T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
133.1 | | LYMPH::INGRAHAM | | Tue Feb 04 1986 13:01 | 33 |
| Another group of interest is the American Space Foundation, a group established
exclusively as a lobbying organization with Congress and the U. S. Government.
Quoting from my membership card:
"Recognizing that the United States space program is critical to the future
of the United States and all mankind, the American Space Foundation (ASF) was
formed to lobby in Washington for a stronger American presence in space.
ASF is the nation's fastest growing pro-space organization. ASF is the only
pro-space organization set up to work with Congress and the U. S. Government
for a better space program.
ASF is a national grass-roots organization, financed entirely by our members.
We accept no government funds, but rely upon the support of Americans who
believe in the need for a more active space program."
The organization was established in part by Ed Gibson, Skylab III astronaut.
Aside from periodic news letters (and pleas for money) the group gets together
once a year in Washington and meets with various officials connected with
the space effort, whether from NASA, Congress, or other institutions.
I don't have the complete address with me, but this will enable you to
hunt down the phone number through Information.
American Space Foundation
National Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20070-0390
Again, this organizatio is a lobbyist organization, and I don't know if
contributions may be deducted.
|
133.2 | | PAUPER::AUGERI | | Tue Feb 04 1986 14:24 | 22 |
| RE: .1
In your response, I took what you said to mean that if you lobby, then the
contributions are not tax deductible. Is that a correct interpretation?
Is there a difference between testifying and lobbying?
The membership application for the National Space Institute says that
contributions are tax deductible. I also believe that they conduct some
sort of lobbying effort. If they don't lobby, they certainly have
testified in front of various committees and commissions. For example,
NSI Executive Director Dr. Glen Wilson testified before the Subcommittee
on Space Science and Applications of the U.S. House of Representatives.
Also, President Ben Bova, Vice President Dr. Mark Chartrand, and Dr. Glen
Wilson testified before the National Commission on Space.
I am not sure about The Planetary Society. I read a statement in their
magazine that says they didn't want to be "involved directly in political
lobbying. Instead, they intended to influence public policy indirectly,
through public information and education." Whether they have stuck to
this policy is unclear to me.
Mike
|
133.3 | | LYMPH::INGRAHAM | | Tue Feb 04 1986 16:37 | 9 |
| I don't wish to sidetrack this note on taxes, especially since I know
next to nothing about tax law. Thus what I said was correct -- I don't
know if contributions to a lobbying group are deductable. Maybe someone
out there in tax-land can let us know. Again, though, let's not get
too far sidetracked here please!
The important point, I believe, is that we find and support organizations
which promote space, whether by keeping public interest alive, by doing
active research, or by lobbying Congress.
|
133.4 | | VIKING::FLEISCHER | | Wed Feb 05 1986 05:48 | 3 |
| Contributions to lobbying groups are not tax-deductible.
Lobbying is quite distinct from just testifying before congress.
|
133.5 | | OLIVER::OSBORNE | | Thu Feb 06 1986 16:33 | 12 |
| re: .1
NSI and the L5 Society are planning a merge. I don't know if it's
complete yet, but it has been in the works for a while. I believe that
NSI is going to change it's name to National Space Society, or some
such. The latest issue of "Space World" has all the details, but I
don't have it with me.
I'll see if I can dig up all the details by tomorrow.
John Osborne
|
133.6 | | LYMPH::INGRAHAM | | Sun Feb 16 1986 12:42 | 18 |
| Another group worthy of note is the Independent Space Research Group.
This organization is dedicated to building and launching satellites for
use by amateur astronomers and others. Their first project, currently
under construction, is an Amateur Space Telescope (AST), containing
an 18-inch Ritchey-Cretien Cassegrain telescope, two solid state TV
cameras, a small spectograph, and control and communications hardware.
Its signals will be available for direct pickup in the home using
amateur radio equipment.
I don't know the launch schedule, or whether or not the Challenger event
will affect it. A membership contribution of $50 or more will get you
a commemorative decal which will fly in a GAS container on the launch
flight.
