T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
273.1 | | BOOTES::KEYES | | Tue Feb 21 1989 15:08 | 5 |
|
I know of a person who purchased a four winns horizon and he loves
it with the 205hp.
|
273.2 | Four Winns - Good first boat.. | ASPEN2::BOIKO | | Tue Feb 21 1989 15:29 | 22 |
| Rick,
Four Winns builds a good boat for the money and in addition
includes a good warranty which covers hull and power plant. All in all
a good family boat for the money.
Now as far as HP is concerned, I would select either the 205 V6 or
the small V8. With over 1.5 tons to push around, the 175 V6 seems a
little small. The 205 is roughly the same engine as the 175 - but has
the 4 barrel carb instead of the 175's 2 barrel. On Lake Sunapee in NH,
there are Four Winns 205's all over the place, and people seem to like
them quite a bit.
And yes, an underpowered boat will effect resale value to some
extent. The price difference between the 175 and the 205 should not be
all that much. The main difference between the 205 and the small V8, is
smoothness when running, rather then a great deal of difference in
acceleration or top end - due to the increase in weight over the V6.
Four Winns makes a nice first boat..good luck
-mike-
|
273.3 | Four Winns also | MYVAX::ONEILL | | Wed Feb 22 1989 09:19 | 15 |
|
Rick,
Last year I bought a 205 from Four Winns, I have the V-6 175.
With a steel prop I am able to get 38.5 mph, with a aluminum
prop I get 35-36 mps. As Mike B. stated in the earlier reply
the only difference between the 175 and 205 is a 4 barrel carb.
and about $ 1 K more in money. You may want to check with your
insurance company on coverage for bigger engines. Feel free
to give me a call to discuss the boat. So far I am very pleased
with the Four Winns product.
Best of luck,
Mike (287-3173)
|
273.4 | Four Winns also | BOMBE::CUMMINGS | Paul T. Cummings BXB1 | Wed Feb 22 1989 11:50 | 15 |
|
I have an 85 Four Winns 196 Cuddy. This is what the 205 used
to be before they molded the swim platform in with the rest
of the boat. (The 205 was what I wanted but for $$$.) I have
a 175 Mercruiser, which is a four cylinder marine engine.
I had my doubts before I bought the boat but am pleasently
suprised. On a good day (ok ideal day) I can hit 40. I can
pull up a skier with 4 people on board but it helps a great
deal to put someone in the bow. With 6-8 people I will go
several minutes to get on plane unless someone is on the bow.
I too am very pleased with Four Winns and I think they have
come along way since 85 too. Please feel free to call if you
want.
|
273.5 | I was impressed | NRADM::WILSON | Gimme snow or gimme Spring! | Wed Feb 22 1989 12:00 | 15 |
|
A non-noting friend of mine here at work has a Four Winns 205
Sundowner with the 175 hp V-6. I have driven and skied behind
it, and thought it had plenty of power. When he first got it
it would do just over 40 mph, but then he had it re-propped to
help pull up skiers. Now it will do just under 40.
At first he was happy with the power, but now that he's had it
2 seasons he says he should have gotten the 205 hp V-6. I guess
it's like anything else, he's starting to outgrow it, and the
"bigger-and-faster" bug has bitten him. 8^)
Rick W.
|
273.6 | more horses are better | GYPSY::SLIZ | | Wed Feb 22 1989 14:48 | 16 |
|
I bought a 200 Horizon (1988) and am a first time boat owner. At the time, a
great many friends that were boat owners suggested to buy a larger engine the
first time as they all wish they had. I purchased the 260 HP and am real happy
with it. I can pull two or three skiers with 5 or 6 on board and it performs
as if there were no one else aboard or being pulled. With the larger engine
the boat planes out the same with or without skiers. Top speed is about 52, but
I very seldom travel that fast unless trying to beat a storm on lake WINI.
As for price, each time you jump up an engine size add approx. $600 per jump.
That was 1988 prices.
I have been extremely happy with the boat and trailer it around four of
major lakes in N.H.
