T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
92.1 | Slalom fever! | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | GPX User | Mon Aug 01 1988 17:44 | 30 |
|
Hi Rick,
I can't give you any info on how to ski around the boat, but I'd
sure like to talk about slalom skiing.
One of the things I've been working on this summer is turning.
As I come across the wake, I try to keep my knees bent and close
together. When I come to the spot where I think I should make
the turn, I straighten out (my legs) and push, switch edges
and lean.
Some of the advice I've gotten through this file is to develop a
rhythm, this seems to help. It also helps if I'm skiing slow, about
28 mph. If I ski faster than that, I lose my rhythm and sometimes
balance because things are happening too fast. I think its also important
to turn early, rather than late.
The cheater I put on the ski works nicely, the fear of skipping is gone,
so I can concentrate on resisting more fully and getting better
acceleration.
What I like most about slalom is the workout it gives. You can really
wear yourself out!
My next goal will be one-handed turns, :>).
Jeanne
|
92.2 | Which hand? | TOMCAT::SUTER | Water is meant to ski on! | Tue Aug 02 1988 09:52 | 22 |
|
Jeanne,
Glad to hear your slalom is coming along so well...
Once you figure out which hand needs to leave the handle on
turns and get the timing down, removing one hand from the handle
on slalom turns really increases your turning ability.
The hand to remove is of course the outside one, the one
away from the wake. At first, just let go of the handle, but
keep your free hand within grabbing distance of the handle.
As your timing improves and the release of the handle fits
into your rhythm then increase the distance, but no further
than your hip.
The other thing to look for is where the arm left holding
the bag (I mean rope :-) ) is pointing. It should be aimed
directly at the tow pylon.
Rick
|
92.3 | Bend ze knees! | JEMEZ::RCURTIS | Footer | Wed Aug 03 1988 15:29 | 16 |
| Re: .0
Rick, it sounds to me like the skier just ain't going fast enough,
you gotta hammer it across that wake.
Re: .1 Jeanne, first things first. The one arm turn is important,
and it will come much easier than you think, it's not hard, it's
just getting over the fear of letting go. More important though
is your knees. NEVER, I REPEAT NEVER EVER EVER, straighten your
knees. Knees bent and pushed forward is what slows you for the
turn. Get this down first, or at the higher speeds you'll come
sailing into the bouy with more slack than you can figure out what
to do with, I promise.
Rob
|
92.4 | Speed for 200 lbs | HJUXB::BIANCO | | Wed Aug 03 1988 16:25 | 14 |
|
Re .1
Jeanne you mentioned slowing down to 28 mph in order to get your
timing and balance. I agree that slowing down will help learning
the basics, but weighing in at 200 I'm afraid I might sink into
the water. Can anyone tell me what speed I should be
learning/improving my technique at? Anything less than 34/35 and
it feels like I'm sinking or at least getting a lot of spray in
the face.
Thanks
Bob
|
92.5 | | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | GPX User | Wed Aug 03 1988 17:16 | 16 |
|
Bob, are you skiing on a ski thats' right for you? I think you
should be on a 68 inch ski (or thereabouts). Riding a flat ski will
produce lots of spray when you are skiing slow. Try to angle
your ski more across the wakes if you can. You're not that heavy
that you can't ski at slower speeds without sinking, just don't flatten
out or stand up straight.
I read a story written by Bob LaPointe in waterski mag. that
he skis @ 19 MPH sometimes when he needs to work on his timing
and rhythm.(now thats slow!)...
I'm sure the other guys can help you out here.
Jeanne
|
92.6 | Ski Length Chart | FSDEV1::BSERVEY | Bill Servey | Thu Aug 04 1988 14:27 | 16 |
| Re: .4, .5
I read from the Ski Limited Catalogue the following reccomendatation
on ski lengths (this varies slightly by manufacture, but most are
common to these ratings).
Weight (lbs) 80-100 100-120 120-140 140-160 160-180 180-200 200+
Ski Length 64 64 66 68 70 72 72
(inches)
Note that most ski's in this catalogue are only available in 67"
until you start buying the better skis... I weigh in the 180-200
range, and saw few skis in this mag that were available in 72",
most were 67-69", and these were in the $300 price range!
|
92.7 | Skiers speed makes a difference. | BINKLY::SMITH | | Thu Aug 04 1988 16:48 | 19 |
|
re: .6
Be careful in using this chart since I see no mention of the speed
that the skier is skiing at. There is easily a difference of 2"
in the length of the ski for differnces in speed from 30 to 36 mph.
for example: The "RIGHT" ski for a 160lb person who normally skis
at 30 mph may be 67" but for the same weight at 36mph
the length may be 65".
The chart is a good place to start, but may need to be tweeked.
As you noted these differ slightly from each manufacture and is
really a matter of perference and skiing style. The best thing
to do is try different lengths if it is possible.
Good luck,
Mike Smith
|
92.8 | 170cm = 67" ? | HJUXB::BIANCO | | Thu Aug 04 1988 17:45 | 18 |
| Re .5
Jeanne,
I am using a 170 cm (I think thats 67"). This wasn't a guess,
I've skied on other lengths and found this to be comfortable. Besides
I looked at an EP chart and for the speed and size, the 170 cm was
right.
I think you're right as far as getting caught "flat" at times
because I don't really get the water in the face until I get tired
or lazy. I find that my arms "weaken" quicker than they should
and my shoulders are even with my hips. Sounds like too much speed.
Any suggestions or conclusions.
Bob
PS BTW its an EP Comp 1, new ski from an old O'Brien. The System
90 bindings are Great!
|
92.9 | And watch the Pros... | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | GPX User | Fri Aug 05 1988 14:07 | 15 |
| Bob,
When I took the lessons in Florida, the pro there told me to
keep my arms extended and down by my hips, and to use the baseball
grip. I had never taken a lesson before and I'm still trying
to get rid of bad habits. Like in every sport, if you can learn
the correct way initially, it'll save you a lot of grief later.
Somedays I'll go out there though, and nothing works, yesterday
for instance, it was too choppy, the air was too thick, and I
couldn't find my edges. :>)
Jeanne
|
92.10 | Don't get caught cheating! | TOOK::MERSHON | Another H2Oskier!! | Mon Aug 08 1988 14:13 | 38 |
| RE: .1
Jeanne,
In your note, you mentioned a fear of skipping out on your slalom
ski. You remedied your problem by adding a cheater (wing) to the
fin of your ski. You also noted that you straightened out your
legs in order to push the ski through the turn. In .3 Rob advised
you to NEVER, NEVER straighten out your legs! This is true, and
by keeping your legs bent and pushing your knees (and ankles) towards
the apex of your turn you are slowing the ski down and driving
the inside edge deep into the water. If you get a chance to watch
the pros on ESPN note how deep they get the ski into the water at
the apex of the turn. Only a small part of the tip can be seen.
