T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1580.1 | Yes | JUMP4::JOY | Perception is reality | Thu Feb 09 1995 13:11 | 9 |
| Soumetty,
YOu can connect two systems back to back using a SAS device
(cheapest). But this will be the extent of your FDDI network as there
is no way to add any other stations. If you use DAS devices you will
have created a 2 node FDDI ring and can add other devices in to the
ring at will.
Debbie
|
1580.2 | Extending SAS to SAS ring? | BUNDE::BURNS | | Thu Feb 09 1995 17:15 | 14 |
| re .1
Hi Debbie,
I was under the impression that it would be possible to extend the SAS to
SAS case in your reply by adding a DAS in the middle. Am I correct about
this?
Of course, even if my understanding is right, the ring would not be
operational while the DAS were being inserted between the two SAS. A
solution starting with DAS only would have an advantage in this regard.
Malcolm
|
1580.3 | It COULD be done, but would you want to? | JUMP4::JOY | Perception is reality | Fri Feb 10 1995 12:44 | 25 |
| Hi Malcolm,
A-S and B-S connections are valid, but you don't gain much by it and
can have some management headaches. If the DAS in the middle is
concentrator then of course this would be the way to go. If it were a
system, then you would have something that looked like this:
------ -------- ------
| S|........|A B|.......|S |
| | | | | |
------ -------- ------
A port = Primary Ring in, Secondary Ring out (when in a ring config)
B port = Primary Ring out, Secondary Ring in "" "" ""
S port = Primary Ring only (in and out)
So you haven't gained too much by adding that DAS device in the middle,
but it can be done to increase your non-ring FDDI network by one node.
Not something I would recommend to a customer except in unusual
circumstances.
Debbie
|
1580.4 | Thanks very much for helping | COWBOY::MIRGHANE | | Mon Feb 13 1995 05:55 | 1 |
|
|
1580.5 | Cabling clarification | MAASUP::PORAMBO | | Tue Feb 28 1995 14:17 | 14 |
|
Per .1
> YOu can connect two systems back to back using a SAS device
> (cheapest).
How do accomplish this? Is it as simple as taking a set of fiber optic
cables and plugging them on to the distribution panels of each system?
Or do you need a concentrator?
thanks,
Bob
|
1580.6 | | NETCAD::B_CRONIN | | Tue Feb 28 1995 16:29 | 5 |
|
Just take a cable, and plug the two systems together. Nothing else
is required.
When you want add a 3rd system you will need to buy a concentrator.
|
1580.7 | Which UTP cable connects 2 DEFTA-UA ? | 49575::DYSLI | Pierre J. Dysli @ZSW - ACT/SR Technology Advisory | Wed Apr 19 1995 08:47 | 10 |
| Which cable do you need to connect 2 SAS/UTP FDDI controllers together
(eg. 2 DEFTA-UA) ?
Direct or cross-over ?
Any reference plse ?
Regards
Pierre
|
1580.8 | BN25H | NETCAD::MELARAGNI | | Wed Apr 19 1995 09:03 | 7 |
| All FDDI UTP connectors are pinned out the same. This means you will
*always* need an *odd number* (1,3,5,etc) of crossovers when connecting
two ports together. Obviously one cable is sufficient.
Digital's UTP crossover patch cord is the BN25H.
bill
|
1580.9 | Thank you ! | 49575::DYSLI | Pierre J. Dysli @ZSW - ACT/SR Technology Advisory | Wed Apr 19 1995 11:00 | 3 |
| Thank you !
Pierre
|
1580.10 | SAS connected to DAS? | ADISSW::FERRARA | | Fri Mar 07 1997 16:05 | 9 |
|
Just to make sure I understand, then in .3, that it is valid
to connect a SAS directly to either the A or B port of a DAS?
I would like to do this only for testing purposes, as it is
not the true network configuration.
-BobF
|
1580.11 | | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Fri Mar 07 1997 17:28 | 17 |
| Yes, an S-A or S-B is valid. The only problem that you may have is if
the A or B, of the DAS, is already connected to an M port. In this case
the tree cnx (M) would be preferred over the other.
For example -
DAS
A B
/ \
/ \
M S
The A-M cnx would come up and the B-S would not.
Bill
|
1580.12 | A to B on a DAS? | ADISSW::FERRARA | | Tue Mar 11 1997 11:37 | 6 |
|
For testing purposes, can I connect the A connector to the
B connector on a DAS device to form a loopback connection?
-Bob
|
1580.13 | Yup... | NETCAD::BATTERSBY | | Tue Mar 11 1997 12:17 | 1 |
|
|
1580.14 | | NPSS::MDLYONS | Michael D. Lyons DTN 226-6943 | Wed Mar 12 1997 09:32 | 4 |
| ...except that it isn't a loopback - it's a ring with one station on it
- your station.
MDL
|