Membership information may be obtained by writing the Independent
Space Research Group, P.O. Box 23083, Rochester, NY 14692. Membership
also includes an interesting, although slightly technical, newsletter
periodically.
|
133.7 | Michaud's REACHING FOR THE HIGH FRONTIER | RENOIR::KLAES | N = R*fgfpneflfifaL | Mon May 15 1989 13:48 | 16 |
| A book I highly recommend to those of you who want to join and/or
form various space groups and need some background information on
doing so can obtain this help from Michael A. G. Michaud's 1986 book,
REACHING FOR THE HIGH FRONTIER: THE AMERICAN PRO-SPACE MOVEMENT,
1972-84, by Praeger Publishers, 521 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10175
(a division of Greenwood Press, Inc.), ISBN 0-275-92150-6 (paperback),
$17.95. 436 pages.
Michaud's book not only gives an excellent history of the
development of U.S. (and British) space groups over the past decades,
but also lists addresses of major space groups and has an excellent
bibliography. The most interesting fact is that whenever NASA activity
goes on the wane, pro-space group activities increase.
Larry
|
133.8 | USSEA | PRAGMA::GRIFFIN | Dave Griffin | Mon Oct 23 1989 19:22 | 49 |
| While hanging around the Orlando airport after the STS-34 launch
(that I missed, but I DON'T WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT...) pardon me..
I learned about the following organization (brochure highlights below):
United States Space Education Association
"World's First Citizen Support Space Organization"
Their international HQ is at:
746 Turnpike Road
Elizabeth, PA 17022-1161
U.S. membership is $18/year (july->july), $20 international, $25
international/airmail.
Objectives:
o Promote the peaceful exploration of outer space through a better
educated public.
o Develop the proposal for the USA to open up the new worlds in space
for all mankind in an fair and equitable manner.
o Stimulate public awareness of the benefits to mankind that accrue
from a viable and expanded manned and unmanned space program.
o Encourage personal research and understanding of space technology.
o USSEA is a worldwide non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated
to promoting peaceful space exploration, seeking to achieve goals
through both professionals and laymen.
o USSEA is an internation network with many organizations and
industries around the world.
o USSEA is supported entirely by membership dues, donations, and mail
order sales. Our staff consists solely of volunteers and officers that
do not receive any financial compensation.
Membership perks:
o Membership card (oooo)
o Membership certificate
o Member Handbook (guide to services, etc.)
o SPACE AGE TIMES subscription (6 issues/year)
o UPDATE subscription (monthly bulletin)
o Occasional Bonus Items (trinkets of some sort)
o NASA and ESA Folders (access to free inventory of publications)
- dave
|
133.9 | ISECCo | VERGA::KLAES | Quo vadimus? | Wed Aug 04 1993 11:22 | 78 |
| Article: 68605
Newsgroups: sci.space
From: [email protected]
Subject: ISECCo Info, Space NOW Organization!
Sender: [email protected] (USENET News System)
Organization: University of Alaska Fairbanks
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1993 02:25:18 GMT
Info on a SPACE NOW organization, at a grass roots method:
General Information
for
The International Space Exploration and Colonization Company
(ISECCo)
P.O. Box 60885
Fairbanks, AK 99706-0885
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Humankind forever seeks to expand its horizons and space is
the greatest horizon of all. The unlimited resources of space are
practically within humanity's grasp. We have touched other
celestial bodies; with our space probes we have explored other
planets, and human footprints are on the Moon. Despite people's
interest, mass participation in space activities are limited. For
the people of Earth this means that we are still planet-bound.
We formed The International Space Exploration and Colonization
Company to enhance development of the technologies needed to
colonize space. We are organized to provide a means by which people
can directly input their efforts into the space movement.f We do
this by using vo unteer gabor to build our projects. Our
expectations are to develop core groups in areas across the globe
who will do various aspects of the work. Currently our efforts are
concentrated on developing a closed ecological life support system,
as described in the Project Summary.
In the short time ISECCo has been in existence we have grown
from a small group of friends to an international organization.
ISECCo members enjoy being a part of the greatest emigration ever
undertaken. This is your chance to make your mark on future
generations by creating a viable space effort that will eventually
lead to colonization! I urge you to provide all the support you
can: Our efforts shall ultimately carry us to the stars!
===========================================================================
Projects Summary:
ISECCo's first project, a closed ecological life support
system (CELSS, the term and the acronym were invented by NASA), is
best pictured as a garden in a house. More technically, it is a
human life support system using biological action to provide and
cycle air, water and nutrients (leading to the name biosphere).