This is what will prevent the ski from skipping.
My advice to you, and I think others will agree, is that problems
in slalom, because it is such a technique oriented facet of w-skiing,
should be worked on first by altering technique. After you have
mastered technique you can start making alterations to your
equipment, such as adding a cheater. Try taking your cheater off
and working on your technique. As long as you rely on the cheater,
you aren't going to develope the necessary skills for slalom, and
you are only cheating yourself (of good technique).
Give it a shot, it may be tough to get used to, but in the end you'll
be better for it! You may even find that you'll be able to ski
longer. For people that aren't used to them (cheaters), their legs
(and other parts of the body) tend to tire quicker. The experts also
advise the same thing: they say a cheater shouldn't be added until you
are able to ski cleanly into short-line!
I hope this helps Jeanne, and remember: Cheating can bring better
grades, but it also can get you FLUNKED OUT!!
Happy waves,
-ric.
|
92.11 | ??? | SALEM::M_TAYLOR | I call it sin... | Mon Aug 08 1988 14:28 | 15 |
| I saw some mention of a "heel cup" for non-booted rear-footers and
am wondering this now: Does the heel cup require the rear foot to
be locked-in before getting out of the water? Or, can one simply
"step in" after getting up with one? I realize this may be a little
ametuer-ish for some of you that use full-wraps, but I don't really
have the time or possibly the patience to learn to get up with both
feet in the ski, but have found that most of my slalom errors occur
when I am skiing aggressively and my rear foot just won't stay in
the ski; it really ruins my concentration!
Thanks.
Mike
BTW--Great topic and related discussion!
|
92.12 | You can put you foot in after starting... | BINKLY::SMITH | | Mon Aug 08 1988 15:34 | 18 |
|
Mike,
The "heel cups" that I have seen are ones that you CAN put your
foot into after you have gotten up with your back foot out.
The people I have seen with them seem to think it is a good compromise
between a full wrap and just a toe. I have only seen them on skis
never have seen them in a store, probably worth the price to try
it out.
Personally I do not understand the problem of getting
up with both feet in the ski. That is how I learned to slalom ski
from day one and have never had a problem. I have a rear toe,
and I have tried to get up with my back foot out and I can't do it.
I guess we all have our own personal styles.
Mike Smith
|
92.13 | It is ... alive! | ROGER::GAUDET | Ski Nautique | Mon Aug 08 1988 15:35 | 46 |
| Now that I'm back from vacation and obviously a pro skier :-) I
can attempt to shed some light on the subject of slalom skiing
(although I must admit I did more jumping and footin' last week
than slalom).
All of the advice here is correct and just like any sport practicing
the basics is essential. Good, smooth technique is the primary
objective in slalom. I especially like the suggestion to remove
the cheater and try it like the folks on EPSN. That's exactly what
you should do. Watch the tapes, over and over, and see what they
do, then ask yourself why they do it and what the results are (and
I don't mean a complete pass, just how good was the turn based on
what they did to achieve it). If you can maintain good posture
with both hands on the rope then fine. My cousin used to ski all
6 buoys at 36mph on a full 75' line with both hands on the rope!
I couldn't believe it but he could run all 6 consistently that way.
It wasn't pretty, but it worked. Now he's developing the "remove
one hand" technique and is having trouble making all 6 at 36mph.
The 3 guys in our ski group seem to have a good handle on making
6 at 15-off at 32mph, but 34mph is shakey and 36mph is elusive for
all of us right now. Gotta work on that rythym.
Another suggestion I have is to keep your eyes off the water. Crazy
as this sounds, people generally have a tendancy to look at the
wake or the tip of their ski...WRONG WRONG WRONG! I look at the
point on the opposite shore that I want to go to, preferrably BEHIND
the next buoy ( :-) ) and lock my eyes on it. While in the turn,
you turn your head to the spot on the other side you want to hit.
The bottom line...have faith in your ability to cross the wake and
let your brain consider controlling the factors involved in timing
the turn. There's alot of them, and you needn't worry about whether
your knees will bend when you hit the wake. My slalom runs improved
dramtically when I stopped worrying about whether I would make it
over the wake without falling.
OK. That's enough for now. My compliments to all those who added
their 2 cents here. It's all great advice. Now...to the water
for implementation!
...Roger...
P.S. One quicky regarding .-1 about the rear heel cup...I haven't
seen them on newer skis but a friend of mine has one of these on
a Jobe Edge. He can get out of the water without his foot in the
boot and just steps in while under way and pulls the heel cup on.
Nifty little device. Don't know if Jobe still makes it.
|
92.14 | | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | GPX User | Mon Aug 08 1988 16:06 | 18 |
|
I'm a little confused because I do watch the Pros ski and I've
seen them extend their legs when they're coming into the turn...
at least thats' what is looks like to me. When they come across
the wake they're knees are bent and close together...more so than
when they come around the buoy. I'll watch my tapes again! Also,
Deena Mapple has a good article on slalom in this months WSKI mag.
I do straighten out my legs, but not to the extent that they are
locked.
Well, something else to work on, thanks for all the great advice.
I'll think about taking my cheater off. :>) That did make a lot
of sense though. Thanks Ric...
Jeanne
|
92.15 | It's a whole new ballgame! | TOOK::MERSHON | Another H2Oskier!! | Mon Aug 08 1988 17:04 | 23 |
| RE: .14
Jeanne,
You will probably see some straightening (sp!) of the knees on the
ESPN tapes, but not total. And you must remember that these ARE
the pros and they do things that may not be technically perfect
when they are pushing the limit. Look how graceful Andy Mapple
can make a 32 off pass and then watch him run into 39.5 off. It's
a whole new ballgame at that length!
Also, to prevent yourself from skipping out, you should emphasize
your knee bend more during the preturn and then straighten them
a bit at the apex. If you accentuate the knee bend at this time,
you will slow that ski down perfect and a little straightening out
won't hurt too much. And remember to keep your shoulders back during
the turn if you're gonna work on this. If you bring the ski into
a good slow turn and you're forward it could result in what
is called an out-the-front. And those AIN'T fun!!
Good luck!!