My next step would probably be a LIBERATOR.
|
273.7 | which is it? | USRCV1::RECUPAROR | | Thu Feb 23 1989 09:11 | 22 |
| Well I think I have decided to go with the larger engine, But now
I'm really confused. First I have gotten two different stories
from dealers as to whats available on the 205 for 89. This is what
I think they offer:
175hp V6
200hp V8
205hp V6 ?
230hp V8
260hp V8
which is it?
Second if I have a choice between the 200 V8 and the 205 V6 am I
better going with the V6 because it's lighter? One dealer is telling
me CI's are more important at that point than the difference in
weight.
which is it?
Rick
|
273.8 | go with the V-8 | CVG::MULLIN | | Thu Feb 23 1989 12:16 | 6 |
| I have an '88 205 Sundowner with the 200 HP V-8 and really like it. I
was told by the dealer that the V-8 is smoother running than the V-6
and based on 1 season with the boat I have to admit that it is
extremely smooth and quiet at all operating levels. My top speed is
about 44 MPH with 2 on board and I have no problem pulling skier with 4
or 5 people on board.
|
273.9 | I did it | USRCV1::RECUPAROR | | Mon Feb 27 1989 09:21 | 8 |
| Well I did it!! This past weekend I bought the 205 with the 200hp
V8. The dealer did not have one in stock so it will be about 8
weeks before it's here ( no problem since there's still ice on the
lake). I ordered it with a couple of extras like an hour meter
so I know when to change the oil, a wiper and the SLX II package.
Can't wait for spring!!
Thanks to everyone for your advice.
|
273.10 | Cumulative experience with engine on different boats | SMART5::JGUNNERSON | JLG | Thu Jun 08 1989 16:15 | 12 |
| Trailer Boats magazine had a comment on the 4.3 V6 with 4bbl engine
that may be relavent this discussion (though the base noter has made
his choice). In their experience they have found that the 4.3 4bbl
engine to "bog" when opened to full throttle from rest. They feel this
is due to the amount of fuel being dumped into the relatively small
engine by the big secondaries in the carb. So, those that go to the 4.3
4bbl for the "extra power" may find themselves in the curious position
having more power, but using less. Reading between the lines seemed to
indicate that staying with less peak power or going to the small V8
would be more rewarding.
john
|
273.11 | Never heard this before... | ASPEN2::BOIKO | Is this Heaven..No, it's Iowa.. | Thu Jun 08 1989 17:28 | 22 |
| re .10
John,
I have the 205 HP 4.3 liter V6 you are talking about in my 174 Sunsport
Baja, and I never experienced any bogging down of the engine with a 21
pitch prop I briefly had on the boat.
As in my case, the number one reason for low end performance problems
is first the prop pitch (I now have a 23 pitch SS), second the hull
size/weight/design and thirdly, amount of HP/torque. This is assuming there
is no damage to the prop, engine or hull. I've been in boats with the same
engine (ie 4.3 4bbl), and have experienced very good out of the hole
performance and, as in my own case, been in boats that have been proped for
speed vs low end power/torque - and these boats do not do so well at the
low end of the rpm range (Right Rick :-). Overhub exhaust can sometimes
help here, as well as making a prop pitch, or blade design change.
Powerboat magazine has tested boats with the 4.3 V6 4bbl many times,
and the performance tends to vary given different hull/size/weight/design
and prop configurations.
-mike-
|
273.12 | Your milage may vary | SMART5::JGUNNERSON | JLG | Fri Jun 09 1989 12:57 | 10 |
| Thank you for your experiences with this setup. I could only report
what I have read about it, and the only reason I did so was that it
seemed that they found this to be almost universal on the boats setup
with this powerplant. As you say there are many variables, however if I
had to buy a boat untested in the water I might choose a different
powerplant based the article alone since I'd have no way of predicting
the results due to my limited knowledge of the other factors you
describe.
john
|
273.13 | Thanks for the info... | ASPEN2::BOIKO | Is this Heaven..No, it's Iowa.. | Fri Jun 09 1989 16:12 | 26 |
| re .12
John,
I took a look at the power/rpm/speed curves from Powerboat magazine
last night, comparing the V6 4.3 (205 HP) powered boats with other
boats of similar size (hull design and prop pitch) but powered by V6
(175 HP) and V8 (260 HP) Mercruiser power plants - and their low end
performance just didn't look that much different. So I'm really at a loss
to explain their findings...
