T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
71.1 | Tricky business | CSSE32::APRIL | Winter Wanderer | Tue Jul 12 1988 11:22 | 40 |
|
>Seeing how I've never tricked in my life (really)...I was
>wondering if there are any experienced trickers out there?
That could be taken out of context :')
>How do you get out of the water with them? Same way as two skis?
Yes .... sort of. You have no fin so you have to fight to keep your
ski's together. Also you DO NOT go as fast as when you slalom or
regular ski, you go slow (@20-22 MPH).
>What should I attempt first? I know, just staying up, right!
I know this sounds simplistic .... try crossing the wake back and forth
a few times. It's harder than you might think because you don't want
to get too much momentum going to the side as your ski's will come out
from under you.
The 1st 'trick' everybody tries is to ski backwards. Once you get
that down a 360 is next on the list. You'll need a trick harness for
toe holds.
To ski backwards you stay just outside of the wake with your 'power'
hand to the inside (I'm a righty). What I do is hold the handle down
as close to my right hip/waist as I can get it and then give it a
little tug to pull up a few feet. As I'm doing that I rotate to the
outside and grab the handle with my left hand holding the backwards
position. To come around all the way ( a 360) you just keep rotating
using the left hand and releasing the right.
>There is a rear toe on one of them for slalom tricking.
I have never 'tricked' with one ski but some people say it's easier
than two ! I have my doubts.
Chuck
|
71.2 | Be patient! | GIMLEE::RC | Footer | Tue Jul 12 1988 11:35 | 23 |
| Jeanne,
Getting out of the water is the least of your worries, it's
easy, same as two skis. But once you are up you need to get into
and stay in perfect position or these things are very slippery.
The position: Knees bent as far forward as you can possibly get
them. Weight on the balls of your feet. Back straight. Head up,
NEVER look down. If you look down that's where you're gonna go.
Keep the handle low, down about the waist, and a little closer
to your body than normal.
Don't try any tricks until you get this position perfect.
You won't be consistent. Sometimes you'll hit the trick, some-
times you'll crash. For example when you try to learn the 180
front to back. If you straighten your legs you WILL fall on your
A**. If you bend over and/or look down you will fall on your face.
So just spend a lot of time skiing around in the perfect position,
crossing the wakes and whatnot. It will be worth the time spent
because later your tricks will come easier.
Good Luck
Rob
|
71.3 | Got it! | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | | Wed Jul 13 1988 11:04 | 8 |
| Great! Thats just the kind of information I was looking for.
Thanks very much, I have all next week to practice these things.
Head up, knees bent, weight on balls of feet.....I'll start there
and work on the spins later.
Jeanne
|
71.4 | Do as I say.... | REMEDY::KOPEC | Spaceman Spiff | Fri Jul 29 1988 10:20 | 7 |
| Well, if you *really* want to know how to do it, I have some pictures
of Roger "Ski Nautique" snorting several hundred gallons of water
back when he was trying to learn a backward start on tricks...
...tom ("the man with the negatives")
(I *Never* let roger take a camera when *I'm* skiing..)
|
71.5 | Destruction of the evidence... | ROGER::GAUDET | Ski Nautique | Fri Jul 29 1988 14:20 | 7 |
| RE: .-1
Oh no, not the backwards start pictures! Looks like I gotta get
a portable X-ray machine and bombard your house with a lethal dose
when the wife and kid aren't home... :-)
...Roger...
|
71.6 | The pot calling the... | REMEDY::KOPEC | Spaceman Spiff | Fri Jul 29 1988 15:13 | 7 |
| Of course, it's a good thing Roger doesn't have any pix of me just
getting up on skis... amazing there was any water left for him to
snort...
We now resume our regularly scheeduled trick-skiing note.
...tek
|
71.7 | Tricky | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | GPX User | Mon Aug 01 1988 12:48 | 15 |
|
Re: -1
Ha! I think you should scan those negatives and put them on the
system so we can ALL SEE what Roger looks like. It can be done!
(How much ya willing to pay to get them back, Rog?!) :>)
I've yet to try a backwards deep water start on the tricks, I'm
still trying to ski backwards with both hands on the handle. I
can ski backwards with one hand, but haven't been able to find
the handle with the other hand. Anyhow, its a lot of fun even
if I do dump everytime, but hey, I can ski sideways noooo problem!