-ric.
|
92.16 | Slaloming in "adverse conditions" | TOOK::MERSHON | Ric Mershon | Wed Aug 10 1988 17:34 | 6 |
| Last nite's experience on the Fort Meadows Resevoir brings to mind
a good topic of discussion here: Skiing in the wind and rough water.
What tips do you have for skiing in these conditions (besides avoiding
them altogether ;-))!
-ric.
|
92.17 | MUMBLE MUMBLE - TRAILERS BROKEN - MUMBLE MUMBLE | UBOHUB::READING | Roger Reading | Mon Aug 22 1988 14:23 | 30 |
| Hello wat is going on ere!
Well ladies and gentlemen I have now been skiing on one ski(mono)
for the last two seasons and can use either one or two footed deep
water start. However I prefer the beach start (if I can keep my
balance.)
I have a 13' shakespear with a 50HP Merc 1 season old. I find it
very hard work to try and get out with both feet in the bindings
but it is possible. However I prefer the one footed style because
it's easier.
If you ski behind plenty of horses then its no problem to get out
on a mono ski either with both feet in or one foot out. But for
us with the lower sized engines please have pity because
1 it takes us longer to get out and I believe we need better technique
because of the lack of pulling power
2. It tires you out even before you started skiing.
I would be very interested to hear what people have to say about
the last topic - rough water skiing- I seem to do mosty of my skiing
on the sea which is frequently very choppy.
Regards
Roger R.
PS. I forgot what the point of this discussion was Perhaps I had
better go home and fix my trailer.
|
92.18 | Bend ze knees! | GIMLEE::RC | Footer | Mon Aug 22 1988 18:54 | 6 |
| Rough water? Bend your knees even more, as far forward as they
will go. Remember though don't bend your waist as you bend your
knees, bend the ankles and weight the toes. Keep your back
straight.
Rob
|
92.19 | 2 Foot start is gettin tougher! | HJUXB::BIANCO | | Wed Aug 24 1988 18:50 | 18 |
|
I have been slalom skiing for about two full seasons now and I noticed
this season with my new EP Comp 1 that I am having a difficult time
doing a deep water start with both feet in. With my old O'Brien
I had no problem. I did notice two things different right away.
1. The EP has the front binding set about 3 inches closer to the
front of the ski than the O'Brien.
2. The EP has a wing on it.
I have double wraps so a 1 foot start is out of the question. The
EP feels great once I'm up so I'm reluctant to drill new holes to
move the binding back. Any tips on deep water starts like what
side is the rope SUPPOSED to be on 8^). It sounds like I've probably
been doing it wrong in the past and getting away with it, but not
now. Same boat and motor as last season and unfortunatly I'm the
same weight also. Thanks for any suggestions.
Bob Bianco
|
92.20 | Size? | ARCHER::SUTER | Water is meant to ski on! | Wed Aug 24 1988 19:15 | 15 |
| re: < Note 92.19 by HJUXB::BIANCO > -< 2 Foot start is gettin tougher! >-
> 1. The EP has the front binding set about 3 inches closer to the
> front of the ski than the O'Brien.
Bob,
Is the binding on the EP closer to the tip or is
the EP a smaller ski than the OB? Size plays a very important
factor in slalom starts. If someone is having a difficult time
coming up on one ski, I hand them the fat, old wooden ski and
usually see success... Big difference when it comes to amount of
ski surface pushing on the water.
Rick
|
92.21 | Mono-Ski Technique Hints | TOMCAT::SUTER | Water is meant to ski on! | Thu Aug 25 1988 10:18 | 27 |
| Moved by Moderator
<<< VICKI::CVG$DATA0:[NOTES$LIBRARY]BOATS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< PowerBoats >-
================================================================================
Note 128.0 Mono-Ski Technique Hints !! 1 reply
HAMPS::JONES_S "Water Ski + Mirror Shades" 18 lines 24-AUG-1988 13:59
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess I'm starting this off with hints and advice about mono-ski
technique in mind... That is I'm after some so...
Dear Marg,
When mono skiing I find turns to the right smooth and easy, and
left handed turns awkward and clumsy... I'm looking for that 'riding
on rails' sensation on the left handers ! Anyone got any hints ideas...
The other thing is in all the ski piccies, we see people almost
horizontal with a beatiful crecent shaped wake behind them, the
best I seem to manage is 30 degrees, followed by a resonably large
(and painful to the ego) splash...
p.s. I'm a right foot first man (as if you needed telling) !
Steve (Who wants to be in one of those photos too !!)
|
92.22 | | TOMCAT::SUTER | Water is meant to ski on! | Thu Aug 25 1988 10:19 | 21 |
| Moved By moderator
<<< VICKI::CVG$DATA0:[NOTES$LIBRARY]BOATS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< PowerBoats >-
================================================================================
Note 128.1 Mono-Ski Technique Hints !! 1 of 1
GIDDAY::SADLER "I'd rather be skiing...." 13 lines 24-AUG-1988 20:28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just know I'm going to say something here and some one will have
to correct me :-)
The reason one side turns better than the other is because everyone
has a bad side (dependant on which foot is forward) on which your
balance isn't as good as the "good" side. The only way I've overcome
this is practice and bruises so that you can over come the imbalance.
As for throwing up large amounts of water (that can swamp other
boats in a single go) read other notes in this conference about
turning and again practice.
.jim. whose_biggest_sprays_are_still_from_face_plants
|
92.23 | EP and O'Brien are the same length! | HJUXB::BIANCO | | Thu Aug 25 1988 11:02 | 13 |
| re: .20
Rick,
Both skis are the same size, 170 cm, and both have similiar
total ski area (widths are the same also). Any advice on a two
foot start would help. I took the wing off the EP and will try
it without tomorrow. It becomes very frustrating and tiresome not
getting out of the water right away (especially when I used to be
able to do it).
Bob
|
92.24 | Keep at it! | SETH::WHYNOT | | Thu Aug 25 1988 11:48 | 18 |
| Bob,
I went from a EP Comp cr1 (1982 vintage) to an O'brien TRC, and
had the opposite problem, finding the O'B much more difficult to
get up on. (This was confirmed by friends' who tried both skis)
It just takes a lot of practice to overcome the 2-feet-in deep
water start, but here are a couple of things to try:
- if you are left foot forward, the rope should be on the right
side of the ski tip. (conversely, R foot fwd, rope on L side of
tip) as you are being pulled, try angling the ski tip toward the
rope slightly such that the ski is being supported by the rope.
you won't fall over this way and it gives you a little extra
support. (they sell a handle called, I think, an Easy-Up, that
you put the ski-tip through to get support but I doubt you need it)
- try having your driver give you more throttle out of the hole.
