T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
64.1 | Victory by 10 | COMET::DURAN | | Wed Aug 31 1994 11:10 | 7 |
| You heard it here first!!!!
Raiders over the Niners in the Superbowl!!!!
Wildman
|
64.2 | Smart Money | COMET::DURAN | | Thu Sep 01 1994 01:49 | 8 |
| Just in case anyone is looking to make a few bucks?
The smart money is on the Raiders +7 over the Niners this Monday nite.
More tips to follow!
Wildman 8^{o>
|
64.3 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Tue Sep 06 1994 18:24 | 2 |
| Better rethink your tips. Raiders got toasted and Dallas will have
something to say about the niners.
|
64.4 | Away the Bairns...!!!! | KIRKTN::SWRIGHT | | Tue Sep 06 1994 21:04 | 6 |
|
Falkirk to beat Kilmarnock at Rugby Park on Saturday....!!!!
|
64.5 | Hope he walks... | COMET::DURAN | | Wed Sep 07 1994 05:19 | 9 |
| The Raiders got hurt bad, real bad.
I thought the networks handled MaCallums injury well.
Let's all pray he walks again, much-less play in the Football.
Wildman (&^{( >
|
64.6 | No D in Denver! | COMET::DURAN | | Fri Sep 09 1994 11:31 | 16 |
| Yes the Raiders lost MaCallum and the game, but the Niners lost
both starting linemen on the right side. It may not have been worth
the win after all, esp when you consider the Niners scoring 21 points
after the Raiders pulled Hos. Should provide just the incentive needed
in the bowl.
And yes the Niners will handle the self proclaimed, self centered, self
serving, Cowbells. If I ever hear another loser quote "America's Team"
again I think I'd ralf. To top that, the three people reading over my
shoulder all are shouting, YES! Can you take it, I don't think so.
Well now that I've gotten that out I feel much better now. Let's
see who do I have more than the Bells of Texas, the enver Broncos of
course. What the Pick of the Week? Give the 3 and take the Jets.
Why? Because theirs no D in Denver!
|
64.7 | I hope your kidding cause I am | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Fri Sep 09 1994 22:13 | 11 |
| The cowbells(as you call them),and they *ARE* America's team whether
you like it or not, haven't lost to the overrated niners since the
infamous "catch"(1981?) in which mighty Joe was really throwing the ball out
of bounds but couldn't cause he doesn't have the cojones to throw that
far. Clark simply got in the way of the ball :-) And besides, the
cowbells had Danny White. Thats enough to handicap any team. Not to
worry, the Niners have Steve who is White's equivalent in
championship games.
Besides, I was hoping the Faids would beat the Niners but it didn't
happen.
|
64.8 | Attn!! Your Vote Requested. | COMET::DURAN | | Tue Sep 13 1994 02:57 | 5 |
| Is anyone out there? Does anyone really care? Let's test this
theory. If you think The Cowbell's are America's Team then vote YES,
and say why. If you think the Cowbell are about as obnoxious a team as
they come, then vote NO. For the entertainment the rest of America,
8 ) ) ) ) ) ) ), please give us your opinion why.
|
64.9 | Over the pond | CHEFS::WARRENJ | LongLASTLine | Tue Sep 13 1994 09:56 | 3 |
| I'll abstain....don't know who they are!
Jackie
|
64.10 | Im also on the wrong side of the pond | PAKORA::SWRIGHT | | Tue Sep 13 1994 11:51 | 4 |
| Ill join you.....
|
64.11 | Moooooooooo-ve Over ! | PAKORA::JJACK | Hi...My name's Aldridge Prior | Tue Sep 13 1994 12:42 | 5 |
|
Are the Cowbelles the female version of the Dalls Cow-boys ?
If so, when they make a tackle, do their udders get in the way ?
|
64.12 | | QCAADC::RAVISHANKAR | I_Before_E_ExceptAfter_C | Tue Sep 13 1994 13:31 | 3 |
|
<-------- hehehehehehehehehe !!
|
64.13 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Tue Sep 13 1994 19:52 | 5 |
| >>Are the Cowbelles the female virsion of the Dallas Cowyoys?
>>If so, when they make a tackle, do their udders get in the way?
Absolutly! Iffin they are the female version of the Cowboys that is.
:-)
|
64.14 | Mental condition of the Cowbells! | COMET::DURAN | | Wed Sep 14 1994 03:35 | 8 |
| Well after the first day of the ballot it seems nobody has ever
heard of a reason why the Cowbells, (mental condition of the Cowboys,
DINGY!), think they are America's Team. More-over, that's also the
reason for the Star on the helmet, sooooooo dingyyyyyyy their see'en
Stars.