Jeanne
|
71.8 | | CSSE32::APRIL | Winter Wanderer | Mon Aug 01 1988 13:05 | 19 |
|
Finally got a chance to do some trickin' this past weekend (I think
Pat inspired me). (In my best Andy Rooney voice..... ) "Didya ever
do something by accident and then say "hey ! that was fun ! I'll try
to do it this time", and ya never do it again 'coz your TRYIN' "
Well ... I did this 'trick' on my tricksters and then completely
wore myself out tryin' to duplicate it the rest of the day. What I
did was in attempting to do a 360 I came around and not only completed
the 360 but WENT RIGHT AROUND AGAIN WITHOUT STOPPING ! In about 20
or so subsequent attempts at this 'double 360' I did about 20
variations of a Greg Louganis dive. To make matters worse, when I
came in after doing the thing by accident the 1st time, I excitedly
asked my spotter if he saw what I did and he just said 'nah, I was
checking out the blonde sunbathing on the raft over there'.
Gee thanks, I'll call you when I'm drowning.
Chuck
|
71.9 | America's Favorite 4 letter word - FREE | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | GPX User | Tue Aug 02 1988 15:39 | 12 |
|
I believe you, Chuck! :) Hey you know you did it, what does it
matter if no one saw you achieve such a maneuver? Whats that
worth, 24,000 points??
Andy Rooney....the only thing funnier than his commentaries are
his EYEBROWS! I bet Brooke Shields is jealous.
Jeanne
|
71.10 | Aerial 360's | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | GPX User | Tue Aug 09 1988 11:30 | 10 |
| This past weekend I was finally able to master the front-to-back,
360 and backwards ski. Now I'm wondering what to attempt next,
maybe an aerial 360....?
Has anyone done this? I would assume you bring the rope behind
you and position the handle at your hip? Any suggestions would
be appreciated.
Jeanne
|
71.11 | The trick is... | ROGER::GAUDET | Ski Nautique | Tue Aug 09 1988 12:22 | 43 |
| Jeanne...
As I'm sure you've seen on ESPN the trick runs are done with a single
ski. You don't see too many two ski trick maneuvers. But I think
there are a few crazy things left for you to try on two before going
to one ski.
One thing I guess you could try is a step-over. I've never done
it, but I think the way you do it is while you're skiing in a particular
orientation, you bend down and put the rope near the water, then
as you pop up to do a 180 turn (say front to back) you step over
the rope with one ski. As an example, you're skiing forward, you
bring the rope down and begin turning to your left, pivoting on
your left ski and stepping over the rope with your right ski. Seems
logical to me. I STRONGLY recommend using a trick release for this
maneuver. It sounds like you could get tangled up pretty easily.
And yes, I did consider the fact that you end up skiing with the
rope between your legs. I guess then you have two ways out (at
least two which keep you on the skis :-) ) ... do a back to front
step-over or release the handle with one hand, grab it behind your
back with the free hand, then do the same for the other hand and
voila...you're skiing backwards in "normal" position.
Another thing is the backwards deep water start. That one I can
do (or at least used to be able to do). I first learned this by
putting my hands between my legs and grabbing the rope behind my
knees. I later figured out that this is unnecessary. You start
with the rope behind your knees but grab the rope around the knees,
not between them. Tell the driver to "Hit it!" when your head goes
under. What you do is kick the tails of the skis up when you dunk
your head. Don't forget to exhale rapidly or you'll have the lake
up your nose very quickly. Stay crouched until you're up on plane
and "ta da!" you're skiing backwards. It looks really impressive
from the boat or shore.
Aerial 360s are another one too. I can do them on a kneeboard.
Haven't tried one on tricks yet. Wrapping the rope around your
waist seems like the logical method. Gotta try that one...
Are you bringing your tricks to the gumball today? Maybe I'll get
inspired to try a few things myself... God help me! :-)
...Roger...
|
71.12 | | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | GPX User | Tue Aug 09 1988 13:01 | 9 |
|
Yes, I wanted to try the backwards deep water start....thanks for
the specs!
I'll have the tricks with me today for the gumball and my camera,
so ham it up!