Just hold on tight and you'll be dragging the same amount of water,
but for less time, thereby reducing fatigue and getting up quicker.
Just keep at it, and good luck.
Doug
|
92.25 | Lean back, more beef! | ROGER::GAUDET | Ski Nautique | Thu Aug 25 1988 12:56 | 9 |
| Bob...
In addition to Doug's suggestions, I've found that leaning back
more than usual helps. When I come up with both feet in the bindings
I'm almost sitting on the back of the ski. Additional throttle
will definitely make a big difference too. Practice, practice,
practice...
...Roger...
|
92.26 | Rope on what side? Lean Back? | HJUXB::BIANCO | | Thu Aug 25 1988 18:31 | 23 |
| re:24
Doug,
I've read that a right foot forward skier should have the rope
on the left, but I find my ski tip bailing out to the right when
coming up. Consequently I put the rope on the right of the ski
and actually point the tip to the left to compensate for this bailing
out. Sounds like I'm in trouble before I even start. I tend to
be in a tight tuck with a lot of weight forward on the ski to avoid
plowing thru the water. Could this also be part of the problem
since a lot of weight forward tends to give you less control of
the ski? Maybe what Roger said in .25 makes a lot of sense since
leaning back figures to give me more control of the ski initially.
Once going, maybe then should I shift that weight to the front.
I seemed to forget everything I learned just in order to get
up. Thanks again for your suggestions and I'm going to try the
rope on the left tomorrow. And also to lean back. Unfortunately
I have plenty of weight to lean back with 8^).
Bob
|
92.27 | Success! | HJUXB::BIANCO | | Mon Aug 29 1988 17:02 | 23 |
| re: .25
Roger,
I took your advice last Friday and had less difficulty coming
up with both feet in. I concentrated on LEANING back not PULLING
back! What a difference! Got up first pull each time and I kept
the rope on the wrong side (right side for a right foot forward).
I noticed that everyone else was a RFF skier and they also had the
rope on the right side. Oh Well, leaning back seemed to help me
a lot. Thanks for the advice.
I did notice my first run out (I fell 8^) ) that without the
wing the ski seems to slip right out the side. But later in the
day when I could barely hold onto the handle any longer, I realized
what I've been doing wrong. As I come out of the turn, I have a
tendancy to let the boat pull me through. It seems so basic and
you read it everywhere to pull through the turn but Friday was the
first time I ever did it. It was like being born again! Your body
position is where it's supposed to be and you find yourself getting
excellent angle out of the turn.
Bob
|
92.28 | This feels cold! | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | Nike -- Just Do It | Tue Aug 30 1988 12:53 | 7 |
|
Is it me or has anyone noticed the water is getting chilly!
Time for a full wet-suit or I'll never make it past September :>)
Jeanne
|
92.29 | Time for the September song ? | MENTOR::REG | Just browsing; HONEST, I'm BROKE ! | Tue Aug 30 1988 13:25 | 6 |
| re .28 I think its the air thats getting chilly; which is why
I fall so much, to get WARM again:-^)
Reg
|
92.30 | Advice? No charge! | ROGER::GAUDET | Ski Nautique | Tue Aug 30 1988 13:39 | 20 |
| RE: .27
Great job, Bob! I'm glad I could be of some help. I'm still a
little uneasy about the rope on the "outside" of the ski when you
come up. I guess if it works for you then stick with it. I just
know that I've always had the rope on the "back foot" side of the
ski when taking off. Keep the faith with the tiring out problem.
You're finding out that there are muscles that you never used while
your technique wasn't as good. Now those muscles are identifying
themselves and in a painful way. To quote an old clich�, "No pain,
no gain!" Ain't it the truth?
RE: .28 & .29
C'mon guys...it's just colder than the 95+ degrees we had earlier
in August. You're just spoiled! :-) Besides, that's what the
wetsuit was made for...prolonged skiing in adverse conditions.
Ski on, dear friends!!!
...Roger...
|
92.31 | | CSSE32::APRIL | Winter Wanderer | Tue Aug 30 1988 13:54 | 18 |
| > RE: .28 & .29
>
> C'mon guys...it's just colder than the 95+ degrees we had earlier
> in August. You're just spoiled! :-) Besides, that's what the
> wetsuit was made for...prolonged skiing in adverse conditions.
> Ski on, dear friends!!!
...Roger..., Jeanne, et. all -
I was just thinking .... If Mike Boiko wears a full wetsuit when it's
95 + degrees .... what does he wear when it's 55 degrees ???
Chuck who_pulled_a_hamstring_this_past_weekend_doing_the_wrong_things
_on_skis
|
92.32 | | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | Nike -- Just Do It | Tue Aug 30 1988 18:12 | 8 |
| Re: -1
I bet he wears a wet-suit under his dry-suit (thats my plan)!
Chuck, were you hamming it up when you pulled that hamstring? :>)
Jeanne
|
92.33 | Chilly? Bah Humbug! | TOMCAT::SUTER | Water is meant to ski on! | Tue Sep 06 1988 10:47 | 17 |
|
re: A Last few...
Mike B. wears a winter ski jacket, a down vest and stays in
the boat when it's 55 outside. I have pictures Mike!
Chilly? Nah...... Although, even though I'll ski until
the ice forms, I have to admit that the spirit just isn't
the same as in the spring when we do beach starts with winter
hats.
Instead of yeah!!!! there's no ice... Let's ski...!
It's more like ... Oh it's my turn again, huh?
Rick
|
92.34 | The song remains the same! | ROGER::GAUDET | Ski Nautique | Tue Sep 06 1988 18:19 | 18 |
| re: .-1
Gee, Rick, that sounds like a familiar tune! Remember Webster Lake?
Roger: "Gee Rick, it can't be my turn already, my feet are still blue!"
Rick: (standing on the swim platform) "Sorry, dude, but I think
it IS your turn, considering we're the only two people in the boat.
Besides, those white caps aren't too bad once you catch the rhythm."
Roger: "Thanks, I feel better now. Where's the handle?"
:-) :-) :-)
BTW: When's the next gumball? I've got the full suit ready to
go!
...Roger...
|
92.35 | SPRAY | MYVAX::MICRO_A | Wake Viking | Wed Nov 02 1988 10:27 | 9 |
|
Does anyone have any hints on making good spray? Is it the same
technique as making a good slalom-buoy turn?