This technique is particularly suited for planetary colonies and
permanently manned space stations but not for space transportation
systems. We have named our CELSS Nauvik, which is an Eskimo term
meaning nurturing place.
We will be housing Nauvik in a 40 foot diameter, airtight dome
buried underground. ISECCo began actual construction in the spring
of 1990. Construction continues with shell completion projected
for late 1994. Balancing our ecological environment is expected to
take a couple of years. We plan to make our first attempt at
sealed operation in late 1996 or 1997. Isolation for one year will
be proof of a working system. It will probably take several years
to develop the technology necessary for Nauvik to remain sealed for
the entire proving period; there are many unknowns. We expect to
minimize the input in the first few years and successful operation
should follow as the technology develops.
We are well along with the preliminary research. We are
growing a variety of foods using both hydroponics and advanced
soil techniques. These crops are being developed now, and will
eventually provide all the food needed for the animal inhabitants
which may include fish, chickens, rabbits and (naturally) humans.
ISECCo, P.O. Box 60885, Fairbanks, AK 99706-0885
[email protected] or [email protected]
|
133.10 | SSI | VERGA::KLAES | Quo vadimus? | Thu Aug 19 1993 13:49 | 144 |
| Article: 69616
From: "SSI" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Energy from Space: Space Studies Institute Info
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 93 15:52:44 -0400
Organization: Space Studies Institute
AN OPEN INVITATION
THE VISION
Dr. Gerard K. O'Neill founded the Space Studies Institute (SSI)
in 1977 with the hope of opening the vast wealth of space to
humanity. The late O'Neill, professor of physics at Princeton
University, envisioned a modern society powered by clean, depend-
able, full-time solar energy supplied by Solar Power Satellites
(SPS). Many people feel that Solar Power Satellites represent
the only technically and ecologically sound source for Earth's
future energy needs. Since each currently envisioned SPS could
provide electrical power equivalent to ten average nuclear power
plants, the value to Earth is apparent. Such satellites are
feasible if built and maintained by persons living for extending
periods in space. The space colonies needed for such activities
would first be positioned between Earth and the Moon, and then
eventually expand to locations in other parts of our solar system.
THE INSTITUTE
The Institute's mission, continuing under the direction of Prof.
Freeman Dyson, is to open the energy and material resources for
human benefit within our lifetime. SSI's first commitment is to
complete the missing technological links to make possible the
productive use of the abundant resources in space. Its second
goal is to promote the formation of private, governmental, or
multi-national programs to use space resources responsibly and
carefully, avoiding environmental damage.
SSI'S PROGRAMS
Transport Mechanisms
SSI has sponsored research on several transport mechanisms needed
for the development of space. SSI's first research program was
to develop the Mass-Driver, an electromagnetic accelerator, which
could be used to move lunar material efficiently and economically
to high-Earth orbit for processing. SSI funded the work on
Mass-Drivers II and III which were advanced models of a concept
originally developed at MIT under the direction of Drs. Henry
Kolm and Gerard O'Neill.
The Mass-Driver program demonstrated sufficient power to launch
baseball-sized modules of lunar material into useful orbit. A
Mass-Driver can also be used as a reaction engine and could thus
be used to move asteroids to useful locations.
An Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) will be an important component
of the transportation system in the space manufacturing system.
SSI research studies examined the long lead items required for
OTV development with a particular eye toward vehicles capable of
transporting people and materials from low-Earth orbit to lunar
orbit.
SSI has also sponsored studies of alternative propulsion systems
such as laser or microwave beamed energy vehicles.
Materials Processing and Production
SSI has been a leader in the area of chemically separating and
refining lunar materials. The Institute has developed a number a
techniques to separate lunar soil into its constituent elements,
including a process called benefication, in which useful materi-
als are produced from lunar soil without the use of chemical
reagents or consumable electrodes. The Institute has also con-
tributed to the development of a class of materials known as
glass-glass composites. These materials are composites in which
both the fiber and the matrix are made from components of fused
lunar soil. These materials show great promise for providing
large quantities of structural materials for space construction
without the need for traditional chemical processing.
Material Sources
Since the availability of materials in space is crucial, SSI has
sponsored searches for Earth-Sun Trojan Asteroids and has de-
veloped proposals for the retrieval and mining of near asteroids.