Jeanne
|
71.13 | Harness time | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | GPX User | Tue Aug 16 1988 18:39 | 10 |
| I've ordered a harness to try a new dimension in tricking, this
should be an experience, hopefully the harness will let go during
the fall and I won't be dragged under water by one foot (for some
reason I keep visualizing this happening)
If anyone uses a harness, your comments would be appreciated.
Thanx
Jeanne
|
71.14 | Be carefull, is the YANK that will get you... | BINKLY::SMITH | | Wed Aug 17 1988 11:34 | 27 |
|
Jeanne,
Do you use a ski pylon or do you tie off the back of your boat?
I would be leary of using a harness if you tie off the back. The
problem is not so much being dragged under water as much as the
angle that your leg can be pulled at when you fall.
I have seen two methods used during tricking with a harness:
1. A "trick release" is attached to the pylon, a pin is pulled
by the spotter in the boat which releases the line when the skier
is "going" down; ie:you release the line before they hit the water
and the line yanks their leg.
2. Have the spotter wrap the line once around the pylon and hold
it with their hands, the pull really is not that bad for basic
trick skiing. Then the spotter just lets go when the skier is going
down. This is not as good as the first method since there is some
resistance as the rope unwraps.
Good Luck
Mike Smith
|
71.15 | | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | GPX User | Thu Aug 18 1988 11:13 | 14 |
|
Yes Mike, I tie off the back of the boat. I did see the trick
release advertised in Overton's catalog. Right next to the ads
for the harness's which state "designed to slip off easily should
you fall"....the ad for the release said "helpful aid for tricking
to avoid injury should you fall"....
Somewhat contradictory I thought.
But I'll give it a shot, the season's almost over anyhow :>) It
will put a little pressure on me not to fall. "Fall and you die!"
Jeanne
|
71.16 | | GIMLEE::RC | Footer | Mon Aug 22 1988 18:29 | 6 |
| I wouldn't risk it myself Jeanne. Knees aren't built very
well to start with and even harder to repair. Better to
find some way to release than chance your foot getting stuck.
Rob
|
71.17 | Slalom Tricking | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | GPX User | Tue Aug 23 1988 11:09 | 13 |
|
Yes, I decided to forget about the harness till' next year. Instead,
I had the slalom toe mounted on the trick.
Well, its' not easy. I'm a goofy footer (right foot forward), as
soon as I'm able to place my foot in the back, I lose it. Five times
I've fallen, consistently to the left. If I put any weight on the
back toe, thats' when the ski kicks out from under me. Its the
weird angle of the toe piece, 45 degrees, that makes it hard to
control.
Jeanne
|
71.18 | I'll get it! I'll get it! | DONVAN::DECAROLIS | Boil Some Water! | Thu Jun 22 1989 11:26 | 29 |
|
Well, here we are, 1989....the year of the goofy footer!
Do we have any slalomn trickers out there? I have a bad
case of "cheap trick fever"...thats' what I'm thinking my
tricks are...cheap.. because they don't have any tracks on
the underside of the ski.
I don't know if I'm ready for a new slalomn trick yet, but
I'm wondering if S.T. is easier with a tracking ski.
After dropping one of the tricks (I tell the driver to increase
the boat speed first), its somewhat of a struggle to keep
the ski under control. I think with practice it'll come,
but the ski decided it was going to cross the wake and I
had no choice but to follow! I'm sure my weight was a
deciding factor on where that ski was headed!
As for new two ski tricks, has anyone tried this? Get into
the reverse position on the outside of the wake and then
cross the wakes over to the other side....lots of fun
behind a Nautique/M.C. Once you're able to cross the
wakes in reverse the next trick is to take air and come
about in a forward position.
Cheap Trick Fever!
jd/
|
71.19 | Tricks or Treat | CSSE32::APRIL | Winter Wanderer | Thu Jun 22 1989 11:57 | 23 |
| > Do we have any slalomn trickers out there? I have a bad
> case of "cheap trick fever"...thats' what I'm thinking my
> tricks are...cheap.. because they don't have any tracks on
> the underside of the ski.
