T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1715.1 | Everyone has an opinion..... | CGOOA::PITULEY | Ain't technology wonderful? | Mon Jun 12 1995 17:20 | 21 |
| In my opinion........
In my opinion, the college would be better off trying to trade it for
multi-mode fiber. Single mode fiber is useful for longer runs than the
college will require. It will also make it difficult to *easily* integrate
FDDI, Ethernet and any other technologies they may see fit to use on
their campus.
Digital's ethernet products use mutli-mode fiber intrefaces and the
majority of the FDDI products do as well. There are, of course, Mod
PMD's (modular physical media dependent) for devices like the 900MX
concentrator but they are more expensive than the multi-mode PMD's.
The extra distance that comes with single mode would no be required on
this college's campus.
.......In my opinion......
Brian Pituley
NPC, Calgary
|
1715.2 | | STRWRS::KOCH_P | It never hurts to ask... | Tue Jun 13 1995 01:16 | 5 |
|
In my opinion, they should try for an 80/20 mix. The single mode fiber
may be required for high speed ATM connections between buildings. It's
not clear whether multi-mode will be able to handle that speed at that
distance.
|
1715.3 | | NETCAD::MELARAGNI | | Tue Jun 13 1995 08:56 | 14 |
| Re .1: i would have to disagree with your assertion that one could not
*easily* integrate FDDI and ethernet onto the same LAN -- this is precisely
why we sell our line of work group bridges. Plug a DB900 into the hub
backplane and you have FDDI/ethernet bridging. Nothing could be simpler.
Also the distances that you're talking about -- 2mi (3.3km) -- is beyond the
range of MMF fddi. If you wanted to traverse the total distance you'd need
SMF. The other alternative would be to place MMF concentrators every 2km.
But that could be more expensive than the single SMF link.
bill
BTW, current proposals for ATM OC-12 (622 Mbit/s) support 200m - 300m of MMF
cable.
|
1715.4 | | CGOOA::PITULEY | Ain't technology wonderful? | Tue Jun 13 1995 11:21 | 21 |
| A rebuttal of .3's critique of my first response....
>> Re .1: i would have to disagree with your assertion that one could not
>> *easily* integrate FDDI and ethernet onto the same LAN.........
I *know* that integrating FDDI and ethernet into the same LAN is
easily done. I have designed *several* LANs with just this as the
goal. What I was saying (and I apologize if it wasn't clear) is that
SMF is not useful in as many situations as MMF. For example, there are
*very* few SMF ethernet devices.
I realize now (thank you .2) that I was guilty of narrow thinking in my
first response. A definitive answer to the college's quandry around
SMF vs. MMF really should wait until a complete needs assesment and LAN
design have been done. Any move to procure cabling (whether fiber or
copper) before a design has been done is premature and will probably
prove to be costly.
Brian Pituley
NPC, Calgary
|
1715.5 | don't forget the premise | VMSNET::M_HYDE | From the laboratory of Dr. Jekyll | Tue Jun 13 1995 13:22 | 19 |
| But remember that the school has *already* been *given* a lot of single
mode fiber. The question can be rephrased as:
Given that they already have a lot of single mode fiber with zero
investment - is it worth trying to use it everywhere as a fiber
backbone? Or do the limited selection and expense of SMF devices make
it more practical to simply unload the 'free' SMF cable and try to sell
it or trade it for MMF - especially when, in typical small college
style, they have minimal funds to spend?
They are already a DEC shop system-wise, (cut my teeth there on a
PDP-8), and I'm trying to show them that it's worth looking at DEChubs
etc. for building the campuswide network. They think this free
gift of single mode fiber is their ticket to a fiber based network and
I'm trying to inject some reality.
Thanks for your comments so far. I'm still lurking.
mark
|
1715.6 | A simple (I hope) answer.... | CGOOA::PITULEY | Ain't technology wonderful? | Tue Jun 13 1995 17:16 | 14 |
| IMO....
I do not believe that it is worth it to try to "force" any network to
use exclusively SMF fiber. Given the state of technology, it is also
unrealistic.
I don't want to sound like a broken record but.....The final
determination needs to be made *after* a network design has been done.
It might turn out that *some* of the SMF can be used and the remainder
traded or sold.
Brian Pituley
NPC, Calgary
|