| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 437.1 |  | SNDCSL::SMITH | TANSTAAI | Mon Jul 04 1988 14:23 | 19 | 
|  | >    We can either try and work within the current famework, or we can try
>    and change the way our governament is formed.  Or both.
 
    How about something really radical, working outside the framework?
    Commercial and private space exploration/development isn't entirely
    impossible, and if you get away from the triply_redundant_gold_plated
    NASA way of doing things, the prices come down substantially....
    
    Flight qualified: The height of the paperwork exceeds the height
    of the vehicle.
    
    Man-rated: The height of the paperwork exceeds the expected altitude
    of the vehicle.
    
    It took NASA 90 days(!!) to fix the problems and go ahead after
    the Apollo 13(?) disaster, the Shuttle problems are closing in on
    3 years and one has to wonder if it will ever fly again...    
                                                           
    Willie
 | 
| 437.2 | An exortation to go slow | VINO::DZIEDZIC |  | Mon Jul 04 1988 17:50 | 17 | 
|  |     I've heard quite a lot about how long it has taken to recover from
    the Challenger disaster versus Apollo, and while I agree with the
    basic sentiment (we're taking too damn long to recover), we should
    keep in mind that the ENTIRE shuttle system has been re-examined
    and re-worked (where necessary), whereas in the case of Apollo only
    the capsule required substantial work (the Saturn V wasn't changed,
    for example).  I'd easily believe the shuttle system is at least
    an order of magnitude more complex than the Apollo capsule; based
    on that, I guess NASA is doing pretty well.
    
    Also, NASA is under an incredible pressure to get this one "right".
    If Discovery ends in disaster, we can kiss the U.S. future of the
    U.S. space program goodbye.
    
    Now, at last, we're back on the road.  Let's take a little extra
    time, if necessary, and make it right!  (2 months to go!)
    
 | 
| 437.3 | Why - for our very survival as a race | MTWAIN::KLAES | Know Future | Tue Jul 05 1988 09:21 | 38 | 
|  |     	In 1983 and 1985, SF author Michael McCollum wrote two excellent
    SF novels, LIFEPROBE and PROCYON'S PROMISE.  They dealt with an
    advanced alien civilization, referred to only as the Makers, who
    were desperately trying to search for a means of faster-than-light
    (FTL) space travel, so that their wonderful civilization would not
    end up using all the resources of their solar system and die out,
    as sublight starships just could not maintain an entire society
    in any reasonable amount of time.  FTL travel was the key to their
    survival and expansion into the Milky Way Galaxy (And eventually
    beyond it to the rest of the Universe).
    
    	The point of all this is that like the Makers, we too will one
    day encompass our entire solar system, and it will eventually not
    be enough for the human race to survive upon.  We MUST reach out
    to the other stars of the galaxy in order for our species to continue.
    If this sounds far-fetched or something for our distant descendants
    to worry about, then my point has been made:  We concentrate too
    much on today and do not plan for tomorrow.  If we stop our space
    programs, the human race is doomed to eventually die in either the
    confines of our solar system or Earth.  What we do now affects our
    future.  Of course their are other nations to carry on the exploration
    of space, but the U.S. space program is vital as well, and we must
    all work together to ensure our survival.
    
    	Our civilization has become too advanced for us to suddenly
    stop (barring a nuclear war), so that we just cannot (and will not)
    reverse ourselves to start living like primitive peoples, which
    WOULD allow humanity to survive on Earth indefinetely; but that
    time is long past.  Our own advancements have forced us to reach
    out into space to continue existing.  We cannot sustain ourselves
    with Earth's resources forever.  Like the Makers, we must expand
    into the Universe; though it may not necessarily be vital that we
    find some FTL capability immediately in the process - though it
    certainly would not hurt - we must explore and settle new solar
    systems.  
    
    	Larry
    
 | 
| 437.4 | Gotta get off this rock first! | SNDCSL::SMITH | TANSTAAI | Tue Jul 05 1988 16:00 | 9 | 
|  |     Never mind getting out of the solar system, there's a critical "mass"
    of resources nessesary to get off this planet and start a
    self-sustaining space-faring civilization, and there's going to
    be a time in the not too distant future when it will be impossible
    to get the critical mass together.  Our great-grandchildren will
    probably be unable to get off the planet (the way things are going)
    without an infrastructure already in place.....
    
    Willie
 | 
| 437.5 | RE 437.4 | MTWAIN::KLAES | Know Future | Tue Jul 05 1988 16:40 | 4 | 
|  |     	I believe that was part of the whole concept I was discussing.
    
    	Larry
    
 | 
| 437.6 | re .5 | SNDCSL::SMITH | TANSTAAI | Wed Jul 06 1988 09:36 | 9 | 
|  |     Yup, you were!  However, try taking the concept "let's get out of
    the solar system while we can" to the congress....  All part of
    the same picture, I agree, I'm just trying for the first small steps.
    There's actually a plus side to the "critical mass" problem, once
    you get started, the explosion runs on it's own.
    
    You're right tho, we're essentially in agreement.
    
    Willie
 |