The only time I tried slalom trickin' was when I UNINTENTIONALLY
dropped a ski ! Actually it was kinda fun but like you said you've
got an automatic tendendy to go to the wake and there's just no
simple way of stopping that motion.
> As for new two ski tricks, has anyone tried this? Get into
> the reverse position on the outside of the wake and then
> cross the wakes over to the other side....lots of fun
> behind a Nautique/M.C. Once you're able to cross the
> wakes in reverse the next trick is to take air and come
> about in a forward position.
One of the things I've been wondering about is the necessity of
a safety release. My boat doesn't have one so I don't attempt any
tricks involving the feet. How's about you ?
Chuck
|
71.20 | More fun than slalomn! | DONVAN::DECAROLIS | Boil Some Water! | Thu Jun 22 1989 16:24 | 20 |
|
Chucks.....
I haven't managed a toe-hold manuever yet, but when I
do there will be a trick-release of some sort rigged up.
The trick harness may or maynot come off during a fall,
I wouldn't want to pay the consequences....which could be
a nasty yank.
From what I've read about slalom tricking, your weight
has to be over the ball of your foot and bent knees are a
must. When the ski took me over the wake, I was able to
prevent a fall by taking the back foot out of the toe, and
using my foot as a rudder.
Having your feet in the slalomn trick position feels
very weird, its going to take some getting used to.
Jeanne
|
71.21 | what's up with tricking? | COMET::KLEINM | | Tue Nov 26 1991 17:58 | 13 |
| Jeanne,
Now that the snow is flying and the turkeys are hiding,how was your
1991 season as far as tricking is concerned? Has everyone become
frustrated with tricks,the last note was written back in '89.
Tricking isn't a real popular event out here in Colorado and I
assume it's the same out there since neithor of us get the large
doses of quality-warm water time that is required to become
proficient on tricks.
ski ya later,
Matt-rix
|
71.22 | It was a slalom season this year! | DONVAN::DECAROLIS | can you say *winterize*......NO! | Wed Nov 27 1991 10:39 | 27 |
| Matt-rix,
This season I focused mostly on slalomn skiing.
My 91' season was spent breaking in my new Connelly
HP slalomn. I did manage a trick lesson at ski school in the spring,
we worked on side slides and front-to-backs on the single
trick. It's just practice, practice, practice with tricks.
Learning new tricks means spending *lots* of time on
the water (and in it), and there wasn't enough time or
engergy left after slalomn skiing to practice tricking.
I think I took five trick runs over the summer, thats pretty bad
now that I think of it!
My outboard just can't cut it either, for tricking, it
can't hold steady at 18/20MPH without the driver thrashing
the throttle. Excuses! Excuses! My best trick runs
have always been behind a tournament boat with a good
driver!
Leo B. in this notes file is a superb tricker,
he does wake 360's in the toe-hold as well as front-to-
backs and back to fronts. I fell down on dry land
with my foot in that contraption. :>)
Jeanne
|
71.23 | TrIcKs ArE fOr KiDs!! | COMET::KLEINM | | Wed Nov 27 1991 17:56 | 21 |
| JEANNE,
Luckily,last season I worked 2nd shift which allowed me to ski in the
mornings,and I skiied nearly every day but,I too found it hard to leave
the Concept in the bag and jump on the trick. The course and chasing
those buoys is just too addicting compared to swimming lessons that
you get when you trick. The time I spent started paying off though
and I found myself excited to get back out there once I started putting
high point runs together. Compared to slalom,tricking requires so
much more practice and patience. Thanks for writing back,I was
interested in your progress.
btw. How do you like your HP? Is it a signature series? And if it
is,have you experimented with the adj. fin? Out here the Concept is the
rage. Out of 34 club members, 14 are on the Concept,and 4 are on the
HP.
later,
Matt
|
71.24 | Connelly HP | DONVAN::DECAROLIS | can you say *winterize*......NO! | Mon Dec 02 1991 12:10 | 31 |
| Re: -1
>> How do you like your HP? Is it a signature series? And if it
>> is,have you experimented with the adj. fin? Out here the Concept is the
>> rage. Out of 34 club members, 14 are on the Concept,and 4 are on the
>> HP.
I like the HP, it's incredibly fast. Yes, it is part of the
signature series, I bought this ski new in 91. I haven't
experimented with the fin, but would like change the
angle so it would help me slow down the ski coming into
the pre-turn.