SSI also funded a design study for the Lunar Polar Probe, a small
probe which would scan the Moon from a polar orbit, searching for
water and other useful volatiles. Scientists have suggested that
ice and other volatiles may be trapped near the poles. In addi-
tion, the probe would fill major gaps in knowledge of chemical
abundances on the Moon's surface. SSI has also sponsored studies
to examine uses of the Shuttle External Tank as a source of raw
and structural material for space stations, platforms, or habitats.
Habitats and Beyond
Larger structures such as space habitats and solar power satel-
lites are of prime interest to SSI. Dr. O'Neill pioneered design
studies of the large, 10,000 person habitat "Island One." This
structure and initially smaller designs could be constructed in
situ from lunar materials. SSI has sponsored much research
examining all aspects of these designs, including a study of the
smallest possible habitats capable of supplying simulated gravity
adequate for human needs.
The production of solar power satellites in space is likely to
be the basis for the first commercially feasible space program.
SSI sponsored a study which established that the most economical
way to construct an SPS is to use lunar materials. The SSI study
determined that more than 98% of the mass needed for each SPS
could be obtained from the Moon.
OPPORTUNITIES FOR PARTICIPATION
Corporate Membership
SSI's Corporate Membership program offers corporations access to
SSI's broad base of technical advisors, access to a resume pool,
access to exhibit space at the biennial SSI Conference on Space
Manufacturing. Research partnerships are encouraged.
Senior Associate Membership
Senior Associates pledge financial support of $100.00 or more per
year for a five year period. Senior Associates are crucial to
SSI's ability to make long-term research commitments.
Regular Member
SSI Membership is open to individuals worldwide. All members
receive the Institute's newsletter, which is published bimonthly
and keeps all SSI members abreast of SSI research. Membership
fee: Regular $25.00; Senior or Student $15.00; non-US addresses,
please add $10.00.
Volunteer
As a nonprofit organization, SSI relies on the expertise of many
volunteers. Opportunities to assist SSI in the areas of re-
search, education, presentations, development of visual arts and
technical writing.
If you are interested in the future of man in space or in any of
the challenges outlined above, contact by letter, phone, email or
FAX: Space Studies Institute, P.O. Box 82, Princeton, NJ 08542,
USA; phone 609-921-0377; FAX 609-921-0389 Email wk02562@world-
link.com.
"Americans always do the right thing, once they have exhausted
all other possibilities." - Winston Churchill
|
133.11 | The Final Frontier | VERGA::KLAES | Quo vadimus? | Thu Jan 13 1994 19:30 | 154 |
| Article: 4925
Newsgroups: talk.politics.space
From: [email protected] (Eric S Klien)
Subject: Oceania
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 1994 23:26:38 GMT
Freedom Needs Frontiers
by Jim Davidson
Since I was six, watching the Apollo 11 landing from Taiwan with my
family, I've been interested in space. For all that time, I knew
that opening the space frontier was vital. It would save the world.
I learned later that we could get our resources from lifeless planets
and planetoids instead of from the only one capable of supporting
life. We could create new materials in weightlessness, use vacuum
for exciting industrial processes, see the world from a new vantage
point, create hotels and tourist facilities, bring solar power down
from a place where there was no night and no clouds. Most of all, we
would not be threatened with extinction just because some disaster
made Earth unlivable. Eventually, we would spread to the stars and
even a disaster like our sun going nova would not wipe out the human
race.
What I didn't realize at the time, and what many space activists
still do not accept, is that our desires were never reflected in the
space program. Most of us felt that the way to make space settlement
a reality was to support the government space program. We were
encouraged in this view by Congressional staffers, aerospace industry
leaders, and others involved in the complex of organizations
surrounding NASA. Many still feel this way. We were wrong.
Frontiers are not opened by governments. They are not opened by
centrally planned efforts. They are opened chaotically, by the
motives that can drive tens of thousands of people, by self-interest,
by tens of thousands of different ideas of what is possible and
desirable. Governments did not build clipper ships, railroads,
covered wagons, riverboats, or any of the instruments that opened
frontiers to settlement. Governments at best encouraged certain
lines of inquiry. So supporting government space development was
never very productive and in many ways counterproductive.