Wildman
|
64.15 | Yea and there are 27 other teams that wish they were as mental | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Thu Sep 15 1994 20:15 | 12 |
| Whether they are Gods team, America's team or the Cowbells,
Cowpies,Cowgirls, one thing is for sure. They are
Superbowl Champs two years running, Something even you cannot deny.
So if they were DINGY you had better hope they are no longer DINGY or
you are going to be bitterly disappointed and seeing STARS once again
this year.
@@
>
\_/
|
64.16 | Go Cow.... Whatevers, you know how to win! | CSC32::D_ROYER | I don't do reruns! | Thu Sep 15 1994 22:54 | 9 |
| Well said, Ben!
If we could get a Quarterback on the Broncos we might have a chance,
but while we have Elway, chances of having a real team are slim and
none, we need someone who has talent to match their ego.
Dave�
|
64.17 | Cowboys, America's Dingiest Team! | COMET::DURAN | | Fri Sep 16 1994 07:09 | 22 |
| Their is no denying the fact that they have won two Superbowls in a
row. However their is also no denying that they are obnoxious,
self centered, self serving, and dingy. Cut the Cr*p. Give me one
reason why they are America's Team. Many teams have won more games,
more Superbowls, scored more points, etc... They claimed to be what
they were, Champions. The Cowbells claim to be what they are not!
This self dilution diminishes their credibility and raises serious
questions about their mental state. Hence the slogan, (Cowboys,
America's Dingiest Team!)
Now for the news, on the talk radio show, (One on One Sports), I
heard that Hos had taken a serious blow to his shoulder from Trapp
during practice. This is the reason that the Raiders did not throw a
single long pass during the 49er game. This also explains why he threw
three interceptions the following week against San Diego, (completely
out of character for him). The report continued by saying he should be
his old self by Sunday. Therefore take the four and the Raiders to
beat the Broncos in enver.
Wildman Duran &^{o>
said his arm is fine now and should be his old self
|
64.18 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Fri Sep 16 1994 18:17 | 29 |
|
You are wrong my friend. No one has won more Superbowls. No one has
been to more Superbowls. 4 is the most anyone has won and 4 is the
most anyone has lost. 7 is the most any one team has been there and
guess who they are. As far as scoring more points well only Leon Lett
kept them from taking that record. More folks buy Cowboys merchandise
than any other team and I am talking about the world not just the U.S.
Even when they were losing all their games they were still in the top
5. Now they are numero Uno and I know you know what that means. So
maybe they should be called "The Worlds Team." :-)
When was the last time you heard a Cowboy make the claim that they were
America's team? Usually it is the media who brings that up and not the
players and it never fails to get you anti Dallas fans all riled up.
Why? It is just a name and has nothing to do with what they do on the
field. Thats where the game is played and you must admit that they
have been doing well the last couple of years.
As far as being called Americas team, well that was bestowed on them by
NFL Films back in the early 70's I believe when NFL Films made a film
about the Cowboys after they had won their first Superbowl and titled
the film "America's Team". So ifin you want to get on somebodies case
about that name I suggest you give a call to NFL Films and ask them why
the decided to name a Film about the Cowboys "America's Team."
I might add that this is the ::FRIENDS conference and not the ::SPORTS
or ::AMERICAN_FOOTBALL Conference so lets be nice here.
Anyone for tiddly winks?
|
64.19 | come over to the Nook and enjoy a drink and friendship. | CSC32::D_ROYER | I don't do reruns! | Fri Sep 16 1994 18:39 | 13 |
| This string is getting to be boring and a bit onsided...
afterall who else but the noter who brought up the subject refers to
the Dallas Cowboys as the "Cowbells"? Lighten up or go to the soapbox.
In here we are FRIENDS like Ben said, we do not need or want
controversy. There is enough stress on the job without adding to what
everyone has. I like the Cowboys, you do not. Fair enough, let the
thing drop, OKAY!
Dave�
|
64.20 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Fri Sep 16 1994 18:49 | 9 |
| Good Idea Dave. I'll head on over to the Nook. And yes Mr. Duran you
are invited too. No need getting all upset over a name for gods sake.
Stress on the job I won't have to worry about come Nov 18th, but until
then I guess the Nook would be a nice place to go and "unstress" :-)
@@
>
\_/ Ben
|
64.21 | | MEOC02::CASEY | MEO78B::CASEY | Fri Sep 16 1994 18:50 | 8 |
| I see that the major USA networks are all planning to move to
televising Australian Rules Football from 1995.. so what USA sport is
about to get the big heave ho to enable this?
Has there been anything in the USA news media about this yet?