Magnus
ps RE:92.22 I really couldn't find this discussion anywhere else
in this conference. ds
|
92.36 | Fall = serious embarrassment | ROGER::GAUDET | Ski Nautique | Wed Nov 02 1988 12:06 | 7 |
| A good spray comes from a good turn. Sure, you can kick the tail
deep and throw some water, but a nice smooth turn with a little
tug at the apex of the turn with toss a nice wall of water. Of
course, timing is everything when you're trying to soak that canoe
full of admiring fans! :-)
...Roger...
|
92.37 | Slalom Dock-Starting Advice Needed | SLALOM::PEARSON | | Tue May 23 1989 16:25 | 9 |
| Having *finally* completed my dock... :-) I think it's high time to
learn how to dock-start. I've always deep-water started, and it seems
like dock-starts would be alot less strenuous. Anybody got any tips,
advice, etc.. (like how much slack to have) on slalom dock-starting
that would make the learning process a little less painful?
Thanks in advance
Jon
|
92.38 | | TAZRAT::WHYNOT | | Tue May 23 1989 16:35 | 9 |
| Jon,
You should start with Beach starts and then progress to those
FLYING dock starts. They look darn impressive when completed
successfully, but damn foolish when not... What it takes is PRACTICE!
As for how much slack, it depends on the skier, boat, driver, height
of dock, etc, etc... TIMING is the most critical part.
Again, work on the beach starts FIRST, then go jump off your dock!
Good Luck,
Doug.
|
92.39 | Beach-start?? Oh No - Not That!! :-) | SLALOM::PEARSON | | Tue May 23 1989 16:54 | 13 |
| re: .38
Hi Doug,
I did *try* beach-starting once.... :-} I was visiting some friends
and they just hopped along on one foot (the one without the ski,
that is.. :-) ) and zip - they were off. It sure looked easy until
I tried it! If dock-starting is more difficult than beach starting,
then I guess I've got more work cut out than I thought.
Thanks for the advice
Jon
|
92.40 | | DONVAN::DECAROLIS | H2OSKI | Tue May 23 1989 17:26 | 16 |
|
Jon,
You can dock start without *flying*.... the flying part
comes later. I think the flying dock starts involve standing
up and leaping off the dock, where the ordinary kind of
dock start is simply sitting on the dock with your ski
extended in front of you and then stepping into
it when the driver hits it. This is *much* easier.
As Doug mentioned, timing is very important whether
your standing or sitting. I don't need/take any slack
in the line so I can get away with bad timing. Try it
and good luck!
Jeanne
|
92.41 | Hit it! | ARCHER::SUTER | Gentlemen, start your *marine* engines! | Wed May 24 1989 10:02 | 23 |
|
The big advantage of a beach start over a dock start(sitting
or standing) is the fact that with the beach start you get the
opportunity to hop if needed, whereas the start from the dock
doesn't allow this luxury. So... if the timing is wrong when
doing the dock start, 1 of 2 things happen. 1) you remain on
the dock or 2) you go for a swim.....
Best to get the timing down with a beach start first...
BTW: the driver is certainly involved in the timing issue
also. The best way I've found for the driver is to have the boat
perfectly straight in front of the skier then have the driver
idle out and keep the boat idling in gear until the skier
utters those words we all know and love... "hit it". Personally
I go out on about 1.5 to 2 feet of slack, but many beach starters
use no slack at all.
Good luck.......
Rick
Jon... sounds like you need to attend a Gumball......!
|
92.42 | Balance of forces | ROGER::GAUDET | Ski Nautique | Thu May 25 1989 10:24 | 13 |
| Good advice from all these folks, but one addition...balance. The
problem with doing beach or dock (flying or not) starts is that you
can't get away with leaning forward like you can with the deep water
start. Picture it, you're in the deep water, you say "hit it" and your
shoulders get yanked forward. But you fight it, drag through the water
a little further and stand up. On the beach or dock, the same happens
to your shoulders, but the ski tip sinks and your face follows. It's
simple physics...the old Newton's law of equal and opposite reactions.
So the best advice I can give is to concentrate on keeping your
shoulders and hips back during a beach/dock start. You'll find
yourself on top of the water more than beneath the surface! :-)
...Roger...
|
92.43 | Shallow - shallow - shallow ! | LLOYDJ::OSTIGUY | Oh Sugar | Thu May 25 1989 10:33 | 4 |
| I've never see a start off a dock that wasn't done from the
sitting position....but in any case as the laster commenter
said....its shallow where you start and maybe stop so be very
careful and good luck. Lloyd
|
92.44 | bad form? | ARCHER::SUTER | Sunny and 80! | Thu Feb 15 1990 11:15 | 16 |
|
Disclaimer: Same as barefoot reply only for skiing...
What minor improvements should I look for in my slalom
skiing? I assume "actually" making it thru the course is
realistic, but what about 15 off? :-) Let's see.... pull the
handle to my opposite hip after the turn...... I think the
main thing will be getting rid of my bad habits....
Do I dare try the infamous tumble turn on a slalom? Ouch,
my ankle hurts just thinking about it..... :-)
Of course being at Hazelwood's I should be able to jump
at least 200 feet by Friday, right?
Rick
|
92.45 | Latest "Water Ski" talks about the slalom masters | ROGER::GAUDET | Nothing unreal exists | Thu Feb 15 1990 13:11 | 16 |
| Rick, if you have some time, check out the latest issue of Water Ski magazine.
They have a comparison of the "Big Four" (as the call them), Andy Mapple, Bob
LaPoint, Carl Roberge, and Mike Kjellander. Ignoring the stuff about how they
all can "power their way through the course" (the infamous Carl Roberge
"scamble" method) you can get some good tips on what to do to improve your
slalom form. Good photos too (no Kjellander though...he was injured when they
did the photo shoot), so you can work on body position as well as handle and
head movement. Probably the most prominent thing I remember about your
technique is a slight fear of the wake when approaching on your "off" side.
That's almost a given for all of us, but you have to feel good about hitting
(actually, *slicing*) the wake from both sides so that you can maintain the edge
and speed to set up for the next buoy. The article also talks about "angle"
which is another key aspect of the slaom technique. Read it, drill it into your
brain, and do it on the water. Simple, eh? Enjoy!
...Roger...
|
92.46 | Slam Dunk, but not in the turn! | KAHALA::SUTER | We dun't need no stinkin' skis, (sometimes) | Tue May 28 1991 10:52 | 21 |
|
Time for a slalom skiing sanity check....
