Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2259 |
Total number of notes: | 8590 |
We are proposing the following architecture for a big project where 54 Alpha/PCI machines must be connected using FDDI with high availability requirements. The computers are also linked together with an Ethernet LAN. For this Each Alpha computer is linked using a PCI/DAS Interface to 2 concentrators ( dual homing). The total number of connection are then 2x54=108. We propose 20 DECconcentrators 900 mounted on 3 DEChub900: - The 1st DEChub900 contains 8 DECconcentrators 900 - The second contains 8 DECconcentrators 900 - The third contains 5 DECconcentrators 900, 1 PEswitch, 2 DECrepeater 900TM. We plan to utilise port 1 and 6 of one concentrator per hub to connect to the next and precedent hub to make the ring. This utilizes 6 slots for a total of 120 leaving enough connections for the 108 required by the computers. We suppose that all concentrators on a given hub are connected to the backplane FDDI link. The 2 repeaters "DECrepeater 900TM" are utilised for the Ethernet network and the PEswitch enables to bridge the Ethernet and the FDDI. Furthermore we need to bridge this FDDI network with 2 other FDDI networks in a redundant way. For this we propose 2 DECnis 600 each with 3 FDDI boards; each board being connected with one of the FDDI network. In the case of the described net above we shall use port 1 and 6 of of 2 concentrators to make the link to the 2 DECnis. The DECnis is assume to bridge the 3 networks filtering traffic but letting broadcast messages go through it. Here are our questions: 1/ Does the FDDI configuration based on the 3 DEChub900 and the 20 concentrators work? If not how should we do this configuration? Knowing that dual homing of the computers is a must. 2/ Is the DECnis the right device to bridge the FDDI rings? Does it filter the local traffic. Will it let the boadscast messages through? 3/ Will doubling the DECnis for high availability correct? Thanks very much for help. Soumetty.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1658.1 | NETCAD::B_CRONIN | Mon Apr 24 1995 18:46 | 12 | ||
I can't tell from the note whether you want the modules in the hub to be configured in a ring or a tree. If it is a ring, then what you are proposing can't be built with the Hub900. If the plan is to connect the backplane via a tree, it sounds like it works, assuming that the connections between the concentrators is a dual ring. If there are any requirements for wrapping the ring within the backplane, you need to be careful, as the trees (by their nature) can't wrap. Since the design appears to be very high availability, I suspect that there might be some more details of the hub to hub config that we need to discuss. | |||||
1658.2 | NETCAD::B_CRONIN | Mon Apr 24 1995 18:48 | 4 | ||
Sorry, I just noticed a point of mass confusion. When I said that the connections between the cons is a dual ring, I meant the connection between the hubs. |