Don
*8-)
|
64.22 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Fri Sep 16 1994 18:59 | 2 |
| I've not heard anything bout it but BaseBall would be a sport already
giving itself the big heave ho to enable it :-)
|
64.23 | Now it's Worlds Team? | COMET::DURAN | | Tue Sep 20 1994 00:31 | 5 |
| You are absolutely correct, you have gotten out of control. Now
your claim is Worlds Team? Would you like to rethink that Mr. Benbaca.
Wildman
|
64.24 | Just opinions | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Tue Sep 20 1994 18:17 | 11 |
| Nope.
Besides, if you let what I claim bother you then you are the one with
the problemo. Whatever I may claim or whatever you may claim are quite
simply opinions. Whether they are agreed upon is up the each
individual. The term 'America's Team' was NFL Films opinion at the time
the film was made and the term stuck. Whether you agree with it or not
is your choice, and we all know you do not :-) However we Dallas fans
know it sticks in your craw everytime it's brought up.
So lets drop it now. I've said what I wanted.
|
64.25 | | STRATA::MANGINI | left blank so as NOT to OFFEND | Wed Sep 21 1994 00:50 | 40 |
|
Hey Wildman.........
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM DALLAS IS AMERICA'S TEAM
Sorry couldn't resist. :')
iceman
|
64.26 | Anyone can pick the easy ones! | COMET::DURAN | | Wed Sep 21 1994 02:33 | 47 |
| Well let's not restrict our converstion to just the AFC, let's discuss
the NFC. Well, to be more exact, let's discuss the Cowbells,
er-um-boys. I know how that set's you off, let's not have another out
break of----they are, they are, THEY ARE SO!
Ok first the math, 4=4. This is a very simple concept. The same
number equals the same number. San Francisco and Pittsburg have
four Superbowl wins.
Another concept--- loses count against you.
4-3 means slightly better than a .500 mark.
The number of time's for a Superbowl showing is nice, but not the
same as the number of times you are Champion.
Most Sales: The Oakland/Los Angles Raiders have generated the most
income to the NFL Porperties since the early 1970's. The normal
statistic for a neutral city is; the home team and the current
Superbowl winner switch for the one two spots and the Raiders sell
third. When added up across the country they generate the most sales
over all.
Last but not least, Johnson is gone. The Denver Broncos are finding
out right now just how important Dan R. was to their team. The
Cowboys struggled against two mediocre teams and lost to a third.
I'll admit that the salary cap took away some depth, and Jones
selections in the draft were average. Jones also mandated that just
about everything Johnson had done before he left remain the same, ie...
the hiring of Zampezee etc...
I know every team goes up and down from week to week and over the last
two years the Cowboys have been a power-house. However, I also think
the above mentioned circumstances and the lack of change Jimmy would
have injected could produce the end for the Boys.
I still think the Niners will take the NFC, and they lost three first
string offensive linemen and Young still isn't Montana, etc... The
reason I most think they will prevail is, they DIDN'T stand pat. How
they got Deion, God only knows. I don't expect him to make a great
difference right away, but down the road watch-out! He's a dangerous man
on both sides of the ball.
Now I hope I've given you some down to earth analysis of the NFC. I
was providing the same type of analysis for a few other games. What I'm
hoping is some insite's you might have on tuff game's coming up, after
all anyone can pick the easy-one's.
|
64.27 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Thu Sep 22 1994 16:48 | 20 |
| Not that easy to pick the easy ones. When Washington was the best team
and undefeated they lost to a Dallas team that hadn't won a game. Last
Last year Dallas went into Atlanta and was supposed to win but got
trounced. The following week they choked against Miami.Both games they
were supposed to win.
Most everyone was writing them off to defend the championship and were
again picking SF to take it all.Frisco had the #1 offense, easier schedule
in the last few games but lost their last two of three to teams they were
supposed to beat! See, not that easy. But then they destroyed the
Giants, a team that Dallas struggled against to win the NFCeast crown
only a week before. Ricky Watters had 5 TD's and again SF was picked to
go into Dallas and mutilate the Cowboys. I don't have to tell you the
rest.
Again
|
64.28 | This year it's pay back time! | COMET::DURAN | | Fri Sep 23 1994 01:09 | 12 |
| Well what's your pick of the week? Only a couple left for us at CX02.
San Francisco over New Orleans, Kansas City over LA Rams, Houston over
Cincinnati,--- to easy. No last year San Diego won in LA late in the
game with an interception returned for a touch down. This year the
Raider's backs are to the wall and it's pay back time. So give the 3.5
and take the Raiders at home.