My latest slalom problem results in sliding sideways into the wake
after the turn as evidenced by the bruised ribs currently residing
on the left half of my torso.
I assume this happens because I'm not slowing the ski down enough
in the preturn and when I come out of the turn with little or no
control the ski kicks out before I reach the first wake and SLAM!
I try to shift my weight forward, but it just doesn't "feel"
right, yet.
Any Ideas? Has anyone seen(or felt - Ouch) this problem
before? Do I just have fear of sinking the tip of the ski in
the turn which won't really happen?
Rog, I have plenty of time now to read the WSki articles as
I can't even spot right now.... groan...
Rick
|
92.47 | Ouch! | DONVAN::DECAROLIS | hit the ball-AS LOUD AS U CAN | Tue May 28 1991 12:29 | 18 |
|
This is what happens when you let my brother drive! :>)
Shoulda had me at the wheel Rick!
Hope you have a speedy recovery!
Sounds like you may be leaning too far back coming through
the wakes, and maybe not having your shoulders and upper body
facing the direction you're heading. I was told to be more
agressive, but I prefer to have my technique down pat first.
Body slamming is not for me! :>)
Get well soon!
Jeanne
|
92.48 | I too have felt this pain.... | BINKLY::SMITH | | Tue May 28 1991 12:31 | 48 |
| Rick,
I have definite felt what you describe. I have on several
occations fallen exactly at the wake and had the wake catch
me right on the ribs. Definite gets the old stale air out
of the bottom of your lungs. :-) I do not know if you wear
your barefoot suit or a regular life vest, but I have been
fortunate enough to come away with out significant harm and
I think a lot is do to the life vest absorbing a fair amount
of the blow.
Anyway how to not have it happen again.
Well I have a couple ideas about what happens to me. First of
all I seem to remember it happening only on what should be considered
my "good" side turn. Ribs not as exposed on opposite turn.
And this is generally a more agressive turn trying to catch up
from the poor "off side" turn.
1). Like you mentioned, did not slow down the ski, too much
speed into the turn, slack rope, when I try to resist the boat
I get too far back and I basically end up laying down on the water
right as I get to the wake. The extreme angle caused by basically
laying down flat to the water can sometimes bring skeg of the ski
close to the surface and clause ski to slide out. One thing I
find is if you get your shoulders back but do not keep your
hips up you are going to lose it.
2) BUT I think it also happens when I am actually too far forward
in the turn. Here I get pulled over the front of the ski and am forced
to bend at the waist, hands get pulled up away from waist (exposing ribs)
weight is pulled forward putting you in a very poor postion as you race
back towards the wake, off balance you get pulled over and into the
wake.
I generally find the ski slides out if the skeg comes out. If you
are losing it at the wake you may not have enough weight back on the
ski to keep the skeg in the water.
Well at least this is what I seem to understand when reading about this
stuff. I certainly can't do any of it myself. :-)
Mike
PS If you had a boat that didn't have a wake this would not
be a problem. :-) ( Like I should talk :-) )
|
92.49 | Check your handle position too | ROGER::GAUDET | Nothing unreal exists | Tue May 28 1991 14:44 | 16 |
| Rick, I can add some to what Mike said in .48. It sounds like poor handle
position out of the turn may be causing your troubles. Regardless of how you
hold the handle in the turn (one or two hands) it should always be at your waist
just after the turn. Keeping the handle low will help you control slack in the
line. This in turn helps you keep your shoulders back and hips forward. If you
break at the waist, you loose lots of pulling power when the rope gets tight,
and the boat wins the tug-o-war. That's when you over-compensate by leaning way
back, and typically end up sliding into the wake.
I can relate to the sideslide into the wake...it's not pleasant! 'Course, you
haven't come off a 5-1/2' ramp in the inverted position to experience what it
really feels like to hit the water at warp speed! :-) Some people call it
"freestyle jumping" ... but how come those guys always (well, almost always)
land on their skis? You mean you have to ski away from a freestyle jump? :-)
...Roger...
|
92.50 | I think I need a Gumball! | KAHALA::SUTER | We dun't need no stinkin' skis, (sometimes) | Tue May 28 1991 15:08 | 18 |
|
Jeanne,
I better stop skiing with any member of the DeCarolis family.
I always get a new injury around you guys... :-)
Mike and Rog,
Too far back? As in leaning too far away from the boat? Is there
such a thing or do you guys mean too much weight on the rear of the
ski? I think I may be guilty of not returning the handle to my opposite
hip soon enough after the turn. I've noticed that sometimes it ends
up out where it doesn't belong and I have to fight to get the handle
back where it belongs.
BTW: Mike, you hit the nail (or would that be the rib) on the head,
I was wearing my BF suit! Guess it'll be an *approved* PFD from now
on!
|
92.51 | | KAHALA::SUTER | We dun't need no stinkin' skis, (sometimes) | Tue May 28 1991 15:13 | 8 |
|
Oh yeah... I don't think I ever end up with any Doug.. errr
I mean slack line. I reach for the pylon and have to get my free
hand back on the handle QUICK because it will depart towards the
boat driver if I don't move petty quick.... That indicates to me
that little or no slack line exists....
Rick
|
92.52 | Are you *handle*-ing it properly? | ROGER::GAUDET | Nothing unreal exists | Wed May 29 1991 13:37 | 11 |
| Slack or no slack, it still sounds to me like you're either not keeping your
shoulders square to the direction of travel out of the turn, or you're pulling
the handle to your chest rather than your waist (hip), which results in too much
lean and nothing to counter-act it...the result is a slow but inevitable
side-slam.
Best thing to do is try it close to the wake. Don't get really wide and try to
develop the technique. Free ski and try turning just after the second wake.
Worry about running buoys later.
...Roger...
|
92.53 | Body position! | ELMAGO::RCURTIS | Footer | Tue Jun 11 1991 12:32 | 13 |
| Hey guys,
Boy are you guys analyzing the he$$ out of this one.
Simplify: I bet you'll find a stiff front leg and
a bent waist at the root of this one, as Mr. smith
alluded to. Get that body position right and lean
all you want to. Worry about all those little things
later.
Rob..who because of the sale of his home this spring
was unable to ski until June 2nd (can you believe it?),
but has finally nailed down those single trick 180's!
|
92.54 | The good, the bad and the offside! | KAHALA::SUTER | We dun't need no stinkin' skis, (sometimes) | Wed Sep 25 1991 14:32 | 26 |
|
Bad side vs. Good side............
Let's see I ski left foot forward therefore my good cut through
the wakes is from right to left (or starboard to port) and my good
turn should be on the right? side?
