T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
437.1 | | SNDCSL::SMITH | TANSTAAI | Mon Jul 04 1988 15:23 | 19 |
| > We can either try and work within the current famework, or we can try
> and change the way our governament is formed. Or both.
How about something really radical, working outside the framework?
Commercial and private space exploration/development isn't entirely
impossible, and if you get away from the triply_redundant_gold_plated
NASA way of doing things, the prices come down substantially....
Flight qualified: The height of the paperwork exceeds the height
of the vehicle.
Man-rated: The height of the paperwork exceeds the expected altitude
of the vehicle.
It took NASA 90 days(!!) to fix the problems and go ahead after
the Apollo 13(?) disaster, the Shuttle problems are closing in on
3 years and one has to wonder if it will ever fly again...
Willie
|
437.2 | An exortation to go slow | VINO::DZIEDZIC | | Mon Jul 04 1988 18:50 | 17 |
| I've heard quite a lot about how long it has taken to recover from
the Challenger disaster versus Apollo, and while I agree with the
basic sentiment (we're taking too damn long to recover), we should
keep in mind that the ENTIRE shuttle system has been re-examined
and re-worked (where necessary), whereas in the case of Apollo only
the capsule required substantial work (the Saturn V wasn't changed,
for example). I'd easily believe the shuttle system is at least
an order of magnitude more complex than the Apollo capsule; based
on that, I guess NASA is doing pretty well.
Also, NASA is under an incredible pressure to get this one "right".
If Discovery ends in disaster, we can kiss the U.S. future of the
U.S. space program goodbye.
Now, at last, we're back on the road. Let's take a little extra
time, if necessary, and make it right! (2 months to go!)
|
437.3 | Why - for our very survival as a race | MTWAIN::KLAES | Know Future | Tue Jul 05 1988 10:21 | 38 |
| In 1983 and 1985, SF author Michael McCollum wrote two excellent
SF novels, LIFEPROBE and PROCYON'S PROMISE. They dealt with an
advanced alien civilization, referred to only as the Makers, who
were desperately trying to search for a means of faster-than-light
(FTL) space travel, so that their wonderful civilization would not
end up using all the resources of their solar system and die out,
as sublight starships just could not maintain an entire society
in any reasonable amount of time. FTL travel was the key to their
survival and expansion into the Milky Way Galaxy (And eventually
beyond it to the rest of the Universe).
The point of all this is that like the Makers, we too will one
day encompass our entire solar system, and it will eventually not
be enough for the human race to survive upon. We MUST reach out
to the other stars of the galaxy in order for our species to continue.
If this sounds far-fetched or something for our distant descendants
to worry about, then my point has been made: We concentrate too
much on today and do not plan for tomorrow. If we stop our space
programs, the human race is doomed to eventually die in either the
confines of our solar system or Earth. What we do now affects our
future. Of course their are other nations to carry on the exploration
of space, but the U.S. space program is vital as well, and we must
all work together to ensure our survival.
Our civilization has become too advanced for us to suddenly
stop (barring a nuclear war), so that we just cannot (and will not)
reverse ourselves to start living like primitive peoples, which
WOULD allow humanity to survive on Earth indefinetely; but that
time is long past. Our own advancements have forced us to reach
out into space to continue existing. We cannot sustain ourselves
with Earth's resources forever. Like the Makers, we must expand
into the Universe; though it may not necessarily be vital that we
find some FTL capability immediately in the process - though it
certainly would not hurt - we must explore and settle new solar
systems.
Larry
|
437.4 | Gotta get off this rock first! | SNDCSL::SMITH | TANSTAAI | Tue Jul 05 1988 17:00 | 9 |
| Never mind getting out of the solar system, there's a critical "mass"
of resources nessesary to get off this planet and start a
self-sustaining space-faring civilization, and there's going to
be a time in the not too distant future when it will be impossible
to get the critical mass together. Our great-grandchildren will
probably be unable to get off the planet (the way things are going)
without an infrastructure already in place.....
Willie
|
437.5 | RE 437.4 | MTWAIN::KLAES | Know Future | Tue Jul 05 1988 17:40 | 4 |
| I believe that was part of the whole concept I was discussing.
Larry
|
437.6 | re .5 | SNDCSL::SMITH | TANSTAAI | Wed Jul 06 1988 10:36 | 9 |
| Yup, you were! However, try taking the concept "let's get out of
the solar system while we can" to the congress.... All part of
the same picture, I agree, I'm just trying for the first small steps.
There's actually a plus side to the "critical mass" problem, once
you get started, the explosion runs on it's own.
You're right tho, we're essentially in agreement.
Willie
|