Wildman &^{o>
|
64.29 | Payback will have to wait | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Wed Sep 28 1994 00:17 | 3 |
| Raiders lose in last seconds to SanDiego. Montana gets skunked.
New Orleans plays the niners tough until that intercept by Dion. It
ain't so easy is it. Like they say, on any given Sunday.....
|
64.30 | if you want to be safe | COMET::DURAN | | Wed Sep 28 1994 05:18 | 5 |
| Well where's your picks? There are alway a few games favored by 10 or
more. You could choose one of those if you want to be safe.
Wildman
|
64.31 | I'm already safe | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Thu Sep 29 1994 00:19 | 10 |
| I am not into 'picks.' There is only one team I care to see win. I they
win, they win, if they lose, they lose. End of story. No guessing games
for me. This way I gain no money but I lose none either.
I don't believe in spreads and think that picks with anyone should be
straight up if you are into that kind of thing. However, I think it's
really weak to win even if the team a person picks loses the game but
covers the spread. WEAK!
|
64.32 | | KAMALA::DREYER | Soon to be cruising! | Wed May 03 1995 03:13 | 3 |
| I'm not into sports
But--------->
|
64.33 | anothre *33!!! | KAMALA::DREYER | Soon to be cruising! | Wed May 03 1995 03:13 | 1 |
| Tonight I *am* into snarfing!!
|
64.34 | My turn | ANNECY::BALAS_B | Someone, somewhere, somehow, and me... | Wed May 03 1995 17:07 | 2 |
| Before Twix_age_snarf...
BenJ. ;)
|
64.35 | Outrage Outrage Outrage!!!!!!! | LJSRV1::LAMBRECHT | The Spirit of Bavaria | Wed May 03 1995 17:13 | 6 |
| That is the most unfair outrage I ever encountered!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
* * * * * ---- 5 nasty swearwords!!!!
;)
Twix_has_to_wait_another_year for this snarf here
|
64.36 | Ca, tu l'as d�j� dit! | ANNECY::BALAS_B | Someone, somewhere, somehow, and me... | Wed May 03 1995 17:26 | 4 |
| Tu radotes Twix, �a doit �tre la vi�illesse...
(U repeat yourself Twix, it's probably due to your age)
Yours nastyly, BenJ. :)))
|
64.37 | 37 Prime Snarfffffff | LJSRV1::LAMBRECHT | The Spirit of Bavaria | Wed May 03 1995 17:28 | 8 |
| Thanks for the setup BenJ!!!!!
This here is a............. Prime Snarfffff!!!!
37 is a fine nice prime number.
;)
Twix_snarfing_prime_numbers
|
64.38 | Elle m'�nerve avec ses snarfs d�biles... | ANNECY::BALAS_B | Someone, somewhere, somehow, and me... | Wed May 03 1995 17:46 | 3 |
| Twix, could U please write something interresting before I go...
Twix_primary_snarfing_everything... BenJ. :(
|
64.39 | howdy all long time no write | LUDWIG::MANGINI | left blank so as NOT to OFFEND | Wed Sep 27 1995 18:27 | 102 |
|
Well I haven't been in this file for a long long time. Figured I'd pop
in now and then to see what going on? I don't know most of you and you
probably don't know me (just a few). I wanted to post this for you all.
Just to let you know I'm a huge huge hockey fan (ask chico) and if any
of you saw the closing of the boston gahden last night you'll love this
article if you haven't read it yet....
posted without permission from the boston globe ( i don't care) via
THE BOSTON BRUINS MAILING LITS.....
enjoy, (you might need a tissue)
By Michael Madden
Boston Globe
The idea came to Normand Leveille as soon as the letter arrived in Laval,
Quebec, three months ago. ``As soon as the letter from the Bruins came,''
said Lucie Lagare, ``Normand said he wanted to come to Boston Garden and he
wanted to skate.
``When I read the letter to him, I said, `Are you going to bring your
skates with you to Boston?' And Normand said, `Oh, yes.' ''
Lucie Lagare knows Normand Leveille as well as anyone. They met in a
Quebec rehabilitation center two years ago, both recovering from cerebral
hemorrhages. ``I had the same thing happen to my brain that happened to
Normand's,'' said Lagare, ``but it happened to me on my right side of my
brain and to Normand on his left. So I know . . . but when Normand told me he
wanted to skate . . . I didn't know.''
There had been one try at the empty Forum in Montreal eight years ago
when Leveille thought he still was going to be a hockey player again, still
was going to wear the No. 19 for the Boston Bruins again, ``but it was rough,
Normand told me,'' said Lagare. ``It had not gone well.''
