T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
946.1 | | PRAGMA::GRIFFIN | Dave Griffin | Sat Aug 05 1995 17:24 | 11 |
| I'm sure the sat. watchers can fill in the details, but there is at
least one (and I thought 3) "constellation" satellites up there.
I've seen them on various elements lists, but never bothered to try
and watch them myself.
All are military in nature. I thought the most well-known had over 5
parts. I doubt they were KH's (unless the nature of KH's have changed).
- dave
|
946.2 | Navigation? | skylab.zko.dec.com::FISHER | How may I be honest with you today?-Tuvok | Mon Aug 07 1995 21:52 | 1 |
| GPS?
|
946.3 | | LHOTSE::DAHL | | Tue Aug 08 1995 10:20 | 6 |
| RE: <<< Note 946.2 by skylab.zko.dec.com::FISHER "How may I be honest with you today?-Tuvok" >>>
> GPS?
I'm almost positive that the DoD's GPS satellites orbit alone.
-- Tom
|
946.4 | | STAR::HUGHES | Captain Slog | Tue Aug 08 1995 13:02 | 11 |
| re .3
Correct, the GPS satellites orbit alone. The term constellation is used
to describe any related group of satellites, not necessarily orbiting
in close proximity.
I do recall reading about some sigint satellites that were grouped
together in orbit, perhaps to do some type of interferometry. It would
take me a long time to track down the reference though.
gary
|
946.5 | Cobe runs in polar & is supposed to be visible naked eye... | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Tue Aug 08 1995 13:46 | 6 |
| If .0 can supply the date and time along with his site location at
the time of the observation, I'll take a shot at running it through
my satellite tracking program I have on my PC at home.
I may be able to determine what it/they was/were.
Bob
|
946.6 | | skylab.zko.dec.com::FISHER | How may I be honest with you today?-Tuvok | Wed Aug 09 1995 12:36 | 5 |
| Re GPS: Are you saying that no two GPS satellites are in the same orbit (except
for time)? I somehow had the impression that there were two or 3 of them all in
the same orbit. Or did you just mean that they are not close together?
Burns
|
946.7 | | LHOTSE::DAHL | | Wed Aug 09 1995 12:41 | 8 |
| RE: <<< Note 946.6 by skylab.zko.dec.com::FISHER "How may I be honest with you today?-Tuvok" >>>
I wouldn't be surprised if there were one or two on-orbit GPS satellite spares.
I don't know what a likely orbit would be for them, since (assuming that they
exist) they would need to be able to maneuver substantially to replace an
in-operative satellite. In any case I doubt that they'd be parked very close to
one of the other satellites in the constellation.
-- Tom
|
946.8 | | STAR::HUGHES | Captain Slog | Wed Aug 09 1995 13:21 | 17 |
| I didn't say that GPS birds are not in the same orbit, just that they
do not orbit together (or at least that is what I was trying to say).
There are several GPS orbits, basically the same but different orbital
planes. Each orbit has several satellites, spaced equally around the
orbit.
I don't know what they do for spares. I suspect changing orbital planes
requires more delta-V than the satellite propulsion system can provide.
I'd be more inclined to design some redundancy into the system so that
it can remain operational after point failures. I think a GPS receiver
only needs to see 2 birds to fix location.
If there are on orbit spares, there would be no reason to have them
in close proximity to active satellites.
gary
|
946.9 | More likely it was a spent COSMOS upper stage rocket/s | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Wed Aug 09 1995 14:21 | 13 |
| From my recollection of three separate web sites I have visited
in recent months, and also by parsing through the visual.tle
file found at the space archives maintained by TS Kelso, the
GPS satellites are going to be pretty difficult to be seen by the
naked eye or even in binoculars. So whatever it was that was seen,
it wasn't GPS birds. It's more likely that it was an old COSMOS
rocket booster. There are a lot of these in orbits with inclinations
greater than 80�. Alot of these COSMOS upper stage rockets & boosters
are in the visual magnitude range of between magnitude 3-8, according
to some information I seen.
Bob
|
946.10 | Still awaiting Brian's observation site... :-) | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Wed Aug 09 1995 14:25 | 8 |
| I'll await Brian's posting of his observation site used when he
made his observation, and then I should be able to narrow down
what it was that he may have seen.
That way I can enter his observing location along with the date
& time into my satellite tracking program, and something should
pop up.
Bob
|
946.11 | | AUSSIE::GARSON | achtentachtig kacheltjes | Wed Aug 09 1995 20:03 | 3 |
| re .1
I think you are thinking of the NOSS (Whitecloud) series. See 360.8 et seq.
|
946.12 | Visual Elements for tracking | WONDER::SKRYPEK | | Wed Aug 16 1995 13:40 | 10 |
| FTP from archive.afit.af.mil/pub/space the file visual.tle for most
visual orbiting objects. Plug this into a satelite tracking
program(PCTRACK or WINORB) to calculate passes. Also try on the WWW
the following; http://ssl.berkeley.edu/isi_www/
for the MIR, Shuttle(When it's up) and a few others.
Terry
|