Like I said, this ski is fast. A couple of my friends
tried it out, one skis on an HO Mach I, the other, a top
of the line Kidder, and they both said the same thing...
the ski is too fast! The few times I was able to get on
the course this summer, I noticed the ski helped me make up
for lost time.
The HP is very stable through the wakes, and I haven't had
too many experiences with over-turning the ski. Have
any of your club members explained what makes the HP different
from the Concept. Sounds like you belong to a Colorado Connelly
Club!
Jeanne
p.s. and send some of that snow to New England, we need
some snow to ski on to help get us throught the winter!
|
71.25 | | COMET::KLEINM | | Mon Dec 02 1991 17:14 | 17 |
| Jeanne,
I have rode the HP before,I spent about a month on it and liked it up
to about 28 off,but like you mentioned "I have never overturned it",I
couldn't make it turn tight enough. Have you ever watched Mike
kjellander's off side turn?? He loses a lot of time over there,on his
good side he literally throws the ski around the buoy by slamming his
body into the water and pivots on his body. The ski just does'nt finish
it's turn tight enough.
The HP is more stable,and faster than the Concept but most of the
skiers who were on the HP ;have moved to the Concept because it turns
so
tightly and helps ;you set up with great angle through the
wakes,deceleration is another big plus with the Concept.
More later,
|
71.26 | slowing that fast ski | COMET::KLEINM | | Mon Dec 02 1991 17:43 | 13 |
| Jeanne,
To help your HP decelerate more effectivelly, take about 1/32 of an
inch from the depth of the blade in the front only. That will put more
pressure on the front of the ski and aid in decelerating. Only go a
little at a time,you'll notice a lot of changes when you start changing
the fin. You'll know when you'vwe gone too far as lyuou will find
yourself breaking at the waist as you approach and round the ball.
sending snow your way,
Mattrix,future Rocket Pilot
|
71.27 | | DONVAN::DECAROLIS | can you say *winterize*......NO! | Tue Dec 03 1991 12:18 | 21 |
|
>> couldn't make it turn tight enough. Have you ever watched Mike
>> kjellander's off side turn?? He loses a lot of time over there,on his
>> good side he literally throws the ski around the buoy by slamming his
>> body into the water and pivots on his body. The ski just doesn't finish
>> it's turn tight enough.
Really...all this time I thought Mike was slam-dunking on his
good side. I've got a Mike Kjellander poster in my office, "In
Your Face"....and now I can see that indeed he is in the water
on his off-side, doubt he'll ever blame this on the ski though!
At my level of skiing, the ski turns tight enough! Thanks for
the tip on de-acceleration, it's something I've wanted to
experiment with.
Jeanne
p.s. Got the snow, but we need more! Much much more.
|
71.28 | Kjellander on the Rocket next year?!! | COMET::KLEINM | | Tue Dec 03 1991 17:06 | 16 |
| Connelly has discontinued the HP for '92. Look for Mike to be piloting
the new Rocket. The Rocket is basically a Concept with a much stiffer
forebody and midsection. The tail however has more rocker and is softer
than ;the Concept. They have done everything that I wanted to see done
to the Concept to make a better performing ski at the shorter line
lengths of 32 off-35 off and beyond. I fractured internal fibers on my
concept at 35 off. I felt like the factory Concept was just too soft
for short line lengths,and I was right. You'll see me on a Rocket next
season.
We are getting off the subject that is supposed to be discussed in
this section,aught to move to slalom.
ski ya later,
Matt
|
71.29 | #714 | DONVAN::DECAROLIS | can you say *winterize*......NO! | Wed Dec 04 1991 10:16 | 7 |
|
Matt,
Please go to note 714. I have some questions.
Jeanne
|
71.30 | More *stuff* taking up space in the boat... | QETOO::WHYNOT | Malibu Skier | Mon Jul 19 1993 17:05 | 32 |
| Just thought I'd resurrect a dead note...
I bought a pair of O'brien Pro-Trac Tricks for the wife last week and we got
to try them out over the weekend (boy are they slippery). My wife took them
for a ride first and had no problem getting up and skiing on them. I tried to
coax her into going sideways or spinning, but she wouldn't. She seemed to be
content on just skiing on them for the time being, to get used to them and had
no problems with wake crossings.