It is just one month short of 13 years ago that Leveille, an heir
apparent to Johnny Bucyk at left wing for the Bruins, was checked into the
boards in Vancouver's Pacific Coliseum by the Canucks' Marc Crawford. Between
periods, Leveille's face grew flaccid and he had difficulty speaking and his
life was in danger. Doctors eventually diagnosed an arteriovenous malfunction
_ a brain hemorrhage _ as the cause for Leveille's collapse, not any hits
from playing hockey. His life was saved, but his career _ and a normal life _
were over.
Year followed year of rehabilitation. But Leveille ``still has his No. 19
Bruins sweater at home,'' said Lagare, ``and he'd say how he wanted to wear
it again at Boston Garden . . . and wear it skating.''
Those who were at Boston Garden on the Garden's last night will never
forget the sight. Bobby Orr cried tears at his ovation, and as Mark Santos of
Raynham put it, ``I've seen Larry Bird night, I've seen the Celtics win
championships and I've seen everything there is to see at Boston Garden, but
I've never seen emotion like this.''
``We had trouble finding skates [yesterday] for Normand,'' said Lagare.
``There was one pair and then there was another pair, but they would not fit.
Finally, we got a pair from the Bruins locker room.''
The Bruins were introduced to the crowd in alphabetical order after the
exhibition game against the Canadiens. Roar followed roar. And then, as
Leveille walked to the dasher with the aid of a cane, ``Normand Leveille''
was announced to the crowd and Raymond Bourque took the cane from his hand,
held it out in front of Leveille for support, and . . . No. 19 was back on
the ice.
The smile, the widest smile a human can smile, told all, but Lagare
translated a few words by Leveille from French to English. ``He said on the
ice he felt lighter,'' she said.
Emotion flowed throughout the Garden, so raw it could be felt.
Leveille sat in a small wooden chair at mid-ice, his smile holding firm
and wide. As the Bruins from later in the alphabet were announced, the Johnny
McKenzies and the Jean Ratelles and Milt Schmidts and Eddie Westfalls and
all of them, Leveille would clap with his left hand, clapping his left thigh,
clapping like everyone in Boston Garden for the last game.
Then, as Rene Rancourt sang ``Auld Lang Syne'' and as the Bruins took
their final skate around the Garden, Normand Leville insisted on joining his
teammates. Terry O'Reilly skated over to give Leveille one arm and Bourque
once again held the cane out in front of Leveille and Leveille slowly _ but
very surely _ skated one last time around the Garden ice. By skate's end,
virtually all the Bruins had surrounded Leveille, the emotion too strong to
ignore.
A few minutes later, Leveille sat on the same little wooden chair outside
the visitors' locker room and the skates were removed. The smiles were wider
than ever as Bruin after Bruin kidded with him _ ``You haven't got your
speed yet, but you got around the point pretty well,'' kidded Gerry Cheevers
_ and Leveille's smile was wider than ever.
Lagare was asked to ask Leveille how his emotions survived the emotional
night. ``He says there are no words to describe his feelings,'' she
translated. ``He said he was so happy at the support of the players and the
support from the fans.''
Leveille and Lagare intend to open a rehabilitation center for children
soon, ``and it is both our ideas,'' she said. And if the new center ever
needs an example of what the human spirit can accomplish, one need only
produce the tape of Normand Leveille skating on Boston Garden's last night _
13 years after he collapsed in Vancouver, British Columbia.
the following is an excerpt of Kevin Paul Dupont's article in the Boston Globe
``A fantastic night,'' said Orr.
It was a night that belonged to Boston, but in the end was stolen by a
lone, big-hearted skater from Montreal. A gift for all, but for one man alone
to behold.
|
64.40 | | ADCA01::RAVISHANKAR | IndecisionIsTheKeyToFlexibility | Thu Sep 28 1995 05:54 | 4 |
|
Ice dood ! *8)
|
64.41 | :') | LUDWIG::MANGINI | left blank so as NOT to OFFEND | Mon Oct 09 1995 00:16 | 8 |
|
hey, hey, hey...
iceman
|
64.42 | | KERNEL::JOHNSONP | Things that make you go mmmmmmmmm! | Fri Apr 04 1997 17:35 | 4 |
|
We have a footie match next week, OSS against OCC & I'm not sure
whether I should play, I have a very big bruise from playing at the
weekend & I could ruin my chances of ever playing next to Jamie....
|
64.43 | petition drive underway | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Mon Apr 07 1997 15:12 | 1 |
| I think checkers ought to be an olympic sport.
|
64.44 | | KERNEL::JOHNSONP | All is not lost.... YET! | Wed May 07 1997 15:04 | 2 |
|
I'm orf to the gym tonite, does that count as sport...???
|