Frontiers are good for freedom. Consider the closing of the American
frontier in 1893, the year the Oklahoma territory was settled.
Within a generation, freedom in America was under attack from every
front. Muck-raking journalism was developing a now-traditional
rivalry between business interests and the media. Anti-trust
regulation was initiated to break up rail companies, oil companies,
and other well-developed industries. The prohibition movement was
gaining ground, with fervent demonstrations in major cities.
Populist sentiment forced a Constitutional amendment to provide for
an income tax. The Food and Drug Administration was formed to
regulate food production, and increasingly control access to
life-saving medicines. Labor unions were on the rise. Agricultural
price controls were instituted, beginning a debilitating trend toward
farm subsidies. By the time children born in 1893 were twenty, all
these threats to freedom were accepted practice. By the time they
were thirty, Prohibition had made legislated morality real,
institutionalized organized crime, and created popular support for a
strong national police agency, the FBI. By the time they were forty,
the New Deal was underway, with Social Security numbers for everyone,
a Securities and Exchange Commission with increasingly frightening
powers, and a host of agencies too numerous to malign individually.
At fifty, the military industrial complex was introduced with World
War II. And the rest you probably know by heart.
Frederick Jackson Turner, in his great thesis on the closing of the
American frontier, said that the frontier represented an important
part of the American psyche. For, whatever their situation in Boston
or New York, any American could walk to the frontier. That power to
vote with their feet made their working and living conditions more
bearable. In many cases, it caused employers to improve wages and
conditions to keep their trained workforce in place. Always, though,
it was a place to escape, a safety valve. The refined stayed back
east, the rough moved west.
Oceania is a step toward opening a new frontier. And from the
frontier of the open ocean, the frontier of space is no further away
than it is from any piece of land, about 100 miles straight up. If
we are successful in opening the ocean frontier, we will have more
resources and better ability to open the space frontier.
Developments in single stage to orbit (SSTO) vehicles make the use of
ocean-based launch sites just as attractive as land-based sites.
Most important, though, Oceania represents a paradigm shift. The
grand strategy from which the Apollo program grew had been detailed
in a series of articles in Collier's magazine in the fifties by
Werner von Braun. That strategy was conceived by the same man who
had made rocket technology available to the Nazi war machine. It was
not designed to open the frontier of space to human activity. It was
designed to establish government activity beyond the atmosphere. The
plan included Earth-to-orbit shuttles, Earth orbit space stations,
bases on the Moon, and culminated in the establishment of a base on
Mars. There it ended, without so much as a whisper about families
moving into space, companies developing space resources, cities in
orbit or on other planets.
For three decades, the agency and its contractor community that was
created to pursue that strategy did so with a vengeance. Anything
that stood in the way of the vision was demolished. Even the
vestiges of Apollo, the Lunar Science Experiment Packages were shut
down to preserve funding for the next step in the plan, the shuttle.
Rescuing Skylab was never seriously pursued by NASA because having no
space station justified creating a new, larger program. When, in
1988, space activists managed to get the Space Settlement Act passed,
amending NASA's charter to have it support the creation of human
settlements in space, it was ignored. NASA to this day flaunts the
Space Settlement Act, having never reported to Congress its actions
to advance space settlement, although required every other year.
In 1988, I was working for a small company, Space Services
Incorporated of Houston, Texas. We had developed a small launch
system, the Conestoga, even test launched it from a Texas Gulf Coast
island. And every effort we made to attract customers was undercut
by NASA, offering the same service for less. Analysis of their
budget showed repeatedly that they were not charging even their
marginal cost for launches. This dumping kept on until 1985, when a
Florida funeral home company thought it could make money launching
people's ashes into space. Since that idea made NASA people worry
about being laughed at, Space Services had its first customer. That
customer would later be driven from business by the Florida state
commission that regulates funeral homes, using a law that says that a
two-lane paved road to the funeral site had to be maintained by the
funeral home. NASA did not give up its fight to dominate space,
even after the Challenger accident brought an executive order to
remove most commercial satellites from the shuttle.
The paradigm shift that Oceania represents is the objectivist shift,
that the only person who will do for you exactly what you want
is...you. Many in the space community still look to the government
to give them what they want, shining cities in space, earthly cities
powered by cheap, clean space solar power. Until we get away from
the old way of thinking, we can only get, at best, what the old
strategy was headed toward: Bases of government employees carrying
on missions to new places. We cannot have an open frontier until we
go and open it, cannot have new cities, new societies in space until
we build them, cannot have the wealth of the Solar System until we
mine it.
