| Title: | FDDI - The Next Generation |
| Moderator: | NETCAD::STEFANI |
| Created: | Thu Apr 27 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Thu Jun 05 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 2259 |
| Total number of notes: | 8590 |
We are proposing the following architecture for a big project
where 54 Alpha/PCI machines must be connected using FDDI with high
availability requirements. The computers are also linked together
with an Ethernet LAN.
For this Each Alpha computer is linked using a PCI/DAS Interface to 2
concentrators ( dual homing). The total number of connection are then
2x54=108. We propose 20 DECconcentrators 900 mounted on 3 DEChub900:
- The 1st DEChub900 contains 8 DECconcentrators 900
- The second contains 8 DECconcentrators 900
- The third contains 5 DECconcentrators 900, 1 PEswitch, 2
DECrepeater 900TM.
We plan to utilise port 1 and 6 of one concentrator per hub to connect
to the next and precedent hub to make the ring. This utilizes 6 slots
for a total of 120 leaving enough connections for the 108 required
by the computers.
We suppose that all concentrators on a given hub are connected to the
backplane FDDI link.
The 2 repeaters "DECrepeater 900TM" are utilised for the Ethernet
network and the PEswitch enables to bridge the Ethernet and the FDDI.
Furthermore we need to bridge this FDDI network with 2 other FDDI
networks in a redundant way. For this we propose 2 DECnis 600 each with
3 FDDI boards; each board being connected with one of the FDDI network.
In the case of the described net above we shall use port 1 and 6 of
of 2 concentrators to make the link to the 2 DECnis. The DECnis is
assume to bridge the 3 networks filtering traffic but letting
broadcast messages go through it.
Here are our questions:
1/ Does the FDDI configuration based on the 3 DEChub900 and the 20
concentrators work?
If not how should we do this configuration? Knowing that dual homing of
the computers is a must.
2/ Is the DECnis the right device to bridge the FDDI rings? Does it filter
the local traffic. Will it let the boadscast messages through?
3/ Will doubling the DECnis for high availability correct?
Thanks very much for help.
Soumetty.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1658.1 | NETCAD::B_CRONIN | Mon Apr 24 1995 17:46 | 12 | ||
I can't tell from the note whether you want the modules in the hub to
be configured in a ring or a tree. If it is a ring, then what you
are proposing can't be built with the Hub900. If the plan is to
connect the backplane via a tree, it sounds like it works, assuming
that the connections between the concentrators is a dual ring. If there
are any requirements for wrapping the ring within the backplane, you
need to be careful, as the trees (by their nature) can't wrap.
Since the design appears to be very high availability, I suspect that
there might be some more details of the hub to hub config that we
need to discuss.
| |||||
| 1658.2 | NETCAD::B_CRONIN | Mon Apr 24 1995 17:48 | 4 | ||
Sorry, I just noticed a point of mass confusion. When I said that the
connections between the cons is a dual ring, I meant the connection
between the hubs.
| |||||