T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
40.1 | | STAR::KMCDONOUGH | | Fri Jun 10 1988 10:55 | 11 |
| I don't know the details of Province Lake, but the lake association
would be a good place to start. They should at least know if the
town or state takes an active interest in managing the lake.
I would suspect that you will meet some resistence if you plan to
install the slalom course and leave it there, though.
Kevin
|
40.2 | Some Possibilities | SETH::WHYNOT | | Fri Jun 10 1988 11:50 | 30 |
| Rick,
By law you are supposed to recieve a state permit for installation
of a course. Give the N.H. dept of public safety (marine div.) a
call for details. As a rule they don't issue permits for individuals,
it has to be issued in the name of an association or club. (you're
the president of the Province Lake Ski Club, right?) Also, they
WILL send an inspector out to see the proposed location before the
permit is issued.
If you are serious about a permanent course, I would suggest you
spend the money and get a real, regulation course such as Accufloat
(~$1000. for all mat'ls including PVC) for a number of reasons.
First and foremost it's alot easier to maintain, and the only expense
is replacement balls @about 3 bucks apiece. (We went through 8 last
year) As far as the bouys are concerned, the line tying them to
the PVC "arms" should be the weakest link of the system. We made
the mistake of using 3/8" nylon, and when the bouys get snagged,
the eylets get torn out of them. We now use 1/8" nylon and if they
get snagged you just need a new piece of nylon. Granted, they do
somtimes get cut up, ripped and punctured, but all in all they are
pretty durable for all the abuse they go through.
OR...
You could get a PortaSlalom course from C&S Specialities, P.O.Box
5598, Ft. Worth TX 76108, (817) 763-4155 (no price given)
Ref pg 114, July '88 issue of Waterski Magazine. It sets up in as
little as 15 minutes (says them) no permits are required, because
it's not permanent, and we can take it with us for our gumballs:^)
Doug.
|
40.3 | correction and more info | SETH::WHYNOT | | Fri Jun 10 1988 12:16 | 11 |
| The correct phone numbers for C&S are 817-294-3954 or 817-444-5687
(the magazine made a mistake) The prices are as follows:
6 bouy course: $475.00 4 bouy course: $385.00
Includes main line, reel, risers and connecting hardware.
Does not include PVC, Bouys (16 req. for 4 bouy course, 22 for 6
bouy course) and 2 anchors.
|
40.4 | My guess? Better buy some more balls! | GIMLEE::RC | FOOTER | Fri Jun 10 1988 15:22 | 23 |
|
Rick,
From our experience on a public lake, yes you'll be
replacing bouys every week. Unless people are more considerate
back east. Out here we used to get about 2 hours of peace in
the very early morning then everyone would come out and attack
us. They follow us through the course, cut in front, drive
along beside to watch, and on and on it goes. Then they want
to try it. They drive over the bouys, they snag them with the
rope, and whatever else you can imagine. Each Saturday morning
when we got to the lake the first business was to cruise and
look for bouys. Then rebuild the course, as in tie what you
can find back on and replace what you can't find and what they
chewed up with their props. We replaced 2 or 3 each week.
Even now on the private pond we loose a few, the kids like to
swim out and steal them, to be used as kickballs. And a couple
have been shot to death. Of course you can stand to replace a
few for PERFECT water.....every time.......all day long.
Good luck with it!
Rob
|
40.5 | The plan | TOMCAT::SUTER | Water is meant to ski on! | Thu Jun 16 1988 15:06 | 17 |
|
RE: Doug
I can't spare to clams for a portable course right now but it
is a hellevan idea~!
I think what I'll start with is something like a hidden
permanant course. Sink the anchors in about 5 feet of water
with a foot of line tied to styrofoam floats with clips on top
and whenever I want to use it I'll just take the balls out
with their adjustable lines and clip them on. Of course for
now all I need is 4 bouys and entrance/exit gates...
If you guys come up I'll add the other 2 bouys!!! :-)
Rick
|
40.6 | ~~~~~~~* | SETH::WHYNOT | | Fri Jun 17 1988 09:20 | 5 |
| I recieved the brochure from C&S (Porta-slalom) I'll send it to
you anyway as it contains some good info, i.e. diagrams, photos
and dimensions.