It was my turn next, and also had no problem getting up and skiing on them.
My first thought was they felt like *VERY* dull ice skates the way they were
sliding around. So now I thought I'd try something; A little sideslide to the
left, then a little sideslide to the right, (well o.k., they were only 45�
sideslides each way, but I wasn't facing forward) then a snowplow... I had no
desire to go backwards, and I had enough so I tossed the handle.
When she brought the boat back around, she asked what I wanted to do, so I
tossed one of the skis into the boat and told her I was gonna do one. These
are premounted with rear slalom toe rubber; one is set up for a left-foot-
forward, and the other is set up for a right-foot-forward (we can go double!).
I had no problem getting up on one, although more throttle would've been
nice (blub, blub), and actually started to enjoy myself. The response of the
slalom trick seemed much better than the pair; you know, one less thing to
worry about. I was getting real confident "slaloming" inside the wake, and
even asked for more speed. Then decided, time for some wake crossing, at
which point took my first (and shortly after my second) fall of the year.
Ooops, guess I leaned a little too much and the ski slid out from under me.
Got up again, and the same thing happened again. A *real* slalom ski, this
thing ain't... So I got back into the boat (my wife is in hysterics), and
said "I'm done..I have a two-fall limit".
All in all, it was a good experience...She really likes them; I'll stick
to my *real* slalom ski.
Doug
|
71.31 | Standing up is the easy part! | DOCTP::DECAROLIS | Jeanne | Tue Jul 20 1993 14:30 | 48 |
| Doug,
Glad to hear you two are getting into tricking. Tell Trish
to stick with em', they take time and you do need to push
yourself a little into trying a new trick, but all in all,
they're safe fun.
When my first pair of tricks arrived in the mail a few years
back, I remember first trying the side slide, (recommended
learning pattern), and after feeling comfortable with that,
I tried reverse skiing. I figured worse scenerio was that
I'd fall. And I did. But, even though I dumped first try,
I was able to experience what it felt like going backwards
and within two or three tries that trick was learned. From
there it's front to back's, back to fronts and 360's, wake
fronts and wake backs. And who was that guy who did a
backwards deep-water start on the tricks?! :>)
The first thing to practice on tricks is wake crossings, just
ride the tricks and get comfortable on them.
Suggestion on the side slide for Trish, tell her to keep
the handle in close to her body, remain upright with knees
bent and try to pivot on her vertical axis. No breaking
at the waist! If she wants to turn to the right, she
can take her right hand off the handle and hold on with
her left hand only, again, she needs to keep the handle
in close and down by her waist.
Slalom tricking is wicked! I've never gotten past a side
slide on the slalom, but then, I've put the tricks aside to
concentrate on the *real* stuff, slalom skiing on the
slalom course. :O) If you want to improve on tricks you've
got to commit the rest of your life to it! :>)
I noticed an interesting pattern with ice-skating and tricking,
both require you stay upright on your vertical axis. At the rink
this past winter, I used my tricking skills to help me
learn new figure-skating manuevers. And trick skiing is
also recommended to barefooters for cross-training.
I'm glad to hear of another woman tricker out there, tricks
arn't just for kids!
Jeanne
|
71.32 | Try it with 72" skis! | ROGER::GAUDET | Because the Earth is 2/3 water | Tue Jul 20 1993 16:39 | 14 |
| Hey Doug, forget all that work on those short skis. Try coming up backwards on
a pair of jump skis!!!! Somewhat easier, great fun, just remember to not get
"stuck" in the crouched position. Very strange when you're riding on the water
with the handle tucked neatly behind your knees, but the forces that are keeping
you planing on the water are also preventing you from standing up! I remember
being in this position, looking over at my buddy (you remember Kyle?), he's
laughing hysterically, and I'm yelling, "Now what the $#%@ do I do?" Too funny,
but lots of fun.
It's much nicer when you come up correctly, i.e. smoothly transition from the
crouch to the standing position before the boat reaches planing speed.
...Roger... who's_boat_is_currently_on_the_trailer_due_to_no_water_in_the_lake
:-(
|