The difference between my good side cut and my bad side cut is
like night and day!
Good side: Nice angle, good acceleration, solid cut..
Bad side: Lousy angle, poor acceleration, generally wimpy
cut..
Here's what I was leading up to... I re-read the past few replies and
a suggestion to slow down and improve form was made. This sounds like
a good suggestion, but when working on cuts through the wake how does
a skier slow down and practice form when the whole idea is more
acceleration?
Rick
BTW: The temps are getting nippy lately... Rog, Reg, Doug.. are you
guys ready for ice-in-the-hair skiing?
|
92.55 | Uhh, what the books and magazine articles said. | ULTRA::BURGESS | Mad Man across the water | Wed Sep 25 1991 14:54 | 26 |
| re <<< Note 92.54 by KAHALA::SUTER "We dun't need no stinkin' skis, (sometimes)" >>>
> -< The good, the bad and the offside! >-
> Here's what I was leading up to... I re-read the past few replies and
> a suggestion to slow down and improve form was made. This sounds like
> a good suggestion, but when working on cuts through the wake how does
> a skier slow down and practice form when the whole idea is more
> acceleration?
I think it means a) have the boat driver slow down
b) don't ski as wide
c) maybe go back to a longer line length.
This should all combine to give you more time to think about
what you're doing, see/feel what results are coming from it and commit
that info to muscle memory. Y'know about muscle memory, right ?
> BTW: The temps are getting nippy lately... Rog, Reg, Doug.. are you
> guys ready for ice-in-the-hair skiing?
Sure, in fact I was thinking about some before work skiing
only last night - - while I was playing with my new toy (-:
Reg
|
92.56 | Why have more of this and less of that ? | ULTRA::BURGESS | Mad Man across the water | Wed Sep 25 1991 15:35 | 22 |
|
Would some knowledgeable person please explain ski design ?
I don't mean the finer points, just a broad brush description of
what the various "features" do.
Rocker ? Why or when is more better than less
Stiffness ? ditto
Tail taper ? ditto
Tunnel shape, width, depth, sharpness of edge, etc.
Ski length ? why is shorter faster ?
Finz and wingz
Never mind all the fuzzy stuff the glossies promote, this
would be a good start.
Reg
|
92.57 | and while you're at it... | MIZZEN::DEMERS | | Wed Sep 25 1991 16:45 | 9 |
| I see "Z turn", "C turn", "TC turn" as a style of skiing. As for my style...
I get up, I turn, I go to the other side, I turn, I fall. What kind of
style is that?
Seriously, I have "Z turn" style O'Brien and I don't know what it does for
me...
/Chris
|
92.58 | Let the fall water skiing season begin!!! | ROGER::GAUDET | Because the Earth is 2/3 water | Thu Sep 26 1991 12:58 | 32 |
| RE: Rick & Reg ... yeah, I'm ready. In fact I just unfolded the drysuit to be
sure all the seams are OK. But heck, it's still in the 60's ... we won't be
needing that thing for *months* !!! :-)
RE: Ski "characteristics" ... there were a couple of good articles in "Water
Ski" magazine back in the spring/early summer that explained what the various
characteristics of a ski are for. Rather than give you my "amateur definitions"
I'll try to dig up the issues and post them here.
RE: "Z" vs. "C" vs. "TC" ... though I'm inclined to think it's more of a
marketing thing than a performance thing, the way I understand it is as follows:
"Z" turn: a *very tight* turn close to the buoy. A "Z" turn skier
expends a lot of energy at the buoy, actually *kicking*
the tail of the ski around to complete the turn.
"C" turn: a casual turn (that's not where the "C" comes from, as far
as I know), beginning well in advance of the buoy, and
requiring a good amount of angle across the wake to set up
for. This is, in my opinion, the type of turn that you're
supposed to learn. The other types are for very short line
and high speeds (approaching 36 mph).
"TC" turn: a "tight carving" turn (hence "TC"), similar to the "Z"
turn but not as sharp. A little more angle across the
wakes than with the "Z" turn, thus allowing execution of
the tight turn very near the buoy.
RE: /Chris ... your style? I'd have to classify that as "standard style" for
those of us trying to improve our skills! :-)
...Roger...
|
92.59 | Ne info please | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | I will truely miss my friends! | Wed Aug 19 1992 22:07 | 15 |
| Question...
I need some info on a Connelly Signature Seriers Slalom SKi.
It's Ceramic/Graphite.../Custom Competition.../
On the Bottom of the ski it says...Flex and Rocker Balanced???
" " " " " " " " ...Hand Tuned Acrylam Base?
What does all that mean to a intermediate skier?
Is the ski any good? What price is fair?
Please help!
thanks,
B.A.
|
92.60 | The CONNELLY CONCEPT IS # 1!!! | COMET::KLEINM | What do you mean I missed the gates? | Thu Aug 20 1992 04:09 | 73 |
| B.A.
If it is a ceramic/graphite signature series ski it has to be
the Concept. The Concept is/has been the best selling Connelly
ski for years. It also holds more records on the local,state,regional
and national level than any other ski on the market. It has
enjoyed tremendous sucess to say the least. To give you an example,
at the last tournament I went to,out of 115 skiers,95 of them were
on the Concept.
This ski is so successful because it works well for open water
free skiers through some pretty serious line lengths. I see people
run the course at 30 mph with a concept,and I see people run the
course at 35 off. It is a forgiving ski that turns very well.
Custom competition means the boots are totally adjustable to the
individual that is riding it. By using Gel-packs and adjusting the
width on the front section of the boot,you can set the boots up to
custom fit your foot. If this ski is used,you may need to purchase
another set of gel packs which I believe costs about 20 bucks per
boot. You only need to do this if you want the truely custom fit.
The gel packs mold to the bottom of your feet and assist in arch
support and comfort.
Flex and rocker balanced simply means that each and every Signature
series ski is thouroughly checked and tested after it is produced.
Mass production skis are just stuck in a box and shipped. The
repeatability or trueness varies greatly. A signature ski is measured
in the fore body,mid section and tail area for the variances of the
actual blueprint models in the areas of the flex patterns and the
rocker.
Hand tuned acrylam base means the ski is hand tuned. Each Sig. ski
after coming out of the mold is perfected by hand.The add scratches
in a longitudinal manner to break up surface tension and to reduce
imperfections in the finish.
