on the port or starboard side? Mine was on the starboard
side toward the stern. When I turned right at a speed of about 20,
the engine would cav (as a result of the hook) Does your boat cav
on a turn? This would indicate the hook is probably your problem.
Repositioning the engine on the transom will NOT fix or compensate
for a hooked hull.
I had a raised floor and a way I got around it was to allow water on
board as a balast to keep the bow up and the boat realtively planed.
(weight distribution as mentioned in several replies) I bought the boat
to teach my son and wife how to pilot and when I felt they could handle
a new boat, (without screwing it up 8^) ) I bought one.
>Rick W.
>P.S. I know where there's an older model ~15 foot Glastron fiberglass hull
> for $225. It has no motor or trailer, is set up for your OMC 40, and
> looks to be in pretty solid shape. Swapping your motor and other
> hardware to another hull may be easier and cheaper than fixing the
> one you've got.
This is what I would do.... Check it out... I looked into fixing
my old boat but found out (very quickly) that it was'nt worth the
effort.
|
675.9 | Thanks Everyone! | SPCTRM::BRENNAN | | Thu May 31 1990 11:11 | 19 |
| Thanks for all the advise already provided.
.3, Jim - I'll try the tank test.
.5, Reg - Hook may be the problem, it's so slight that I can't imagine
it affecting the stability, but as suggested by a reply,
it may be increasing under pressure. The boat is on
RT122 in Millbury, right off the Mass Pike exit. Beside
the Red Shanty on right after Panzera & Sons Furniture.
.7 Rick W. - The floor does not look bad, but I have not checked out
the stringers and definately do not want to invest
my time in a rebuild, Uhg. Where is that Glastron?
.8 Mr.Karr (?) - I think I'll look into the Glastron. Please disregard
this plane out problem if you see me advertising a boat
for sale! (Naw, I wouldn't try a fast one like that.)
.4 & .6, Mr. (?) Cadmus, thanks for your input.
Again, thanks for everyone's input, this is a very helpful file.
I'll post the results of all tests after this weekend.
|
675.10 | | JLGVS::GUNNERSON | | Mon Jun 04 1990 12:21 | 7 |
| I don't have any advise for the originator, but I do have a question regarding
the problem. The orginator said that new fiberglass and paint was applied to the
hull. The question is, if the hull was distorting enought to cause the boat dive
when power is applied, wouldn't this result in stress cracks in the new material
that could be observed? If so such cracking might help diagnose the problem.
john
|
675.11 | Solution Discovered | SPCTRM::BRENNAN | | Tue Jun 05 1990 13:03 | 25 |
| Problem Solved!
Solution: I placed a wooden 2x4 on the back of the boat, outside
the stern, inside the external motor mount bracket. This moved the
prop(&shaft) out behind the boat far enough to allow it to "drive"
the back of the boat down while pulling the bow up enough for the
proper plane out degree.
The problem was that the stern of the boat was angled "in" at the
bottom (orginal design). When an engine was placed on the boat without
the "spacer" the prop was actually angled in and up, driving the bow down
while underway.
The bow of the vessle now comes up during acceleration and then
planes out neatly at 1/2 to full throttle. It was quite windy at
times Sunday and the boat handled satisfactorily. I'm happy.
Thanks to everyone who had an idea or thought to share on the subject.
Fortunately the solution was the cheapest and easiest option.
Thanks Again Everyone!
Tom
|
675.12 | Tilt mechanism Missing? | BIZNIS::CADMUS | | Wed Jun 06 1990 10:23 | 9 |
|
TOM: did you check the motor tilt adjustment mecanism to make sure that
the motor was tilted all the way - that motor has an adjustable tilt
so that you shoul d be able to do what you accomplished with the 2x4
with the mechanism on the motor- O have seen those coorode and get
removed- perhaps that is the real problem
Dick
|
675.13 | Something sounds wrong here | CSMET2::CHACE | is it getting warmer? | Wed Jun 06 1990 16:13 | 39 |
|
> Solution: I placed a wooden 2x4 on the back of the boat, outside
> the stern, inside the external motor mount bracket. This moved the
> prop(&shaft) out behind the boat far enough to allow it to "drive"
HUH? Do you mean that you placed a 2X4 between the motor bracket
and the transom? Near the bottom to cause the motor to tilt out
when the clamps are tightened? This sounds very risky to me (uneven
pressure on the transom, chance of losing the motor or breaking
the transom)
> the back of the boat down while pulling the bow up enough for the
> proper plane out degree.
> The problem was that the stern of the boat was angled "in" at the
> bottom (orginal design).
This is how ALL outboard boats are made!! You boat/motor combo should
work just fine with the transom like that!
> When an engine was placed on the boat without
> the "spacer" the prop was actually angled in and up, driving the bow down
> while underway.
If the motor is trimmed all the way in as you say it was - this
SHOULD happen! If you look at the motor brackets on the outside
of the transom, you'll see a row of 5 holes along the bottom on
each side. There *should* be a pin that goes through a pair of these
holes (the same hole on each side) Is this pin missing? If it is
you HAVE to get one since the motor tilt lock uses this pin to lock
it in the down position. If it *is* there, you *should* be able to
move it to a higher position to get the results you want without
using a 2X4.
It may be that your hook is causing a bow-down attitude that
the normal motor trim is not able to compensate for. But in any
case, using the 2X4 permanently sounds somewhat dangerous.
Kenny
|
675.14 | Safety Concerns | SPCTRM::BRENNAN | | Thu Jun 07 1990 10:36 | 49 |
| .12 Dick
.13 Kenny
The adjustable pin (spring loaded bar on this Evinrude) is intact
and working, the tilt lock is working also, I have to hold/press the latch
down if I want to pull the motor up out of the water. I am confident
the motor bracket and all it's hardware are in factory designed
working order.
Yes Kenny, I did place the 2x4 between the motor bracket and the
transom, this is the ONLY way the boat would perform satisfactorily.
The transom on the boat is about 3/4" thick at best. The motor bracket
would easily fit on 2" transom. That leaves you with about
1 1/4" play. If the motor is placed on the transom without any
"spacer", the motor bracket naturally rides flush along the
exterior side of the transom, leaving a good inch between transom
and the interior side of the motor bracket. So you tighten the motor
mount, take it for a ride, try every setting on the adjustable pins
and it nose dives. When placed on the boat in this manner the prop
is at the same angle as the flush motor mount, accelerate and the
force tends to push the nose down more than the boat forward.
The only way (read cheapest and easiest) I've found to achieve a
satisfactory ride is to move the prop and shaft out away from the
transom to achieve an angle that will allow the motor to push the boat
forward rather than push the bow of the boat down.
I agree Kenny that this could be dangerous. Before attempting the
first shake down cruise with the "spacer" 2x4 in place, I grabbed
the motor and attempted to lift, shake and wiggle it off the transom,
the back of the boat came up with the motor indicating to me that it
was not going to fall or jump off during normal operation.
Let's remember this boat is a 1959 Sears and Robuck (read junk)
and the motor is a behemoth of a 1963 40 HP Evinrude ($300 for the
entire package with trailer). I will not be attempting to tow any
skiers and will never have more than 1 other person in the boat with
me, so the stress on the transom will be moderate to light at best.
Yes, this looks like and is a Mickey Mouse solution but it's the
only solution I have run across to date. I am probably going to bolt the
"spacer" 2x4 to the transom to provide a secure mount if I cannot
find another solution.
Thanks for the input and concern,
Tom
|