Doug.
|
40.7 | Now you see it...now you don't! | ROGER::GAUDET | Ski Nautique | Wed Jun 22 1988 15:08 | 12 |
| Gee Rick, I remember reading in one of the WSmags that some guy
on some lake installed a course with a big cable attached to a winch
on the shore in front of his house. When he was done using the
course, he'd just hit the switch and the whole course would sink
about 3-4 feet below the surface! No joke. I wonder if you could
get away with calling this a "temporary" course? :-) I'll have
to see if I can dig up the article. Sounds like a pretty nifty idea!
...Roger...
P.S. I like Doug's idea about the portable course...great for those
after-work gumballs!
|
40.8 | Back to the drawing board | NRADM::WILSON | You have my word on it... | Wed Jun 22 1988 15:36 | 16 |
| RE: Note 40.7
>> Gee Rick, I remember reading in one of the WSmags that some guy
>> on some lake installed a course with a big cable attached to a winch
>> on the shore in front of his house. When he was done using the
>> course, he'd just hit the switch and the whole course would sink
>> about 3-4 feet below the surface! No joke. I wonder if you could
>> get away with calling this a "temporary" course? :-) I'll have
>> to see if I can dig up the article. Sounds like a pretty nifty idea!
Are you kidding? If a skier or swimmer ever got caught up in a contraption
like that and drowned the lawyers would have a field day. And rightly so.
Rick W.
|
40.9 | A year later... | BUFFER::GOLDSMITH | | Thu Jul 20 1989 15:56 | 9 |
| Rick,
We haven't been formally introduced, but my name is Steve and am
over on Pine River Pond. I know this is a year later, but if you or
anyone else out there figured this buoy thing out, let me know. First,
I'd like to see yours on Province and try it out :) and see how it
worked out. We on PRP have been looking for something like that to try
for a couple of years now. If you come up with any help, thanks.
Steve
|
40.10 | | ARCHER::SUTER | Gentlemen, start your *marine* engines! | Thu Jul 20 1989 17:31 | 10 |
|
Hi Steve,
The thought of putting in a slalom course on Province is still
just that; a thought. Maybe someday.....
Rick
BTW: Welcome to the file and I bet you even know where Taylor City
is!
|
40.11 | one more for PRP | MCIS2::LEE | | Tue Jul 25 1989 13:42 | 10 |
| Hi Steve, good to see someone from PRP. I assume your located next
to the Richard's? I'm located just around the corner after the sand
bar (gray and wine Celebrity).
Ski Show in a few weeks, maybe they might set up a course for you.
How are you barefooting? My son is just starting to try and is having
some problems.
Dave
|
40.12 | slalom courses and public waters | CSLALL::JEGREEN | Cuz I love that dirty water.. | Mon Oct 07 1991 13:53 | 22 |
| I was reading an article in a Laconia NH newspaper yesterday about the
frustration created by waterski slalom courses. The particular article
was about the Squam Lake Waterski Association. They have had to move
their course 3 times during the year, and then it finally had to be
pulled out. Property owners are upset over the abusive and dangerous
stunts that the course attracts, and the fact that a section of 'their'
water has been dedicated for use of waterskiers. The ski association is
equally upset saying they are getting a bum rap. Either way, the course
is out and it will likely stay out.
According to the NH Dept of Public Safety they have permits for 22
slalom courses on NH lakes (Winnipasauke, Newfound, Squam, Oppechee,
Country Pond [Kingston], to list some). The article went on to say that
all course permits will be reviewed during the winter due to the influx
of complaints over them. From the sounds of it, there won't be 22
permits issued next year. The article has quoted one woman, a NY law
student, as saying she was determined not to leave for home until the
Squam lake course had been pulled. I reckon she's home now.
Geez, what will slalom courses and dinosaurs have in common ?
~jeff
|
40.13 | Not Suprised | SALEM::GILMAN | | Tue Oct 08 1991 16:22 | 9 |
| I am not suprised at the Squam Lakes Propery Owners objecting. My own
observations on Squam suggest that objections at any activity which
is 'attention getting' such as water skiing would meet with
objections like that. I am not suggesting that the water skiiers
were acting incorrectly.... just that Squam is a touchy area when it
comes to anything which could be perceived as threating the ecology
or property owners rights.
Jeff
|