Your 100% correct, your milage may vary..and so could your boats
overall performance given just a slight change in any single area.
That's why it's really important, whey buying/shopping for a boat, to
get information from many different sources (ie. magazines, dealers,
notesfile, friends, etc..) rather then any one place. This is true with
any substantial purchase.
John, thanks for the 4.3 V6 info from Trailer magazine, I think
it's very interesting. I'll try to get a copy and look into it further.
-mike-
|
273.14 | Read it again just to make sure I had it right | SMART5::JGUNNERSON | JLG | Tue Jun 13 1989 15:41 | 10 |
| I don't have a copy myself, being cheap I read my best friend's. I
looked at it again this weekend, and yep, it said that *they* found
that the egine would hesitate noticeably if throttle was opened wide
too quickly, and *they* said that this was typical of the 4.3 4 bbl and
that slowely opening the throttle was the workaround. But they did
praise the Volvo duoprop for making it seem like the Rinker had a V8.
I just found it to be something to think about/watch for.
john
|
273.15 | Four Winns Prop Pitch | USRCV1::RECUPAROR | | Thu Jun 29 1989 10:44 | 11 |
| Hey four winns owners howabout some prop pitch stories??
I bought a 205 sundowner with a 235. It has the factory prop (not
sure what the pitch is) but I can only hit 4100 RPM,s and am going
about 47 mph. The mannual says max rpm's is 4200-4400 so I would
think I am overproped. Does anybody with a similar boat have the
same experience and has any tried steel.
thanks
|
273.16 | Go for the stainless prop - same size | CSMET2::CHACE | let's go fishin' | Thu Jun 29 1989 11:01 | 13 |
|
Since you're only 100 rpm off the recommended max rpm range, you're
only VERY SLIGHTLY OVERPROPPED. The next size down in pitch will
probably give you too many RPMs (the sizes aren't that close together).
A SS prop, because of it's thinner profile, will usually give a 300-500
RPM increase compared to the same DIA and Pitch aluminum one. This sounds
like exactly what you need. (SS props also will usually give a little
more speed on the top end, AND are more durable - like when you
run them through sand, they usually just get shiny, as opposed to
aluminum props that get dinged from the little pebbles in the sand.)
Kenny
|
273.17 | Wanted: opinions | CONCRT::SHAW | @PDM, DTN: 291-0025 | Fri Jun 08 1990 09:31 | 13 |
| Is anyone willing to offer an opinion of the value of the following?
I am considering purchasing it for water skiing and family boating.
1988 180 Four Winns Horizon Bowrider
175hp 6 I/O
Transferible warranty with 22 months remaining
Includes drive on Four Winns trailer
Appears to be in good condition
Asking price dropped from 12,500 to 11,000
Thanks,
Stan
|
273.18 | I would.... | ALLVAX::ONEILL | | Wed Jun 13 1990 13:35 | 28 |
|
Stan,
That not a bad price at all, if the boat is clean, look like it has
been taken care of, then go for it. The 175 hp will push the boat
in area of 45 mph, depending on the pitch of the prop. The 175 has a lot
of get up and go. In Trailer Boats, April issue, there is an article
on page 56, "Shootout". They take 5 boats equality equiped and test
them. The boats are in the 17' range, Bayliner, Glastron, Sunbird, VIP
and Four Winns. The boats are judged on Speed, fuel economy, handling,
styling, interior comfort, ride, price, acceleration 0-30,
construction, storage. So anyway the bottom line is
Four Winns 41 points out of 60 available points
Glastron 39
VIP 37
Bayliner 32
Sunbird 31
I have a '88 205 Sundowner with a 175 hp, I had very good service and
pleased with the product. My boat will do 40 mph, has no problems in
pulling skiers out of the hole.
Good Luck,
Mike
|