Signature series Skis from Connelly with double custom contours
retail at $685.00. You can not purchase a sig. from a mail order
catalog. The skis you would want to compare them to from a mail order
are not sigs,they are not hand tuned,flex checked and they do not
posess the high wrap cusom fitting boots,they look almost the same
but are not near as secure or comfortable as the custom boots.
The difference in retail is over $100.
If you ride over the center of the ski in the turns and stay back
through the wakes,the Concept is an excellant ski,especially if you
are skiing at or above 30 mph. It is so incredibly forgiving,it
wins many skiers with improved performance.
The one thing that I forgot to add was that in 1991 Connelly added
an adjustable fin system to the Concept which makes the ski worth
at least $35 more. It is a high-tech fin system that is very accurate
and rugged,not a cheap add on like some manufacturers use.
They normally sell at a pro shop for $460 plus w/dbl customs.
So take it from there. If the boots are in good shape,and they fit
your foot size without cramping,it would be a good buy for no more
than $300.
Concepts hold their value real well,they have proven to be the
ultimate weapon for the majority of skiers out on the water today.
hope that helps,
MattK
who has ridden Concepts since they were introduced back in 1989 and
have helped several dozen skiers ranging in all abilities set their
concept up for them seeing an immediate improvement the first time
out on it.
It's a winner,you'll love it!!
|
92.61 | hope you could read -.01 | COMET::KLEINM | What do you mean I missed the gates? | Thu Aug 20 1992 04:17 | 11 |
| sorry for the typo's and the hard to read sentances,I was in a hurry
to get out of here. :-)
Matt.
b.t.w. I now ride a Rocket which is basically a high bred model
designed after the Concept and the old HP. It works great above 34
mph if you have a tendancy to ride foreward,like to take your time
in the turns and crank it through the wakes. The Sig.Rocket retails
for $695.00 and sells for about $515 or so at the pro shops.
|
92.62 | Thanks! | RAVEN1::B_ADAMS | I will truely miss my friends! | Thu Aug 20 1992 15:30 | 11 |
| .60� The one thing that I forgot to add was that in 1991 Connelly added
.60� an adjustable fin system to the Concept which makes the ski worth
It has the adjustable fin, with a very well built connection to the
ski! Very impressed!
Thank you for the very insightful information! I'm taking it out
Saturday to drink some water! :*)
B.A.
|
92.63 | Suyderhoud tape is HOT!! | COMET::KLEINM | What do you mean I missed the gates? | Mon Dec 28 1992 21:38 | 12 |
| I received "Mike Suyderhoud's Advanced slalom clinic" video from Santa
Claus for X-mas. It is an hour and a half long and I would HIGHLY
recommend it to anyone skiing in the course from 32 mph/15 on up.
Mike and Bob LaPoint use some very high tech film manipulating and
in-depth coverage for each phase of skiing the course at each line
length and speed from I think...28mph longline on up.
It's great!!
Matt
|
92.64 | A remake of an old one?? | QETOO::WHYNOT | Malibu Skier | Thu Dec 31 1992 14:16 | 9 |
| If this is the same tape that I have, about 5 years old, (or is it a
new one) yes it's pretty slick! Bob makes everything look SO easy.
Notice how he does his preturn in the air? He shoots across the first
wake, gets airborn over the second, and plants the ski *after* the
edge change, then rounds the bouy. Amazing to watch. I'll have to dig
out my copy and take another look on my new VCR that Santa brought; to
see how it's supposed to be done. :^)
Doug
|
92.65 | Skier becomes UFO! | KAHALA::SUTER | and now for something you'll really like! | Tue May 21 1996 10:35 | 16 |
|
Great conditions last night! No other boats and GLASS calm! Yeehaaa...
I felt really strong on my ski last night, but managed to perform
a little trick that I don't think I have done before. I came out of the
turn real hard and fast and when I got to the wake the ski came straight
up, tip first and I, needless to say, followed it.
Since I didn't go out the front, I know I wasn't getting pulled
over by the boat. I wonder, though, exactly what the heck I did do.....
My best guess is that I was too far back on the ski maybe because I had
pushed the tail around the turn. Any ideas?
thanks,
Rick
|
92.66 | You're spending too much AIR time. | BIRDIE::WHYNOT | Malibu Skier | Tue May 21 1996 12:13 | 16 |
| Me thinks that you overturned the ski (...came out of the turn real
hard and fast...) and scared the beejeezis out of you self which then
caused you to go "flat ski" (...and when I got to the wake the ski
came strait up,...) and "launch" over the wake.
Been there, done that, nearly put a dent in my forehead from the tip of
the ski. 8*O
You wouldn't go out the front, 'cause you were leaning back. You
didn't fall over backward because, a) when the tail of the ski hits the
wake you get knocked forward, or b) you compensated your balance and
didn't realize it.
Ain't applied physics fun!?
Doug
|
92.67 | What's the fix? | KAHALA::SUTER | and now for something you'll really like! | Tue May 21 1996 14:31 | 11 |
|
Gee, I really didn't think I was flat-skiied over the wake, but
who the hell knows, I'm sure the beejeezis factor weighted heavily here...
Ah yes, the old overturning trick again! When will I learn....?
What's the fix for this one? Simply shoulders back, head up and perpendicular
to the water?
thanks,
Rick
|
92.68 | Right on Doug | GAAS::HYER | | Tue May 21 1996 14:41 | 11 |
| Sounds to me like Doug's got the correct diagnosis. I do *that*...go flat in
the wake. I think this months waterski mag called it something like the 'double
lean.' ... pulling hard out of the turn, go flat across the wake, then back onto
that outside edge again... probably my biggest problem.
Since I don't get the air you did, I wonder if you not only pushed hard with
your back foot in the turn, but also might be skiing with more weight than
normal on that rear foot....a subconscious favoring of that 'healing' front foot?
dave
(aqua therapy must be the same as water skiing.... right!!!)
|
92.69 | | BIRDIE::WHYNOT | Malibu Skier | Tue May 21 1996 17:25 | 16 |
| Back to basics: Take the wing off your ski.
The solution: Work on the *PRETURN* and the rest will follow.
I can demonstrate better than I can write this; but if you decelerate
smoothly during preturn, set your edge and carve your turn (providing
your shoulders are back and you don't break at the waist and get
slack-line,etc,etc) *then* you can pull-like-crazy while *remaining on
edge* till you cross *both* wakes. You now get to change edge, and do
everything again - preturn, decelerate, turn, PULL, cross wakes...
Now do it again with *bouys* for a real humbling experience.
Enough of this...I wanna go SKIING!
Doug _ Still havn't gotten wet yet in '96 :^( :^( :^(
|