Inherently, that is what Oceania is about. That is why there is an
Atlantis Project. To go, to do what needs to be done, to prove that
it can be done, to do it in spite of all the obstacles put in our
way. And if we can do it once, we can do it a thousand times; if we
can do it at sea, we can do it in space.
---
Jim Davidson is President of the Houston Space Society, a group that
is working to change the way people think about space. He has been
involved with the Atlantis Project since September 1993.
To receive more information by e-mail, send your e-mail address to
[email protected].
|
133.12 | "Luddite" -- and damn proud of it... | PRAGMA::GRIFFIN | Dave Griffin | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:02 | 17 |
| Re: .11
I think I'm going to throw up.
Considering the destruction of Native American culture; the genocide of
tens of thousands of men, women, and children; the near or complete eradication
of many animals and natural habitats; the dumping of radioactive wastes,
strip mining, and a thousand other crimes against people and the planet....
To use "freedom" as a rationale for "pushing to new frontiers" makes me
ill.
This kind of one-sided clap-trap will doom the planet long before we figure
how to get off it.
- dave
|
133.13 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jan 14 1994 16:21 | 24 |
| What that essay reminds me of is the string of Utopian ideas that were
popular in England starting with the book Utopia, through Guliver's travels and
others. There are those that say that Carl Marx's ideas on Communism were just
an extension of those romantic ideas that, unfortunately, Lenin took seriously.
The common theme to all of those works was that all the ills of mankind were
caused by the greed and customs of existing cultures and governments and "if
only we could find a new place and start all over everything would be perfect".
Of course, any time that people did start over they made the mistake of
bringing themselves along which meant human frailties and practical problems
caused many of the old problems to pop up once again.
What this guy will never understand is that people like him are so fanatic
that it would be impossible for anyone to be free if anyone like him were in
charge of the project since he is obviously so opinionated that you could not
possible disagree with him and continue to exist in any civilization that he
controlled. It would almost certainly be the worst kind of oppression, not
unlike the oppression that followed Lenin into his implementation of Utopia.
He is right about one thing, space travel will not become common place until
it is economically attractive. With a little luck, none of us will be stuck
with him in a small space craft.
George
|
133.14 | First Millennial Foundation | MTWAIN::KLAES | No Guts, No Galaxy | Mon Sep 19 1994 19:25 | 154 |
| From: US3RMC::"[email protected]" "MAIL-11 Daemon" 16-SEP-1994
CC:
Subj: Marshall's Intro "Cross your fingers"
!!!!!!!!!!Welcome to the First Millennial Foundation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We are thrilled to have you aboard. We are just beginning
one of the greatest adventures in human history and it is
always exciting when a new voyager joins us on our odyssey
into the future.
The Foundation is a non-profit organization formed to carve one
desirable future out of the infinite array of possibilities.
In my book, The Millennial Project, I describe how we can
eventually reach the stars by building up a space-based
civilization one step at a time. The first step in that
program is the colonization of the Earth's last frontier:the
sea. The real job of this first generation of Foundationers is
sea colonization. Later generations will build on our work
and leave the planet on their way to the stars. Our great
challenge is to build the floating island city of Aquarius.
The first step toward Aquarius will be the creation of a
demonstration space colony on an island in the Caribbean.
This show-case community will be a prototype sea/space colony,
called Aquarius Rising. In Aquarius Rising we will develop and
demonstrate many of the key technologies that will lead to
successful completion of Aquarius. Like Aquarius itself,
Aquarius Rising will be built around ocean thermal energy
conversion (OTEC) technology. OTECs will provide the power,
fresh water, and maricultural base of the colony's economy.
This technology, together with tourism, will produce abundant
surplus revenues that will attract the investment capital
needed to construct Aquarius Rising. Tourism is now the
world's largest industry, and it will always have an important
place in the economics of developing new space colonies. Our
business prospectus is in the works right now, and once
completed, it will attract the capital necessary to design and
build our first colony.
It is essential to the successful genesis of the Millennial
Project that we build a large and growing human organization.
The last chapter of my book describes the ways and means of
forming this organization First Foundation. This seed of an
idea has fallen on fertile ground, and our Foundation is
growing at a breathtaking pace. With the support of people
like you, we will be able to accomplish all of our goals. The
biggest problem we have at the moment is getting everyone
integrated into the Core structure hence this letter.
We had our Second Annual Core Conclave in Denver, Colorado in
August. Talented and dynamic people came together from all
over the country. It was exhilarating to be in such company
and know that with people such as these, all things are
possible. The birth of First Foundation can really be dated
from the weekend of August 6-7, 1994. Before that date, we
were really just a group of people with a common interest. Now
we can actually claim the noble title of "organization". The
Core membership convened to conduct some business vital to our
future as a functional organization: A final set of Bylaws was
agreed upon, a Board of Directors was elected, and the
devilish issue of money was met head on.
The Core, after some lively debate, came to a consensus
conclusion that we must all commit a definite quantity of cash
to this process. Without some infusion of capital we cannot
accomplish anything. Effort alone will avail us nothing,
without the means to convert that effort into tangible effects.
The amount settled upon was $120.00 per year for individuals
or $200.00 for couples (a couple being defined as a pair of
sentient beings). This is an amount that is significant
enough to allow us to actually accomplish some things: publish a
newsletter regularly; set up a newsgroup on the Internet;
produce posters, pins, T-shirts and other wampum for trade;
produce slide sets and other support materials for speakers;
etc. (A Projects Outline spelling out these and other projects
is attached.) Yet, the $120 was perceived as an amount of
money that is really not beyond anyone's reach. It can be
paid in an annual lump sum or in installments of $10/month. If a
Core member feels hard pressed to come up with the cash, the
Foundation will supply copies of the first edition of The
Millennial Project for sale on consignment. These books sell
for $20. Half that amount goes to the publisher and First
Foundation gets to keep the rest. So by selling one book a
month you can generate your contribution.
Membership in the Core also requires a personal commitment.
The commitment is simply to do what you can to help achieve the
goals of the Foundation. This is accomplished by joining one
or more of the Project Teams and then doing what you can to
help that team achieve its near and long term goals. You are the
sole arbiter of what is appropriate for you to contribute. No
one will be looking over your shoulder or second guessing your
decisions about how much time and effort you can devote to the
Foundation. You alone will make that call. All that is
required is that you commit yourself to the Foundation in your
own heart. What you do on the basis of that commitment is
entirely up to you.
As a member of the Core, you actively participate in the
governing body of the Foundation. We have a Board of
Directors, partly permanent and partly elected by the Core
membership, to conduct the routine business of the Foundation.
Major decisions, however, are made by the Core. These
decisions will either be made at the annual Core Conclave, or
by special ballots sent out by conventional and electronic mail.
As a member of the Core you will make many of the decisions
that determine the course of the Foundation, and the ways and
means of achieving our goals. As we evolve, systems of determining
seniority and net contributions will be established.
These systems will then be instrumental in determining what
benefits of Foundation membership each Core colonist is
entitled to, e.g., priority for residence in Foundation
colonies, etc.
For people who do not wish to be active members of the Core,
there is a second level of membership available:the Cladding.
Cladding members are supporters of the Foundation, who are
interested in what we're doing, but are unwilling or unable to
commit to Core membership. Membership in the Cladding is
available for a contribution of $25 per year. Cladding
members receive our newsletter and other updates on our activities,
but are not voting members of the governing body.
The Foundation Core is organized into functional divisions,
within which there are teams working on specific projects. An
outline of the various projects now in progress is attached.
Please let us know which projects, if any, you'd like to work
on. We need help with everything. If you are flexible and
willing to roll up your sleeves, please send us some more
detailed information about your special skills and interests
and we will assign you to a project team.
I can't thank you enough for your interest and support. The
Foundation is gathering amazing momentum as people like you
join us. There is now absolutely nothing that can stop us.
Together we can reach the stars!
I look forward to hearing from you again very soon.
Most sincerely yours,
Marshall T. Savage
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Date: Fri, 16 Sep 1994 14:41:15 -0600 (MDT)
% From: [email protected]
% X-Vmsmail-To: @CORE1.DAT
% Message-Id: <[email protected]>
% Subject: Marshall's Intro "Cross your fingers"
|